logo
Why is North Korea courting Russian tourists?

Why is North Korea courting Russian tourists?

Bangkok Post5 days ago
Hoping to replenish state coffers with much-needed foreign exchange reserves and offset the sharp post-Covid decline in Chinese tour groups, the Hermit Kingdom has set its sights on inquisitive holiday-makers from an ideologically aligned Russia.
On July 27, Russian budget carrier Nordwind Airlines launched the first non-stop civilian flight from Moscow to Pyongyang in 77 years with more than 400 passengers allegedly on board. The inaugural monthly air route between both nations' capitals came on the heels of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un personally unveiling a newly developed, state-of-the-art beach resort in the Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area at the end of June -- only to prohibit overseas arrivals a week thereafter.
Curiously enough, this blanket entry ban applied to all outsiders except Russians -- 15 of whom spent a week in Pyongyang and Wonsan doing the bidding of a pro-Kremlin police state. As a reciprocal gesture of goodwill for the roughly 14,000 North Korean troops dispatched just under a year ago to fend off Ukraine's Kursk offensive on top of Pyongyang supplying up to 40% of Moscow's total ammunition for the "special military operation" since August 2023, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov encouraged leisure seekers from Russia to visit the luxury seaside complex during his trip there in mid-July.
For the deeply insecure and paranoid Kim dynasty, however, tourism promotion remains something of a double-edged sword. While bespoke tour packages peddled by state-owned travel agencies help the North Korean regime, there is a real danger of importing ideas and virtues that run counter to the militant self-sufficiency -- known as Juche -- which the reclusive East Asian country swears by. Westerners, in this regard, are looked upon as particularly inconvenient guests, not least because the noisy, rough-and-tumble democracies they hail from happen to be an anathema to the hereditary handover of power and the fabled "Paektu bloodline" that characterises North Korea.
Arguably, the most notable and high-profile cultural clash to have arisen from these conflicting governance models was the incarceration of American college student Otto Warmbier by North Korean law enforcement authorities in January 2016. The then 21-year-old undergraduate was detained en route back to the United States and handed a draconian 15-year prison sentence for stealing a propaganda poster from a cordoned off section of his Pyongyang hotel. Despite the Trump administration securing his premature release and repatriation just 17 months later, an already paralysed and barely conscious Warmbier perished within days of returning home due to torture-induced brain damage.
For the sake of averting such PR disasters, the North Korean government likely concluded that hosting Russian visitors is a much safer bet given their conformist nature and disinclination to deviate from officially accepted behaviour in a society where the stakes for independent thinking or open discourse could not be higher. It is worth recalling that prior to the coronavirus outbreak, an estimated 300,000 Chinese nationals frequented North Korea annually and accounted for around 90% of inbound tourists. That said, communist China's decision to fling its doors open to foreigners from 75 countries over the past couple of years has seen several predominantly Apec nations respond in kind.
Beyond recurrent calls by certain EU member states to bar Vladimir Putin's subjects from the Schengen Area, some Russian tourists now routinely overstay their welcome, exude a false sense of entitlement in Kremlin-friendly Global South destinations, from Indonesia to Sri Lanka to Uzbekistan. The fact that they have begun flocking in record numbers to heavily embargoed jurisdictions such as Cuba and Iran speaks volumes about the unprecedented mobility constraints ordinary Russians currently face.
Mindful of this, Chairman Kim is stepping up efforts to ensure North Korea ticks all the right boxes for the "brotherly" people of Russia. In February 2024, a group of 98 Russian journalists, students, social media influencers and travel bloggers were the first non-nationals to be granted access to the DPRK "under special circumstances" following a four-year Covid-inspired lockdown. Yet unlike that batch from Vladivostok, which, to their credit, made no bones about the suffocating restrictions they were subjected to or North Korea's untold internal deficiencies, the 15 Muscovites who headed there this time around were on a myth-busting mission to normalise and whitewash Mr Kim's gross mismanagement of his personal fiefdom.
Aside from singing the praises of Pyongyang's ultra-modern architecture, Wonsan's pristine beaches and the mouth-watering local cuisine they were treated to, perhaps most telling was Anastasiya Samsonova's testimony to Sky News on witnessing "nothing terrible" in North Korea and feeling "absolutely free". That the 33-year-old HR manager and her fellow compatriots did not consider having a state-appointed minder leading them by the nose to pre-approved sites of interest and policing who they interacted with a violation of their freedom reflects how low a bar Russian tourists set for themselves when venturing abroad.
Among the reasons why Russians are supplanting their Chinese counterparts as the primary target audience of North Korea's nascent tourism industry is thanks to increasingly strained ties between Moscow and Washington. Whereas Donald Trump's unilateral withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and subsequent "maximum pressure campaign," vis-à-vis Iran, garnered a great deal of attention during his first term in office, he adopted an equally hardline and hawkish approach towards North Korea with the exception of the 2018-19 period when diplomacy was given a chance by both parties to little avail.
Needless to say, the Hermit Kingdom is still a US-designated "state sponsor of terrorism" and also features on the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF's) blacklist, meaning that any individual or entity caught bankrolling Bureau 39 -- the Kim family dictatorship's unofficial slush fund -- remains fair game for secondary sanctions. The rationale behind Nordwind Airlines operating charter flights to Pyongyang rather than Aeroflot was down to fears of the latter being denied US landing rights, as the Russian and American negotiating teams earlier pushed for a resumption of the pre-war direct Moscow-New York service.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Last Frontier unlike any other place
Last Frontier unlike any other place

Bangkok Post

time21 hours ago

  • Bangkok Post

Last Frontier unlike any other place

Alaska has been thrust into the news this weekend for reasons that require no explanation. It's a suitably symbolic venue for the Trump-Putin summit considering it was once part of the Russian Empire. It is certainly an extraordinary part of the world that is much appreciated by those who love the wilderness. American author Jon Krakaeur once observed "Alaska is a place that constantly reminds you of just how small you are in the grand scheme of things. It's a humbling experience." It's more than twice the size of Texas, which means it's definitely on the large side. I haven't been to Alaska but just the mention of its name brings images of majestic mountains and an unbelievable wilderness with gritty residents who don't complain when it gets a bit nippy in the winter or being bitten by squadrons of mosquitoes. It is also home to North America's tallest peak Denali (Mt McKinley). Considering its location it's hardly surprising that it's the chilliest US state. Even Putin once described it as "too cold". The Russians, who colonized the place in the 18th century found the territory a bit too much to handle and happily sold it to the US in 1867, negotiated by US Secretary of State William H, Seward. Political opponents referred to the sale as "Seward's folly" because they thought the land was not worth the bother. Alaska didn't become an official US state until 1959 and is still nicknamed The Last Frontier. A final word from American politician Lisa Murkowski: " Alaska is a place unlike any other on Earth". Baking hot and cold Hopefully during the summit Trump and Putin had the opportunity to tuck into a helping of the dessert Baked Alaska which was originally named to celebrate the aforementioned acquisition of Alaska by the US. The dessert includes ice cream on a cake base covered by a thick layer of baked meringue. The name reflects the odd mix of hot meringue and the cold ice cream which represents Alaska. As a kid I had never heard of Baked Alaska which was probably just as well as it is not exactly health food. North to Alaska Probably the first time I became aware of Alaska was as a teenager back in 1960 when Johnny Horton's song North to Alaska (from the film of the same name starring John Wayne) became a big hit around the world. The song relates the experiences of a gold prospector in the 1890s. The country singer, who had a fine baritone voice was tragically killed in a car accident in Texas shortly after recording the song and this probably added to its mystique and sales. Horton had earlier enjoyed another hit featuring the northernmost state with a song called When it's Springtime in Alaska (It's Forty Below). It also concerns a gold prospector who takes "a little stroll to the Red Dog Saloon" in Fairbanks and falls in love with the singer "Redhead Lil". This proves not to be a wise choice because "Lil" already has a boyfriend ominously called "Big Ed". New Orleans Horton's biggest hit came in 1959 with The Battle of New Orleans. The lyrics relate events building up to the famous confrontation in 1815 in which the British were heavily defeated. In one version released in the UK the lyrics were diplomatically amended with the word "British" being replaced by "rebels.'' All versions, however had the defeated army running "down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico". Minor misunderstanding On to more mundane matters. Although I have lived in Thailand many years I still occasionally experience miscommunications, usually of my own making. I had a reminder of this the other day. When my wife and I returned to Bangkok from Chaiyaphum recently we were accompanied by two Thai "tree surgeons". Their mission was solely to chop down a tree at the back of our house that had grown so large that it could cause serious damage if it fell in a storm. Much as I love trees I was aware of the problem and agreed to the chop. We had arrived home mid-afternoon and being weary after an eight-hour journey I retired upstairs for a brief nap, leaving the tree cutters to get on with it. Not a good idea … Blame the bees I was awoken by the sound of chain saws and thought I'd better check how they were getting on. To my horror they were cutting down nearly all of the other trees in the garden but had not touched the one at the back which was the only tree that needed the chop. They explained they could not cut the tree in question because it hosted a large bee nest (rahng peung) and there was a danger of people getting stung. A fair enough explanation. In the meantime they decided to "trim" the other trees and bushes which was not what I had in mind. They were such friendly fellows however, I couldn't complain and after all it was my fault for not supervising things properly. The net result is that we now have a rather sorry-looking garden resembling a war zone and a stubborn large tree at the back with a bee nest. There is also a family of very upset squirrels who now have to look before they leap. Oh well.

Rare earths are definitely China's trump card
Rare earths are definitely China's trump card

Bangkok Post

time3 days ago

  • Bangkok Post

Rare earths are definitely China's trump card

China's weaponisation of rare earths has emerged as a major flash point in US-China trade negotiations. These critical materials, especially the high-performance magnets they make possible, are vital components in electric vehicles (EVs), wind turbines, industrial robotics, and advanced defence systems. In response to China's strict rare-earths export controls, the United States has quietly lowered tariffs, relaxed export controls on AI chips, and even softened visa restrictions for Chinese students. At the same time, the US is scrambling to secure alternative supplies. In July, the Department of Defense announced a landmark multi-billion-dollar investment package to boost MP Materials, the company behind America's flagship rare-earths project. But what if, despite massive subsidies and years of effort, the US still can't escape its dependence on Chinese rare earths? Japan offers a cautionary tale. In 2010, following a maritime standoff over the Senkaku Islands, China abruptly cut off exports of rare-earth to Japan. In response, the Japanese government pursued a series of strategic measures: investing in Lynas Rare Earths, an Australian producer; boosting domestic research and development in recycling and substitution; forging its own commercial partnerships with Chinese magnet manufacturers; and building strategic stockpiles to cushion future supply shocks. More than a decade later, Japan still sources over 70% of its imports of rare-earths from China. China's rare-earths dominance wasn't built overnight, and it won't be easily eroded. Its strength does not lie in hoarding raw materials, but in the industrial capacity to refine, process, and produce at scale. Today, China controls between 85% and 90% of global rare-earths refining capacity, and produces roughly 90% of the world's high-performance rare-earths magnets. It is the only country with a fully vertically integrated rare-earths supply chain -- from mining to chemical separation to magnet fabrication. China's manufacturing edge has given it not only an industrial lead, but also a technological moat. Between 1950 and 2018, China filed more than 25,000 rare earths-related patents, more than twice the number filed in the US. Decades of hands-on experience in the complex chemistry and metallurgy of rare-earths processing have yielded a depth of expertise that Western firms cannot easily replicate. Moreover, in December 2023, China's government moved to cement its lead, imposing sweeping export bans on the technologies behind rare-earths extraction, separation and magnet production. China's lax environmental regulation has also given its firms a powerful advantage over their Western competitors. In 2002, the Mountain Pass Rare Earth Mine in California was forced to halt refining operations after a toxic waste spill. By contrast, China's more permissive regulatory environment has allowed rare-earths production to expand rapidly, with fewer delays and far lower costs. Importantly, rare-earths chokepoints are not fixed; they evolve with technology. China understood this, waiting patiently as Western dependence on rare-earths magnets increased exponentially with the global green transition, which created massive demand for EVs and wind turbines. Even if the West succeeds in building a parallel supply chain for today's rare-earths needs, tomorrow's chokepoints may lie elsewhere. Quantum computing, for example, increasingly depends on rare isotopes like ytterbium-171, as well as on elements such as erbium and yttrium. These emerging applications could become the next pressure points, leaving the US and its allies once again racing to catch up. The US therefore must confront an uncomfortable truth: China's dominance in rare earths is likely to endure for the foreseeable future. Defensive strategies like supply-chain diversification may address some vulnerabilities, but true resilience demands an offensive strategy that enhances American leverage. The US still holds many valuable cards. As long as it retains control over technologies or infrastructure that China cannot live without -- be it advanced chips, frontier AI models, and access to the dollar-based financial system -- China has a strong incentive to keep rare earths flowing. For years, though, the US has pursued the opposite course: gradually decoupling and restricting key technology flows to China. Since the first Trump administration, the US playbook has been to blacklist leading Chinese tech firms and tighten export controls on cutting-edge chips. While these measures initially hobbled Chinese firms such as Huawei and ZTE, slowing the country's AI development, they have proved difficult to enforce. Riddled with loopholes, they created opportunities for enforcement arbitrage. As outgoing US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo conceded in December 2024, "Trying to hold China back is a fool's errand." At the same time, US export controls have galvanized efforts in China to build indigenous alternatives, effectively accelerating the rise of national champions like Huawei. Far from strengthening American leverage over China, US policy is steadily eroding it. If you are Nvidia, losing access to the Chinese market doesn't just mean forfeiting billions in revenue. It means losing influence over the most important AI ecosystem for developers outside the US. Recent policy shifts suggest that this realisation is starting to take hold. The Trump administration's decision to relax restrictions on sales of Nvidia's H20 chips to China signals a move away from blanket bans and toward more calibrated engagement. Counterintuitively, such engagement may be a smarter form of de-risking. The more that China relies on American technology, the more deeply the two sides' supply chains will become entangled, and the harder it will become for China to weaponise its own strategic assets, including rare earths. ©2025 Project Syndicate Angela Huyue Zhang, Professor of Law at the University of Southern California, is the author of 'High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy' (Oxford University Press, 2024) and 'Chinese Antitrust Exceptionalism: How the Rise of China Challenges Global Regulation' (Oxford University Press, 2021).

Thai tourism momentum weakening
Thai tourism momentum weakening

Bangkok Post

time3 days ago

  • Bangkok Post

Thai tourism momentum weakening

Thailand's tourism business could be slow for the remainder of the year, as the country faces more intense competition from Vietnam and South Korea, which are offering visa exemptions to more markets, say industry executives. As well, they say, the domestic co-payment subsidy scheme did not effectively improve revenue for half of the participating Thai hotels. South Korea recently announced a visa-free policy for Chinese tour groups starting in September, ahead of the Golden Week holidays in October. Vietnam has expanded visa-free entry to 12 more markets, including Belgium, the Netherlands and Switzerland, bringing the total to 39 markets. Thailand has an extensive visa-free policy that covers 93 countries, but it will become less effective unless the government addresses the country's unsafe image and promotes new tourism products and attractions more actively, said Thanapol Cheewarattanaporn, president of the Association of Thai Travel Agents (Atta). Despite border tensions with Cambodia and the attack on two Malaysian tourists in Bangkok on Aug 8, he said the government has been slow to reassure tourists about safety or take action to instil confidence in prospective travellers. Negative sentiment about Thailand has spread on overseas social media, said Mr Thanapol, making it very hard to reach the government's goal of 35 million foreign arrivals this year. Atta plans to hold roadshows next month in Taiwan and India in an effort to restore tourism confidence. As of Aug 10, Thailand had welcomed 20.2 million arrivals, down 6.9% year-on-year, with 2.8 million Chinese the largest market. However, Chinese arrivals are down about 30%, because of safety concerns as well as growing interest in other destinations. Vietnam has been a big beneficiary of the shift, recording 12.2 million foreign arrivals during the first seven months, a gain of 22.5% from a tear earlier, driven by 3.1 million Chinese and 2.5 million South Koreans. Da Nang alone has already welcomed 1 million South Korean tourists. Morrakot Kuldilok, president of the eastern chapter of the Thai Hotels Association (THA), said many tour groups, particularly from Russia, Europe and India, have shifted their trips from Pattaya to Vietnam due to newer, cheaper properties. A five-star hotel in Vietnam may cost half the price as a similar-tier property in Pattaya, she said. Ms Morrakot said the government should act faster to combat obstacles, such as the strong baht, which has increased hotel prices by 5-7%. According to a July survey by the THA of 126 hotels in Thailand, 47% said the domestic tourism co-payment scheme would not increase their revenue, while 28% expected revenue to increase by no more than 5%. Some hotels in the East forecast a revenue increase of 6-10%, with Chon Buri the top destination, projected to have roughly 48,000 bookings out of the 300,000 allocated for major cities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store