Microsoft sued for killing Windows 10 — could this lawsuit force a shocking U-turn?
Windows 10
's official support ends in October 2025, but not everyone is ready to move on. A California resident has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, claiming that the company's decision will unfairly force millions of people to buy expensive upgrades. The case raises important issues concerning fairness, e-waste, and consumer rights.
A California man,
Lawrence Klein
, is suing Microsoft over its plan to phase out Windows 10 support in October 2025, citing high user numbers, stringent
Windows 11 hardware requirements
, and potential e-waste, as per a report by TechRadar.
What is the big deal about this lawsuit?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Remember Him? Sit Down Before You See What He Looks Like Now
33 Bridges
Undo
Klein says that Microsoft's plan to stop support is against consumer and business codes because almost half of all Windows users still depend on the OS. The lawsuit cites recent numbers that show Windows 10 has a market share of about 43%, which is much higher than that of earlier OS versions at the same stage.
ALSO READ
: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe
The lawsuit demands that Microsoft provide free updates until adoption rates drop significantly, arguing that current policies unfairly force costly and unnecessary upgrades, as per a report by TechRadar.
Live Events
Are Windows 11's hardware rules too harsh?
Klein's strongest point is that Microsoft made the hardware requirements for Windows 11 too high. About 240 million devices can't upgrade without being replaced because they don't have TPM 2.0 security chips or some modern CPUs.
Some people say that this could lead to millions of still-working PCs being thrown away, which would cause a huge
e-waste crisis
. Some people think that Microsoft's push for "Copilot+ PCs" is just a thinly veiled way to get people to buy new computers, as per a report by TechRadar.
ALSO READ:
Betrayal? Outrage erupts as Trump reportedly makes secret Alaska natural resource offer to Putin
Is it possible for Microsoft to change its mind?
Even if Klein's lawsuit doesn't win, it could put enough public pressure on Microsoft to change its mind. The company has already given in once by offering a free year of extended support if users sync certain settings to OneDrive instead of charging $30, as per a report by TechRadar.
But for a lot of people, that's not enough. The lawsuit suggests linking the end of support to adoption rates instead of set deadlines. This could make the transition easier and cut down on upgrades that aren't needed.
ALSO READ:
Microsoft eyes remote work crackdown, office return could be imminent - here's what it means for staff
The Big Picture
This case isn't just about keeping an old operating system alive; it's also about finding a balance between being responsible and being creative. If Microsoft sticks to its current plan, millions of people may have to buy expensive new hardware or use systems that aren't safe. If it changes, it could set a standard for how tech companies deal with changes in the future.
The lawsuit is already getting people talking more about corporate responsibility, sustainable tech policies, and how much control users should have over their devices, no matter what the court decides.
FAQs
When will Windows 10 support officially end?
Microsoft plans to discontinue support on October 14, 2025.
Why is Microsoft being sued?
The lawsuit claims that ending support too soon will harm consumers and generate massive e-waste due to strict Windows 11 hardware requirements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Air Canada flight attendants officially launch nationwide strike, grounding hundreds of flights
Over 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees ( CUPE ), initiated a strike at 1:00 am EDT on Saturday, August 16, 2025. This action follows the expiration of a decade-long contract in March and a subsequent eight-month deadlock in negotiations. The strike has effectively grounded the airline's operations, impacting approximately 130,000 passengers daily. Air Canada has suspended all flights for the duration of the work stoppage, including those operated by Air Canada Rouge. However, regional services operated by Jazz Aviation and PAL Airlines remain unaffected. The heart of the dispute by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo At the core of the dispute is the issue of compensation. CUPE contends that flight attendants are not compensated for significant portions of their work, including critical safety checks, attending to onboard medical and safety emergencies, and assisting passengers with boarding and deplaning. The union also highlights that entry-level flight attendants' wages have increased by only 10 percent ($3 per hour) over the past 25 years, failing to keep pace with inflation. In response, Air Canada proposed a 38 percent total compensation increase over four years, including an 8 percent raise in the first year. However, CUPE rejected this offer, arguing that the real increase for many members is just 17.2 percent, insufficient to address the rising cost of living. Live Events Government Intervention Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu has expressed concern over the lack of progress in negotiations and has urged both parties to return to the bargaining table. The government is advocating for continued dialogue to achieve an agreement and avoid further disruptions. Public opinion appears to favor the flight attendants, with 59 percent of Canadians supporting their push for boarding pay. This widespread support underscores the public's recognition of the essential services provided by flight attendants and the importance of fair compensation. Impact on Travelers The strike has left thousands of travelers stranded or facing significant delays. Air Canada has canceled hundreds of flights, and passengers are advised not to go to the airport without a confirmed new booking. The airline is offering full refunds and limited rebooking options through other airlines, although seats are scarce due to high summer demand. The strike is expected to continue, potentially causing further disruptions in air travel. Travelers are urged to stay updated on the situation and consider alternative arrangements. The outcome of this labor dispute will have lasting implications for labor relations in the airline industry and may set a precedent for future negotiations.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explained: The rise of fake productivity at work; how employees are ‘task-masking' to look busy
If your calendar looks like a Mumbai local at rush hour and Teams pings like a Diwali bazaar, you're not alone; that bustle may not be real productivity. But it may not be real productivity. A new workplace habit is spreading: Fake productivity, the theatre of looking busy while sidestepping high-impact work. One recent clue: A Workhuman poll found more than a third of UK employees (36%) admit to 'pretend productivity', driven by pressure to appear constantly active and to protect work–life balance. In parallel, leaders are wrestling with 'productivity paranoia': Microsoft's Work Trend Index reports 85% of managers say hybrid work makes it hard to trust productivity, even as employees themselves report feeling productive—an optics paradox tailor-made for performative busyness. The conditions are ideal for what social and workplace commentators now call task-masking—performative micro-tasks (reply-all, calendar clutter, meeting hopscotch) that signal effort without moving outcomes. Media analyses link the behaviour to return-to-office pressures and the surveillance vibe of 'bossware,' which nudge people to show activity over achievement. Meanwhile, collaboration load has ballooned: Microsoft shows people attend roughly three times more Teams meetings than in February 2020, while investigative summaries of Atlassian's State of Teams suggest tens of billions of work hours are lost yearly to pings, low-value meetings and duplicated effort. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Add the cognitive drain of video calls—Stanford's validated Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue scale has tied specific design factors (mirror anxiety, close-up eye contact) to depleted energy—and you get a recipe for surface-level work that 'looks' productive but isn't. This is not simply a moral failing; it is a systems problem. Always-on messaging fuels telepressure—the compulsive urge to respond—which research in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology connects to poorer sleep, higher burnout and worse work–life balance. People learn to survive the signal-choked day by doing visible tasks that keep the Slack dot green. The result: energy burns on the appearance of work, outcomes lag, and trust erodes. Understanding why task-masking thrives—and how to replace it with outcome-first habits—is now a core career skill. What exactly is 'task-masking' (and how is it different from simple busyness)? Task-masking is performative busyness: Behaviours that signal industriousness (typing loudly, darting between meetings, carrying a laptop everywhere) while avoiding deep, outcome-bearing work. The label has spread through Gen-Z-heavy social feeds and newsrooms. Analysts describe it as a productivity theatre tuned for the open-plan and the activity dashboard. The underlying prevalence is plausible given Workhuman's finding that 36% of UK workers confess to 'pretend productivity,' often to escape burnout or unrealistic expectations. The psychology and systems that fuel fake productivity Fake productivity doesn't emerge in a vacuum—it's shaped by systems that reward responsiveness, visibility and performative hustle. At the centre is telepressure: the compulsive need to answer messages instantly, regardless of urgency. Multiple studies in occupational psychology link this behaviour to poor sleep, elevated burnout and fractured work–life boundaries. But the pressure isn't confined to pings and emails. According to Microsoft's 2023 Work Trend Index, employees now attend nearly three times as many Teams meetings as they did before the pandemic. That explosion in meeting load may aim to increase coordination, but it comes at the cost of cognitive fragmentation and depleted focus time. The problem is compounded by the medium itself. Stanford's research on Zoom fatigue finds that constant video calls introduce non-verbal stressors—close-up eye contact, mirror anxiety, and reduced mobility—that accelerate exhaustion across the day. Layered on top is the rise of digital presenteeism—the compulsion to appear online and 'active' even when unwell or mentally drained. According to the CIPD & Simplyhealth Health and Wellbeing at Work survey (2022), 81% of UK organisations reported presenteeism among remote workers, compared to 65% in physical workplaces. The numbers expose a system where visibility trumps well-being—and where looking busy matters more than being effective. Together, these factors fuel task-masking: a survival strategy in a workplace architecture built for appearances. Why Gen Z is over-indexed on task-masking Gen Z did not invent pretend work, but they are operating in a post-pandemic labour market where visibility is often misread as value. Return-to-office rules, legacy KPIs and leader distrust make 'being seen' a protective strategy. Coverage of task-masking consistently spotlights younger workers navigating visibility politics while fearing job loss or AI displacement. At the same time, values have shifted: Deloitte's 2025 global survey finds Gen Z prioritises well-being, balance and learning ; they will comply with optics if outcomes and boundaries are unclear, but they are quick to disengage from rituals that feel meaningless. Several surveys show that many Gen Z workers resist full-time office returns, increasing the temptation to 'signal' productivity when present rather than to refactor the work itself. Task-masking and quiet quitting: Cousins, not twins Quiet quitting is disengagement to the contractual minimum; task-masking is disengagement disguised as hustle. According to Gallup's State of the Global Workplace 2024 report, only 21% of employees worldwide were actively engaged at work. The majority were either disengaged or quietly quitting, creating ideal conditions for fake productivity to flourish. In such environments, workers are more likely to adopt surface-level behaviours that signal busyness, such as excessive meetings or constant online presence, rather than contributing to meaningful outcomes. When trust is low and objectives are fuzzy, people hedge: They keep the lights blinking, attend everything, and avoid risk. In that sense, task-masking can be the performative arm of quiet quitting—a way to stay safe while mentally stepping back. How managers create (or crush) faux productivity Leaders can unintentionally train teams to optimise for optics: Obsessing over green dots, input metrics and time online. Microsoft's 2022–2025 data calls this 'productivity paranoia,' visible when managers track activity rather than outcomes and calendars swell to compensate. A related body of research, Atlassian's State of Teams report, highlights the enormous time sink caused by pings, meetings, and duplicated effort. It estimates that billions of work hours are lost annually to ineffective collaboration. The fix is not more dashboards; it is clarity (what is the outcome, who owns it), cadence (fewer, sharper meetings) and evidence (show progress with artefacts, not attendance). Bottom line Fake productivity isn't laziness—it's a symptom of misaligned systems. In today's workplace, visibility has become a proxy for value. When calendars are packed and Slack is never silent, activity becomes the performance, not the means to an end. Employees aren't defying work; they're adapting to cultures where being seen outweighs producing results. Task-masking emerges as the rational response to environments that reward optics over output. Quiet quitting and fake productivity aren't opposites—they're parallel forms of disengagement. One retreats quietly, the other performs loudly. Both thrive when trust is low, goals are vague, and measurement skews toward motion instead of meaning. In this landscape, the green dot—the little status indicator once meant to show availability—has evolved into a badge of allegiance, a digital placeholder for presence. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explained: Are you a DIY (Direct) mutual fund investor? Avoid making these mistakes
Investing through direct mutual fund plans—bypassing advisors and intermediaries—appeals to many investors for its lower costs and greater control. However, common missteps can derail this DIY approach and impact long-term returns. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency According to some mutual fund advisors, many DIY investors are concerned about the poor performance of their investments and taking wrong investment decisions in their eagerness to salvage their investments. Also Read | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund and Bandhan Small Cap Fund among 8 mutual funds which received over Rs 1,000 crore inflow in July Best MF to invest Looking for the best mutual funds to invest? Here are our recommendations. View Details » by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Would you like to know more? Undo If you are one of those 'direct' investors, here are some pointers for you. Don't rush your decisions. Every financial choice comes with a cost. Many new investors, in their rush to exit a scheme, overlook charges like exit loads and capital gains tax—realising the impact only after the decision is made. It's important to remember that redeeming your investment too early can invite taxes and penalties. For instance, some funds may also levy an exit load if you sell before the specified holding period. Being aware of these costs can help you avoid unpleasant surprises and make more informed investment decisions. Live Events Relying too much on forums and free advice It doesn't matter whether you began investing in mutual funds after thorough research or simply took the plunge. What matters now is that, as an investor, you continue to build and refine your understanding of mutual funds. Relying solely on generic advice from friends or online forums can often mislead you, especially when such guidance ignores your risk appetite, investment horizon, and financial goals. That's why it's in your best interest to stay reasonably well-informed. A sound knowledge base will not only help you avoid costly mistakes but also strengthen your journey of wealth creation through mutual funds. Clashing expert opinions can confuse Many DIY investors often post the same query across multiple forums or seek advice from several 'experts.' These experts could be fellow investors, active advisors, or even those running the forums themselves. Sometimes the guidance overlaps, but often it differs. One should always remember that they don't need consensus from every expert before making a decision. Each advisor will interpret your situation differently. Instead of chasing uniformity, pick one trusted source—be it a friend, colleague, forum, or online advisor—and avoid overcomplicating things. Diverse opinions are natural, but they shouldn't cost you your peace of mind. Also Read | Top 5 mid cap mutual funds to invest in August 2025 Educate yourself Hiring an advisor to manage your investments doesn't mean you should stop learning about mutual funds yourself. Many investors often share stories of being misled by unscrupulous advisors. To protect your interests, it's important to stay updated, track your portfolio, and keep enhancing your knowledge. This not only helps you safeguard your investments but also maximises your wealth-building potential. Even seasoned investors never get complacent—they continue learning to sharpen their skills and improve their mutual fund strategies. Hire a professional You may not like to hearthis, but it's important advice. If managing everything on your own feels overwhelming, consider hiring an experienced mutual fund advisor to guide you. Ask trusted friends or colleagues for recommendations and choose someone reliable. With the right advisor by your side, you won't need to stress about your investments every time markets face a rough patch. A thoughtful DIY strategy, driven by discipline and clarity and based on your risk appetite, investment horizon, and goals, can be just as effective and rewarding as managed investing. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
