Trans KU student spoke out about housing policy. Then he was fired from campus job
The University of Kansas is being sued by a former student employee who says he was fired after speaking to reporters about the elimination of gender-inclusive housing at his on-campus residence hall.
The lawsuit was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Kan., on behalf of Anthony Alvarez, who recently completed his junior year at KU. He previously worked as a proctor, similar to a resident assistant, at Grace Pearson Scholarship Hall.
Alvarez alleges he was fired in March for violating his employment agreement when he was quoted in a Feb. 27 KCUR article titled 'KU students protest housing changes they say will harm trans and nonbinary residents.'
The complaint accuses KU of violating Alvarez's free speech and of retaliating against him. A KU spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
In the article, Alvarez, who is transgender, expressed frustration with KU's plans to get rid of a gender-neutral bathroom in the dorm and to prohibit students there from sharing dorms with people whose gender on file with the university is different from their own.
KU's website defines gender-inclusive housing assignments as 'a housing option in which two or more students share a multiple-occupancy space, in mutual agreement, regardless of the students' sex, gender identity, and/or gender expression.'
Dozens of students protested the changes, which were announced in a Feb. 5 email to Grace Pearson residents. Alvarez was one of three trans students quoted in the KCUR article, which noted that he was a proctor at the dorm.
Alvarez says he was speaking as a trans person who would be affected by the policy — not as a representative of the university.
KU did not eliminate gender-inclusive housing at all dorms, but advised that Grace Pearson residents who want to retain gender-inclusive assignments should apply at a different scholarship hall for the 2025-26 school year.
In addition to the university, the lawsuit names as defendants Sarah Waters and Emily Chellgren, respectively the director and assistant director of KU Housing and Residence Life.
It alleges that in a March 7 meeting with Chellgren, Alvarez was placed on probation until March 13 and told he had violated several provisions of his employment agreement.
'The first provision states in part that '(Staff will) demonstrate a commitment to personal integrity, such as modeling good judgment, ethical behavior, and adherence to laws and policies,'' according to the lawsuit.
'The second provision states in part that '(Staff will) refer a student's parents, relatives, friends, and/or the media (press) to your supervisor. Unless otherwise designated, the Director of Residence Life, in conjunction with KU Strategic Communications & Public Affairs will respond to all media inquiries.''
Alvarez was allegedly directed to submit a letter rescinding his acceptance of a similar proctor position at a different KU dorm for the 2025-26 school year.
According to the lawsuit, one day after receiving a letter that said he had three days to appeal the probation decision, Alvarez received a separate letter informing him that he had been terminated, effective immediately.
'Chellgren stated that Plaintiff's termination was based on the conduct which led to his probationary status — speaking to a member of the press — and on alleged additional policy violations since the March 7 meeting,' the suit states.
In addition to losing his salary, Alvarez was allegedly told he would lose his dorm room in Grace Pearson and his university meal plan, which was tied to the proctor position.
The lawsuit said Alvarez suffered economic harm, damage to his reputation, emotional distress, and the loss of constitutionally protected employment opportunities.
'Defendants lack any legitimate, non-retaliatory justification for Plaintiff's termination, and any such justification offered is merely pretextual,' according to the lawsuit, which requests that the university pay for Alvarez's legal fees and any other damages.
On Friday, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE, a national free speech group, sent a letter to KU condemning its decision to terminate Alvarez.
'Anthony Alvarez was unfairly punished for speaking to the media about an issue he cares deeply about in a personal capacity,' Ross Marchand, an attorney for the group, told The Star in an email.
Marchand said the assertion that student employees must get advance approval from administrators before speaking with reporters is both unlawful and at odds with KU's media guidelines and practices, which encourage employees to 'respond to media inquiries on topics on which they are experts or over which they have administrative authority.'
Marchand said KU employees have 'wide discretion to speak with reporters in their personal capacity.'
'KU Housing should follow the law and university policy and drop the related sanctions on Alvarez.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Former Alabama veterans commissioner sues Ivey for defamation and wrongful termination
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The former head of the Alabama Department of Veterans Affairs filed a federal lawsuit on Wednesday accusing Gov. Kay Ivey of wrongful termination and defamation. W. Kent Davis, a retired U.S. Navy rear admiral, filed the lawsuit that accuses the governor of illegally firing him last year. The lawsuit contends the dismissal was retaliation for statements and actions that the governor did not like. Ivey last year said she was using her 'supreme executive power of this state' to fire Davis. Ivey's office hand-delivered the letter to Davis' lawyer about 45 minutes after the State Board of Veterans Affairs, in a 3-2 vote, rejected Ivey's request to remove Davis. A lawyer for Davis said only the board, which hired Davis, had the ability to fire him. 'We think it's pretty clear that she did not have the authority to fire him. He did not work at the pleasure of the governor,' Kenny Mendelsohn, a lawyer representing Davis, said. A spokesperson for Ivey indicated the governor stood by the decision. 'We are very confident Governor Ivey's necessary actions will stand any court test there may be,' spokesperson Gina Maiola wrote in an email. Davis and Ivey's office had a public falling out last year that centered on an American Rescue Plan grant. During the dispute, Davis had filed an ethics complaint against the state mental health commissioner, after the Department of Mental Health cancelled a related agreement to administer the grants. The Alabama Ethics Commission dismissed the complaint. 'I don't think anybody in this room doubts what the real reason here is. This is retaliation for that ethics complaint,' Davis said. The governor had accused Davis of failing cooperate with her office and other agency heads and of mishandling an American Rescue Plan grant program. Ivey in an Oct. 18 letter to Davis said the ethics complaint was frivolous and a weaponization of the dispute process. Davis said his office acted properly and the governor's actions and statements have interfered with his ability to find other employment.


CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Family of Gen. Richard Cavazos, Army's first Hispanic four-star general, saddened by President Trump's plan to rename Fort Cavazos
The family of Gen. Richard Cavazos, the U.S. Army's first Hispanic four-star general, expressed sadness Wednesday over President Donald Trump's plan to restore the original names of several military installations, including renaming Fort Cavazos in Killeen back to Fort Hood. Base renamed in 2023 to remove Confederate ties Trump's announcement comes just two years after the Central Texas base was renamed during the Biden administration as part of a broader initiative to remove Confederate references from U.S. military sites. The base had previously been named after Confederate Gen. John Bell Hood. Gen. Richard E. Cavazos Military Hall of Honor, LLC In a statement, the Cavazos family said an Army representative confirmed the change during a phone call with them on Wednesday. Family told renaming honors different Hood The Cavazos family said they were told the renaming may honor a different Hood, whom they described as the "courageous Colonel Hood of World War I" rather than, in their words, the "infamous Gen. John Bell Hood." "We do not and cannot share the same understanding as the president as to his reasoning for doing so," the family said in the statement. Cavazos praised as Hispanic trailblazer They noted that when Fort Hood was renamed Fort Cavazos, Gen. Colin Powell and others in the military remarked on Gen. Cavazos's impact on "Hispanic persons in the military." They quoted Maj. Gen. Alfred Valenzuela, as saying, "I told him what he meant to us poor Hispanic kids [...] his impact as a mentor is probably the greatest impact our Army had … we all looked up to him as an American soldier, a Hispanic soldier." Focus remains on service members Meanwhile, the family said its "greatest focus is and should always be on the everyday men and women who serve this country in the armed forces." "While the name of the base may change, the everlasting legacy of the incredible men and women who continue to serve there cannot," the statement said. Cavazos was decorated war veteran In addition to being the Army's first Hispanic four-star general, Gen. Cavazos, a Texas native, was a decorated veteran of the Korean and Vietnam wars. He also served as the commanding general of III Corps at Fort Hood from 1980 to 1982.


Washington Post
12 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Fulbright board resigns over alleged Trump administration interference
The entire 12-person board tasked with overseeing the State Department's Fulbright Program resigned Wednesday, claiming political interference from the Trump administration. In a statement posted on the board's Substack, the congressionally mandated Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board said its members voted 'overwhelmingly' to resign from the board 'rather than endorse unprecedented actions that we believe are impermissible under the law, compromise U.S. national interests and integrity, and undermine the mission and mandates Congress established for the Fulbright program nearly 80 years ago.'