
Ask the expert: Can you explain the types of car insurance write-offs?
Dear Alex,
My insurer intends to write off my 58,000-mile 2016 Peugeot 3008 following a collision in which most of the front panels require replacement. But otherwise, it's in great shape and very economical, so I have asked them to reconsider. If they decline and offer me cash (enough to cover the repair cost), would it be sensible to get it repaired? If it is, how would I go about it?
– JL
Dear JL,
As long as your car isn't a Category A or B write-off, which means it cannot be put back on the road, the insurer will be quite happy to sell it back to you. They'll then give you the cash insurance payout, less the amount you're paying for the car, then it's yours to keep.
If the car is deemed a Category N write-off – the damage is not structural – you can repair it and put it back on the road, although you'll need to notify the DVLA of its Category N status.
If your insurer marks the car as a Category S (ie structural) write-off, it will need a new MOT inspection once it's been repaired. You'll also need to apply for a new registration document because your old one will have to be surrendered to your insurer.
Might this be worth it? As far as I can tell, you'd have to pay about £8,000 to buy an identical 3008, so, in theory, that's what your insurer should be paying out.
However, a Category N write-off will be worth significantly less – at the time of writing, the only one I can see for sale with similar mileage to yours is going for £4,000.
Therefore, the remedial work is only worth doing if the cost of the car combined with the cost of the repair is not going to be any more than £4,000. That way, you'll have the remaining £4,000-odd left over from the insurance payout to compensate you for the loss of value on the car.
If it's going to cost more, I don't think I'd bother, no matter how nice the car is. There are plenty more Peugeot 3008s out there – it isn't a rare car yet – so it should be relatively easy to take the payout, buy a replacement and save yourself the hassle of getting the repair work done.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
8 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
RAC warn millions of UK drivers over number plate fault
These plates have a reflective coating, which prevents them from being identified by speed cameras and roadside ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras. Online sites are also flogging self-adhesive laminate covers that can be stuck to existing plates, rendering them invisible to enforcement cameras. The British Number Plate Manufacturers Association, which represents companies producing the vast majority of plates in the UK, wants tougher regulation of the sector to crack down on illegal suppliers. Trading Standards and the DVLA are calling for a crackdown on sales of illegal 'ghost plates' on cars. They are fake or altered number plates that can't be read by police cameras. They're becoming an increasing problem on UK roads with drivers, often linked to criminal gangs or… — Good Morning Britain (@GMB) June 3, 2025 Its chairman warned that the products are 'enabling serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected'. In addition to selling ghost plates, online retailers are brazenly offering transparent films and reflective sprays that obscure a plate's letter and number combination under infrared light. Sprays are advertised by sellers on well-known online retailers for around £4. Some are also selling plates with subtly altered characters to disrupt camera software's ability to recognise them accurately. BNMA chairman Michael Flanagan said: "Far from being the tightly regulated industry it should be, number plates are increasingly being sold by unscrupulous below-the-radar suppliers using non-compliant, untraceable materials. "They rarely ask for the documentation that the DVLA require. "This is a criminal offence and enables serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected. Recommended reading: "Motorists deserve to know they are buying a legal, compliant number plate from a legitimate supplier. "Now is the time for the Government to tighten the regulations." RAC head of policy Simon Williams, who will also attend the roundtable with MPs today, added: "Given the proliferation of number plate recognition cameras used for various types of enforcement, it simply isn't right that criminals can get away with these offences by easily purchasing illegal ghost plates. "Together with the modern motoring menace that is cloned number plates, where blameless drivers have to prove their innocence for motoring offences they didn't commit, it's apparent these are serious and growing problems that need solutions."


Powys County Times
9 hours ago
- Powys County Times
RAC warn millions of UK drivers over number plate fault
The Government is being urged to clamp down on the rise in availability of illegal number plates. These plates have a reflective coating, which prevents them from being identified by speed cameras and roadside ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras. Online sites are also flogging self-adhesive laminate covers that can be stuck to existing plates, rendering them invisible to enforcement cameras. The British Number Plate Manufacturers Association, which represents companies producing the vast majority of plates in the UK, wants tougher regulation of the sector to crack down on illegal suppliers. Trading Standards and the DVLA are calling for a crackdown on sales of illegal 'ghost plates' on cars. They are fake or altered number plates that can't be read by police cameras. They're becoming an increasing problem on UK roads with drivers, often linked to criminal gangs or… — Good Morning Britain (@GMB) June 3, 2025 Its chairman warned that the products are 'enabling serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected'. In addition to selling ghost plates, online retailers are brazenly offering transparent films and reflective sprays that obscure a plate's letter and number combination under infrared light. Sprays are advertised by sellers on well-known online retailers for around £4. Some are also selling plates with subtly altered characters to disrupt camera software's ability to recognise them accurately. BNMA chairman Michael Flanagan said: "Far from being the tightly regulated industry it should be, number plates are increasingly being sold by unscrupulous below-the-radar suppliers using non-compliant, untraceable materials. "They rarely ask for the documentation that the DVLA require. "This is a criminal offence and enables serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected. "Motorists deserve to know they are buying a legal, compliant number plate from a legitimate supplier. "Now is the time for the Government to tighten the regulations." RAC head of policy Simon Williams, who will also attend the roundtable with MPs today, added: "Given the proliferation of number plate recognition cameras used for various types of enforcement, it simply isn't right that criminals can get away with these offences by easily purchasing illegal ghost plates.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mother was terrified she'll be dragged to court after over £770 in bus lane fines when taxi was registered at her her address
A mother bombarded with 11 bus lane fines feared she would be dragged into court after a taxi was registered to her home. Shocked Anna Brunskill was horrified when she received a notice from the DVLA on April 23 telling her a vehicle had been registered at her address in Warrington with a name she did not recognise. Since then the 49-year-old has received almost a dozen £70 bus lane penalty notices, racking up to £770 in total. She said nine of these charges were posted to her on the same day of May 15 - despite her having no idea who owns the car now tied to her home address. The marketing manager has already alerted the DVLA and Warrington Borough Council to inform them of the situation. Anna spotted the vehicle appears to have a taxi light on its roof in the photos on the penalty notices. She said there was a chance it was an innocent mistake, as there are two roads with similar names in the area. But she was concerned due to the sudden volume of fines. However, Warrington Borough Council, in Cheshire, confirmed it was a 'genuine mistake'. Describing the debacle, Anna said: 'We suddenly got 11 fines in the post. 'I think that's what raised my suspicions more than anything. 'We don't know this person, we've lived at this address for 14 years and we don't know the car at all. 'That's not very nice, it's a bit worrying especially these days with identity fraud. 'It's definitely alarming and the fact that he only bought this car in April just before we started getting these fines.' When she received the notice that a new vehicle had been registered at her address, confused Anna swiftly rang the DVLA to report this to them. She said they told her they would open a case for her and then on May 8 Anna received the first bus lane fine for the car that had been registered to her address. She said rang the local council, who told her to get an acknowledgement form from the DVLA and send it to them so they could pause the charges. While on the phone with the council, Anna says she was told that there were 10 other penalty charges for the car registered at her address. Two days later she received a huge stack of them through the post. Since then Anna has received confirmation from the DVLA that her address has been removed from their records. Anna said: 'It was worrying. 'I was more worried about the bus lane to be honest and the DVLA bit because I thought, you don't want to not be paying your penalty notices. 'You can get all sorts of things against your name can't you if you don't sort things like that? So that was my main worry. 'You could get a county court judgement against you. 'When you're talking about county court judgements and stuff it can affect your credit history and all sorts. 'It is absolutely irritating, I probably spent about three hours in total speaking to people, being on hold, waiting for people. 'They've all been very helpful to be fair but time out of your working day isn't great.' The DVLA said that any motorist who receives fines or correspondence for a vehicle they do not own should contact Action Fraud, the issuing authority of any fines or penalties and also write to DVLA giving as much information as possible. They said that if the DVLA is made aware of an error on the vehicle record, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence, the Agency will remove the address details from the vehicle record. They explained it is an offence to knowingly provide false information or documents to the DVLA under the Road Traffic Act 1972. A Warrington Borough Council spokesman said: 'Unfortunately, a genuine mistake was made when the taxi driver's vehicle was registered with the DVLA. 'Ms Brunskill's fines for driving in a bus lane have now been cancelled, and no further action will be taken.'