logo
‘Stagflation' is the economy's worst nightmare. The trends in Boston should be a wake-up call.

‘Stagflation' is the economy's worst nightmare. The trends in Boston should be a wake-up call.

Boston Globe13-03-2025

But there are rumblings of a revival for the defining financial scourge of the 'Me Decade': stagflation. And we could get a sneak peek of that '70s show rerun.
Stagflation is an extended stretch of rapidly rising prices and little or no economic growth.
That's not happening now, and economists say it's a long-shot scenario. But the trend here is troubling: Consumer prices in Greater Boston and across New England are rising faster than the rest of the country even as the region's economy underperforms.
Advertisement
What's happening:
Stagflation fears are on the rise because President Trump's on-again, off-again
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'We are in some pretty unique economic waters,' said Mark Melnik, director of economic and public policy research at the Donahue Institute at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. 'It is hard to point to many historic analogs to what we are seeing with the policy responses and rhetoric coming out of Washington, and the markets are starting to respond as a result.'
Catch up:
Inflation heated up in February across New England, jumping 4.5 percent from a year earlier,
It was the biggest increase in two years and underscored a troubling contrast to
The January CPI reading for the Boston metropolitan area, the latest available, showed prices up an annual 3.9 percent, nearly a full point higher than the national rate and the second highest among metros, after Honolulu.
Why it matters:
Conditions are different today. The deficit is high, but so are interest rates. Inflation has been declining and the economy is growing. We haven't had a shock to the system like the oil embargo.
Advertisement
But recession worries are building again as the economy shifts into a lower gear and Trump hits the country's biggest trading partners with inflationary tariffs and threatens to widen
'If the prevailing policy uncertainty worsens and market volatility rises further, this could lead to a vicious feedback cycle onto the economy,' Gregory Daco, chief economist at professional services firm EY, said in a note.
The big picture:
Prices rose 2.8 percent, down from 3 percent in January, as declining energy costs moderated the biggest uptick in food prices since January 2024.
Consumer prices excluding food and energy — a measure known as core CPI that is considered a better indicator of underlying inflation — dipped to its lowest annual pace since April 2021.
Stock prices rose modestly after two days of losses. The S&P 500 gained 0.5 percent while the tech-heavy Nasdaq climbed 1.2 percent.
Economic fundamentals 'remain disinflationary,' Daco said, but 'tariffs, confusion around trade policy, and tighter immigration policy mean the risks to inflation are tilted to the upside.'
Zoom in:
The risks are evident locally, with inflation reheating in metro Boston and across the six-state region.
Elevated price increases are worrisome in a part of the country where the cost of living is already high.
The Donahue Institute puts Massachusetts in the top five states for child care costs, energy prices, and home values.
Moreover, growth in
In the past year, the unusual suspects have been driving inflation faster than the national rate, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston's
These include housing, medical care, education (including tuition and books), and communications (including internet and cable TV).
Final thought:
While the specter of Nixon-era stagflation still haunts us, a lot would have to go wrong for it to reappear.
Inflation is projected to slowly return to the Fed's 2 percent target — by 2026 or 2027, according to the
Economic growth is seen slowing to about 2 percent this year, the Fed estimated, down from 2.8 percent in 2024.
But Trump's commitment to tariffs is a giant wildcard. His pledge to reorder the US economy and its place in the world is a risky undertaking.
There is a remote but real possibility that the chaotic rollout of import duties and deep cuts to the federal workforce and government spending just might trigger a shock that ends in financial crisis.
Advertisement
Larry Edelman can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.

AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest

San Francisco Chronicle​

time6 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest

President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.

California says Trump's deployment of National Guard violates state sovereignty
California says Trump's deployment of National Guard violates state sovereignty

Politico

time7 minutes ago

  • Politico

California says Trump's deployment of National Guard violates state sovereignty

California will ask a judge to reverse President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles, arguing that the use of the military to suppress immigration protests is an illegal and unconstitutional intrusion on state authority. The state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, a Democrat, unveiled on Monday the basis for the lawsuit, which he said would be filed imminently. The state will ask a federal judge to 'set aside' Trump's Saturday move to 'federalize' California's National Guard troops, part of an order to defend federal property and personnel carrying out Trump's deportation policies. Gov. Gavin Newsom told POLITICO on Monday that federal law requires Trump to coordinate his call-up of the National Guard with the state. 'There was no communication through our office, period, full stop. So, by definition, it's an illegal act,' Newsom, a Democrat, said, adding that the president failed to meet other key prerequisites for the deployment. Bonta alleged that Trump's action violated federal law and the 10th Amendment, the Constitution's provision that protects state sovereignty and rights. At a press conference Monday, the state attorney general said Trump's order 'skipped over multiple rational, commonsense' steps and wound up escalating the unrest while trampling on California's sovereignty. Trump invoked a provision of federal law that gives the president the ability to deploy National Guard troops in limited circumstances, including to suppress 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion' and to help 'execute' federal laws when 'regular forces' are unable to do so. Bonta argued that the provision requires Newsom's concurrence. 'The governor's agreement and consent needs to be part of any calling in of the National Guard. That didn't happen,' the attorney general said. The statute says that a president's order to deploy the Guard under the provision 'shall be issued through the governors of the States.' It does not expressly mandate consultation with or approval by the governor. Newsom contends that the provision requires at least some communication with the governor's office. Trump indicated over the weekend that he warned Newsom prior to Saturday that he intended to send in troops if he deemed Newsom's response to the protests insufficient. Trump has repeatedly described the L.A. protests as stoked by 'insurrectionists' and has vowed to 'liberate' the city. Bonta and Newsom say the streets had been largely calm when Trump's deployment and inflammatory rhetoric reignited the protests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store