logo
Law should change to allow review of cases of jailed officers, lawyer says

Law should change to allow review of cases of jailed officers, lawyer says

Yahoo17-07-2025
The law should be changed so that cases overseen by police officers who are later jailed for crimes are automatically reviewed for potential miscarriages of justice, a solicitor has said.
Matt Foot said the change would be a 'very simple reform' to prevent cases such as that of Errol Campbell, whose name was posthumously cleared at the Court of Appeal on Thursday, almost 50 years after he was convicted.
Mr Campbell, who died in 2004, was found guilty in April 1977 of theft and conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms goods depot in south London, where he was a British Rail employee, and jailed for 18 months.
The case against him was led by the discredited British Transport Police (BTP) officer Detective Sergeant Derek Ridgewell, who, along with two colleagues, later pleaded guilty to stealing from the same depot.
Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Wall and Mr Justice Butcher, said on Thursday that it was with 'regret' that the court could not undo Mr Campbell's suffering.
But they said they hoped that clearing his name 'will at least bring some comfort' to his surviving family, including his son, Errol Campbell Jr.
Speaking to the media following the hearing, Mr Foot, who represented Mr Campbell Jr, said: 'In 1980, when Ridgewell was convicted, nothing happened to his cases.'
He continued: 'We are calling for a change in the law that, when a police officer goes to prison, there is an automatic review of their cases to look for miscarriages of justice.
'If that had happened, that would have saved more than 45 years of misery for the Campbell family.'
When asked if he had political support for the law change, Mr Foot said: 'We are talking to the Justice Select Committee, we're talking to the junior minister, and we believe that it is something that could be put into Hillsborough Law, alongside that, as a very simple reform that could stop this sort of thing ever happening again.'
He also called on BTP to name those who 'harboured' Ridgewell, claiming it was 'no secret' in the 1970s that the officer was 'racist and corrupt'.
He added that there were 'bound to be others' who were victims of miscarriages of justice.
Mr Campbell unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 1978, but his son applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), with the help of the charity Appeal, to look at the case in September 2024.
The CCRC had already referred the convictions of Mr Campbell's co-defendants, Saliah Mehmet and Basil Peterkin, whose convictions were quashed in January last year.
Henry Blaxland KC, representing Mr Campbell on Thursday, told the court it was dealing with victims of a miscarriage of justice brought about by 'state crime'.
In a statement read out by Mr Foot outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the ruling, Mr Campbell Jr said that BTP knew that Ridgewell was 'corrupt' but 'let him carry on regardless'.
He continued that his father's conviction 'caused absolute misery', but that his father was 'dapper' and 'a good man'.
He also said that he was 'angry that Ridgewell is not alive for this day'.
In 1980, Ridgewell, along with detective constables Douglas Ellis and Alan Keeling, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms Depot, with Ridgewell dying in prison before he had completed his sentence.
In a previous judgment, the court found that their criminal activities between January 1977 and April 1978 resulted in the loss from the depot of goods to the value of about £364,000, 'an enormous sum of money at that time'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Walsall Council provides update on future of former Bloxwich Hospital
Walsall Council provides update on future of former Bloxwich Hospital

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Walsall Council provides update on future of former Bloxwich Hospital

The deputy leader of Walsall Council has provided an update following speculation about the future of the former Bloxwich Hospital site. The premises, still owned by the Black Country NHS Trust, was last used as a psychiatric facility before its closure in February 2025. READ MORE: Nine Walsall councillors blocked from standing in 2026 elections amid Conservative branch chaos The sale of the Reeves Street site is part of an agreement that has allowed the trust to secure funding for the newly opened Older People's Inpatient Unit at Dorothy Pattison Hospital. Since its closure, social media has been flooded with unsubstantiated claims that the building will be converted into 'luxury' accommodation for 'illegals'. However the trust said it was committed to ensuring any future use for the site will 'align with the needs of the community'. Currently, the building has no existing planning permissions and no live planning applications are under assessment by the council for any alternative use. Ward member for Bloxwich West, Councillor Michael Coulson, asked for the update at full council on July 30. Deputy leader Councillor Adrian Andrew responded: 'The trust, after interventions by officers, myself and Councillor Flint, are committed to ensuring that any future use for the site aligns with the needs of our community. 'They are working closely with us now to support the disposal and deliver a scheme that meets local needs. 'Any forthcoming proposal will be subject to a planning application and associated formal statutory consultation process.' Council Andrew said he has been 'quite firm' with the chief executive of the trust about its responsibility to secure the building. He added: 'Organisations which own public property need to make sure it is secured and that they are not causing a problem to the communities they represent, otherwise it just passes the bill on. 'Whether that's to the fire service because of an arson attack, or the police, or the council because we have to start taking enforcement action. 'I've been quite firm about their responsibility as a public sector organisation to the people that we all represent.'

Tesco shopper horrified after 'finding piece of glass' in £1.80 meal deal pasta
Tesco shopper horrified after 'finding piece of glass' in £1.80 meal deal pasta

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Tesco shopper horrified after 'finding piece of glass' in £1.80 meal deal pasta

A Tesco shopper was shocked after 'finding a shard of glass' in their £1.80 cheese and tomato piece. The 44-year-old man, who wished to remain anonymous, took a bite into the pasta and immediately noticed a 'hard piece'. The customer, who works as a civil servant, assumed it was a 'shell' but was gobsmacked to discover 'it was a piece of glass', he claims. READ MORE: 'Demonised' drink actually has healthy benefits Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join Thankfully, he was uninjured. He told BirminghamLive: "I took the meal to work and began to eat it. "I bit into a hard piece of pasta, which I assumed was a shell, but when I took the piece out of my mouth, I noticed that it was a piece of glass. "Luckily, I did not fully bite into it as it would have cut my mouth or tongue. He bought the pasta as part of a £3.60 meal deal from the Tesco store in Hamstead Village, in Great Barr, Birmingham, on the evening of Sunday, July 6. The shopper, who hails from Birmingham, continued: "I was shocked and at the same time lucky. "If I had swallowed the piece of glass, I could have potentially injured myself. "I showed my work colleagues, and they were shocked too. "It has put me off buying any pasta meal deal in the future from any store." He added: "I just hope Tesco takes this matter seriously before someone is injured." The customer has since returned the pasta and accompanying 'glass shard' to Tesco. A follow-up investigation has concluded that the sharp object was actually a piece of plastic originating from the product's packaging. Tesco said this was an isolated incident within the production process and additional steps have been taken to ensure it won't happen again. A review of the production process has been carried out and staff have been given additional training. In addition, the customer has been offered a full refund and they've been directly contacted by Tesco. A company spokesperson said: 'We're sorry to hear about this. "We work closely with our suppliers to ensure there are robust quality procedures in place. "We have fully investigated this, and the supplier has taken additional steps to ensure all products meet our high quality standards."

DWP set for major 'snooping' powers and what it means for claimant details
DWP set for major 'snooping' powers and what it means for claimant details

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DWP set for major 'snooping' powers and what it means for claimant details

Millions of benefit claimants could have their bank accounts scrutinised by the Government under contentious new "snooping" powers being introduced by the Labour government. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will soon have the authority to demand banks disclose private financial details as part of what ministers are labelling the "biggest fraud crackdown in a generation." The plans are in the spotlight as a minister provided an update on the looming powers. READ MORE: £441 DWP handouts arriving for people with muscle or joint pain Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join The extensive measures are included in the Fraud, Error and Debt Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament. Ministers maintain that these changes will help in identifying those falsely claiming benefits, such as people with savings exceeding £16,000 who are not eligible for Universal Credit. But, critics argue that the Government is establishing a "system of mass financial surveillance" that could inadvertently ensnare innocent people. Baroness Maeve Sherlock, a DWP minister in the House of Lords, disclosed new aspects of the policy this week – such as the crucial provision known as the Eligibility Verification Measure, which will compel banks to comply with official data requests. This will enable DWP agents to request personal details from financial institutions, including a claimant's name, date of birth, sort code, account number – and importantly, whether the account appears to violate benefit eligibility rules. Baroness Sherlock said: 'The information that can be requested under an Eligibility Verification Notice will include basic information about the account holder, such as name and date of birth, and the sort code and account number. "Agents may also request information about whether the account meets eligibility requirements.' The powers are set to be rolled out in stages over the next 12 months, starting with a small group of banks. Officials say the crackdown is designed to recover an estimated £1.5 billion over five years by tackling fraud and correcting errors early – before they spiral into large amounts of unmanageable debt. A DWP spokesperson said: "Our Fraud, Error and Recovery Bill includes an Eligibility Verification Measure which will require banks to share limited data on claimants who may wrongly be receiving benefits – such as those on Universal Credit with savings over £16,000. "As well as tackling fraud, the new powers will also help us find genuine claim errors sooner, stopping people building up unmanageable debt. "This measure does not give DWP access to any benefit claimants' bank accounts." However, the proposals have already triggered fierce opposition from privacy advocates, who argue the fresh powers extend well beyond what is required. Civil liberties organisation Big Brother Watch told The Independent: "It threatens to usher in an unprecedented system of mass financial surveillance." Baroness Sherlock also confirmed that the DWP will also gain powers to directly seize money from individuals using Direct Deduction Orders – similar to those used by HMRC and the Child Maintenance Service. She stated that the department anticipates making between 5,000 and 20,000 deduction orders annually. The DWP argues that these measures are an essential tool for swiftly recovering money where overpayments have occurred. However, critics worry they could result in hardship for families already grappling with the cost-of-living crisis. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has maintained that the powers are necessary to "restore trust in the welfare system" – but opposition voices are expected to intensify as the bill approaches the statute books.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store