logo
US aid cuts halt HIV vaccine research in South Africa, with global impact

US aid cuts halt HIV vaccine research in South Africa, with global impact

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — Just a week had remained before scientists in South Africa were to begin clinical trials of an HIV vaccine, and hopes were high for another step toward limiting one of history's deadliest pandemics. Then the email arrived.
Stop all work, it said. The United States under the Trump administration was withdrawing all its funding.
The news devastated the researchers, who live and work in a region where more people live with HIV than anywhere else in the world. Their research project, called BRILLIANT, was meant to be the latest to draw on the region's genetic diversity and deep expertise in the hope of benefiting people everywhere.
But the $46 million from the U.S. for the project was disappearing, part of the dismantling of foreign aid by the world's biggest donor earlier this year as President Donald Trump announced a focus on priorities at home.
South Africa hit hard by aid cuts
South Africa has been hit especially hard because of Trump's baseless claims about the targeting of the country's white Afrikaner minority. The country had been receiving about $400 million a year via USAID and the HIV-focused PEPFAR.
Now that's gone.
Glenda Grey, who heads the Brilliant program, said the African continent has been vital to the development of HIV medication, and the U.S. cuts threaten its capability to do such work in the future.
Significant advances have included clinical trials for lenacapavir, the world's only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV, recently approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. One study to show its efficacy involved young South Africans.
'We do the trials better, faster and cheaper than anywhere else in the world, and so without South Africa as part of these programs, the world, in my opinion, is much poorer,' Gray said.
She noted that during the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, South Africa played a crucial role by testing the Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines, and South African scientists' genomic surveillance led to the identification of an important variant.
Labs empty and thousands are laid off
A team of researchers at the University of the Witwatersrand has been part of the unit developing the HIV vaccines for the trials.
Inside the Wits laboratory, technician Nozipho Mlotshwa was among the young people in white gowns working on samples, but she may soon be out of a job.
Her position is grant-funded. She uses her salary to support her family and fund her studies in a country where youth unemployment hovers around 46%.
'It's very sad and devastating, honestly," she said of the U.S. cuts and overall uncertainty. 'We'll also miss out collaborating with other scientists across the continent.'
Professor Abdullah Ely leads the team of researchers. He said the work had promising results indicating that the vaccines were producing an immune response.
But now that momentum, he said, has 'all kind of had to come to a halt.'
The BRILLIANT program is scrambling to find money to save the project. The purchase of key equipment has stopped. South Africa's health department says about 100 researchers for that program and others related to HIV have been laid off. Funding for postdoctoral students involved in experiments for the projects is at risk.
South Africa's government has estimated that universities and science councils could lose about $107 million in U.S. research funding over the next five years due to the aid cuts, which affect not only work on HIV but also tuberculosis — another disease with a high number of cases in the country.
Less money, and less data on what's affected
South Africa's government has said it will be very difficult to find funding to replace the U.S. support.
And now the number of HIV infections will grow. Medication is more difficult to obtain. At least 8,000 health workers in South Africa's HIV program have already been laid off, the government has said. Also gone are the data collectors who tracked patients and their care, as well as HIV counselors who could reach vulnerable patients in rural communities.
For researchers, Universities South Africa, an umbrella body, has applied to the national treasury for over $110 million for projects at some of the largest schools.
During a visit to South Africa in June, UNAIDS executive director Winnie Byanyima was well aware of the stakes, and the lives at risk, as research and health care struggle in South Africa and across Africa at large.
Other countries that were highly dependent on U.S. funding including Zambia, Nigeria, Burundi and Ivory Coast are already increasing their own resources, she said.
'But let's be clear, what they are putting down will not be funding in the same way that the American resources were funding," Byanyima said.
___
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say
Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say

San Francisco Chronicle​

time31 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli strikes across the Gaza Strip overnight and into Monday killed at least 30 people, according to local hospitals. The Israeli military meanwhile said it killed a senior Hamas militant last month who had held a hostage in his home. The 21-month war triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack is raging on after two days of talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ended last week with no sign of a breakthrough in negotiations over a ceasefire and hostage release. Twelve people were killed by strikes in southern Gaza, including three who were waiting at an aid distribution point, according to Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, which received the bodies. Shifa Hospital in Gaza City also received 12 bodies, including three children and two women, after a series of strikes in the north, according to the hospital's director, Dr. Mohammed Abu Selmia. Al-Awda Hospital in central Gaza reported six killed and eight wounded in strikes in the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp. The Israeli military says it only targets militants and tries to avoid harming civilians. It blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas. The military said a June 19 strike killed Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita, who it said had taken part in the Oct. 7 attack and held hostage Emily Damari, a dual Israeli-British citizen, in his home at the start of the war. There was no comment from Hamas nor independent confirmation. Thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel that day, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 people, most of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. The militants are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 58,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its tally. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and is led by medical professionals. The United Nations and other experts consider its figures to be the most reliable count of war casualties. Israel's air and ground war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and driven some 90% of the population from their homes. Aid groups say they have struggled to bring in food and other assistance because of Israeli military restrictions and the breakdown of law and order, and experts have warned of famine. ___

Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say
Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say

The Hill

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli strikes across the Gaza Strip overnight and into Monday killed at least 30 people, according to local hospitals. The Israeli military meanwhile said it killed a senior Hamas militant last month who had held a hostage in his home. The 21-month war triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7 attack is raging on after two days of talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ended last week with no sign of a breakthrough in negotiations over a ceasefire and hostage release. Twelve people were killed by strikes in southern Gaza, including three who were waiting at an aid distribution point, according to Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, which received the bodies. Shifa Hospital in Gaza City also received 12 bodies, including three children and two women, after a series of strikes in the north, according to the hospital's director, Dr. Mohammed Abu Selmia. Al-Awda Hospital in central Gaza reported six killed and eight wounded in strikes in the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp. The Israeli military says it only targets militants and tries to avoid harming civilians. It blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas. The military said a June 19 strike killed Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita, who it said had taken part in the Oct. 7 attack and held hostage Emily Damari, a dual Israeli-British citizen, in his home at the start of the war. There was no comment from Hamas nor independent confirmation. Thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel that day, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 people, most of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. The militants are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 58,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its tally. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and is led by medical professionals. The United Nations and other experts consider its figures to be the most reliable count of war casualties. Israel's air and ground war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and driven some 90% of the population from their homes. Aid groups say they have struggled to bring in food and other assistance because of Israeli military restrictions and the breakdown of law and order, and experts have warned of famine. ___ Khaled reported from Cairo and AlJoud from Beirut. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at

Will Congress be a lifeline for hospitals?
Will Congress be a lifeline for hospitals?

Politico

time41 minutes ago

  • Politico

Will Congress be a lifeline for hospitals?

Presented by With Robert King Driving the Day HOSPITALS TO STRIKE BACK — Despite suffering a defeat in President Donald Trump's megabill, hospitals might still win the war, Robert reports with POLITICO's Amanda Chu and David Lim. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes $340 billion in cuts to hospital budgets over the next decade. But priorities can change in Congress, and hospitals have ample time to sway lawmakers back to their side. A long time: Congress delayed the cuts' implementation until 2028 — a presidential election year — and lobbyists are gearing up to persuade lawmakers to rescind them. 'Are they really going to want to cut rural hospitals in an election?' asked Chris Mitchell, head of the Iowa Hospital Association. 'We're going to talk to our delegation early and often about the impact of these cuts.' Even before the bill was passed on July 3, some lawmakers in competitive districts hinted that a health care provision that restricts a state's ability to receive more money from the federal government for Medicaid could be tweaked or gutted. 'If it looks like we have issues, and we're not comfortable, we can change it,' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) said. 'Things are subject to change. We're going to have different members of Congress. We're going to have a new president. Things are going to be different.' Lawmakers have long delayed or outright reversed painful cuts. Congress delayed and then eventually repealed a 'Cadillac' tax on high-end health plans in the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Background: The megabill targeted two tools that states use to get higher Medicaid payments from the federal government. One is a cut to the amount states can tax hospitals to pay for Medicaid. Another caps state-directed payments, which allows states to direct how providers are paid by privately run managed care plans. States rely on both tools to juice Medicaid payments to hospitals and other facilities. Hospital groups say the programs compensate for low rates that don't cover care costs. But conservative critics say the tools are akin to money laundering by enabling states to get additional federal dollars. Hospital groups have said the programs are a lifeline for rural and urban hospitals that have a high amount of Medicare and Medicaid patients. But that wasn't enough to sway Republicans. However, hospitals might not need to undertake an outright repeal and instead could try to carve out for vulnerable facilities. 'There is going to have to be some work done to say, 'Well, we need to have more grandfathering,'' said Dr. Larry Bucshon, a Republican lobbyist who served seven terms in an Indiana House district. WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE. I hope your week is off to a good start! For more on the potential political impact of the megabill cuts, keep reading. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. On The Hill MEDICAID IN THE MIDTERMS? Democrats are counting on using the Medicaid cuts passed as part of the megabill as a key line of attack against Republicans in the 2026 midterms. There's just one problem: The major changes to the program don't begin to take effect until 2027, POLITICO's Nicholas Wu, Lisa Kashinsky and Madison Fernandez report. Republicans delayed work requirements until 2027 and financing changes until 2028. They also front-loaded the bill, signed into law early this month, with tax breaks that voters are likely to see sooner. 'If we say 'they took it from you,' but it hasn't happened yet, it just complicates it,' said California-based Democratic strategist Doug Herman. That's leaving some Democrats concerned that their Medicaid-focused messaging might not hit home before November 2026 — and blunt their efforts to use the backlash to President Donald Trump's signature legislative achievement to fuel a Democratic wave next year. Even so: Democrats are still forging ahead with making Republicans' Medicaid reductions a central theme of their midterms messaging. Many have already dusted off the playbook they deployed in the 2018 midterms when Democrats picked up dozens of House seats after running against Republicans' near-repeal of the Affordable Care Act and massive tax cuts. This cycle, Democrats have eyed redder seats in Florida, Kentucky and Virginia as they try to push into GOP-held territory. That's partly because, while most painful impacts were delayed as long as possible, some effects could be felt sooner — like those on rural hospitals that require longer-term budget planning. 'We will need to remind voters that the impact is going to kind of come in waves, and that a lot of the brunt of the damage won't be felt until next year, or even after the midterms,' said Cherlynn Stevenson, a former Kentucky state representative running for the congressional seat being vacated by GOP Rep. Andy Barr. 'We just will have to remind them that provisions of the bill are still coming, that deadlines are looming.' SENATE RESCISSION VOTE THIS WEEK — The Senate must vote by Friday on nearly $10 billion in spending cuts that include deep reductions for global health, Robert reports. But it's unclear whether Republicans have enough votes to pass the $9.4 billion in cuts to funds already approved by Congress. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins of Maine has expressed reservations with cuts to public broadcasting and global HIV prevention among other health programs. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) is also concerned about public broadcasting cuts, specifically how they could affect rural and tribal areas. The details: GOP leadership can lose three Republican senators and still pass the bill with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tied vote. If Republicans make changes, the package must go back to the House for final approval by the July 18 deadline. President Donald Trump has weighed in on the potential holdouts and threatened on his social media platform, Truth Social, to withhold endorsements of any Republicans who don't back the effort. AROUND THE AGENCIES A NEW SYSTEM? The Trump administration wants drug companies to charge similar prices for their products in the U.S. as they do in other high-income nations. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is considering a new attempt to incentivize that, David reports with POLITICO's Lauren Gardner. Makary said in a Friday Bloomberg interview that his agency might give companies a voucher to shorten a medicine's review time if they commit to aligning U.S. prices with other high-income nations — a move that would buck precedent. Historically, the FDA has avoided taking into account drug prices when selecting products to prioritize for review. 'We can issue a national priority review voucher for companies that are promising to equalize the price between other OECD countries and the United States, with even other products that they currently have,' Makary said on Bloomberg Television's Wall Street Week of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development nations, a policy forum made up of member countries. 'We want to incentivize good behavior in the marketplace.' Key context: Craig Garthwaite, a health economist at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, noted that drug prices are not supposed to be part of the FDA decision-making process. 'It's really important that the market believes that the FDA is thinking about the safety and efficacy alone,' Garthwaite said. 'If you start muddying the water with prices or, frankly, other parts of the national priority review vouchers, I think it casts doubt on the entire validity of the FDA enterprise.' An HHS spokesperson said Makary's comments support the administration's push for a most-favored-nations pricing policy. WHAT WE'RE READING The Associated Press' Mark Thiessen reports on U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announcing the federal government is dropping charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, a Utah plastic surgeon accused of giving children saline shots instead of Covid-19 vaccines. The New York Times's David Enrich reports on how UnitedHealth has worked to quiet critics after the murder of Brian Thompson, the chief executive of the company's health insurance division. The Washington Post's Caitlin Gibson reports on how a generation of young people in Gaza are planning for the future as amputees.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store