
Fibre optic drones: The terrifying new weapon changing the war in Ukraine
An acrid smell hangs over the town of Rodynske. A couple of minutes after we drive into the city we see where it's coming from.A 250kg glide bomb has ripped through the town's main administrative building, and taken down three residential blocks. We're visiting a day after the bomb struck, but parts of the wreckage are still smoking. From the edges of the town we hear the sound of artillery fire, and of gunshots – Ukrainian soldiers shooting down drones.Rodynske is about 15km (9 miles) north of the embattled city of Pokrovsk. Russia has been trying to capture it from the south since the autumn of last year, but Ukrainian forces have so far managed to stop Russian soldiers from marching in.So Russia has changed tactics, moving instead to encircle the city, cutting off supply routes. In the past two weeks, as hectic diplomatic efforts to bring about a ceasefire in Ukraine have failed, Russia has intensified its push, making its most significant advances since January.We find proof of that in Rodynske.Within minutes of us arriving in town, we hear a Russian drone above us. Our team runs to the closest cover available – a tree.
We press up against it so the drone won't see us. Then there's the sound of a loud explosion – it's a second drone making impact nearby. The drone above us is still hovering. For a few more minutes, we hear the terrifying whirring sound of what's become the deadliest weapon of this war.When we can't hear it any more we take the chance to run to hard cover in an abandoned building 100ft away.From the shelter, we hear the drone again. It's possible it returned after seeing our movement.That Rodynske is being swarmed by Russian drones is evidence that the attacks are coming from positions much closer than known Russian positions to the south of Pokrovsk. They were most likely coming from newly captured territory on a key road running from the east of Pokrovsk to Kostyantynivka.After half an hour of waiting in the shelter, when we can't hear the drone anymore, we move quickly to our car parked under tree cover, and speed out of Rodynske. By the side of the highway we see smoke billowing and something burning – it's most likely a downed drone.
We drive to Bilytske, further away from the frontline. We see a row of houses destroyed by a missile strike overnight. One of them was Svitlana's home."It's getting worse and worse. Earlier, we could hear distant explosions, they were far away. But now our town is getting targeted – we're experiencing it ourselves," says the 61-year-old, as she picks up a few belongings from the wreckage of her home. Luckily Svitlana wasn't at home when the attack occurred."Go into the centre of the town, you'll see so much that is destroyed there. And the bakery and zoo have been destroyed too," she says.At a safehouse just out of reach of drones, we meet soldiers of the artillery unit of the 5th Assault Brigade."You can feel the intensity of Russian assaults increasing. Rockets, mortars, drones, they're using everything they have to cut off supply routes going into the city," says Serhii.His unit has been waiting for three days to deploy to their positions, waiting for cloud cover or high-speed winds to give them protection from drones.
In an ever-evolving conflict, soldiers have had to rapidly adapt to new threats posed by changing technology. And the latest threat comes from fibre optic drones. A spool of tens of kilometres of cable is fitted to the bottom of a drone and the physical fibre optic cord is attached to the controller held by the pilot."The video and control signal is transmitted to and from the drone through the cable, not through radio frequencies. This means it can't be jammed by electronic interceptors," says a soldier with the call sign Moderator, a drone engineer with the 68th Jaeger Brigade.When drones began to be used in this war in a big way, both militaries fitted their vehicles with electronic warfare systems, which could neutralise drones. That protection has evaporated with the arrival of fibre optic drones, and in the deployment of these devices, Russia currently has the edge. Ukraine is trying to ramp up production."Russia started using fibre optic drones much before us, while we were still testing them. These drones can be used in places where we have to go lower than usual drones. We can even enter houses and look for targets inside," says Venia, a drone pilot with the 68th Jaeger Brigade."We've started joking that maybe we should carry scissors to cut the cord," says Serhii, the artillery man.Fibre optic drones do have drawbacks – they are slower and the cable could get entangled in trees. But at the moment, their widespread use by Russia means that transporting soldiers to and from their positions can often be deadlier than the battlefield itself.
"When you enter a position, you don't know whether you've been spotted or not. And if you have been spotted, then you may already be living the last hours of your life," says Oles, Chief Sergeant of the reconnaissance unit of the 5th Assault Brigade.This threat means that soldiers are spending longer and longer in their positions. Oles and his men are in the infantry, serving in the trenches right at the very front of Ukraine's defence. It's rare for journalists these days to speak to infantrymen, as it's become too risky to go to these trenches. We meet Oles and Maksym in a rural home converted into a makeshift base, where the soldiers come to rest when they're not on deployment."The longest I spent at the position was 31 days, but I do know guys who have spent 90 and even 120 days there. Back before the drones arrived, the rotations could have been between 3 or 7 days at the position," says Maksym."War is blood, death, wet mud and a chill that spreads from head to toe. And this is how you spend every day. I remember one instance when we didn't sleep for three days, alert every minute. The Russians kept coming at us wave after wave. Even a minor lapse would have meant we were dead."Oles says Russia's infantry has changed its tactics. "Earlier they attacked in groups. Now they only send one or two people at times. They also use motorcycles and in a few instances, quad bikes. Sometimes they slip through."What this means is that the front lines in some parts are no longer conventional lines with the Ukrainians on one side and the Russians on the other, but more like pieces on a chessboard during play, where positions can be intertwined.This also makes it harder to see advances made by either side.
Despite Russia's recent gains, it will not be quick or easy for it to take the whole of the Donetsk region, where Pokrovsk lies.Ukraine has pushed back hard, but it needs a steady supply of weapons and ammunition to sustain the fight.And as the war enters a fourth summer, Ukraine's manpower issues against a much bigger Russian army are also evident. Most of the soldiers we meet joined the military after the war began. They've had a few months of training, but have had to learn a lot on the job in the middle of a raging war.Maksym worked for a drinks company before he joined the military. I asked how his family copes with his job."It's hard, it's really hard. My family really supports me. But I have a two-year-old son, and I don't get to see him much. I do video call him though, so everything is as fine as it could be under the circumstances," he trails off, eyes welling up with tears.Maksym is a soldier fighting for his country, but he's also just a father missing his two-year-old boy.Additional reporting by Imogen Anderson, Sanjay Ganguly, Volodymyr Lozhko and Anastasiia Levchenko
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Western democracies have a duty to resist growing Russian aggression
SIR – Beyond the finances not adding up, which appears to be a feature of all Labour policy, the other thing that struck me about the Strategic Defence Review (report, June 4) was its leisurely response to what it acknowledged to be a present and growing threat. Surely the best answer to Russian aggression towards Europe is to increase support to Ukraine now, giving it everything we can without restrictions on use, while properly ramping up full sanctions and other deterrent actions against Russia. Russia is now weaker than it has been for some time, thanks to the extraordinary efforts of Ukraine. We in Western Europe have a moral obligation to defend Ukraine and other nations from repeated Russian aggression. Hopefully, at the same time, we may ultimately help Russia towards a better future, and deter China from resorting to conflict. Colonel Ronnie Bradford (retd) Vienna, Austria SIR – Your Leading Article (June 4) draws attention to the fact that the Prime Minister declined to set a firm date for when the defence budget would increase to 3 per cent of GDP. This gives rise to two concerns. Will 3 per cent be enough, when Nato is poised to set a new target for members to spend 5 per cent? And, given the obvious urgency of the matter, why will this happen only in the next parliament? Brigadier Rod Brummitt (retd) Bournemouth, Dorset SIR – I read your Leading Article (June 4) with incredulity. You write that 'Sir Keir dismissed calls to set specific spending targets as 'performative fantasy politics' '. When I served during the Cold War period, we mustered four armoured divisions – each of three brigades – in Germany, as well as substantial UK Land Forces and a Territorial Army of several thousand. Now, as Lewis Page has written (Comment, June 1), the Army's sole war-fighting division, which is supposed to have three brigades, is actually a two-brigade force with enough equipment for just one. As you say, 'If the deployments needed for the next two or three decades are to be met, then commitments have to be made now.' As it is, what threat does the Government believe we can deter? Lt Col Jeremy Moger (retd) Hazelbury Bryan, Dorset SIR – John Healey, the Defence Secretary, talks about a 10-year plan to get Britain ready for war (report, June 2), in the face of 'growing Russian aggression'. Does he really think that Vladimir Putin is going to wait that long? He added that the Strategic Defence Review would send a 'message to Moscow'. Mr Healey publicises his plans, while Putin hides his. It isn't hard to see who is likely to be the winner. Mick Ferrie Mawnan Smith, Cornwall


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Four men ‘torched Ukrainian-owned firm in UK on behalf of Russia's Wagner Group'
FOUR men accused of torching a Ukrainian-owned firm in the UK did so on behalf of Russia's Wagner Group, a court has heard. Goods including Starlink satellite equipment were being sent out to Kyiv from the targeted industrial estate unit. Around £1million in damage was caused when it was set alight in Leyton, East London, in March last year. Paul English, 61, Nii Kojo Mensah, 23, Jakeem Barrington Rose, 23, and Ugnius Asmena, 20, are said to have started the blaze. The Old Bailey was told that CCTV placed them driving to the scene in English's Kia Picanto. Jurors heard Rose and Mensah were seen climbing a wall to approach the warehouse, while Mensah also livestreamed the arson. Prosecutor Duncan Penny, KC, said they were paid agents motivated by 'good old-fashioned greed'. He added: 'They did not act alone . . . they were recruited by and directed by two others who have since admitted their role in the aggravated arson. 'This was deliberate and calculated criminality at the behest of foreign influence.' Vladimir Putin -controlled Wagner Group. The four deny aggravated arson. The trial continues. Full devastation of Op Spiderweb revealed as new pics show Putin's jets in RUINS after drone blitz 1


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Let's give BBC World Service the funding its power deserves
The BBC is many things to many people, from its revered children's and educational programming to the wonders of the natural world, with Sir David Attenborough a trusted guide. In the UK, we are fortunate to have a healthy creative industries and media sector that thrives on the talents of our nation and represents all corners of the country. But how much value does the BBC have internationally? It is a question the government appears to be taking seriously. In January it launched the Soft Power Council with the aim of boosting economic growth and security. • BBC World Service cuts 'leave gap for Russia and China' A central part of the UK's soft power is the BBC World Service, which operates in 42 languages — 43 if you count the recently announced BBC News Polska offer — and delivers independent news to hundreds of millions of people every hour of the day. During decades of drawn-out and bloody wars, through prolonged periods of enforced isolation, the BBC World Service has a history of providing information for those desperately in need. And it's still doing it today, launching urgent services in recent times in countries facing unimaginable horror. Notable interventions include extended broadcasts for Ukraine as the war erupted, a radio service in Sudan as civil combat ensued and enhanced services for Myanmar after the devastating earthquake. And yet among the geopolitical friction and cultural chasms that underlie global conflicts and catastrophes, a more pernicious threat has taken hold. Earlier this year, the latest Global Risks Report published by the World Economic Forum registered disinformation and misinformation as the most prominent risk facing the world. Disinformation drives doubt, division and destabilisation by playing on our insecurities. It has the power to enrage, to shock and to provoke. In the modern world, disinformation is everywhere, fuelled by self-interested states and turbo-charged by artificial intelligence. • Maga propaganda takeover looms for silenced Voice of America In a febrile climate, this can have devastating results. But there is hope. In Nigeria, misinformation that President Tinubu had forged his university documents led to significant unrest until the BBC debunked the claims, calming the situation. In Pakistan, a viral video with more than 400,000 views on X claimed to show an explosion caused by a Pakistani response to hostilities with India over Kashmir. In fact, the images were from the 2020 Beirut port explosion in Lebanon. The BBC's teams used fact-checking, data analysis and video verification to either debunk the content or at least give it more context. Countering disinformation and providing verified, independent news is what makes the BBC World Service the most trusted international news provider in the world. Recent research also found that it is the most well-recognised British cultural export, alongside our world-beating universities, first-class film industry and the Premier League. The organisation drives a favourable attitude towards the UK and also notably increases the likelihood of its audience wanting to invest here. That's not bad for a product the government terms 'soft power'. Let us hope that next week's spending review settlement for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office includes additional resources to restore some of the lost funding to this great British asset. Lord Blunkett was home secretary between 2001 and 2004