
Acid mine drainage: South Africa can learn from Japan's experience of toxic waste dumping
This article looks at the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) in South Africa and the recent Central Basin decant in Boksburg Lake and compares it with a best practice example in Japan. It demonstrates how environment, social and governance (ESG) practices are relevant to transform the way governments and businesses operate.
In 2002, the public learnt about acid mine drainage (AMD) when it occurred in the West Rand near Krugersdorp, Gauteng. This led to serious concerns about the effect of mining on the environment.
Additional concerns arose about the government's response to AMD from a policy perspective. During that time only an inter-ministerial committee document of 2010 on AMD existed.
Shortly after, the AMD Emergency Works Project was implemented, and the short-term treatment of AMD commenced in the three basins of the Witwatersrand (as per the IMC document) from 2012 to 2016.
My research from 2011 to 2017 found that the evolving policy response and social dynamics of AMD were not sufficiently synchronised to deal with similar predicaments in the future.
In 2017, the first draft of the Mine Water Management Policy surfaced and was approved in 2022. This policy sets the tone for the desirable management of mine water in South Africa but envisions that treated AMD will contribute to South Africa's water dilemma only by 2040. Thus, a long-term treatment does not exist and in the interim, potential decanting is possible, further affecting communities and the environment.
In June 2025, the media reported that the central basin had decanted and the water in Boksburg Lake was not being fit for use. But it's those very people who are dependent on the water who may not heed to the warning, let alone know about it.
Several initiatives (such as the National Water and Sanitation Master Plan, the National Integrated Water Security Framework and the Vaal Anti-Pollution Forum) have surfaced to address the serious water crisis in South Africa. The government has put forward the importance of partnerships, that of the private sector and stakeholder participation. But pivotal to these partnerships is the involvement of communities to achieve environmental sustainability.
The master plan identifies key actions in the water sector and provides the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders such as the three tiers of government and the private sector.
Japanese example
Japan's island of Teshima provides a best practice example of how governments, businesses and communities can work in partnership towards environmental sustainability.
In the 1970s, almost a million tonnes of toxic waste was dumped by a company on the western end of the island and open air burning began, harming the community of Teshima. The Kagawa Prefecture (equivalent to local government) certified that the waste was unharmful and provided the authorisation for the disposal. The company had sought the permit under the pretence of earthworm farming.
In 1990, the Hyogo Prefectural Police started investigating the concerns raised by the public and exposed the company for violating the Waste Management Act and the illegal dumping stopped. Massive amounts of waste were left on Teshima.
The Kagawa Prefecture was of the view that the waste was not classified incorrectly, no impact would be inflicted on the environment and treatment of the waste was not required.
In 1993, resident movements were formed and the Teshima community applied for a pollution conciliation for the waste to be removed. In 2000 an agreement was reached to have the waste removed. The Environmental Disputes Coordination Commission took measures of the landfill site due to the environmental risks not being immediately present.
In the 1980s Japan adopted a 'pollution must be covered up and hidden' approach. After an almost two-decade long rehabilitation process, this has led to tighter laws and increased fines for illegal waste disposal.
This is one of Japan's most dreadful cases and yet one of its biggest victories in terms of environmental justice. The residents suffered for more than 40 years. The cost of the disposal was 80 billion yen (R9 billion), funded by public funds, the prefectural government and the national government.
In Teshima the biodiversity is not restored to its natural state and enhancing tourism of the island will take time, but the residents are committed to playing a contributory role, which in essence depicts environmental sustainability.
Teshima draws similarities with the Grootvlei Mine. Grootvlei had their water-use licence renewed and revoked over a period of years because of non-compliance and was a major contributor of AMD. Similarly, public funds are used for the environmental rehabilitation process.
Japan is an example of a well-established state and South Africa is still developing, and criticism can stem from such a comparison. But Japan and South Africa are part of the G20, which aims to bring together the world's major developed and developing economies to discuss global economic and social issues.
The key takeaway from the comparison is the importance of communities for environmental justice and ultimately environmental sustainability. We have similar strong-willed communities in South Africa. Disadvantaged communities are victims of AMD residual.
As we aim for environmental sustainability in South Africa, the answers are closer than we think. Communities are critical stakeholders — the residents and the employees.
Embedding ESG in business operations can only be done if employees are involved in the process and there is a shared vision for success.
Investors use ESG frameworks to assess a company's sustainability efforts and societal impact.
Investors are more likely to invest in Japan because of past success stories such as Teshima, which the community was at the forefront of. The same can be adopted in South Africa. If the government is really working towards a sustainable environment and businesses are really considering being ESG driven, or implementing the long-term solution to AMD by 2040 as policy evolves, such partnerships are essential.
Dr Suvania Naidoo is an author and an NRF Y rated researcher. The information provided on Teshima comes from her time spent in Japan, Setouchi Olive Foundation documentation, a site visit to Teshima and presentations from researchers at Okayama University. A version of this article was previously published in Mining Weekly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Aid cuts, including by UK, undermine progress on fight against superbugs
Antimicrobial resistance silent pandemic that already claims more than 1.3 million lives every year. File photo A recent global economic model warns that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may cost the world economy up to This escalating threat coincides with a decline in international support for AMR surveillance. The Low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, are likely to bear the heaviest burden because of under-resourced health systems, limited surveillance capacity and growing barriers to effective treatments. AMR arises when microorganisms evolve mechanisms to withstand the effects of antibiotics intended to eliminate them. As resistance spreads, infections that were once easily treatable become increasingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, to cure. This silent pandemic is already responsible for more than By 2050, resistant infections could reduce global GDP by up to 3.1% and push millions into poverty as a result of the cost of prolonged illness and ineffective treatment. Health systems, especially in countries already facing a high burden of disease, are at risk of being overwhelmed. The But Experts caution that even partial reductions in funding may accelerate the spread of AMR in high-risk regions. Such cutbacks can delay the detection of resistant pathogens, disrupt surveillance efforts and weaken public health responses. The consequences are clear: more infections, higher mortality rates and mounting pressure on already overstretched health systems. AMR does not respect borders. Resistant bacteria can emerge in one location and spread globally through travel, trade and migration. Inadequate surveillance in one part of the world increases vulnerability everywhere. Many low- and medium-income countries face compounded problems: limited access to diagnostics, overuse or misuse of antibiotics in both clinical and agricultural settings, as well as underinvestment in water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure. Surveillance programmes supported by international aid help fill these gaps by enabling early detection and informed response. Cutting funding now undermines global preparedness just as AMR risks are accelerating. While AMR is a long-term challenge, the window for effective action is narrowing. Delaying investment now will probably increase the cost and complexity of response in the future. According to recent economic analyses, every dollar spent on AMR containment today could save up to $20 in future health and productivity costs. Continued investment in surveillance, laboratory capacity, workforce training and antimicrobial stewardship is essential for all countries and for global health security. Multilateral partnerships, sustained funding, and equitable access to innovation are critical pillars of any effective AMR strategy. What can be done? Given the recent decline in global funding, it is essential to explore alternative strategies to sustain and strengthen AMR efforts. Reinforce multilateral funding: Donor countries should explore shared funding mechanisms to sustain critical AMR programmes beyond bilateral commitments. Strengthen regional cooperation: Regional AMR surveillance networks can improve resilience and facilitate data-sharing, even in the face of international funding cuts. Mobilise domestic resources: Prioritise public health investment in laboratory systems, data infrastructure, and training to reduce reliance on fluctuating aid flows. Promote responsible antimicrobial use: Stewardship programmes in human and veterinary medicine are essential to slow the development of resistance. Invest in research and equitable access: Support for the development and fair distribution of new antibiotics, vaccines, and diagnostics must remain a global priority. AMR is one of the most urgent and complex public health issues of our time. Progress made in the past decade, through global collaboration, investment and capacity-building now stands at risk. At the very moment when stronger action is needed, international funding is contracting. The decisions made now will shape the trajectory of AMR for decades. Reducing support is not just a financial recalibration; it is a choice that may have irreversible consequences for millions of people worldwide. The global community must act decisively to protect hard-won gains, support countries most at risk and uphold the shared responsibility of safeguarding the effectiveness of life-saving medicines. Dr Jose L Balcazar is a senior microbiologist at the Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA-CERCA), Spain.


Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Dreaming in Color, speaking in truth: Africans are speaking up and this podcast is listening
South Africa is a country where silence often wraps itself around pain like a second skin. Whether because of our past or our present struggles, we've grown up hearing the word gqina , 'be strong,' and soldiering on quietly. At least we used to. In 2025, podcasts have emerged as spaces where South Africans can speak their truths out loud. Local listenership is booming: more than who's listening—female-hosted shows have seen a Among the growing constellation of podcasts showcasing African voices, 'There's something profoundly powerful about hearing young African voices speak their truth with clarity and courage. Africa's youth aren't waiting to lead someday. They're already leading. And the world would do well to listen,' Makumbi says. The fifth season of Dreaming in Color , the next episode of which airs on 24 July 2025, journeys through six African countries, from South Africa to Tunisia, threading together voices that are powerful in their differences and united in purpose. Each episode doesn't just try to tell a single story but rather lead a chorus of lived experience. Mental health is one of the central threads tying these stories together. Across the continent, the stigma around depression and trauma still lingers. Vulnerability is often mistaken for weakness, and naming your pain can feel like an act of rebellion. The podcast creates space for those stories to be shared without shame. In South Africa, where youth depression and suicide rates remain alarmingly high, mental health has become an urgent conversation. A recent episode featuring Kenyan social entrepreneur Tom Osborn, helps move this conversation forward by highlighting the different ways that young Africans approaching the problem. Osborn is leading one of Kenya's most promising mental health interventions, one designed by young people, for young people, and rooted firmly in African ways of thinking. Bridging diasporas and dialects From the heart of the continent to the hustle of the diaspora, the podcast travels far and wide. Conversations move between Johannesburg and London, Dakar and New York, carrying accents, anecdotes and ancestral wisdom across time zones. Among the guests is Farah Mami, a Tunisian impact investor and community builder who's creating spaces where women and artists lead from purpose, not pressure. Raised between Paris and Tunis, she speaks to the tension, and the beauty, of living between cultures. Ore Disu, a Nigerian cultural strategist and museum leader, is reimagining restitution at the Museum of West African Art. She's not just asking what should be returned, but what must be rebuilt, supporting young creatives, reviving artisan practices and using art as a bridge between fragmented histories. In South Africa, visual storyteller and arts leader Lekgetho Makola poses other deep questions: Who gets to frame the African story? And who benefits when it's told a certain way? Through institutions like the Market Photo Workshop and Javett Art Centre, he has created platforms where new narratives are possible. His fellow South African, Nwabisa Mayema advocate for women-led, regenerative business models. Raised in the Eastern Cape, her leadership is deeply grounded in matriarchal wisdom and what she calls 'wild womanhood', not the absence of fear, but the courage to act in spite of it. In her Dreaming in Color episode, she challenges Silicon Valley's obsession with unicorns, advocating instead for 'zebra' businesses: collaborative, community-rooted ventures that prioritise sustainability over scale. Every episode echoes what's already happening on the ground. These conversations honour oral traditions, local languages and the beauty of everyday life. They push back against erasure and remind us that storytelling is alive and very well. Dreaming in Color offers stories that challenge, affirm and inspire. In a world that too often flattens African voices into stereotypes or silence, this series does the opposite: it listens with care and amplifies with respect. The series affirms that our stories, however complex, are worth hearing and worth holding onto. Listen to Dreaming in Color , available on and . Episode 1: Semhar Araia, Eritrean-American activist and CEO founder Episode 2: Leila Ben Gacem, social entrepreneur and general director, Episode 3: Legketho Makola, chief operations officer, Episode 4: Tom Osborn, co-founder and CEO, Episode 5: Nwabisa Mayema, social entrepreneur (South Africa) Episode 6: Ore Disu, founding director, the Institute of the Episode 7: Madji Sock, co-founder and president, Episode 8: Feven Teshaye, founder, Episode 9: Farah Mami, president, Tunisia Chapter of the Episode 10: Tijan Watt, co-founder and managing partner,

The Herald
18 hours ago
- The Herald
SAHRC's 'pro-foreigner stance' comes under fire from ActionSA's Mashaba
'It is important to note that no civic group or individual has the legal authority to control access to public health facilities or to enforce immigration laws,' it said. 'The power to inspect, arrest or detain undocumented people lies solely with the department of home affairs, supported by the police when lawfully required.' All South Africans and those who live in the country — regardless of nationality, race, gender, age, income level or geographic location — have a right to access health-care facilities, it added. Mashaba said residents of Hammanskraal in Tshwane had to contend with no drinking water for more than 20 years because of the influx of illegal foreigners. 'Another problem is how South Africa has now become a free-for-all. We say, 'Come to South Africa, we will give you free health care, free education.' We have opened our borders to international syndicates,' he said. It is likely 'five illegal aliens' deported to Swaziland by US President Donald Trump would end up in South Africa, he added. 'Was the Human Rights Commission established to protect the rights of illegal foreign nationals?' On failed sewer infrastructure, Mashaba said sewage spills onto beaches threaten the city's tourism prospects. TimesLIVE