Holiday village for critically ill children backed by Aston University;.
A holiday village for critically ill children and their families is being planned and backed by a university.Aston University in Birmingham said it would donate £200,000 to Kids' Village which is to be built on a 30-acre site in Wychnor, near Lichfield, Staffordshire. The university named Kids' Village as its charity and praised its aim of providing "a sanctuary where vulnerable families can create precious memories together during the most challenging times of their lives". The charity aims to provide free of charge respite holiday. The land was donated by a farming family and it hopes to support more than 4,000 people a year.
The charity was founded by the Fletcher family who said they know the "pain and worry" of having a child with a life-threatening illness. Gary and Claire's daughter Sam was diagnosed with cancer aged nine which they said led to many years of treatment and worry.Sam Fletcher-Goodwin, now 31 and a presenter and producer, co-founded the charity and helped secure planning permission for the site inspired by her family's visit to Give Kids the World Village (GKTW) in Florida about 20 years ago.
Students from the university's Design Factory will also design one of the village's 10 lodges, which will be called Aston Lodge. The project fitted the university's purpose of serving the communities in our city and region, said Professor Aleks Subic, vice chancellor and chief executive at Aston. "And in particular our main purpose is to transform lives," he told BBC WM presenter Ed James, himself a trustee of Kids' Village. He added the project was "something quite unique" for the UK and addressed the needs of "the most vulnerable young people that you could find in our society".
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Traffic "emergency" could lead to new congestion charge in Oxford
A temporary congestion charge is being considered for Oxford after a bus company warned that traffic delays were at "emergency levels".Oxfordshire County Council said introducing a £5 daily charge for cars on six roads in the city is one of the options available for managing the authority said action was needed because of delays to a planned trial of traffic filters, which cannot be introduced until Botley Road is route is currently shut because of overrunning works at Oxford Station and the railway bridge, which are now not due to finish until August next year. The charging points for the congestion zone would be in the same places as the planned traffic filters:Hythe Bridge StreetSt Cross RoadSt Clement's StreetThames StreetMarston Ferry RoadHollow WayPaying the £5 charge, which would only apply to cars, would allow drivers to go through the six charge locations until the end of the would be available for carers, traders, blue badge holders, and those commuting to or living in a central area of the city. The change is being considered after warnings about delays from the Oxford Bus Director Luke Marion said: "Oxford simply cannot cope with another year of worsening congestion – rather than continuing to wait for the traffic filters, we need a 'plan B' to address the congestion problem over the next 12 months, and we need it quickly."Andrew Gant, Oxfordshire County Council's Cabinet Member for Transport said action was needed."We urgently need to see improvements to travel around the city; better bus services and less traffic overall, to help people get around," he proposals will be discussed by the council's cabinet on June 17 and, if approved, a six-week public consultation would start later this authority said this was with a view to implementing the congestion charge this autumn, and that as a temporary scheme it could be in place for a maximum of two years. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Warning over 10% price hike trick when paying by card abroad this summer
Holidaymakers could see costs rise by 10 per cent this summer as 'dynamic currency conversion' (DCC) provides traders with tempting opportunities to profit from people paying with plastic. DCC, also known as 'cardholder preferred currency', has been around for many years. Hotels, restaurants and shops with significant numbers of tourists often provide the option to pay at a fixed conversion rate. The appeal to the traveller is that they will know instantly how much they have spent in sterling. But they are certain to lose out on the transaction. The practice looks harmless: simply an additional choice. When you ask to pay with plastic or a card stored on a mobile phone abroad, the terminal will often display two figures: the bill in euros (EUR) or other local currency, and a figure in pounds (GBP). Some holidaymakers may fondly assume that the sterling amount is the equivalent to the local currency at current exchange rates. In fact, the cost in pounds includes a margin of up to 10 per cent. This is pocketed by the bank, which passes some of the cash back to the merchant. Anyone who avails of dynamic currency conversion is voluntarily accepting a price increase that could add £1 to every £10 spent – a fast way to lose a slice of hard-earned cash. Many holidaymakers know, when asked abroad if they would like to pay a sterling amount rather than the local currency, always to say 'No'. When offering dynamic currency conversion, merchants are supposed to follow strict guidelines: But during the course of a journey through Europe this month, it has become clear that some traders are not playing fair. Once local currency has been selected, that should be the end of it. But some card machines are programmed to come up with another screen, typically reading: 'Do you accept that if you choose not to take advantage of the guaranteed exchange rate, you will be subject to whatever rate the card company uses?' Below it, there is a box marked 'Accept' and another, 'Reject'. Customers who are paying attention will select 'Accept' because they understand that their bank will just use the appropriate prevailing rate – and that it will be better than the DCC deal. But if 'Accept' is selected, it turns out to be applied to a different question, ie 'Do you accept the DCC rate of exchange?' The correct, counter-intuitive answer is 'Reject'. Some proprietors may not even let customers get this far. After a satisfying lunch of dumplings and tea at a restaurant on the Royal Route leading south from the Old Town of Warsaw, the waiter simply selected 'GBP' on the machine, adding 10 per cent to the cost of the meal. When challenged about this scam, he claimed the machine was faulty and that nothing could be done. For holidaymakers withdrawing cash abroad, ATMs generally offer dynamic currency conversion. It should also be declined. The profitability to the bank becomes clear by noting the GBP sum, selecting local currency and afterwards checking the account online to see the actual sum debited by the bank.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Passenger moans parent lets baby's feet dangle on lap while feeding tot on flight – but who is in the right?
IT'S an age-old problem every passenger is accustomed to - another flyer invading your cramped plane seat. One flyer wanted to know if he was the problem after posting a photo of someone's feet touching his leg with the caption "should I report it to the stewards?" 2 Posting on the Reddit page r/CasualUK the user adopted a somewhat satirical tone when he posted a photo of a baby's feet touching his leg. He captioned the post: "On a flight and a passenger keeps putting his bare feet on me." Fellow Reddit users took it as an opportunity to make jokes about the all-too-common situation. One wrote: "Those piggies need to go to the market" while another wrote "They need Eenie-Meanying immediately." A lot of the jokes relied on baby puns to make light of the situation as one wrote: "They need to grow up." Another said: "I believe the agreed etiquette in these situations is to blow raspberries on them." Others had some slightly more outrageous suggestions, using the opportunity to comment absurd ideas for how to handle the situation. One Reddit users commented: "I would assert dominance by picking them up and using them as a phone, putting on a stupid voice." Another similar suggestion reads: "Completely unacceptable. Have you considered threatening to put him in the overhead locker?" There was a clear divide among commenters between those who like children, and those who don't. Tyson Fury among THOUSANDS of travellers at Appleby as horse fair kicks off Child-loving users were sympathetic to the situation, commenting on how cute the tiny baby's feet were. The not-so-friendly users continued with their edgy jokes, writing: "Just yeet the baby" accompanied by an animated image of someone throwing a baby. Another suggested they post it on the popular subreddit r/PassengerShaming. This forum is a safe space for passengers to vent about their worst aeroplane experiences. It includes shaming behaviours like being barefoot, having your hair over the back of the chair, and blocking the aisle. 2 It's not the first time that travellers have been left frustrated by their fellow cabin-mates' behaviour. An EasyJet flight recently drew attention for being turned into a 'mid-air nightclub' by unruly flyers. During a trip to Ibiza, a group of drunk Brits caused havoc as they banged on luggage compartments and yelled "come on Ibiza." Other passengers on the plane were clearly uncomfortable about the situation, with one saying she felt "scared". Unlike the much more agreeable baby, these British passengers were met by police on arrival.
