Delhi HC sets aside board's decision denying premature release to 1993 plane hijack convict

Time of India

26-07-2025

The
Delhi High Court
has set aside a decision of
sentence review board
denying
premature release
to a man, convicted for hijacking an
Indian Airlines
flight with 192 passengers in 1993.
Justice Sanjeev Narula remanded back the matter to the sentence review board (SRB) fir a fresh consideration and asked it to give its decision within eight weeks.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Science
Cybersecurity
PGDM
Finance
Data Analytics
Technology
Artificial Intelligence
Design Thinking
MBA
Others
healthcare
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
Management
Healthcare
Leadership
Data Science
Degree
Product Management
MCA
Project Management
Operations Management
CXO
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK DABS India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
30 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIT Madras
CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
"It is evident that the impugned decision of the SRB suffers from inadequacy of reasoning and non-consideration of relevant materials, including judicial observations bearing upon the petitioner's conduct and reformation. Thus, the said decision cannot be sustained," the high court said in its July 7 order.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The World's Most Stunning Blue Flag Beaches Ranked: Top 25 List!
Lintmit.com
Read More
The court noted that
convict Hari Singh
's conduct in jail indicated elements of reformation.
Singh was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the offences under Section 4 of the
Anti-Hijacking Act
and Sections 353, 365 and 506(II) of the Indian Penal Code.
Live Events
He was convicted by the trial court in 2001. His appeal was rejected by the high court in 2011, and the special leave petition was withdrawn from the
Supreme Court
.
It was his case that his name was periodically taken up for consideration of premature release by the SRB but it was consistently rejected on the ground of gravity of the offence.
As of May 12, Singh had undergone 17 years, 11 months and six days of actual imprisonment and 22 years, six months and 20 days of total imprisonment, including remission.
Granting relief to Singh, the court said the reasoning provided by the SRB while rejecting Singh's application was inadequate and did not meet the requisite standards of reasonable justification necessary for an order passed by an executive authority under administrative mandate.
"Petitioner's conduct in jail does indicate elements of reformation, as even over a long period of incarceration (almost 18 years of actual imprisonment), there is no record of any untoward incident which would indicate that the petitioner still harbours elements of
criminality
," the court said.
It set aside the latest minutes of the SRB meeting of April 24 this year and asked the board to reconsider the case.