Israel blames malfunction for missile killing Gaza children collecting water
The Israeli military said the missile had intended to hit an Islamic Jihad militant in the area, but that a malfunction had caused it to fall "dozens of meters from the target."
"The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved civilians," it said in a statement, adding that the incident was under review.
The strike hit a water distribution point in Nuseirat refugee camp, killing six children and injuring 17 others, said Ahmed Abu Saifan, an emergency physician at Al-Awda Hospital.
Water shortages in Gaza have worsened sharply in recent weeks, with fuel shortages causing desalination and sanitation facilities to close, making people dependent on collection centers where they can fill up their plastic containers.
Hours later, 12 people were killed by an Israeli strike on a market in Gaza City, including a prominent hospital consultant, Ahmad Qandil, Palestinian media reported. The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the attack. Gaza's health ministry said on Sunday that more than 58,000 people had been killed since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas in October 2023, with 139 people added to the death toll over the past 24 hours.
The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and fighters in its tally, but says over half of those killed are women and children.
Ceasefire?
U.S. President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday that he was "hopeful" on Gaza ceasefire negotiations underway in Qatar.
He told reporters in Teterboro, New Jersey, that he planned to meet senior Qatari officials on the sidelines of the FIFA Club World Cup final.
However, negotiations aimed at securing a ceasefire have been stalling, with the two sides divided over the extent of an eventual Israeli withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources said at the weekend.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was set to convene ministers late on Sunday to discuss the latest developments in the talks, an Israeli official said.
The indirect talks over a U.S. proposal for a 60-day ceasefire are being held in Doha, but optimism that surfaced last week of a looming deal has largely faded, with both sides accusing each other of intransigence.
Netanyahu in a video he posted on Telegram on Sunday said Israel would not back down from its core demands — releasing all the hostages still in Gaza, destroying Hamas and ensuring Gaza will never again be a threat to Israel.
The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive.
Families of hostages gathered outside Netanyahu's office in Jerusalem to call for a deal.
"The overwhelming majority of the people of Israel have spoken loudly and clearly. We want to do a deal, even at the cost of ending this war, and we want to do it now," said Jon Polin, whose son Hersh Goldberg-Polin was held hostage by Hamas in a Gaza tunnel and slain by his captors in August 2024.
Netanyahu and his ministers were also set to discuss a plan on Sunday to move hundreds of thousands of Gazans to the southern area of Rafah, in what Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has described as a new "humanitarian city" but which would be likely to draw international criticism for forced displacement.
An Israeli source briefed on discussions in Israel said that the plan was to establish the complex in Rafah during the ceasefire, if it is reached.
On Saturday, a Palestinian source familiar with the truce talks said that Hamas rejected withdrawal maps which Israel proposed, because they would leave around 40% of the territory under Israeli control, including all of Rafah.
Israel's campaign against Hamas has displaced almost the entire population of more than 2 million people, but Gazans say nowhere is safe in the coastal enclave.
Early on Sunday morning, a missile hit a house in Gaza City where a family had moved after receiving an evacuation order from their home in the southern outskirts.
"My aunt, her husband and the children, are gone. What is the fault of the children who died in an ugly bloody massacre at dawn?" said Anas Matar, standing in the rubble of the building.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tokyo Weekender
4 hours ago
- Tokyo Weekender
Japanese Government Launches New Office To Deal With Unruly Foreigners
On Tuesday, the Japanese government held an inauguration ceremony for a new office that has been set up to respond to issues such as crime and over-tourism involving foreigners. Headed by Assistant Chief Cabinet Secretary Wataru Sakata, the office will serve as a cross agency 'control tower,' with 78 employees, including officials from the Cabinet Office, the Justice Ministry and other bodies . List of Contents: Japanese Government Concerned About 'Conduct by Some Foreigners' The Rise of the Far-Right Yuriko Koike Warns Against 'Hate Speech' Related Posts Japanese Government Concerned About 'Conduct by Some Foreigners' 'Crimes and disorderly conduct by some foreigners, as well as the inappropriate use of various administrative systems, have created a situation in which the public feels uneasy and cheated,' said Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba at Tuesday's kick-off ceremony. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, meanwhile, claimed that the establishment of the new office was not an election ploy by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). How to deal with the increasing number of foreigners in Japan has become a key issue ahead of the House of Councillors election this Sunday. The LDP has promised to 'accelerate efforts toward 'zero illegal foreigners.'' As for the Japan Innovation Party, it has pledged to 'accept foreigners for work purposes only if they can contribute to the growth of the Japanese economy.' Image and logo: Wikimedia The Rise of the Far-Right Immigration has become a hot topic mainly due to the rise of far-right parties. Sanseito, in particular, has been gaining traction with its 'Japanese First' slogan. In a recent survey conducted by The Asahi Shimbun , in which respondents were asked to name their preferred party based on certain policies, the LDP led in everything except 'policy on foreign residents.' Sanseito received the most support in that section. Speaking at the FCCJ two weeks ago, Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya said the Japanese first approach wasn't 'based on xenophobia.' He added, 'We're not intending to exclude foreign workers who are here legally. We just believe cheap foreign labor's not the right way.' The right-wing party is forecast to win seven seats in electoral districts and about eight proportional representation seats. Other parties have made more controversial statements about foreigners during the election campaign. During a stump speech on July 5, Naoki Hyakuta , leader of the minor right-wing opposition Conservative Party of Japan, said that foreign people 'disrespect Japanese culture, ignore the rules, assault Japanese people and steal their belongings.' A day earlier, NHK Party leader Takashi Tachibana described Black people and people of Islamic background as 'scary. ' Yuriko Koike Warns Against 'Hate Speech' Speaking at her regular news briefing on July 11, Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike warned against 'hate speech and tendencies toward exclusion,' when she was asked about issues related to foreigners in Japan ahead of the House of Councillors election. Currently, foreign nationals account for around 3% of the total population in this country. However, the figure did reach a record high of 3.8 million last year. Related Posts NHK Leader Takashi Tachibana Calls Black and Muslim People 'Scary' Sanseito Leader Says 'Japanese First' Approach Is Not Based on Xenophobia Why Japanese Leftists Are Using Melonpan To Mock Sanseito
Yomiuri Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
University Leaders Face Tough Questions in House Hearing on Antisemitism
Three university leaders faced harsh questioning Tuesday during a House hearing about antisemitism on college campuses, as Republicans demanded answers about their handling of statements by students and faculty that the lawmakers found antisemitic. In a three-hour hearing, Robert Groves, interim president of Georgetown University, Félix V. Matos Rodríguez, chancellor of the City University of New York, and Rich Lyons, chancellor of the University of California at Berkeley, asserted a commitment to combating anti-Jewish hatred while defending campus rights to free expression. Groves has been in his position since last year, Matos Rodríguez since 2019 and Lyons since last summer. Tuesday's is the latest of a series of hearings over alleged failures to protect Jewish students that the House Committee on Education and the Workforce has held since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. Tuesday's hearing had combative moments but was less explosive than some previous ones. Earlier hearings put intense personal scrutiny on leaders of other universities, some of whom eventually resigned after controversial exchanges with lawmakers. The hearing was briefly interrupted a number of times by protesters yelling, 'There's blood on your hands' and 'Free Palestine!' After the fourth interruption, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Florida) yelled, 'Shut up and get out of here!' to the demonstrators, then turned to the university presidents and said he blamed them for the disruptions. 'I hold you all responsible for this,' he said. 'It is the attitude that you have allowed on your college campuses that make people think that this is okay.' Facing questions about specific cases of alleged antisemitism on their campuses, the university leaders sometimes demurred or said they could not comment on individual disciplinary matters. In one case, however, Groves said that Jonathan Brown, a professor still listed on his faculty page as the chair of Islamic civilization at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, had been stripped of his chair title after posting on X last month that he hoped 'Iran does some symbolic strike on a base' amid news of U.S. strikes on Iran. 'He's on leave and we are reviewing the case,' Groves told lawmakers. Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-Michigan) said he found the news 'encouraging' but 'long overdue.' Brown did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Walberg questioned Matos Rodríguez about a Palestinian studies job posting at Hunter College that called for scholars who could 'take a critical lens' on issues including 'settler colonialism, genocide, human rights, apartheid' and other topics. The listing was removed in February following a demand from New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D). 'We made sure to tell Hunter College that it was entirely inappropriate to have that posting,' Matos Rodríguez said at the hearing. Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-North Carolina) pressed Matos Rodríguez on whether he sees it as problematic that the president of CUNY's faculty and staff union personally supports BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement that targets Israel. In response, the president stressed that the union 'does not speak for' CUNY. Foxx responded: 'You obviously don't think it's problematic.' Pressed by Fine and Rep. Lisa C. McClain (R-Michigan) on why history professor Ussama Makdisi, who had posted on social media, 'I could have been one of those who broke through the siege on October 7,' had not faced discipline at UC-Berkeley, Lyons said Makdisi is a 'fine scholar.' McClain retorted: 'I'm sure there's a lot of murderers in prison who are fine people, too, fine scholars, but they do some pretty nefarious and heinous acts.' Makdisi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pennsylvania) pushed Groves to condemn a Georgetown employee who had compared Israel's actions in Gaza to Nazi concentration camps in a social media post. 'I reject those kinds of statements,' Groves said. 'I want everyone to know that to the extent that that hurt Jewish students, Jewish faculty, Jewish staff at Georgetown, I apologize for that,' he added. Republicans repeatedly criticized the leaders' handling of faculty unions, which Walberg said have 'played a critical role in fomenting the rise of antisemitism.' The committee's first hearing on antisemitism, in December 2023, put the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University under intense scrutiny over an exchange with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), who asked whether the presidents would punish students if they called for the genocide of Jews. Claudine Gay of Harvard and Liz Magill of the University of Pennsylvania said their response would depend on context. Both resigned in the aftermath. The next hearing, four months later, also sparked controversy as the president of Columbia University, Minouche Shafik, drew criticism from some members of the university when she denounced specific professors and revealed disciplinary details, taking a more aggressive stance against pro-Palestinian leaders on her campus. She also later stepped down from the role. The GOP's critics say the hearings do not represent genuine efforts to combat hatred directed at Jewish students, but rather an attempt to use antisemitism as a pretext to stem anti-Israel rhetoric on American campuses – and cut funding for those institutions. 'I am extremely disappointed in the majority for exploiting my community's legitimate fears and concerns as they advance discriminatory, regressive, unconstitutional, and harmful policy,' Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Oregon) said. 'Jewish Americans and the American people deserve better.' Democrats also criticized the hearings as political theater and condemned the congressional committee's focus on antisemitism as coming at the exclusion of other urgent concerns. 'This is yet another hearing to demonize Muslims and their religion, to demonize Palestinians, including those in Gaza,' Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pennsylvania) said. The Trump administration has leaned on allegations of antisemitism to go after elite universities including Harvard, UC-Berkeley and Columbia in an unprecedented attack on the nation's higher education system. As administration officials have opened investigations into schools and sought to strip them of federal funding, they have expanded their probes beyond antisemitism. The administration has opened two investigations into the University of California, one probing alleged antisemitism and the other investigating its hiring practices for evidence of diversity measures. The schools in Tuesday's spotlight have looked to portray themselves as hard on antisemitism, in part by cracking down on encampments – a movement that swept college campuses in the spring of last year. CUNY was the site of a prominent encampment in New York City and the attempted occupation of an administration building. The school eventually brought in New York police, leading to the arrest of dozens of protesters. 'We learned from that experience,' Matos Rodríguez said in his opening statement, saying the school significantly beefed up security. 'We now have a zero-tolerance policy against encampments.' The encampment at UC-Berkeley ended after the school agreed to review its investments following three weeks of pitched tents and protests. The school strengthened its rules against encampments and banned face masks under some circumstances. Georgetown largely avoided the high-profile encampments that roiled many campuses last year, as D.C.-area student protesters gathered for a united encampment at George Washington University, blocks from the White House. In 2024, the university hosted families of Americans who were taken hostage by Hamas in the 2023 attack for a speaking event, which Groves stressed in his statement to the committee. In a letter to the House committee last week, some of the family members praised Georgetown and its students and faculty. 'During a fraught time in so many public spaces after October 7, 2023, Georgetown created space for something different: a conversation rooted in empathy, dignity, and truth,' the families wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post.
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
Amid heated debate, no real plan for Israel's 'humanitarian city' in Gaza
An Israeli scheme to move hundreds of thousands of already uprooted Palestinians to a so-called "humanitarian city" in Gaza has led politicians to spar with the defense establishment, but officials say a practical plan has yet to be crafted. Even without a clear blueprint, opposition critics have denounced the proposal, with some likening the suggested site to a "concentration camp," which could lead to ethnic cleansing in the coastal enclave devastated by 21 months of conflict. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's administration has defended the project, saying it would offer civilians a safe haven while further weakening Hamas militants' grip on Gaza, but it remains unclear whether it is a concrete government policy.
