Rwanda agrees to take deportees from the US after migrant deal with UK collapsed
Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo told The Associated Press in a statement that the East African country would accept up to 250 deportees from the US, with 'the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement' under the agreement.
Ms Makolo did not provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out.
The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back.
Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade
The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally and are 'the worst of the worst'.
Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum.
Under that proposed deal, their claims would have been processed in Rwanda and, if successful, they would have stayed there.
The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over.
Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants.
The Trump administration has come under scrutiny for the African countries it has entered into secretive deals with to take deportees. It sent eight men from South Sudan, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan in early July after a US Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for their deportations.
They were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in Djibouti as the legal battle over their deportations played out.
South Sudan, which is tipping towards civil war, has declined to say where the men are being held or what their fate is.
The US also deported five men who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos to the southern African kingdom of Eswatini, where the government said they will be held in solitary confinement in prison for an undetermined period of time.
A human rights lawyer in Eswatini said the men are being denied access to legal representation there and has taken authorities to court. Eswatini is Africa's last absolute monarchy. The king rules over government and political parties are effectively banned.
Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US.
Rwanda, a country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed more than 800,000 people in 1994. It has promoted itself under long-time President Paul Kagame as an example of stability and development, but human rights groups allege there are also deadly crackdowns on any perceived dissent against Mr Kagame, who has been president for 25 years.
This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration
Government spokesperson Ms Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because 'our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation'.
'Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade,' she said.
There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees.
Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said 'appeasing President Trump pays'.
'This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
10 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Swiss president travels to US to avert steep tariffs
Switzerland's president is in Washington as part of a last-minute push to stop steep new tariffs, but with no appointment with US President Donald Trump has been scheduled. Switzerland faces a 39% duty, one of the highest among the dozens of economies that will be hit by new tariffs expected to come into force from Thursday. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter and Economy Minister Guy Parmelin are visiting Washington "to facilitate meetings with the US authorities at short notice and hold talks with a view to improving the tariff situation for Switzerland", the government said in a statement. "The aim is to present a more attractive offer to the United States in a bid to lower the level of reciprocal tariffs for Swiss exports, taking US concerns into account," it added. But a White House official told AFP there was "no meeting with the president scheduled at this time". Mr Trump had originally threatened in April to put a 31% tariff on Switzerland. But he surprised the export-driven country last week when he decided to hike the rate to 39% despite numerous discussions between Swiss and US officials aimed at reaching a deal. The Swiss government noted the country will be hit by much higher tariffs than what other wealthy economies, such as Britain, Japan or the European Union, are facing. The Swiss government "reaffirmed that it was keen to pursue talks with the United States on the tariff situation" and the president and economy minister are visiting Washington "for this reason", the statement said. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, however, told CBS television on Sunday that the tariffs on global trading partners, which are coming into force this week, "are pretty much set". Mr Trump signaled that a separate initially "small" tariff on imports of pharmaceuticals from around the world - a key sector for Switzerland - could come "within the next week". But the sector-specific tariff could rise to 150% in a year and eventually be as high as 250%, he said, adding the delay was to allow companies to shift production to the United States. Pharmaceuticals represented 60% of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. A Swiss Government official said Ms Keller-Sutter and Mr Parmelin were accompanied by a small delegation, including the heads of the economy and international finance departments. But the official declined to give details about the potential meetings. The government said it will "issue a statement as soon as there are any relevant developments for the public". The United States is a key trading partner for Switzerland, taking 18.6% of its total exports last year, according to Swiss customs data. Ms Keller-Sutter has said Mr Trump believes that Switzerland "steals" from the United States by enjoying a trade surplus of 40 billion Swiss francs (€43bn). Swiss companies have urged the government to negotiate a lower tariff. "I am convinced that Donald Trump wants to make a deal and show it to his US voters," Nik Hayek, the head of watch firm Swatch, told Le Temps newspaper in an interview published late Monday.
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
US envoy to visit Russia ahead of sanctions deadline
US envoy Steve Witkoff will meet Russian leadership in Moscow as US President Donald Trump's deadline to impose fresh sanctions over Russia's war in Ukraine looms. Mr Trump has given Russia until Friday to halt its offensive in Ukraine or face new penalties. The White House has not outlined specific actions it plans to take on Friday, but Mr Trump has previously threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. The move would aim to stifle Russian exports, but would risk significant international disruption. The US President said yesterday that he would await the outcome of the Moscow talks before moving forward with any economic retaliation. "We're going to see what happens," he told reporters "We'll make that determination at that time," he added. An American source did not specify if the meetings will include Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom Mr Witkoff has met several times previously. Despite pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its offensive against its pro-Western neighbor. Three rounds of peace talks in Istanbul have failed to make headway on a possible ceasefire, with the two sides appearing as far apart as ever. Russia has demanded that Ukraine cede more territory and renounce Western support. Ukraine is calling for an immediate ceasefire and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last week urged his allies to push for "regime change" in Moscow. In recent weeks, Mr Trump has increasingly voiced frustration with Mr Putin over Russia's unrelenting offensive. When reporters asked Mr Trump on Monday what Mr Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Mr Trump replied: "Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Monday Russia considered the talks with Mr Witkoff to be "important, substantial and helpful", and valued US efforts to end the conflict. Mr Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year offensive were unchanged. Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions that Russia claims to have annexed, a demand Ukraine has called unacceptable. Mr Putin also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join NATO. The visit comes after Mr Trump said that two nuclear submarines, he deployed following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, were now "in the region". Mr Trump has not said whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military. Russia, in its first comments on the deployment, urged "caution". "Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation," Mr Peskov said.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
China's geopolitics is in the news, but Chinese citizens' problems are closer to home
News stories about China nowadays largely focus on geopolitical developments, particularly the Sino-American rivalry. But China's 1.4 billion people, while aware of these issues, are more preoccupied with a problem that hits much closer to home: their shrinking families. For millennia, Confucian values have defined the family as essential to social order and harmony, with family relations playing a central role in confronting challenges such as competition for land and resources. Sons managed farms and businesses, and cared for elderly parents. Daughters expanded the family through marriage, creating large extended networks that carried out critical economic and social functions, such as building schools and resolving disputes — functions that in Europe might have been carried out by the church. This basic economic and social structure survived even the dislocations of the 1950s-70s, when the new Communist regime encouraged people to live in dormitories (away from their families, including their spouses) and to send their children to state-run nurseries and boarding schools in order to boost labour productivity. Today, however, the Chinese family is in crisis, owing to plummeting fertility rates, which declined from 7.51 children per woman in 1963 (its modern peak) to just one per woman in 2023. This demographic collapse is putting China's economy, society, and polity at risk. The roots of China's fertility struggles are deep. China's population more than doubled between 1900 and 1979, from 400 million to 969 million. Food shortages were so common during this period that China became known as the 'land of famine'. Between 1959 and 1961, China endured the worst famine in recorded history, with 20-45 million people dying as a result of both high population density and deeply flawed government policies. So, beginning in the 1970s, China's government introduced strict family-planning laws that, for decades, restricted most Chinese households to one child. But family-planning laws are only part of the story. Though China's now infamous one-child policy was loosened in 2016, to two children, and then in 2021 to three, fertility rates have not increased. And unlike other countries grappling with low fertility rates, such as Japan and South Korea, China is still a poor country. According to the most recent data (from 2022) China's median per capita disposable income is $6,224 (€5,390), or $17 (€14) per day, for the 944 million people living in urban areas, and just $2,777 ($7.6 per day) for the 465 million in rural areas. In the United States, that figure is $63,589. Even accounting for America's higher prices, the difference is huge. Add to that limited economic opportunities for young people — including those with university degrees — and Chinese households simply cannot afford more children. The newest generation of Chinese parents face an additional psychological hurdle, rooted in their lack of firsthand experience of big families. The vast majority of them grew up as only children in households with two only children as parents, as well as four grandparents. They did not have cousins or siblings to play with, but they did have a large number of adult caregivers. As a result, many do not value large families and find the notion overwhelming. But all those caregivers imply heavy dependencies as generations age. A small and shrinking cohort of working-age Chinese, operating in a job market characterised by sparse opportunities and low wages, is now supporting a larger and growing population of retired individuals, who have limited access to pensions and healthcare. And their responsibilities extend beyond finances to include physical and emotional support. As if that were not enough, each young person is also the only source of pride for their parents and grandparents, who have collectively dedicated their lives — their time, energy, and money — to setting the child up for success. Young adults now have to earn all the sacrifices their caregivers made for them, effectively compensating their parents and grandparents for the children and grandchildren who were never born. This burden of responsibility is felt starting in childhood. Playgrounds are largely empty, and parks are populated mostly by retirees, even after school and on weekends. Children are more likely to be at home studying than outside playing. All this pressure may well be fuelling rising rates of depression and suicide among youths and young adults. The situation is set to worsen. Slower economic growth — which has already driven youth unemployment to historic highs — will continue to constrain the job market, intensifying already-fierce competition for limited opportunities, and will impede the government's ability to increase pensions. China's government has a strong interest in addressing the crisis of the country's families. Economic and social problems tend to evolve in unpredictable ways, and they can easily spiral into political instability. Although the government has implemented a broad range of policies aimed at encouraging families to have children, including monetary incentives, fertility remains low. How will a civilization built around family units and networks fare as a nation of individuals without siblings and cousins? What will the lives of the elderly be like when there are few young adults to care for them? Can ordinary Chinese, to whom family represents both a virtue and a way of life, feel content without children? As the spectre of social and economic upheaval looms, these questions must be answered. Nancy Qian is professor of economics at Northwestern University, co-director of Northwestern University's Global Poverty Research Lab, founding director of China Econ Lab, and a visiting professor at the Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance Project Syndicate, 2025
