John Swinney to host summit on reducing youth violence
The Scottish Government pledged that funding for the Scottish Violence Reduction Unit will rise by 7% to £1.217m.
The money comes in the wake of the deaths of teenagers Amen Teklay, 15, and Kayden Moy, 16, who both died this year after allegedly being stabbed.
Three teenage boys, aged 14, 15, and 16 years old have been arrested and charged in connection with the death of Amen Teklay, an Eritrean refugee, in Glasgow on March 5. PA Media People attend a vigil for Eritrean refugee Amen Teklay, 15, who died from fatal injuries in March (Mike Boyd/PA Wire).
In recent weeks, three teenage boys – a pair aged 17, and a 14-year-old – have appeared in court charged with the murder of Kayden Moy who was attacked on Irvine Beach, North Ayrshire, on May 17 and died in hospital.
Later this month, a march against knife crime, Parents Against Knives, will take place in Glasgow organised by the family of Kory McCrimmon, 16, who died after he was stabbed in a park in Glasgow's east end on May 21 2024.
Police Scotland said that the total number of serious assaults by 11 to 18-year-olds fell 27% between 2019/20 and 2024/25 from 428 to 313, according to the Scottish Government.
An additional £82,000 funding for the Scottish Violence Reduction Unit was announced this week, and Medics Against Violence also received increased funding of up to £345,000 while a further £156,000 has been awarded to the Mentors in Violence Prevention programme.
The summit on Thursday will include the Justice and Education secretaries, Ministers for Children and for Victims and Community Safety, cross-party MSPs, youth workers and community programmes.
It follows discussions led by Mr Swinney to hear young people and families' experiences and ideas on possible solutions, and will focus on education and community engagement with young people and possible strategies preventing them from turning to anti-social behaviour or carrying a weapon.
Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: 'Scotland remains a safe place to live.
'But more needs to be done to change the attitudes and behaviours of some who are at risk of violence, or young people considering carrying a weapon.
'There is no place for violence in Scotland and anyone who commits a crime will face the consequences.
'Our work remains focused on ensuring our prevention and punishment measures respond to the changing behaviours of young people. This includes ensuring good school and community engagement with young people, appropriate police powers and tackling the root causes of violence.
'At this meeting we want to hear the views of the youth work and third sector representatives on what more, or different, can be done, within the current financial climate, to help address this issue.
'The role of youth work and grassroots community intervention is key.
'We all must work together to help young people feel safe and realise that carrying a knife is never the answer.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
MoD slammed after ministers not told about US troops on Scottish soil
Last year, it emerged that a new base in Lossiemouth, in Moray, would host American Poseidon P8 anti-submarine spy and war planes. When the site opened in May 2024, it became the first time the US military had a presence in Scotland since the end of the Cold War. The Scottish Greens raised concerns that the move signalled the UK Government forging 'closer military relations' with Donald Trump while he is cosying up to Russian president Vladimir Putin. Stop the War said that the decision to allow US troops to be stationed in Scotland without consulting Holyrood should be 'condemned'. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' The National lodged a Freedom of Information (FOI) request with the Scottish Government for any correspondence from the MoD regarding the decision to allow US troops to have a presence in Scotland. 'The Scottish Government does not hold the information you have requested, as matters relating to Defence are reserved to the UK Government,' the response from an official in the Veteran's Unit said. 'As a result, this information is not shared with the Scottish Government. As such, I hereby provide you with formal notice under section 17(1) of FOISA that the Scottish Government does not have the information you have requested.' The MoD previously refuted any suggestion there was a US military base in Scotland, following an investigation by the Ferret. Instead they insisted it was a US 'presence' with a 'US naval detachment' at Lossiemouth. The US navy helped to fund the construction of the new facility where its war planes will be housed, and are set to work alongside UK aircraft. Arianne Burgess, the Scottish Greens MSP who represents the area covering Lossiemouth, said: "A lot of local people will be shocked by these revelations and with the lack of any announcement or basic information. (Image: AP) "The last thing we should be doing is forging even closer military relations with Donald Trump, especially at a time when he is cozying up to Putin and arming genocide against the people of Gaza. "It's time for the Ministry of Defence to level with people and come clean about its arrangements. "With Keir Starmer seemingly joined at the hip with the White House it's more important than ever that Scotland forges its own foreign policy based on human rights, peace and a rejection of the values of Donald Trump." A spokesperson for Stop the War said that there should be 'no US troops or weapons on UK soil'. 'They do not make us any safer from the threats that the warmonger politicians are so enthusiastic about talking up in order to justify increases in defence spending while cutting welfare and hitting the most vulnerable in society the hardest,' they added. READ MORE: SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK 'That the MoD has stationed US troops at RAF Lossiemouth without consultation with Holyrood is of course to be condemned, but comes as no surprise given the Westminster government also allowed US nuclear weapons to be placed at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk without any transparency or debate in Parliament." A spokesperson for the MoD said: "The United States is the UK's closest defence and security partner. As NATO allies, we regularly conduct exercises and operations together to support European and global security. "Defence supports hundreds of thousands of high-skilled jobs across the UK, including over 26,000 in Scotland." US troops had been based in Scotland since the 1960s, including nuclear armed submarines at Holy Loch on the Clyde. After the Cold War ended in 1991, US forces left Holy Loch in 1992. They then left Machranish on the Mull of Kintyre, where nuclear mines were housed, in 1995, and Edzell in Aberdeenshire, a signals intelligence network, in 1997. It comes amid concerns that Trump is in favour of a Russian land grab to end the war in Ukraine, following a meeting with Putin in Alaska. Following the summit, the US President suggested he wants to move straight to a full peace deal, rather than negotiating a ceasefire first. The shift in Trump's position appears to echo the Russians' refusal to agree to a ceasefire before engaging in peace talks. Ukrainian president Vlodymyr Zelenskyy is set to visit the US on Monday, and is set to take UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and top European leaders with him to DC for crunch talks with the US President.
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Confederate statue dedicated to ‘faithful slaves' targeted in class-action lawsuit
A federal lawsuit filed in Columbia, North Carolina is targeting a Confederate monument outside a courthouse that bears an inscription with the line "IN APPRECIATION OF OUR FAITHFUL SLAVES." The lawsuit is calling for that portion of the inscription to be removed or covered up. 'I just remember thinking that slaves had to be so-called faithful or they would be punished or even worse,' Sherryreed Robinson, one of the members of the lawsuit, told the New York Times. 'As an adult, the words sitting on the grounds of a courthouse made me question whether Blacks could really receive justice there.' Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that a portion of the lawsuit could move forward. Tyrrell County officials have been resistant to taking action themselves, citing state monument protection laws that, they say, bars them from making any changes to the monument. The challenge to the statue — which sits on the lawn of the Tyrrell County Courthouse — comes at a time when President Donald Trump and his administration are restoring Confederate names and monuments after many were demolished and destroyed during or in response to racial justice protests in 2020. In June, Trump demanded that the military restore Confederate names that had been previously removed from military bases. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered that a Confederate sculpture removed from Arlington National Cemetery be re-installed. The lawsuit in North Carolina was launched last year — before Trump returned to office — by the Concerned Citizens of Tyrrell County, which is made up primarily of older Black residents. The filing argues that the "faithful slave" portion of its inscription constitutes racial discrimination in government speech, which the litigants argue is a violation of the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. It calls for the county to remove or cover the message. Tyrrell County officials moved to have the lawsuit dismissed in 2024, arguing that county officials cannot change the monument based on a state law limiting how an "object of remembrance" on state property can be changed or moved. 'The North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled that county commissioners are bound by this statute, and that commissioners who are bound by this statute are not motivated by a discriminatory intent,' the motion reads. 'Tyrrell County should not be subject to liability based on its decision to follow state law.' The statue was one of many Confederate monuments erected during the Jim Crow era in the wake of the U.S. Civil War. The Tyrell Monument Association, founded by former Confederate Army lieutenant colonel William Fessenden Beasley, gifted the monument to the county. It has stood on the courthouse lawn since 1902. It depicts a Confederate soldier standing on a base that includes a bust of General Robert E Lee. There are inscriptions on each of the base's four sides, one of which includes the reference to "faithful slaves." Mark Snell Brickhouse, whose great-great-grandfather's name is one of many Confederates' etched on the monument, said he visits the monument and the family cemetery because it honors his family, but he told the Times he agrees that the "faithful slave" portion should be covered. 'I love the statue because it honors my family members,' Brickhouse, 72, told the paper. 'But I can see how the words are offensive to some people. I think the statue should stay because it reflects our history, but those words should be covered.' The Concerned Citizens of Tyrell County tried in the 1990's to have the statue removed completely, but have since changed their course, only asking for the reference to slaves to be removed or covered. Ian Mance, a lawyer with Emancipate North Carolina, a racial justice and advocacy group, told the Times that the statue outside the Tyrrell County Courthouse is the only known Confederate monument that directly endorses or shows an appreciation for, slavery. 'This is the only monument of its kind at a courthouse with that language of appreciation, or an endorsement, of slavery on it,' he said. 'You are talking about families who have been here since before the Civil War. For them, there is this feeling that this monument is offering commentary about their families.' According to Mance, the lawsuit is not seeking damages.
Scottish Sun
9 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government
Christina Hendry fears the stress of defending himself had hastened his death 'FIGHT FOR TRUTH' Alex Salmond's family vow to clear his name as ex-FM's widow set to sue Scottish Government ALEX Salmond's niece has pledged to clear his name as it emerged his widow is suing the Scottish Government over its botched sexual harassment investigation. Moira Salmond, 88, has appointed lawyers to reactivate the ex-First Minister's case seeking reparations for his family after a judge ruled the probe against him was unlawful, unfair and tainted by bias. 3 Christina fears the stress of defending himself had hastened her uncle's death Credit: Andrew Barr 3 Moira Salmond during the public memorial service for her late husband Credit: PA Advertisement 3 The case is reportedly being bankrolled by wealthy friends of Mr Salmond Credit: Getty Allies claim the investigation, and subsequent criminal charges which were dismissed by a jury, hastened the SNP colossus's death from a heart attack aged 69 last year. His niece Christina Hendry, 30, told The Scottish Sun: 'I will do whatever it takes to continue my uncle's work and continuing to clear his name. 'My hope is that the truth comes to light. And that those who dismissed claims of this conspiracy theory are proven wrong.' Advertisement A source close to the family confirmed the case is in an 'adjustment period' where both sides make written pleadings. A top legal team has been hired, including a senior investigator. The case is reportedly being bankrolled by wealthy friends of Mr Salmond. He went on trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020 and was acquitted of 14 charges of sexually assaulting nine women. Advertisement Christina told The Scottish Sun on Sunday how she fears the stress of defending himself and trying to prove the conspiracy had hastened his death. She also hit out at his successor Nicola Sturgeon for dragging his name 'through the dirt' to boost sales of her memoir. Asked how her aunt was coping with Ms Sturgeon's fresh criticism amid a blaze of publicity to promote her book, Christina said: 'She should not have to be going through this and neither should any of the family. Five of the biggest BOMBSHELL moments from Nicola Sturgeon's new memoir 'I find it very distasteful. In some ways it is quite cruel. 'She is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money — she could have said these things in the past few years. Advertisement 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' The Scottish Government said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'
