European biotech ecosystem takes aim at changing the funding narrative
'The science is brilliant in Europe, but the translation is what's lacking,' said V-Bio Ventures managing partner Christina Takke on the state of the European funding ecosystem for biotechs at the ongoing BIO International Convention 2025.
The discussion on funding for European biotechs comes at a time when federal funding in the US is facing cuts while the European Union and France have pledged €500m to attract researchers to pursue projects in the EU. However, this alone is unlikely to foster the necessary ecosystem required to allow European biotechs to thrive.
Historically, US venture capital (VCs) have provided a fillip to early-stage biotechs to build pipelines, influencing how companies operate in the US and Europe. An oft-cited distinction as a result of this is cultural differences between US and European biotechs and their approach to research.
The BIO conference is taking place in Boston, where Avante Biocapital CEO Matthew Foy said an environment exists for a two-way dialogue between academics and VCs. The hubs in Europe are relatively more disparate. Even when it comes to telling a story, Hansa Biopharma CEO Renée Aguiar-Lucander said European biotechs are more focused on the science, while talk of products, market opportunity and domination takes place much earlier with US companies.
Nonetheless, it is often not the company's management team, but the board and how these companies were built by those investors who previously operated in a market without later-stage capital, that can hold back a European company, said Foy.
Against the backdrop of the threat of Asian biotechs, it might be difficult to compete in a global setting with cultural touchpoints like wanting to work fewer hours in Europe, said Lucander. However, there is no reason to reinvent the wheel. It can be cheaper to develop something in Europe than in Boston's Kendall Square, so it is important to combine the approaches that work best, said Takke. On that point of efficiency—or the ability to do more with less, Aguiar-Lucander said European biotechs are already used to being cost efficient, so they may not be impacted as much as US companies when compared to Chinese biotechs.
European biotech has come a long way in the last 10–15 years in terms of the sophistication of VCs, management teams, quality of science, and more, said Foy.
European VC companies such as Sofinnova, Forbion, which recently funded RNA editing company AIRNA, and sleep apnoea therapeutic-focused Mosanna, have raised billions of dollars in 2025.
Finding a silver lining in the conversation on biotech funding that has recently been fraught with challenges, Foy said these VC raises show there is fresh capital to fund and accelerate development. While the sector deals with geopolitical issues, raising money without a syndicate is 'nearly impossible', he said, highlighting the importance of early efforts to build a network. Nonetheless, much larger, later-stage funds are emerging in Europe, which can fund companies further, he said.
VIB managing director Jérôme Van Biervliet said there is capital, but 'the problem is how much of it is being deployed in either venture capital or....the stock market at some point; that's where we're short'.
Van Biervliet was optimistic that with ongoing efforts that invite new talent and management styles, now is the time to push forward for the European funding ecosystem. Alternate funding models have often been suggested as an antidote to biotechs to counter some of the early funding challenges in Europe.
VIB is a non-profit research institute with an emphasis on entrepreneurship and has bio-incubators for startups across Belgium. In the beginning, the institute collaborated with big pharma, but has prioritised small biotechs more recently, said Van Biervliet. He cited the example of VIB's work with Belgian biotech argenx to develop an asthma treatment, ARGX-118, which argenx will now further develop. Having a long-term partner, who can help build an ecosystem for the long term help, and this has been well documented in the US, he added. But much larger, later-stage funds are emerging in Europe, which can fund companies further.
"European biotech ecosystem takes aim at changing the funding narrative" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
22 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Airbus to Raise Shareholder Returns
Airbus AIR -0.79%decrease; red down pointing triangle said it would increase shareholder returns, betting that demand for aircraft will continue to fuel growth in coming years. The European plane maker said Wednesday at the Paris Air Show that it was lifting its dividend payout ratio to between 30% and 50% from a current range of 30% to 40%.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: Gloom pervades ahead of Fed meet's outcome
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Rae Wee Markets head into Wednesday's Federal Reserve rates decision with much uncertainty around the global economy, trade and geopolitical ties. With the Israel-Iran air war entering a sixth day, the G7 wealthy nations struggling to find unity over the conflict in Ukraine, and more signs of fragility in the U.S. economy, the drumbeat of negative headlines offered little respite for investors. U.S. President Donald Trump's call for Iran's unconditional surrender and comments from him suggesting a more aggressive stance toward Iran have also stoked worries of greater U.S. involvement. It was again a risk-off tone in markets on Wednesday, with shares in Asia falling and the dollar buoyant. Stock futures similarly pointed to a mostly lower opening in Europe, though oil prices steadied a little after surging more than 4% in the previous session. It's an increasingly difficult line for Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues to tread given the challenging global backdrop, and much attention on the central bank's policy decision will be on its updated Summary of Economic Projections. For now, markets are still pricing in two Fed cuts by December, but that could very well change should Powell strike a more hawkish tone later in the day. Ahead of the Fed outcome, UK inflation data is also due on Wednesday, where consumer prices are expected to have slowed slightly in May after April's bigger-than-expected surge. The reading comes ahead of a policy decision by the Bank of England on Thursday, where expectations are for the central bank to keep rates on hold. Still, investors will be looking for hints on whether a slowing economy and weaker wage growth could speed up the pace of easing. One of Britain's leading business groups on Wednesday slashed its forecast for economic growth in 2025 and next year due to headwinds from Trump's tariffs and an increase in payroll taxes, a survey showed. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: - Federal Reserve rate decision - UK CPI (May) Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Poop transplants' have been happening for decades. Now researchers have identified some unintended consequences
Fecal microbiota transplants are common medical procedures dating back decades that can help restore the gut health of people with colon infections - but scientists now warn of newly discovered consequences from the procedure. The 'poop transplant' is the transfer of the stool of a healthy donor to a recipient. The stool contains beneficial bacteria that can improve the patient's gut bacteria, which guards immune health and helps to regulate metabolism. They are approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat people with common C. diff infections that may cause severe gastrointestinal symptoms and inflammation in hospital patients who have been on antibiotics. Roughly 48,000 procedures are done each year. Now, University of Chicago researchers say a study in mice and experiments with human tissue have revealed some long-lasting and unintended consequences due to transplanting microorganisms from only one section of the digestive tract. 'I think it's a bit of a wakeup call to the field that maybe we shouldn't willy-nilly put large bowel microbes into different parts of the intestine that shouldn't be there,' Dr. Orlando 'Landon' DeLeon, postdoctoral researcher at the university, said in a statement. 'If we're designing good therapeutics, we should be aware of the importance of matching the regional microbiota to their proper environments, so that we provide better overall health benefits.' DeLeon is the lead author of the new research, which was published on Friday in the journal Cell. To reach these conclusions, the authors gave three groups of mice transplants of microorganisms from the middle part of the small intestine that connects to the colon, and a standard fecal transplant from the colon. The test showed that the microorganisms from each transplant were able to colonize the entirety of the intestinal tract in the mice -- not just certain regions. This created what they called regional gut mismatches, lasting for up to three months following a transplant. The microbes also altered their new intestinal environments, 'terraforming' the lining in ways that caused changes in the recipient's metabolism, behavior and energy balance. There were shifts in liver metabolism, including activity in genes associated with immune function. The mice also exhibited different eating behaviors. The gut has several distinct regions with vastly different microbial ecosystems. Imbalances in gut bacteria have been tied to a risk of cancer. 'There are microbes along the entire intestinal tract, and we just study predominately the last third of it (the colon),' DeLeon said. 'So, how can you expect [a transplant], with microbes from a third of the intestinal tract at the end of it, to fix the rest of the intestine?' What this means for human patients may be murky right now, but the authors say more caution is needed with the transplants going forward. They advocate for an approach that would transfer microorganism from all regions of the intestine and not just largely from the colon. In the future, they plan to conduct further study related to how different microbes exert their influence in different parts of the intestine and how the gut regions terraformed by microbiota mismatches can be restored. 'We have absolutely no idea what's in FMT, except that it's a combination of microbes,' Dr. Eugene Chang, the Martin Boyer Professor of Medicine at the university and senior author of the study, said. 'But even a single FMT will cause a change in the host-microbe relationships in these very different regions of the bowel that may be very difficult to reverse.'