logo
Sensex, Nifty pare gains; realty shares decline

Sensex, Nifty pare gains; realty shares decline

The key equity indices reversed all gains and traded with minor losses in the mid-morning trade. The Nifty traded below the 25,100 level. Realty shares declined after advancing for previous trading session.
At 11:30 ST, the barometer index, the S&P BSE Sensex, shed 18.92 points or 0.02% to 82,177.22. The Nifty 50 index fell 31.45 points or 0.13% to 25,057.90.
In the broader market, the S&P BSE Mid-Cap index shed 0.46% and the S&P BSE Small-Cap index fell 0.08%.
The market breadth was negative. On the BSE, 1,798 shares rose and 1,928 shares fell. A total of 202 shares were unchanged.
Economy:
India's core industries comprising eight sectors reported 1.7% growth in June 2025, down from 5% in the same month of 2024, data released on Monday by Ministry of Commerce and Industry showed.
On a month-on-month basis, the expansion in June is relatively up, when these key sectors grew by 1.2%.
Commerce ministry data showed the production of steel, cement and refinery products recorded positive growth in June 2025.
The Index of Eight Core Industries (ICI) measures the combined and individual performance of production of eight core industries -- Coal, Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Refinery Products, Fertilizers, Steel, Cement and Electricity.
The Eight Core Industries comprise 40.27% of the weight of items included in the Index of Industrial Production (IIP).
The cumulative growth rate of ICI during April to June, 2025-26 is 1.3% (provisional) as compared to the corresponding period of last year.
Buzzing Index:
The Nifty Realty index shed 0.97% to 996.45. The index rose 0.64% in the previous trading session.
Anant Raj (down 2.56%), Raymond (down 1.92%), Phoenix Mills (down 1.65%), Godrej Properties (down 1.58%) and Brigade Enterprises (down 0.93%), DLF (down 0.89%), Lodha Developers (down 0.89%), Oberoi Realty (down 0.58%), Sobha (down 0.39%) and Prestige Estates Projects (down 0.3%) down.
Stocks in Spotlight:
Sagar Cements fell 2.63%. The company reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 7.49 crore in Q1 FY26, compared with a net loss of Rs 32.20 crore posted in Q1 FY25. Revenue from operations increased 19.63% to Rs 670.66 crore in Q1 FY26 as against Rs 560.60 crore in Q1 FY25.
Parag Milk Foods declined 3.79%. The company reported a 1.02% increase in consolidated net profit to Rs 27.58 crore in Q1 FY26 from Rs 27.30 crore posted in Q1 FY25. Revenue from operation rose by 12.34% year-over-year (YoY) to Rs 851.52 crore during the period under review.
Global Markets:
Asian stocks traded mixed on Tuesday as investors turned cautious ahead of the looming August 1 deadline for potential US trade tariffs. Japanese stocks, in particular, saw sharp swings after Prime Minister Shigeru Ishibas ruling coalition lost its majority in the upper house.
Wall Street offered little direction, with US indices closing mostly flat overnight despite hitting fresh intraday records. The spotlight this week remains firmly on corporate earnings, with Tesla and Alphabet set to report on Wednesday.
By the close in New York, the Dow slipped 0.04%, the S&P 500 inched up 0.14%, and the Nasdaq rose 0.38%.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Raj FM urged to oppose plan to hike GST on garments
Raj FM urged to oppose plan to hike GST on garments

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Raj FM urged to oppose plan to hike GST on garments

Jaipur: After a group of ministers in the 55th meeting of the GST Council proposed to increase GST from 12% to 18% on readymade garments costing more than Rs 1,000, the state industry appealed to the state finance minister, Diya Kumari, to raise the issue and oppose the move. The Garment Exporters Association of Rajasthan (GEAR) said clothing is a necessity item and should not attract such steep taxes. GEAR president Rakshit Poddar said, "If GST goes up to 18%, it will have a bigger impact on the middle-class consumers, who usually buy garment pieces in the range of Rs 1,000 to Rs 2,500." He said inflation made raw material costlier, raising the cost of commonly used items. Echoing similar sentiment, the general secretary of the garment body, Amit Maheshwari, said many women are engaged in making ethnic clothes whose costs are relatively higher. "If the taxes go up, the women engaged in the ethnic wear segment will face difficulties. It will impact 5 lakh artisans in the state," said Maheshwari. GEAR suggested that 5% GST can be levied on garments costing up to Rs 25,000 and 18% on garments that are priced more than Rs 25,000.

Project delayed, Rera tells builder to refund Rs 39 lakh to homebuyer in Gurgaon
Project delayed, Rera tells builder to refund Rs 39 lakh to homebuyer in Gurgaon

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Project delayed, Rera tells builder to refund Rs 39 lakh to homebuyer in Gurgaon

Gurgaon: Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRera) has directed Assotech Ltd to refund Rs 38.5 lakh to a homebuyer for failing to deliver possession of a flat in its Assotech Blith project in Sector 99, Gurgaon. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The complainant, Vineet Minocha, booked a 3BHK unit (G-503) in 2012 for Rs1 crore, with possession promised by March 2016. Despite paying Rs38 lakh, the unit remained incomplete. The builder later sought consent to resell the unit, promising a refund within two months—yet failed to deliver. HRera has now ordered a refund of the paid amount with 11% interest. Minocha had submitted a consent letter in July 2021, allowing the developer to resell the unit and refund the amount. The developer returned Rs 13.5 lakh but failed to refund the remaining dues. The complainant then approached HRera seeking recovery of the balance amount. During the proceedings, the promoter argued that the delay was caused by external factors, including the liquidation of the contractor Assotech Ltd by the Delhi high court, Covid-19 disruptions and pollution-related curbs. They also challenged the authority's jurisdiction, claiming the agreement was terminated after the consent letter was issued. However, rejecting these contentions, HRera ruled that the complainant remained entitled to relief under Section 18(1) of the Real Estate (regulation and development) Act, 2016. The authority cited the promoter's failure to fulfil contractual obligations within the agreed timeline as grounds for a refund with interest. "The promoter is liable to refund the paid-up amount of Rs 38,57,714 along with interest at 11.10% per annum from the date of each payment till actual realisation," stated HRera member Ashok Sangwan. The authority directed the refund to be completed within 90 days, failing which legal consequences would follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store