Superdry relaunches with new logo, store design and business model
Superdry, the British clothing brand known for blending American vintage-preppy style with British flair, is undergoing a full-scale reboot. Celebrating its 40th anniversary, the brand returned to Pitti Uomo in Florence for the first time in over six years—marking a key moment in its transformation. 'I came back because I love this show—it's the best in Europe, maybe the world,' said Julian Dunkerton, co-founder and CEO of Superdry, speaking to FashionNetwork.com. 'But more importantly, I needed to feel proud of our product again. And I do—because we've rediscovered who we are. This is the right time to talk positively about Superdry again. Fashion's on my side too—preppy style is back. Once loved by fifty-year-olds, now embraced by 18-year-olds too.'
A year ago, Superdry exited the London Stock Exchange. 'Thank God,' Dunkerton said bluntly. 'It was like being in prison. Now I finally have the freedom to lead again. This is our opportunity to rebuild.'
The new roadmap? A blended model focused on franchising, wholesale and concessions. 'We've already launched franchises in Spain and are very likely to do so in Italy as well,' he revealed.
The company closed its fiscal year on April 30, 2025, with annual revenue down 22% to £488.6 million (€586.4 million), compared to £609.6 million in 2022. The drop was mainly due to continued weakness in the wholesale channel.
Retail also declined, though less sharply, falling 16% to £371.6 million (€446 million), impacted by reduced physical store presence and a significant 18% decline in e-commerce revenue to £146 million (€175.2 million). The brand attributes this performance to 'well-known external and macroeconomic challenges,' along with a strategic reduction in digital marketing spend to focus on profitability. That move paid off: Superdry's EBITDA margin increased by 2.2 percentage points.
Superdry currently operates 89 standalone stores in the UK and plans to expand with new locations in Amsterdam, Saint-Tropez and more cities in the UK, with the next opening scheduled in six weeks. 'Britain remains our most important market, but France is absolutely crucial,' Dunkerton noted. 'Our European focus is growing. In India and Australia, we have key partners—like Brand Collective, with whom we just extended our licensing deal by 12 more years.'
He emphasized Superdry's strong value proposition: 'We offer what I think is one of the best price-to-quality ratios in the world. A Superdry shirt retails at around €60, for example.'
'I'm happy to refocus on our core business—apparel—and our womenswear line is doing especially well,' Dunkerton said. He ruled out further brand extensions for now, though Superdry recently launched a fragrance. 'All of our polos have been redesigned with a vintage effect. We've adopted a more refined brand aesthetic with a new logo. Each product category has its own distinct identity.'
Superdry employs around 3,000 people and has subsidiaries across Europe—though not in Italy, where it works with distributor Interjeans.
'We're undergoing a rebirth,' Dunkerton concluded. 'We'll transform our stores with updated interiors and a more modern in-store experience. Our wholesale partners love the new concept. Just last week in the UK, physical store sales rose 24% year-over-year. The new Superdry journey has begun.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
16 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Trump turns NATO summit into a solo act
"Fantastic." Euphoric after the success of the Israeli–American offensive against Iran, which he described as a resounding triumph, United States President Donald Trump, exultant, presented his participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague on Wednesday, June 25 as yet another accomplishment. Trump had plenty of reasons to be pleased with how the summit unfolded. Every detail of the event was carefully tailored with one objective in mind: Don't provoke the US president, and avoid anything that might expose divisions within the Western alliance. From that perspective, the 76 th NATO summit could be counted as a success. Trump dominated it from start to finish and flew back to Washington with what he saw as a symbolic victory – the commitment from allies to raise defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP). That's what mattered most to him. He could now tell his Make America Great Again (MAGA) base that he had secured what his much-criticized predecessors never could: a more equitable sharing of the burden for European security, which the United States has underwritten since World War II. In this regard, the details were secondary – how the 5% would be divided between investments and operational expenses, the vagueness around timelines and the absence of any enforcement mechanisms. For European leaders, the outcome was far less impressive. To placate their narcissistic and unpredictable partner, they had to engage in extraordinary levels of flattery – sometimes bordering on the absurd – as in the case of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. In exchange for the 5% pledge, they managed to secure a reaffirmation in the final declaration of the "unwavering commitment to collective defense" among all allies – a nod to the enduring relevance of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. But how meaningful is that commitment coming from a US president who, even on the eve of the summit, repeatedly cast doubt on the value of Article 5? The most troubling European concession to Washington involved Russia and Ukraine. The final declaration, stripped to the bare minimum, made no mention of Russian aggression or the ongoing war in Ukraine – glaring omissions, given Trump's refusal to hold Vladimir Putin accountable. Nor did the document include even the faintest promise that Ukraine might eventually join NATO. Compared to previous summits, this was a clear step backward. Russia was referred to only as a "long-term threat," even though it has been bombing civilian targets daily in the heart of Europe and waging hybrid warfare against NATO members. Trump did agree to meet with Volodymyr Zelensky. In a show of magnanimity, he even called the Ukrainian president "likable". But he made no commitment to continuing US military aid to the country. Despite appearances, the Europeans found themselves effectively on their own. It now falls to them to stand tall and prepare for the concrete disengagement of the United States and the likely withdrawal of some of the 100,000 American troops stationed on the continent. They must help Ukraine continue to resist Russian aggression, coordinate their fragmented defense industries and reduce their dependency on the United States. Those 5% of GDP will have to be found, not to placate Trump, but to ensure Europe's own security.
France 24
17 minutes ago
- France 24
After NATO deal, how far will EU go for trade peace with Trump?
Time is running out. The European Union has until July 9 to reach a deal or see swingeing tariffs kick in on a majority of goods, unleashing economic pain. The European Commission, in charge of EU trade policy, has been in talks with Washington for weeks, and will update leaders on the state of play at Thursday's summit. The leader of the bloc's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, set the tone upon arrival. "I support the commission in all its efforts to reach a trade agreement quickly," said Merz, signalling he wants negotiators to close a deal as soon as possible -- even if it means an unbalanced outcome with the Europeans agreeing to some level of US tariffs. The EU has put a zero-percent tariff proposal on the table -- but it's widely seen as a non-starter in talks with Washington. According to several diplomats, the goal at this point is rather to let Trump claim victory without agreeing a deal that would significantly hurt Europe. One diplomat suggested leaders would be happy with a "Swiss cheese" agreement -- with a general US levy on European imports, but enough loopholes to shield key sectors such as steel, automobiles, pharmaceuticals and aeronautics. This would be less painful than the status quo with European companies currently facing 25-percent tariffs on steel, aluminium and auto goods exported to the United States, and 10 percent on a majority of EU products. Merz on Monday hit out at the EU's approach to talks with Washington as "too complicated", urging "rapid, joint decisions for four or five major industries now". The issue will be discussed over a summit dinner Thursday, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen planning to test leaders' red lines in negotiations. If no agreement is reached, the default tariff on EU imports is expected to double to 20 percent or even higher -- Trump having at one point threatened 50 percent. Keeping calm Unlike Canada or China, which hit back swiftly at Trump's tariff hikes, the EU has consistently sought to negotiate with the US leader -- threatening retaliation only if no agreement is reached. "We will not allow ourselves to be provoked, we will remain calm," said Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, urging the EU to avert an all-out trade war with Washington. "We are negotiating and we hope to reach an agreement," but "if this is not the case, we will obviously adopt countermeasures", he warned. Speaking at NATO's summit in The Hague on Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron said a trade war among alliance partners "makes no sense" at a time when they are pledging to spend more their common defence. "We can't say to each other, among allies, we need to spend more... and wage trade war against one another," Macron said. Talks between EU and US negotiators have intensified in recent weeks. "The problem is that on behalf of the United States, we have a heavyweight dealmaker -- on our side, European Union, have light capacity and capability leaders to negotiate," said Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Trump divides the Europeans. Orban and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are both vocally supportive of Trump -- while others are more wary. Meloni on Wednesday declared herself "quite optimistic" about reaching a deal and echoed Macron, albeit in a softer manner, saying spending more on defence among NATO allies went hand in hand with avoiding trade spats. Pro-trade countries in Europe's north are especially keen to avoid an escalation. The EU has threatened to slap tariffs on US goods worth around 100 billion euros, including cars and planes, if talks fail to yield an agreement -- but has not made any mention of those threats since May. The United States is also using the negotiations to try to extract concessions on EU rules -- particularly digital competition, content and AI regulations, which Washington claims unfairly target American champions such as Apple, Google, and Meta. Europeans are ready to discuss common transatlantic standards, but the EU's digital rules are a red line for Brussels.
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
How much more have billionaires amassed in the last ten years?
On the one hand, nearly half of the world's population — over 3.7 billion people — live in poverty. On the other, the world's 3,000 billionaires gained $6.5 trillion (€5.5tr) over the last ten years, the equivalent of 14.6% of global GDP. That's according to a new report from the British confederation of NGOs Oxfam. The group added that since 2015, the world's richest top 1% increased their wealth by more than $33.9tr (€29tr) in real terms. This amount could do a lot of good in the world, and according to Oxfam, it is enough to end global poverty 22 times. The prediction is based on World Bank data from 2021, showing that people living in poverty need an additional $8.30 per day on average to afford their basic needs. To not only end poverty but meet all of the other Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations, including protecting the planet, the required sum would come to $4tr a year. 'Trillions of dollars exist to meet the global goals, but they're locked away in private accounts of the ultra-wealthy,' Amitabh Behar, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said in the report. While private wealth is increasing, governments are cutting aid According to the report, wealthy governments have made the largest cuts to foreign aid since records began in 1960. 'The G7 countries alone, who account for around three-quarters of all official aid, are cutting aid by 28% for 2026 compared to 2024,' the group said. The report also noted that 60% of low-income countries, where such aid is the most needed, are on the edge of a debt crisis. Low-income countries are often considered 'risky', and they therefore pay a lot more to finance debt from the market because of high interest rates, leaving less funding for healthcare or education. Oxfam noted in its report that financing development should not rely on private investments, and instead the group recommended a 'public-first approach'. 'Rich countries have put Wall Street in the driver's seat of global development. It's a global private finance takeover which has overrun the evidence-backed ways to tackle poverty through public investments and fair taxation,' Behar said. Oxfam suggested that governments should invest in state-led development to ensure 'universal high-quality healthcare, education and care services, and explore publicly-delivered goods in sectors from energy to transportation'. However, Western governments are facing debt that is often equal to or more than their annual economic output, putting pressure on governments. Public wealth is not growing as fast as private wealth. Between 1995 and 2023, global private wealth grew eight times more than public wealth, which grew by just $44tr (€38tr). Private wealth swelled by a staggering $342tr (€292tr) in this period. For comparison, the annual global GDP is approximately $100tr (€85tr). Oxfam suggested that governments should reconsider taxing the ultra-rich, saying that billionaires pay effective tax rates close to 0.3% of their wealth. Oxfam International and Greenpeace together commissioned a survey examining what people think about taxing the rich in 13 countries, including the UK, France, Germany and Italy. 'Results of a new global survey show 9 out of 10 people support paying for public services and climate action through taxing the super-rich,' the study said, adding that there is an alarming need for financing in the UN's developmental goals. 'Only 16% of the targets for the Global Goals are on track for 2030,' it concluded.
