Israeli 'regime' was 'begging' US for ceasefire, Iran says
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said in a statement on Tuesday that the Israeli "regime" was "begging" the US for a ceasefire before President Donald Trump made the announcement on Monday, according to Iran's Press TV.
Israel was 'frustrated by the heroic resistance of the Iranian nation", the IRGC said.
It added that the last phase of its Operation True Promise III taught a 'historic and unforgettable lesson' to Israel after its 'brutal and blind' aggression, which killed more than 300 civilians in Tehran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UAE Moments
an hour ago
- UAE Moments
Trump Denies Reports Iran Nuclear Sites Survived US Strikes
Former US President Donald Trump pushed back on Wednesday against reports from American media and leaked intelligence suggesting that recent US airstrikes on Iran did not destroy the country's nuclear infrastructure, as he previously claimed. Trump, posting on his platform Truth Social, blasted CNN and The New York Times, accusing them of downplaying what he described as one of the most successful military missions in history. 'FAKE NEWS CNN, TOGETHER WITH THE FAILING NEW YORK TIMES, HAVE TEAMED UP IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEMEAN ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY STRIKES IN HISTORY,' he wrote. Media and Intel Say Iran's Nuclear Program Still Intact According to unnamed US officials cited in media outlets, a classified intelligence report concluded that Sunday's strikes did not fully destroy Iran's nuclear centrifuges or its stockpile of enriched uranium. Instead, the attack may have only delayed Iran's program by a few months —far from the 'total destruction' Trump had announced earlier. Trump Maintains Nuclear Sites Were 'Completely Destroyed' Despite the conflicting assessments, Trump doubled down on his earlier statement, insisting that the strikes 'obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons' and that 'massive bombs hit exactly the right spot.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the intelligence cited in the reports was legitimate but stood by Trump's claim. She said the document was 'flat-out wrong' and criticized the leak of a top-secret report to the media. What This Means
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
US Bombing of Fordow Leaves Nuclear Core Intact
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai A U.S. intelligence assessment indicates that the air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, have damaged above-ground structures and access points but left underground enrichment infrastructure and uranium stockpiles largely undisturbed. The report by the Defence Intelligence Agency projects only a temporary setback—measured in months—to Iran's nuclear programme, challenging assertions by the White House that the sites were 'totally obliterated'. Satellite imagery released after the strikes on 22 June shows craters and blocked entrances at Fordow, where bunker-busting Massive Ordnance Penetrators reportedly hit ventilation shafts, yet analysts emphasise that the subterranean halls housing centrifuges lie too deep to evaluate via overhead visuals. WMD experts note that centrifuges are 'extremely vibration-sensitive', suggesting potential internal damage, but absent on-site inspection, the extent remains uncertain. ADVERTISEMENT The United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, has urged renewed inspections at the sites. Director-General Rafael Grossi told an emergency Board of Governors session that significant underground damage was plausible, yet only rigorous inspections can confirm impact and assess stockpiles of enriched uranium, including the 400 kg of material enriched to 60 percent purity. The DIA report also confirms that Iranian authorities pre-positioned crucial nuclear materials and equipment prior to the air campaign. High-resolution satellite images captured extensive vehicle activity—bulldozers, trucks and sealed tunnel exits—on 19–21 June, indicating a deliberate evacuation of enriched uranium and centrifuges. Analysts speculate this operation undercut the campaign's intended impact, preserving Iran's capacity to resume enrichment and reconstitution of its nuclear programme with comparative ease. The White House disputes the DIA's findings. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the intelligence leak as 'flat‑out wrong', citing the precision of the bombing campaign and reiterating President Trump's declaration of a 'perfectly executed mission' and 'total obliteration' of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Similarly, the Pentagon backs the President, contending that USAF and Navy strikes, featuring B‑2 stealth bombers flying 37‑hour missions deploying MOPs, decisively hit their targets. Despite official optimism, several non-proliferation experts question whether the attacks achieved strategic success. David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, asserted that while imagery suggests severe impact at Fordow, conclusive assessment requires internal access. Jeffrey Lewis and other analysts emphasise that intact uranium stockpiles, even if held at other sites, provide Iran with a largely intact nuclear baseline. The conflict has escalated beyond the nuclear dimension. Intermittent Iranian missile and drone fire has targeted U.S. and allied bases in the wider Middle East, prompting a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel, while global oil prices fluctuated amid tensions. IAEA technical teams have not yet been able to return to the sites. Grossi reminded parties that uninterrupted oversight is essential for both verifying the damage and ensuring no material has been diverted for weapons purposes. Iran has not formally objected to future inspections, although parliamentary figures have suggested curbs on IAEA activity if international hostility continues. Assessment of long‑term outcomes remains contested. Pro‑strike voices argue that disrupting operations, even temporarily, imposes significant costs on Iran's programme architecture. Critics warn that such tactics could drive Tehran's nuclear scientific talent further underground or accelerate development of redundant facilities. Meanwhile, intelligence officials and non‑proliferation authorities emphasise that blunts, quarterly backtracking cannot substitute for diplomacy. Restoring negotiations with Iran, potentially via intermediaries including the IAEA, remains the keystone for ensuring non‑weaponisation and preventing recurrence. The DIA characterises damage as limited to 'core components and stockpiles'—an interpretation not aligned with politically driven portrayals of mission success. As conflict fatigue weighs on global observers, the effectiveness of military action in halting nuclear proliferation faces renewed scrutiny.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel-Iran conflict hangs over Washington energy conference
Unanswered questions and an uncertain outlook following the Israel-Iran conflict dominated an annual gathering in Washington to discuss emerging trends in the Gulf's energy plans. While Tuesday's 11th annual Petro Diplomacy Conference hosted by the Arab Gulf States Institute was billed to discuss the Gulf Co-operation Council's diversification efforts, analysts were instead left to address with the wider developments in region. That morning, President Donald Trump scolded Israel and Iran for breaking a ceasefire agreement he had announced the night before. That came after a series of events shaking the region, punctuated by the US joining the conflict over the weekend. Traders love volatility. That's how you make money. Producers don't Raad Alkadiriz, senior associate at CSIS. That left leading thinkers playing catch-up at the think tank's downtown Washington conference to developments that seemed to change by the hour. 'I don't think anyone really knows where we are,' said Mona Yacoubian, director of the Middle East Programme at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. There are different paths that could unfold. The crisis could escalate further, or Iran's restrained retaliation against a US airbase in Qatar on Monday could open the door for diplomacy. 'The Iranians are in such a weakened position that they were really not interested in undertaking a response that would have goaded the US or compelled the US to respond again even more strongly,' Ms Yacoubian said. Iran's response and Mr Trump's ceasefire announcement sent oil prices tumbling. Brent, the global benchmark for crude, closed 6 per cent lower on Tuesday. 'Traders love volatility. That's how you make money. Producers don't,' said Raad Alkadiriz, a senior associate at CSIS. So far, traders appear less spooked than they were in 2019, when Iran attacked oil processing facilities in Saudi Arabia. 'At this point the market is very much thinking:n 'Look, we're going to bet on real disruption when we see it, and not on some kind of fear of that disruption,'' said Phillip Cornell, non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and former adviser to Saudi Aramco. Still, questions over the effectiveness of America's strikes on Iran's three nuclear plants remain unanswered. US media reported that Washington's strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear programmes by a few months, which the White House has denied. "The market is very much thinking: Look, we're going to bet on real disruption when we see it, and not on some kind of fear of that disruption Phillip Cornell, non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council And even as Mr Trump said now is the time for peace, a more sour outlook hung over the conference at the Army Navy Club in downtown Washington. 'Iran is not going to come to come to the table and say: Please don't do it again,' said Alan Eyre, diplomatic fellow at the Middle East Institute and former member of the US Foreign Service. 'This has replaced, I think, for many Iranians, the [1984] Iran-Iraq war as the motivating trauma that's going to guide them going forward.' The conflict adds another shade of uncertainty to the region's economic prospects. Analysts say that the Gulf, while largely insulated from the direct effects of Mr Trump's tariffs, are likely to be affected significantly through the higher cost of production in the US. And even less is known about the economic impact of the Israel-Iran conflict. Speaking to the House Financial Services Committee in Congress, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said he would not want to speculate on how it would impact the economy. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo economists maintained their projection the global economy would grow by 2.7 per cent this year despite recent tensions. 'While new confrontation marked a major geopolitical flashpoint in the Middle East and globally, we do not expect any economic disruptions from the conflict and maintain our view that growth prospects are improving,' economists Brendan McKenna and Azhin Abdulkarim wrote in a note to clients.
