Officials Warn 70,000 People in New Jersey Against Going Outside
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Officials in New Jersey have issued an air quality alert for Atlantic City and surrounding areas as a massive wildfire continues to rage across Ocean County, blanketing parts of the state in smoke. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) declared an Air Quality Action Day for Fine Particulates on Wednesday, urging residents—especially those with respiratory conditions—to remain indoors as unhealthy conditions persist.
The warning area impacts roughly 70,000 people.
Why It Matters
The alert, effective until midnight, follows the explosive spread of the Jones Road wildfire, which has burned through roughly 8,500 acres in the Greenwood Forest Wildlife Management Area. The fire, first reported Tuesday, rapidly expanded because of dry conditions and high winds, prompting a state of emergency and forcing thousands to evacuate.
Officials are emphasizing the public health impact of the fire, particularly for vulnerable populations.
What to Know
The NJDEP issued the air quality alert on Wednesday morning as Atlantic City and surrounding areas were experiencing unhealthy air quality levels, in which the Air Quality Index (AQI) falls between 151 and 200.
A map from AirNow shows where unhealthy air quality, depicted in red, is currently impacting people in New Jersey.
A map from AirNow shows where unhealthy air quality, depicted in red, is currently impacting people in New Jersey.
AirNow
"Some members of the general public may experience health effects; members of sensitive groups may experience more serious health effects," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website AirNow said about unhealthy air quality.
A spokesperson with NJDEP referred Newsweek to an alert about the poor air quality when reached for comment.
"Sensitive individuals, including those with heart or lung disease, the elderly, and the young should limit strenuous activities and the amount of time active outdoors," the alert said.
Unseasonably warm temperatures are exacerbating the situation, with light winds pushing the smoke southward, the alert said.
"Following the peripheral of high pressure, winds are expected to rotate in clockwise direction, eventually becoming southeasterly, aiding in the development of a sea breeze and potentially shifting smoke transportation northward," the forecast said. "By evening, a surface trough is expected to develop, which may cause residual smoke aloft to transport towards the surface. Light winds are expected to prevail, potentially keeping transport levels low and aiding in containment of the wildfire."
The New Jersey Forest Fire Service said the fire was 30 percent contained as of Wednesday morning.
What People Are Saying
The New Jersey air quality alert sent to Newsweek: "Smoke from a large active wildfire in Ocean County, specifically Ocean and Lacey Townships, is causing current local levels to reach the unhealthy for sensitive groups (USG) category, with isolated areas reaching the unhealthy category."
Fox 29 anchor Bob Kelly posted on X, formerly Twitter: "HEALTH ALERT. Smoke from the forest fire heading south along the Jersey shoreline from Long Beach Island all the way to Cape May. This is video from Brigantine. Keep your windows and doors closed, and anyone with asthma should definitely stay inside."
What Happens Next
An air quality official told Newsweek that the NJDEP is monitoring the situation and will update the alert if necessary. Rain is expected this weekend, which could improve the air quality.
Residents across New Jersey are advised to stay updated via AirNow for real-time air quality readings and continue taking precautions as advised by local health authorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Beef Recall As Metal Warning Issued
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Michigan-based company is recalling more than 1,000 pounds of a ground beef product due to possible metal contamination, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced. Ada Valley Meat Company issued a voluntary recall on Tuesday for approximately 1,065 pounds of the product, which was packed on May 28 and 30, 2025. Newsweek contacted Ada Valley Meat Company for comment by email outside of regular working hours. Stock image. Ada Valley Meat Company issued a voluntary recall on July 29 for approximately 1,065 pounds of a ground beef product due to potential metal contamination. Stock image. Ada Valley Meat Company issued a voluntary recall on July 29 for approximately 1,065 pounds of a ground beef product due to potential metal contamination. J. Scott Applewhite/AP Why It Matters The recall was issued a Class I risk classification by the FSIS, which represents a "health hazard situation where there is a reasonable probability that use of the product will cause serious, adverse health consequences or death." Foreign material in food products presents health risks, including choking, damage to teeth and digestive tract injury. Small pieces of metal could obstruct airways, especially in vulnerable populations like children and older adults. What To Know The product impacted by the recall is the following: Ada Valley Fully Cooked Ground Beef - pack dates: 5/28/25 and 5/30/25 - lot codes: 35156 and 35157 The product was shipped to retailers and distributors in California, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan and Pennsylvania. It bears the establishment number "EST. 10031," and was packaged in 20lb carboard box cases. The FSIS also warned in its recall notice: "FSIS wants to make sure consumers are aware that some of the recalled products could bear a different establishment number on the label due to further distribution and processing by other establishments." As of July 29, no injuries had been reported in connection with the consumption of the affected product. The problem was discovered after the company informed the FSIS that it had received a consumer complaint reporting the presence of metal pieces in the product. What People Are Saying The FSIS said in its recall notice: "FSIS is concerned that some products may be in institutional freezers. Institutions who have purchased these products are urged not to serve these products. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase." Dr. Mark Fischer, regional medical director at International SOS, told Newsweek previously: "It can be dangerous to consume metals or other foreign objects found in food... [They] can cause cuts or internal injury and may need to be removed via a surgical procedure. If you swallow any foreign objects, it's best to consult a healthcare professional." What Happens Next The recall is listed as active, according to the FSIS. Consumers who purchased the affected product should not eat it and are advised to return it to the place of purchase.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Passenger Reveals Cost of Getting Sick on Cruise Ship: 'Seaway Robbery'
As cruise ships operate as self-contained environments, their onboard medical systems must be equipped to handle emergencies around the clock, contributing to higher prices for treatment. "Cruise-ship medical costs can be surprisingly high because onboard medical facilities operate similarly to urgent care centers in the United States," board-certified family medicine physician Dr. Brynna Connor told Newsweek. She is a health-care ambassador at Connor said: "Because there are limited resources and 24/7 availability—per the American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines, ships must have medical personnel on call 24 hours in case of medical emergencies—you're paying not only for treatment, but you're also paying for the convenience and logistics of receiving medical care in a somewhat-remote environment." Connor said that expenses increase sharply when specialized tools are involved. "When you add in the cost of specialized equipment—RT-PCR machines for COVID/Flu/RSV tests fall under the category of specialized equipment—the bill can increase exponentially and very quickly," she added. For those looking to avoid such expenses, Connor stressed the importance of preparation. "To minimize the chance of needing medical care and avoid a potentially hefty bill, there are ways travelers can help themselves, starting with scheduling an appointment with their health-care provider at least four to six weeks before traveling to discuss any potential health risks at the destinations, necessary vaccinations, and/or preventive medications," Connor said. In addition, she urged travelers to consider coverage options. "Travelers should also look into travel medical insurance, which is specifically designed to cover unexpected illnesses or injuries while traveling abroad—typically these policies will reimburse medical bills for costs like emergency treatment, hospital stays, surgeries, doctor visits, and/or prescription medications—and/or comprehensive travel insurance, which often includes travel medical coverage in addition to other benefits." Connor also recommended taking basic precautions once aboard. "Avoid high-risk food items, such as street food while at port, and drink only bottled or purified water, especially when traveling internationally, as food poisoning and dehydration are common reasons travelers end up in the ship's infirmary," she said. "Also, limit alcohol consumption, which can impair judgment and contribute to dehydration or accidents." Even for the prepared, Connor advised carrying critical items. "It's a good idea to travel with a fully stocked personal aid kit, including anti-nausea medication—particularly useful on cruises—pain relievers, hand sanitizer, and/or any prescription medications," she said. "Make sure if you're portioning out medications; take enough to cover extra days in case of travel delays." Connor recommended having your medical insurance information on hand and checking whether your policy includes international or cruise coverage, or purchasing travel insurance with medical benefits before setting sail. Connor added that many U.S. policies may not offer sufficient coverage. "Many U.S. health-insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, offer limited or no coverage outside the United States. As such, hospitals and doctors in most other countries don't accept American health-insurance plans and will ask for payment up-front, which contributes to a significantly larger bill than you might expect," she said. 'Seaway Robbery' Reddit users were shocked by the cruise travel medical costs highlighted in the viral post. "Over $100 to slap a fingertip pulse ox sensor on you?? What is this nightmare," wrote u/LowVoltCharlie. Another commenter, u/OccasionMU, broke down the charges: "$219 to be admitted to the hospital. Then another $219 to be seen by a doctor. Then $274 for a COVID test. Haha." U/Powerful-Economist42 noted: "That's when you call them and negotiate. Both those were after the initial $199 for the visit. Seaway robbery." For many Reddit users, the lesson from u/ultranothing's post was clear. "That's why you never travel without travel medical insurance," said u/Prosecco1234. "Don't go on a cruise without cruise insurance. You took the risk," wrote u/Salt_Quality_9132. Others echoed the advice. "This is why you never—NEVER—travel outside the country without insurance," added u/Jaydamic. U/EuphoricPines2448 posted: "The more I learn about cruises, the less I ever want to go on one! Sorry you are in this situation OP [original poster]." Newsweek has contacted the original poster for comment via the Reddit messaging system. Stock image: A woman appears stressed while looking at documents at a desk with a laptop and calculator at hand. Stock image: A woman appears stressed while looking at documents at a desk with a laptop and calculator at hand. Getty Do you have a travel-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
What the Future of Medicaid and Medicare Could Look Like
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On this day 60 years ago, the Medicaid and Medicare programs were signed into law by former President Lyndon B. Johnson. It was July 30, 1965, and both programs were established within the Social Security Act. Designed as federal programs to assist the elderly, disabled individuals and those with low income, both have grown into the largest sources of health care coverage in the country. Tens of millions of Americans rely on the programs, and they have protected the country's most vulnerable populations for over six decades now. Before the programs were established, around half of all Americans over 65 had no means of medical insurance, forcing them to pay hefty prices or forgo care entirely. Nowadays, that figure has dropped significantly. "Medicare and Medicaid have been enormous policy successes that have increased Americans' health and longevity while improving financial protections for older Americans," Lauren Nicholas, a health economist at University of Colorado, Denver, told Newsweek. "These programs also support our medical workforce through stable funding and by underwriting graduate medical education," she added. Inevitably, the programs have been shaped by different governmental administrations over the years, and as the programs turn 60, many more political changes are set to alter the course of Medicaid and Medicare's future. In light of the programs' landmark anniversary, Newsweek has spoken to experts about what is in store for the programs in the coming years during the term of President Donald Trump. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Cutting Down on "Waste, Fraud and Abuse" Starting with the appointment of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a key focus of the Trump administration has been removing "waste, fraud and abuse" from the federal health care programs. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report from 2024 found that in 2023, $100 billion was spent in "improper payments"––payments that "should not have been made or were made in the incorrect amount"––across the Medicare and Medicaid programs. GAO said this represented 43 percent of the governmentwide total of estimated "improper payments" that agencies reported for that year. In order to reduce the incidence of these "improper payments," the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency proposed measures such as an initial validation of applicants' identities, eliminating self-certification, and monitoring the programs through improved technology. Analysis of 2024 enrollment data also revealed there were 2.8 million Americans either enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in multiple states, or simultaneously enrolled in both Medicaid or CHIP and a subsidized Affordable Care Act (ACA) Exchange plan, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). As a result, CMS said it would take action to ensure individuals are only enrolled in one program, vowing to "continue to crush fraud, waste, and abuse in America's health care programs." Although, while in principle boosting efficiency and transparency while reducing costs, these changes may also have less desirable impacts on beneficiaries in the future, experts have warned. "Research suggests that the people who will lose coverage from this policy will mostly be working or have serious health problems and should still be in the program," Dr. Benjamin Sommers, a professor of health care economics at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, told Newsweek. "The 'savings' here are not from reducing fraud, but from kicking people off of Medicaid to become uninsured and struggle to afford medical care," he added. "It's a perennial political motto and goal," Tim Westmoreland, a retired professor of health law and policy from Georgetown Law, told Newsweek. "Politicians often say that they are making eligibility requirements more stringent in order to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse, but research has shown repeatedly that this mostly disqualifies people who would be eligible if they could find their way through complex mazes of paperwork," he added. He went on to say it saves "comparatively little money"—the real savings come from "investigating and prosecuting providers, for example, doctors who overcharge, or pharmaceutical companies that game their prices, or medical equipment suppliers who don't deliver, or managed care companies that underserve." Newsweek has contacted CMS via email for comment. "Big Beautiful Bill" Cuts and Requirements Medicare and Medicaid's 60th birthday comes only a few weeks after the passing of Trump's major budget legislation—the "One Big Beautiful Bill." The bill includes the largest funding cuts to the two federal programs in U.S. history, and Medicaid will bear the brunt of this with $1 trillion in cuts over the next decade. The White House has said the bill "protects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it—pregnant women, children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families—while eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse." The Trump administration said that by "eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse" in the Medicaid program, resources can then be refocused on "providing better care for those whom the program was designed to serve: pregnant women, children, people with disabilities, low-income seniors, and other vulnerable low-income families." Overall, the bill "protects Medicaid for the truly vulnerable," the White House added, and said that those with disabilities receiving Medicaid "will receive no loss or change in coverage." On the subject of Medicare, the White House said the federal program "had not been touched in this bill—absolutely nothing in the bill reduces spending on Medicare benefits." "This legislation does not make a single cut to welfare programs—it safeguards and protects these programs for all eligible Americans," the White House added. In regard to Medicaid, the bill will see the introduction of work requirements, so those eligible for the program will have to work a total of 80 hours a month, unless exempt. The bill eliminates enhanced federal matching funds for Medicaid services provided to undocumented immigrants—a measure that affects states offering such coverage, including California, New York, Illinois, Washington, New Jersey, Oregon, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Rhode Island, Maine, and Vermont. All 40 states that expanded the Medicaid service under the ACA will also be affected by the bill. They will face a reduced federal match rate, requiring states to shoulder a greater share of the costs. A number of other changes to the Medicaid program include a restriction in funding for Medicaid-covered family planning services that offer abortions, like Planned Parenthood, and a requirement for eligibility to be redetermined every 6 months instead of every 12 months. Fewer changes have been made to Medicare. These include a narrowing of eligibility to exclude undocumented immigrants and anticipated reductions in federal reimbursements to health care providers, which could affect which prescription drugs are covered by the program. How these changes will shape the future of the programs is not overly positive, according to experts that spoke to Newsweek, and there have been frequent warnings that millions of Americans will lose their health coverage as a result. Paul Shafer, a professor in health law, policy and management at Boston University, deemed the changes to Medicaid "potentially dramatic," telling Newsweek "millions of Americans will lose Medicaid and, with it, their access to health care." "Millions of people will likely lose coverage due to increasing red tape from work requirements and more frequent eligibility checks," Sommers added. "States will lose one of the ways they currently pay for their share of the Medicaid expansion, so we will likely see additional cuts from states that may lead to fewer people covered and reduced benefits." Lower income people will be most impacted, Mark Pauly, a professor of health care management at Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, told Newsweek. "They will have to jump more hoops to keep Medicaid insurance—some who are not sick may decide it is not worth the trouble," he added. On the subject of work requirements, Dr. Susan Goold, a professor of internal medicine and health management and policy at the University of Michigan, told Newsweek evidence has shown that, under work requirement programs, "employment does not increase, people who are eligible are nonetheless dropped, and administering the program costs states money." "Changes to the federal share of Medicaid spending will cause states to either cut enrollment, cut benefits, cut payments to providers or greatly increase their spending," she said. While Medicaid is more directly affected by the bill than Medicare, Pauly said that "Medicare's time will come when provider reimbursements are cut so much that fewer doctors will accept it." Goold added that Medicare will also be indirectly affected by the bill, such as via increases in income tax deductions, including for seniors on social security, which "means less revenue to both Medicare and Social Security." "That speeds up the trajectory toward insolvency, unless future cuts are made to benefits," she said. Also, provider payment rate changes may "make it more difficult for Medicare enrollees to find providers," Goold added. At a time when Medicaid and Medicare popularity is at all-time high, the new tax bill was found to be somewhat unfavorable throughout the county, according to a KFF study, suggesting the federal health programs could have a rocky future as public opinion and policy decision clash. Shafer said: "This bill has been described as 'the biggest rollback in federal support for health coverage ever,' when families are still struggling to bounce back from years of higher inflation and the economy is showing signs of slowing down." Hospital Closures As Medicaid cuts will reduce the number of Americans with insurance, there will be "fewer people who can pay for health care, making it harder for hospitals, nursing homes, and other practices to stay in business," Nicholas said. "We are already starting to see facilities cut back service lines and staffing that they don't think that they can maintain," she added. Shafer warned that "stopping the enforcement of minimum staffing levels in nursing homes means that we won't see patient safety and care improve in ways it could have, keeping seniors at risk in understaffed facilities." Nicholas said that 25 percent of nursing homes are expected to close as a result, which could "leave frail older adults who need a lot of care with nowhere to go." "I worry that Americans will see the first signs of these changes through their pocketbooks and their own health, having to wait longer to get doctor appointments and losing access to local hospitals and providers," she added. Estimates from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has suggested that over 300 rural hospitals could close with all but four states affected. The White House said that rural hospitals comprise 7 percent of all hospital spending on Medicaid, "illustrating that they have not benefited from the massive increase in waste, fraud, and abuse under the Biden administration." "By strengthening Medicaid, we are making more resources available for vulnerable populations and safety net providers, like rural hospitals," the White House said. "We are expanding rural hospital protection, providing targeted funds for rural care, and giving states flexibility to support local providers." While $50 billion has been allocated in Trump's bill over five years to all states for a variety of purposes, including payments to rural facilities, the options states have to protect rural health care are not without their complexities, experts previously told Newsweek. The Future For Medicare and Medicaid In light of the significant, even historic, changes being made to the programs under the Trump administration, the future of Medicaid and Medicare remains uncertain. Aside from major government changes, CMS has also been announcing further changes to both programs in recent weeks, largely focused on reducing federal taxpayer costs and clamping down on issues that fall under the umbrella of "waste, fraud and abuse." This includes an end to expanded continuous eligibility for Medicaid, which allowed some people to remain enrolled for a period of time, even if they were no longer qualified, as CMS vowed to "restore accountability and safeguard the long-term integrity of Medicaid and CHIP." CMS also said in May it would "close a Medicaid tax loophole exploited by states to inflate federal payments to states, and free up state funds for non-Medicaid purposes," as well as launching a "significant expansion of its auditing efforts for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans." The impact of all of these changes remains to be seen, but one thing that appears to be quite clear is that, while less Americans may have access to the programs in the years to come, Medicaid and Medicare will continue to remain critical to many.
