Alliance City Council: 4 candidates vie for 3 at-large spots in May primary
ALLIANCE ‒ Voters in Alliance rarely see contested races for Alliance City Council. The last time it happened was 2013.
Twelve years later, voters will see two contested races in the May 6 primary election for City Council. Both will decide Republican nominees for the November ballot.
The winners will face a challenge in November, too, from a Democrat opponent.
Here is a preview of one of those matchups − council at-large. Four candidates will be vying for three seats that pay $9,962.33 per year.
The pay rate will increase in 2026 to $10,161,57. The term is for two years.
The other contested race, Ward 3, will be previewed in a separate article.
Kristopher Bugara: 'Great infrastructure is key to attracting new businesses to our city...'
Bugara, 49, has been on City Council since 2019, when he was appointed to complete the unexpired term of Roger Rhome in 2019. He has been re-elected two times.
He and his wife, Jennifer, have three children. He works in the insurance business and is a member of several local clubs, including Alliance Elks Lodge 467. He is currently the chairman of council's Streets and Alleys Committee.
Bugara said the city has paved more in the last five years than the previous 10 years combined, and it'll take another decade to get all streets paved.
Kristopher Bugara has served five years on Alliance City Council. He is one of three incumbents seeking the three at-large seats in the 2025 election.
"We are well on our way," Bugara said. "Great infrastructure is key to attracting new businesses to our city, and the streets are a large part of that."
Bugara has been one of the more vocal supporters of transparency in city government, describing it as a priority. He said he doesn't plan to change course.
"I will continue to hold our administration accountable," he said.
Bugara said he does not support rental regulations that come with fees, and said not all landlords should be thrown "into the same pot." He supports a database of all properties.
Bugara also supports attracting more businesses to the north end of Alliance.
"I know we are currently adding a few new businesses downtown, but I would like to see us concentrate more on developing the north side of town and not put all our efforts onto State Street," Bugara said.
Jennifer Kiko: 'I believe strongly in being a good steward of city resources ...'
First elected in 2023, Kiko, 59, seeks her second term on City Council. She has two children and three grandchildren.
Kiko is the grassroots director for Americans for Prosperity. Her other community involvement includes Stark County Family Council, Church of Canton and Alliance Elks Lodge 467.
She currently serves as chairwoman of council's Safety and Judiciary Committee.
Jennifer Kiko has served on Alliance City Council for two years. She holds one of three at-large seats.
Kiko also considers transparency in city government a major priority. "I don't believe we have been effective in communicating with city residents why Alliance takes certain steps in law-making."
Kiko said economic development also is important to provide "a living wage for our residents and securing opportunities that come our way to benefit the entire city and not a few."
She said she supports a rental registration that supports both landlords and tenants. She opposes any fees outside an inspection fee, if necessary.
"I am also opposed to internal inspections and creating a revenue stream to supplement advancing the city administration," Kiko saod.
She also supports the creation of a community resource guide to help residents navigate "all the Alliance resources" available to them.
"I am a representative of the people and want to make sure our residents' best interests are first over everything," Kiko said. "I believe strongly in being a good steward of city resources and taxpayer dollars."
Phillip Mastroianni: 'I'm committed to help make Alliance an attractive place to live ...'
Mastroianni, 39, who works for his family's company Alliance Ventures has been serving on City Council for the past five years. He and his wife, Sarah, have two children.
He currently serves as chairman of the Planning, Housing and Zoning Committee.
Mastroianni has led the legislative process on city's controversial plans to regulate rental property. No formal regulation has been finalized or voted on, as of April 10. Mastroianni said he remains committed to the process.
Phillip Mastroianni has been on Alliance City Council for five years. He holds one of the three at-large seats.
"As chairman of the Planning, Housing, and Zoning Committee, I will continue to advocate for stronger code enforcement of our residential and commercial maintenance and zoning codes. I believe this is a cornerstone for creating a desirable place for people to want to live," Mastroianni said.
He further explained that a majority of Alliance residents live in rental units and "deserve the right to safe housing."
"I'm committed to helping make Alliance an attractive place to live, finding solutions to ensure that we live up to the standards we set for ourselves as a city, and fostering a welcoming community for our current businesses and potential new ones," he added.
His other community activities include serving as a board member for the Alliance Family Health Center, United Way of Greater Stark County, Alliance Farmers' Market and the Greater Alliance Development Corporation.
"Alliance has so many things to be proud of. A top-notch university, a superb hospital, great K-12 schools, a wonderful library system, beautiful parks and a strong Main Street corporation, to name a few," Mastroianni said.
He said the city must keep its focus on growth.
"As a city government, we must continue this positive momentum by using every tool we have, such as the UDAG program, tax incentives and thoughtful planning to create a city that is welcoming new businesses and people."
Rev. Joshua Smith: 'My top priorities center on creating a more responsive and sustainable city for all residents.'
Smith, 39, is a pastor at First Baptist Church of Alliance. He and his wife, Chrissy, have two children. He sees City Council as a "natural extension of his calling" to serve, unite and show compassion but on a broader scale.
"As a pastor, I've devoted my life to nuturing a church community united in pursuing goodness. My leadership experience has taught me the importance of noticing and celebrating community growth and accomplishments ...," Smith said.
He added: "On the flip side, I have also had to develop the skills need to have difficult conversations, mediate conflicts and find common ground among diverse perspectives. I have experience firsthand how the healthiest, most productive solutions often emerge when we approach challenges with respect, transparency and a willingness to truly listen."
If elected, Smith said his priorities would be to "center on creating a more responsive and sustainable city for all residents," and find compassionate and practical solutions for the city's growing homeless population.
Rev. Joshua Smith of First Baptist Church of Alliance is seeking his first term on Alliance City Council, challenging for one of three at-large seats.
Smith also said he is committed to "strengthening our safety forces" but also wants to curb the overtime budget. He supports the city's plans to regulate rentals and called proposed legislation "as a good start."
"While most local landlords exceed minimum standards and genuinely care for their tenants' well-being, I've witnessed properties where necessities like running water, heat, functional plumbing and weather-tight roofs are neglected," Smith said.
His other community activities include serving as chaplain at Alliance Hospice and Aultman Alliance Community Hospital, funeral officiant for families not connected with a church, and Hot Stove baseball coach.
Smith said the city needs more indoor recreation options for families during the winter months. He said his family has to leave Alliance to find those types of activities, such as Pump it Up in Hartville.
"I would love to see Alliance develop similar indoor options where kids and families can remain active, engaged and connected during the winter months. It would create year-long recreational opportunities that strength our community bonds," Smith said.
The winners of the Republican primary will face 39-year-old Jorge Mendoza, a Democrat and data analytics manager, in the Nov. 4 general election. Mendoza has no primary challengers.
Reach Benjamin Duer at 330-580-8567 or ben.duer@cantonrep.com. On X (formerly Twitter): @bduerREP.
This article originally appeared on The Repository: 4 Alliance Republicans vying for 3 at-large council seats

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

15 minutes ago
In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles
The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'

16 minutes ago
Election conspiracy theorist sticks by false 2020 claims in defamation trial
DENVER -- One of the nation's most prominent election conspiracy theorists, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, stuck by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen while testifying Monday during a defamation trial over statements he made about a former official for a leading voting equipment company. Taking the stand for the first time during the trial, Lindell denied making any statements he knew to be false about Eric Coomer, the former product strategy and security director for Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems. Among other things, Lindell accused Coomer of being 'a part of the biggest crime this world has ever seen." Lindell also distanced himself from a story told by a conservative podcaster who accused Coomer of helping to rig the 2020 election. It was discussed during a 2021 symposium Lindell hosted to discuss election fraud. Lindell said he did not know about the story before it was discussed onstage at the event and only learned about it during the trial. Coomer said his career and life have been destroyed by statements Lindell made about him and allowed to be promoted through his online media platform, Frankspeech. During sometimes rambling testimony in federal court in Denver, Lindell painted himself as the victim of 'lawfare' — when people are sued to scare them into silence. Several conservative news organizations, including Fox News, Newsmax and One America News, have settled defamation lawsuits from voting machine companies over allegations that they promoted falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election. In 2021, Newsmax also apologized to Coomer for airing false allegations against him. Nevertheless, Lindell said he hoped his trial would lead people to look at what happened in the election and get rid of electronic voting machines, which have been targeted in a web of conspiracy theories. Reviews, recounts and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his 2020 loss all affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Trump's own attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud, and Trump and his allies lost dozens of court cases seeking to overturn the result. Lindell said he never accused Coomer of rigging the election, but he testified that Coomer's claims led Newsmax to block him from being able to go on air to talk about voting machines. 'You're part of the biggest coverup of the biggest crime the world has ever seen,' he said to the Coomer lawyer questioning him, Charles Cain. Lindell said he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election, and now he has nothing and is $10 million in debt. 'I believe what you did to me and MyPillow was criminal,' he said to Cain during questioning. Both Cain and U.S. District Judge Nina Wang had to remind Lindell several times to listen to the questions and only provide the answers to them, rather than head off on tangents. During the trial, Coomer's attorneys have tried to show how their client's life was devastated by the series of conspiracy theories about him. Lindell was comparatively late to seize on Coomer, not mentioning him until February 2021, well after his name had been circulated by other Trump partisans. Coomer said the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health and the life he'd built and said Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. He specifically pointed to a statement on May 9, 2021, when Lindell described what he believed Coomer had done as 'treason.' Asked by his attorney what he wants out of the trial, Coomer said he would like an apology, compensation and 'a chance of rehabilitating my public image.' Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him — partly because of Coomer's own Facebook posts disparaging Trump, which the former Dominion employee acknowledged were 'hyperbolic' and had been a mistake. 'Your reputation was shattered long before Mr. Lindell said a word about you,' Chris Katchouroff said to Coomer. Katchouroff noted that Lindell also is known for making hyperbolic statements and that what he said about Coomer was simply the result of his sincere concern over vote-rigging in the 2020 presidential election — a claim for which there is no evidence.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proposal to increase SPD salaries by 13.5%
SPRINGFIELD, Mo.- At Monday's city council meeting, council discussed a potential 13.5% increase in Springfield Police Department salaries. This increase would be specifically for sworn officers. Ozarks First asked members of the community how they felt about the potential increase. One person said they would support the increase if there was more information released. Sheila Sharpe tells Ozarks First she understands what it's like to serve the public. 'I've worked in the public sector for all my life, and I feel like most of us are underpaid for what we do,' Sharpe said. 'We do it for the love of what we're doing and helping others.' This ordinance would technically be an amendment to an agreement between the city and the police union. The increase, if approved, would go into effect this July. 'I'm all in favor for that,' Sharpe said. 'I think people that do such dangerous work and put their lives on the line and help us in so many ways. I'm all for any increase in benefits or their salary.' This ordinance is expected to be voted on in two weeks at the next city council meeting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.