logo
Macquarie to buy 12,000 student beds in Europe real estate push

Macquarie to buy 12,000 student beds in Europe real estate push

Business Times5 days ago
[LONDON] Australian finance giant Macquarie has agreed to buy two student housing businesses in Europe that manage over 12,000 beds, in the latest sign of overseas investors pushing into the sector.
Macquarie will buy two specialist student housing investment platforms - MILESTONE and BaseStack Living – for an undisclosed fee, the company said in a statement. Macquarie declined to comment on the deal value.
The move is part of Macquarie's strategy of growing its private markets unit overseas after offloading its international public assets to Nomura.
Student housing has become a hot market within real estate, with investors lured by the prospect of attractive returns at a time when prices have soured for more traditional assets like offices.
The deal will pitch Macquarie against other large investors in the sector, including Blackstone, Legal & General and Greystar.
Student accommodation has jumped to the top of European real estate investors' preferences of what to buy, overtaking rental housing more broadly, according to a June investor survey by trade body INREV.
The platforms acquired by Macquarie span properties in Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Denmark. Macquarie plans to expand the business to other European markets over time, said Brendan Jones, head of real estate for Europe, Middle East and Africa at Macquarie Asset Management.
The owner of BaseStack Living, Justin Hamer, will be named chief executive of the combined student housing group. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Europe: Shares settle lower as investors gauge mixed earnings, EU-US trade progress
Europe: Shares settle lower as investors gauge mixed earnings, EU-US trade progress

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Europe: Shares settle lower as investors gauge mixed earnings, EU-US trade progress

[BENGALURU] European shares closed lower on Friday (Jul 25), as investors assessed mixed corporate earnings while awaiting updates on a framework of an EU-US trade deal that officials said could be reached as early as this weekend. Investors navigated the peaks and troughs around a potential agreement between the two large economies after a busy week of trade discussions with the US culminated in deals with Japan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index dropped 0.3 per cent to session lows after US President Donald Trump said there was less chance of an agreement with the EU, but pared losses after EU diplomats reiterated that a deal of 15 per cent duties on European goods was still in the works. The index last closed 0.2 per cent lower with most regional bourses in red, but on a weekly basis, the Stoxx index was on track for modest gains. 'It's hard to spin it as a good deal, but it would at least avoid much higher US tariffs and retaliation from the EU,' said Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief euro zone economist at Capital Economics. 'The reported deal with the US would take a major downside risk off the table for now, weakening the case for further interest rate cuts.' Also weighing on stocks were elevated bond yields that got a lift after the European Central Bank's comments on Thursday tempered expectations of imminent interest rate cuts. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Meanwhile, corporate earnings were in full swing. Puma was the biggest percentage loser on the benchmark index, falling 16 per cent, its largest daily drop in more than four months. The sportswear brand cut its full-year outlook and reported weaker-than-expected quarterly results. London-listed sports retailer JD Sports slipped 0.7 per cent after Puma's results. On the flip side, LVMH gained 3.9 per cent after the French luxury group reported quarterly results, with analysts pointing to hopes on the horizon as the group said it saw signs of recovery in the Chinese market. The broader luxury index rose 1.8 per cent and was the top sectoral performer. Automobile stocks gained 1.4 per cent, boosted by Volkswagen's 4.6 per cent rise after the CEO of Europe's biggest carmaker said cost cuts must be accelerated in response to tariffs. Earlier in the session, shares took a hit on the company's slashed full-year sales and profit margin forecasts. Still, Traton, a truck unit of German automaker Volkswagen, fell 4.1 per cent. Carrefour gained 5.5 per cent after Europe's biggest food retailer reported its half-year results. Attention next week will turn to key events, including policy decisions from the Federal Reserve, earnings from several 'Magnificent Seven' companies, and Trump's Aug 1 tariff deadline. REUTERS

The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened
The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened

WHEN expectations are at rock bottom, simply showing up counts as progress. That is the story of this week's EU-China summit in Beijing – a hastily truncated, one-day event after China's President Xi Jinping declined to travel to Brussels. The absence of a formal joint communique and the palpable lack of deliverables should not obscure a critical fact that this meeting still matters. The reality of interdependence Despite rising tensions, the European Union (EU) and China together account for roughly a third of global gross domestic product and 30 per cent of world trade. Their economies are intertwined, and their geopolitical futures increasingly entangled. Whether on trade, climate action, or global security, EU-China relations have outsized consequences that go far beyond the boundaries of Brussels and Beijing. That is why, even in a climate of mistrust and mutual suspicion, face-to-face dialogue at the highest level is a meaningful step forward. Given how close the summit came to not happening at all, Xi's confirmation – reportedly just days before – signals a reluctant but essential recognition: disengagement is not a viable strategy. Fractured trust and strategic calculus The optics were clear. A shortened visit, no banquet, and icy body language contrast sharply with the six-day red-carpet treatment extended to Australia's prime minister just a week ago. The EU is not currently in Beijing's diplomatic good books, and the reasons are manifold. First and foremost is Ukraine. China's tacit support for Russia's war has alarmed European policymakers. Beijing's reported position that a Russian loss could embolden US pressure in Asia, reflects a calculus starkly misaligned with European values. The EU's recent sanctions on two Chinese banks linked to Russian military supply chains have further strained ties. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China's restriction of rate earth exports to Europe, after easing them for the US, has inflamed tensions across the EU industry. Though fast-tracked licences have been promised, details remain opaque. And for industries already grappling with competitiveness in areas like clean tech, automotive and computing, the uncertainty is as damaging as the restrictions themselves. Caught between powers Europe's dilemma is exacerbated by the looming presence of the US. Even absent from the summit table, Washington was very much 'in the room'. Both China and the EU are calibrating their moves with one wary eye on US trade policy. China fears a transatlantic deal that will shut it out while the EU fears becoming the dumping ground for excess Chinese goods that can no longer enter American markets. Also, the timing of this summit could not have been worse. With the US trade deadline looming on Aug 1, the incentive on all sides is to avoid provocation. But long-term alignment remains murky. The EU's attempt to 'de-risk' from China, as EU President Ursula von der Leyen has framed it, involves walking a tightrope: reducing strategic dependencies without provoking confrontation. That is a hard sell in both Beijing and Washington. The search for leverage elsewhere China is not the only partner the EU is looking at. Negotiations with Australia, South-east Asia and Mercosur signal a concerted push to diversify trade partnerships. While these will not fully offset dependence on China, they send a clear message: Europe is broadening its options. Climate change might seem like one area ripe for cooperation. Both the EU and China have deadlines approaching for commitments ahead of COP30 in Brazil. Yet even here, progress is stymied. The EU refuses to endorse any joint declaration unless China offers firmer pledges on emission reductions. The concern? That aligning too closely with Beijing could strain transatlantic ties. Small steps, significant implications So, will this summit be deemed a success? That depends on the yardstick. If the expectations are major breakthroughs or a reset in bilateral relations, then ultimately it will be a disappointment all around. But in geopolitics, showing up can sometimes be half the battle. In a world becoming more fragmented and multipolar, structured engagement, however imperfect, is still our best hope. The EU and China may not trust each other much, but they understand that coexistence, and even cooperation, are inescapable. And that, in today's world, is reason enough to keep talking. The writer is senior partner at Penta, based in Brussels

Iran says it held ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers
Iran says it held ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Iran says it held ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers

Find out what's new on ST website and app. A European delegation leaving the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul, following nuclear talks on July 25. ISTANBUL - Iranian diplomats said they held 'frank and detailed' nuclear talks on July 25 with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, who have threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran fails to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Israel launched an attack on Iran in June targeting key nuclear and military sites, sparking a 12-day war and leading Tehran to pull away from working with the UN watchdog. The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate shortly before 1100 GMT (7pm in Singapore) after spending several hours inside. Israel's offensive – which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others and in which residential areas and military sites were struck – also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called 'snapback mechanism' under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August. The sanctions trigger expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Mr Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Mr Takht-Ravanchi, wrote on X that he had used the meeting to criticise the European stance on the 12-day conflict with Israel. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability Singapore MRT service changes needed to modify 3 East-West Line stations on Changi Airport stretch: LTA Singapore S'pore could have nuclear energy 'within a few years', if it decides on it: UN nuclear watchdog chief Life 'Do you kill children?': Even before independence, S'pore has always loved its over-the-top campaigns Singapore Lung damage, poor brain development, addiction: What vaping does to the body Singapore Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges $14m lost from misconduct, poor decisions Singapore Fine for couple whose catering companies owed $432,000 in salaries to 103 employees Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly He said the snapback mechanism had also been discussed, adding: 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' Mr Takht-Ravanchi told state news agency IRNA the Iranian side had demanded 'punitive sanctions' be lifted 'as soon as possible'. Before the talks, a European source said the three countries were preparing to trigger the mechanism 'in the absence of a negotiated solution'. The source urged Iran to make 'clear gestures' on uranium enrichment and resuming cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. 'Common ground' Mr Gharibabadi warned earlier in the week that triggering sanctions – which would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy – would be 'completely illegal'. He accused European powers of 'halting their commitments' under the 2015 deal, which the United States unilaterally withdrew from in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation,' said Mr Gharibabadi. Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if sanctions were reimposed. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Israel's June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the US joined Israel's offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, the US and Iran were divided over uranium enrichment – with Tehran describing it as a 'non-negotiable' right, while Washington called it a 'red line'. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 per cent purity – far above the 3.67 per cent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Israel and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied. 'New form' Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear programme, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi describing the position as 'unshakable'. Though he claimed enrichment had come to a halt because of 'serious and severe' damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Israeli strikes, the full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Mr Trump claimed at the time the sites had been 'completely destroyed', but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments cast doubt on the scale of destruction . Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a 'new form'. Israel has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability. Iran has pledged a 'harsh response' to any future attacks. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store