Newcastle Advertiser's chuckle of the week
Finally, they settle on the Ocean View restaurant, because the waitresses there are gorgeous.
Ten years later at age 50 the friends once again discuss where they should meet for lunch.
Finally, it is agreed that they will dine at the Ocean View restaurant because the food is good and the wine selection excellent.
Ten years later at age 60 the friends again discuss where they should have lunch and finally agree to meet at the Ocean View because they can dine in peace and quiet while looking at the beautiful view.
Ten years later at age 70 the friends discuss where they should meet for lunch.
The Ocean View is agreed upon because wheelchair access and a lift.
Ten years later at age 80 the three men discuss where they should meet for lunch.
Finally it is agreed that they will meet at the Ocean View because they have never been there before.
ALSO READ: Lifestyle: Savour a delicious biltong pasta with this easy recipe
The news provided to you in this link has been investigated and compiled by the editorial staff of the Newcastle Advertiser, a sold newspaper distributed in the Newcastle area. Please follow us on Youtube and feel free to like, comment, and subscribe. For more local news, visit our webpage, follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and request an add on our WhatsApp (082 874 5550).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Warren Hammond's Personal View: March 2016 Forecast 'The USA - The next 18 years' at the halfway mark
' Radical change, transformation, and upheaval ' – in a note released on March 14, 2016, I forecasted that these characteristics would define the USA's next 18 years. Nearly a decade later, the picture is clear. The forecast was designed to inform investment choices, providing a framework for regional, asset class, sector, and security selection, to ensure decisions were both well-informed and highly effective in investment selection and duration. I identified three key areas where change would be most visible and landscape-shaping: Technology Boom: Exponential, accelerating growth across all things technical. Debt Reckoning: An inevitable restructuring of finance, breaking the cycle of cheap money and debt-led consumption. Environmental Revolution: Sweeping policy changes, with water at the centre. I noted that the USA had entered a long-term pattern of radical change, transformation, innovation, and upheaval. It wasn't just policy shifts; a structural overhaul was essential to heal its dependence on cheap money, debt-led consumption, and risky investment. The political backdrop was already unconventional, and the Clinton vs. Trump race signalled that the USA had entered a non-traditional era of leadership choices, reflecting broader systemic shifts. Based solely on the characteristics of this forecast, with no personal preference or bias, The Personal View, in a separate note reiterated throughout 2016, forecast Donald Trump's first presidential win. The original note warned that while long-term results could be positive, the cycle would be marked by volatility and upheaval, especially as debt and risky investment remained 'the nectar of the Gods'. I wrote that the USA might face significant brand damage and public discredit before structural reform and overhaul could take hold. On the environmental side, I foresaw not just policy shifts but a revolution in attitudes toward managing natural resources, with water playing a pivotal role. Almost 10 years on, how close was this to today's reality? Looking ahead to 2033, will these trends continue? Remember, for The Personal View, 'expected' in the context of this forecast, was stated as being 'disorderly, disruptive, fiery, unexpected, and transformative change that upends the status quo, sweeps away what has served historically, and installs deep structural change'. In 2016, I closed the note with a challenge: 'In 18 years, we will see to what extent this view is verifiable.' At the halfway point, that question remains open and is worth asking again today. Do these trends reflect what you see unfolding in the USA? Share your perspective and join the conversation on the next 18 years of transformation. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Shell and Total dealt devastating South Africa offshore drilling blow
The Western Cape High Court has refused environmental authorisation for offshore drilling in a venture led by French energy giant TotalEnergies off South Africa's west coast, in a ruling on Thursday. The High Court said on Wednesday the environment ministry's 2023 go-ahead for exploratory operations in the roughly 10 000-square-kilometre block near Cape Town had been 'reviewed and set aside'. Environmental lobby groups that launched a legal challenge against the project said it would harm marine life. The block is jointly owned by South Africa's state oil company PetroSA, TotalEnergies and British oil heavyweight Shell, with the French firm serving as the operator. In a statement to AFP, TotalEnergies said the venture complied with all required local regulations, including environmental and social, from the outset and it would assess the judgement. Although it had already announced its exit from exploration in the block, it remains 'fully committed to respecting the judicial process to its term', the company said. In overturning the environmental permit, the judge Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood said TotalEnergies could reapply for authorisation after public consultation. Green Connection, one of the groups that filed the legal challenge, said the ruling was a major victory for coastal communities and small-scale fishers. 'Oil spill and blowout contingency plans were kept from the public until after approval, denying communities a chance to comment,' it said in a statement. Interest in oil and gas exploration off South Africa's coast has surged in recent years, driven in part by major discoveries across the maritime border in Namibia and broader energy activity in southern Africa, including Mozambique. The Natural Justice group of environmental lawyers said Wednesday's judgement affirmed that all companies needed to follow due process before seeking the green light for oil exploration off South Africa. 'We will continue to turn to our courts to not only stop the takers who parade under the guise of growth and development, but to ensure that impacts of oil and gas exploration and production are properly scrutinised and that our people and our resources are not exploited,' it said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
WhatsApp accuses Moscow of trying to block secure communication for millions of Russians
Russia said on Wednesday that it had started restricting some WhatsApp, owned by Meta Platforms META.O, and Telegram calls, accusing the foreign-owned platforms of failing to share information with law enforcement in fraud and terrorism cases. Text messaging services and voice notes are currently unaffected. A simmering dispute with foreign tech providers intensified after Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with Russia blocking Meta's Facebook and Instagram, slowing the speed of Alphabet's GOOGL.O YouTube and issuing hundreds of fines to platforms that failed to comply with Russian rules on online content and data storage. 'WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people,' WhatsApp said late on Wednesday. 'We will keep doing all we can to make end-to-end encrypted communication available to people everywhere, including in Russia.' Telegram said its moderators were using AI tools to monitor public parts of the platform to remove millions of malicious messages every day. 'Telegram actively combats harmful use of its platform including calls for sabotage or violence and fraud,' Telegram said. In July 2025, WhatsApp's monthly reach in Russia was 97.3 million people, compared to 90.8 million for Telegram, according to Mediascope data. Third-placed VK Messenger, an offering from state-controlled tech company VK reached 17.9 million people. Russia has a population of more than 140 million people. STEADY DEGRADATION Russia banning WhatsApp and Telegram users from making calls comes as the government is actively promoting a new state-controlled messaging app, MAX, that will be integrated with government services and which critics fear could track its users' activities. Senior politicians are migrating to MAX, urging their followers to come with them. Anton Gorelkin, a leading regulator of Russia's IT sector in parliament, said he would post to his MAX followers first and said many other lawmakers would soon follow suit. WhatsApp's other services remain available for now, but the steady degradation of a service is a tactic Russia has employed before, notably with YouTube, where slower download speeds have made it harder for people to access content. Human Rights Watch said in a report last month that Russia has been 'meticulously expanding [its] legal and technological tools to carve out Russia's section of the internet into a tightly controlled and isolated forum '. Lawmakers have approved a new law that tightens censorship and could have sweeping ramifications for digital privacy, with Russians facing fines if they search online for content Moscow considers 'extremist', including via virtual private networks that millions use to bypass internet blocks.
