
The best secateurs to save you time and effort when pruning your garden, tested
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
There are two main types of secateurs, bypass and anvil. The latter comprises a single blade that cuts against a flat, blunt surface, designed for cutting tougher, woodier or dead stems. Bypass secateurs – by far the most commonly used of the two, and what I've focused on here – comprise two blades that pass each other closely, providing a clean and accurate cut. These secateurs tackle the everyday things: lighter shrub pruning, deadheading, slicing twine and so on.
If well looked after (see below), a quality pair of bypass secateurs can last decades; as a result, gardeners declare staunch loyalties to particular models. I was introduced to a brand early on in my gardening career and have used the same one for more than 15 years, so it's high time I stepped out of my comfort zone and considered some new candidates.
To help me, and you, navigate a bewildering number of models – and with the arrival of spring – I put 12 pairs through their paces. Here are the nine best secateurs from my tests.
Best secateurs overall:
Burgon & Ball bypass secateurs£23 at Farrar & Tanner
Best secateurs for tough stems:
Felco Model 2£64.99 at B&Q
Best budget secateurs:
Spear & Jackson Razorsharp Advantage bypass secateurs£9.95 at Amazon
Best secateurs for comfort:
Niwaki GR Pro£84 at Burford Garden Co
In my almost two decades as a professional gardener, I have encountered every possible use for a trusty pair of secateurs – from sculptural pruning to paint tin opening (ill-advised). I know the strain they're often put under and what is required of a durable pair. I'm also something of a neat freak: if a stem or branch can be cut to smarten a scene, I'll likely have chopped it five minutes ago.
My day-to-day as head gardener at London's Garden Museum includes anything from shaping shrubs and sprucing perennials to snipping stems for indoor flower arrangements. My role also entails leading a hearty and commendable crew of regular volunteers of all ages, who will be the recipients of these secateurs.
With spring in the air, the time for cutting back perennials and grasses in advance of new growth, I took each pair to task in my own garden. I tidied up the small stuff first: old aster stems, scrappy libertia leaves, brittle mounds of purple moor-grass.
While affordability, maintainability and sleek appearance are all considerations when selecting secateurs, for me, there are four key criteria they ought to meet. The first is sharpness. If ever I am frustrated with a pair of secateurs, it is most likely due to their failure to cut through finer plant material: slender or fibrous flower stems, the matted hair of ornamental grasses.
The second criterion concerns how well they cut through thicker stems: small shrub branches, roses, the hardened stalk of a sunflower. This is as much down to the body of the secateurs as the blade. With plenty of living and lignified hazel, elder and buddleia around the garden, I tested each pair on various tougher materials.
The third important consideration is comfort: handles are everything. Whether or not a pair feels securely gripped in the hand comes down to the coating, be it plastic, rubber or metal. Comfort, however, tends to be dictated by their shape and girth.
The fourth is the catch lock. Being able to lock secateur blades shut with ease is crucial. Left open they become a hazard, the sharp blade easily knocked against or catching a finger. Most secateurs are configured with a catch easily manoeuvred with the thumb; in some models, this is substituted with a latching lock at the bottom of the handles. Convenience makes all the difference, as locking is frequent between cuts.
There is one other factor I thought was worth testing: visibility. Secateurs are frequently put down, dropped or absent-mindedly stowed, and therefore easily lost. So, a level of conspicuousness can help, and some brands have opted for vibrant, standout colours. To test this, I asked our five-year-old to do what five-year-olds do best and lose each pair, one by one, in the garden – under parental supervision, of course. My wife timed my subsequent searches.
£23 at Farrar & Tanner£20.99 at Tesco
Despite alloy handles, a carbon-steel blade and an endorsement from the Royal Horticultural Society, I didn't expect a workaday pair of secateurs like Burgon & Ball's to top the lot. They're not only sharp, robust and comfortable but also reasonably priced: a mid-range contender that jostles with the premier pruners.
Why we love itOn the surface, there's nothing extraordinary about these secateurs. In appearance, they adopt a look recognisable in many other brands – the long shaft, swivelling thumb clasp, volute spring and indented handles. However, these unremarkable features are put together remarkably well: in the hand, Burgon & Ball's secateurs feel comfortable, lightweight and well-balanced, while the blade had little trouble slicing through matted grass and larger stems alike. When cutting 2cm+ diameter material, you might need to apply some brute force – or consider the loppers – but for anything below, these make light, easy and precise work.
They stood out well in the visibility test, too. Owing to the intentionally conspicuous orange of the handles, it took a mere 17 seconds for me to locate them in the garden (half hidden beneath a cistus shrub). They're also built with maintenance in mind: the blade and spring can be removed for cleaning or replacing (they come supplied with a spare of each, though I'm not sure whether that's reassuring or disconcerting!). All in all, an excellent, robust and comfortable model that, even after long use, doesn't strain the hands and wrists.
It's a shame that … the screw head on the blade has been left exposed – it's sure to collect mud.
Max cutting diameter: up to 2.5cmLeft handed available? Yes (£22.95 at Amazon)
£64.99 at B&Q£55.55 at Amazon
Swiss company Felco is among the best known of all secateur brands. Individually numbered, its series of red-handled pruners ranges from compact, professional and premium models to left-handed and rotating-handled options. Model 2 is its original, classic pair, hyped by working and amateur gardeners.
Why we love itThere's an undeniable heft to Felco secateurs that offers reassurance: going at the thicker growth of my rampant buddleia, I never doubted the robustness of the body or the force behind the blade. Felco was founded in 1945 and operated out of an old watch dial factory – so the origin story goes. It introduced clockwork precision and finesse to the rugged world of garden maintenance (it also makes loppers, knives and saws). Its tools are made from 70% recycled aluminium and any steel it uses is 95% recycled alloy. All parts can be replaced and the company offers a reconditioning service: secateurs for life, in theory.
When put to the test on the small stuff, the blades cut cleanly each time, never folding or squashing material in that annoying way that secateurs sometimes can. They felt nicely balanced and undemanding on the wrist, the handles pleasantly cushioned by rounded rubber pads. The thumb clasp is second to none, and there's no two ways about it, that blazing red was engineered for prominence: it took me all of six seconds to spy the pair hidden among the plant pots.
It's a shame that … they're just not quite as affordable as other brands.
Max cutting diameter: 2.5cmLeft handed available? No
£18.95 at Tooled Up£9.95 at Amazon
Possibly the most simply designed and hard-working budget secateurs I've had the pleasure of trying, Spear & Jackson's economic offering is a genuine gem. The quality of performance is a level above their station.
Why we love itWith any budget item, there will be inevitable compromises. When it comes to secateurs, however, the element you least want to sacrifice is the quality of the blade, and this, clearly, is what Spear & Jackson prioritised with its Razorsharp Advantage bypass secateurs. The carbon steel blade is durable and smooth and glides neatly beside its chrome counterpart for a faultless cut.
The drawbacks lie elsewhere: the basic coil spring; the lightweight plastic handles; and I wasn't wild about the lock slider at the top. However, they're extremely comfortable for the price – no mean feat in the world of secateurs – and the 10-year guarantee aids confidence.
Cutting a mixture of grasses and perennials, the Razorsharp Advantage secateurs delivered a satisfyingly smooth 'chop', and handled most shrubby material well, provided it wasn't too large. Aesthetically speaking, I'd say they look pretty good, too: no frills, but no clumsy components either.
Spear & Jackson doesn't offer a reconditioning service, though it does offer advice on cleaning and restoring secateur blades.
It's a shame that … they're not just a little tougher with larger material.
Max cutting diameter: 1.5cmLeft handed available? No
£84 at Burford Garden Co£92.40 at Amazon
You're not just purchasing a pair of secateurs here: you're subscribing to a certain quality, comfort and aesthetic in a gardening hand tool. Niwaki's bestselling secateurs are a masterclass in elegance and functionality.
Why we love it
Spy a gardening colleague unsheathing any one of Niwaki's sleekly designed, uber-refined tools, and you know they're not messing around. The brand is the brainchild of Wiltshire-based founder Jake Hobson, and it adheres to the traditions of Japanese tool craft, producing primarily Japan-made hand tools that are as beautiful as they are useful.
Professional gardeners swear by the GR Pro secateurs for good reason. For one, my goodness, do they feel good. There's a balance in the palm that I've genuinely never felt before, and although there are no finger indentations on the handle, they are ingeniously shaped for support. When you open them up, the stylish central spring pushes apart the handles (and, by proxy, the blades) to just the right extent, stabilising them pleasantly in your hand and presenting a wide mouth to the material at hand. Indeed, the top blade itself is noticeably larger than most: unusually for secateurs, it neatly meets the bottom of the corresponding bypass.
Practically speaking, the cut is unreal. True to the Japanese heritage, the GR Pro's blades cut so cleanly that I got sidetracked shaping leaves to within a millimetre. Similarly, they handled the shrubby stuff with comparative ease. So what's the snag, you might ask? For me, it's the catch lock. Located at the bottom of the handles, locking and unlocking becomes a little more cumbersome than with a thumb clasp. Perhaps this is a matter of practice, though – when I queried a gardening pal on how she locks hers, she pinged me a video demonstrating a swift knock against the leg – apparently so intuitive a knack she's never actually realised she does it. As for visibility: sure, with their muted yellow handles they took a fraction longer to spot among the perennials. Let's face it, though: you're unlikely to let these covetable cutters out of your sight in the first place.
Niwaki doesn't offer secateur blade replacements but it does have a secateur sharpening service. And it supplies replacement springs – the GR Pro comes with one.
It's a shame that … it takes two hands to unlock them, and they're on the more expensive side. Everything else is perfection.
Sign up to The Filter
Get the best shopping advice from the Filter team straight to your inbox. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link.
after newsletter promotion
Max cutting diameter: 1.5cmLeft handed available? Yes (£89 at the Plant Centre)
£52.95 at B&Q£43.99 at Amazon
Best for: elegance and precision at a more affordable price
Similar in body to Niwaki's GR Pro, Okatsune's 103 secateurs are sleek and slim, and deliver just as proficiently when it comes to the snip. Okatsune is a Japan-based manufacturer conceived by a former blacksmith. It boasts blades made from the same steel from which Samurai swords are fashioned: a confidence boost for sure when it comes to keenness and durability. I particularly liked the red-and-white colouration of the handles, which, according to Okatsune, symbolises happiness in Japan. I liked the more affordable price tag, too.
It didn't make the final cut because … they feel just a little top-heavy in the hand, with the blade ever so slightly outweighing the handles.
Max cutting diameter: 2.5cmLeft handed available? No
£7.99 at Amazon
Best for: a satisfying snip
Gardeners will concur that there is no one generic 'snip' sound common to all secateurs; each has its signature slice. As is implicit in the name, JiveSnip's uniquely satisfying snip is the product of its titanium blade, which severs smaller diameter garden material with a curiously pleasing feel – worth the price alone. The other, less subtle distinguishing feature of these secateurs is their overtly padded handles, which, according to the manufacturer's blurb, provide non-slip, fatigue-free pruning. Excepting larger, woodier material, I found this to be true enough, though I imagine they may collect soil with extended use.
It didn't make the final cut because … the handle grips are just a little too spongy for my liking.
Max cutting diameter: 2cmLeft handed available? No
£17.99 at Charlies£20.95 at B&Q
Best for: deadheading
Darlac produces a range of bypass secateurs, but I was intrigued by its Cut'n'Hold pruners in particular, contrived with a clasp function intended to ease deadheading and cut-flower gathering. Closing in unison with the adjacent bypass blades, the lightly serrated clasp will hold a stem in place while the blades sever it from the plant. Rather brilliantly, I found this works as effectively for soft, slight stems (eg pulmonaria, geranium) as for woodier examples such as rosemary and helichrysum, each time keeping hold of the stem until released. Add to that a nice metal top clasp (at last, a top clasp that works smoothly!), comfortable handles and Felco-like red visibility, and you've got a really solid, if slightly niche, pair of secateurs.
It didn't make the final cut because … I found that offcuts can occasionally trap between the clasp and the blade.
Max cutting diameter: 2cmLeft handed available? No
£14.99 at Marshalls Garden£14.99 at Bents
Best for: small hands and surprising strength
Trialling a few Kent & Stowe mid-price secateurs, I'd intended to review its all-purpose Eversharp model. However, I was so impressed with its more compact mini pair, I had to give them a shoutout instead. The big surprise here is that, despite the low price and dainty size (17cm in length), this little model can tackle stems that have proven challenging for average-size secateurs. The snip is clean, the grip is fast and the handles are rigid: an excellent pair for delicate propagative work and rigorous chopping alike. But, buyers take heed: dressed in muted greys and earthy brown handles, this little wonder is liable to vanish into the undergrowth if dropped – it took me the longest to find by a good minute.
It didn't make the final cut because … the catch lock is somewhat fiddly, which might be expected for so compact a pair of secateurs.
Max cutting diameter: 1.5cmLeft handed available? No
£114.99 (bare tool) at Ryobi Tools£122 (bare tool) at B&Q
Best for: effortless pruning and for those requiring cutting assistance
A few electric-assisted secateurs are available, with companies such as Stihl and Worx throwing their hats into the ring. However, Ryobi's cordless 18V One+ model is among the most competitively priced. If, like me, you've not tried electric sheers before, you're in for a novel experience. Activated and deactivated with a hold of the trigger, once you get snipping it's addictive – without restraint, beloved shrubs will soon be reduced to kindling. Comfortable and unexpectedly precise, this is a fantastic option for thicker stems, and for those who require some assistance with their pruning. You'll need to buy a battery and charger, and safety glasses are advisable, all available from Ryobi.
It didn't make the final cut because … it wouldn't be fair – this one's got an 18V battery!
Max cutting diameter: 2.5cmLeft handed available? No, but they are ambidextrous
The key to prolonging the life of any pair of bypass secateurs is to keep them clean, oiled and sharp. After rigorous use, wipe away any soil or debris from the body and blade using a damp cloth. If there's a detachable central spring, remove this and clean inside it. Using a whetstone, carefully sharpen the edge of the blade before wiping it with another clean, oiled cloth. Finish by oiling the clasp and spring for a smooth action.
Some secateur suppliers offer a maintenance service. Felco does this with a 28-day turnaround, returning your pair by post fully restored and sharpened. Lastly, it may look a little dorky, but a secateur holster – worn on the belt – will help ensure your cherished pair is kept dry and clean, and safely stowed after each use.
Matt Collins is a garden, nature and travel writer, and head gardener at the Garden Museum in London

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
The best blenders in the US: five favorites for smoothies, soups and frozen drinks
There are few breakfasts that feel as healthy and refreshing as the ever-mutable smoothie. You can make them virtuous, with lots of greens and nut milk, or luscious, with full-fat dairy and cocoa powder – but in order to make a good one, you need a really good blender. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. And while smoothies are the classic use for a blender, these appliances can do so much more; a truly great blender is a kitchen workhorse that can make your morning smoothie, your afternoon dip, your evening soup and even a frozen drink if you're feeling frisky. While blender technology has definitely improved in the last few decades – we now have high-speed contraptions that can make peanut butter in less than a minute – they're all basically attempting to turn large pieces of food into a smoother result. If you're looking for a new one, we've tested the best in the business. Best overall: Vitamix 5200$499.95 at Vitamix Best budget blender: Breville Fresh & Furious$186 at Amazon Best personal blender: The Beast Mega 1200 Plus$219 at Beast Best blender for smoothies on the go:Nutribullet Pro 900$89.19 at Amazon Best blender for the plastic-averse:Oster Classic Series Heritage Blender with 6-Cup Glass Jar$99.99 at Walmart All prices current at time of publication. I've been writing about food for more than a decade, whether that's writing recipes, editing cookbooks or reviewing restaurants. I'm an obsessive home cook with a small kitchen: I love an efficient kitchen tool and don't have patience for useless bits and bobs. I'm also a habitual smoothie maker, meaning that I've made hundreds of morning drinks, as well as plenty of pesto and endless sauces, in my own refurbished Vitamix – and cleaned it by hand each time. After spending a few weeks researching the wide world of blender options, I selected nine blenders to test: six full-sized blenders and three personal blenders. (I skipped immersion blenders, because comparing them to high-powered blenders felt like comparing a bike to a Hummer: they have different uses and vastly different power levels.) I tested each blender's ability to make the following: crushed ice (to replicate frozen drinks), peanut butter, pesto, smoothies and a broccoli-potato-white bean soup. After each test, I washed the blenders by hand, making note of how annoying they were to wash without the luxury of a dishwasher. I also made note of what 'extras' they came with, how they were packaged and what they were made of. I'm donating the blenders I tested to St Mary's Clothing Drive in Brooklyn, a wonderful charity near my apartment. $464.99 at Amazon$499.95 at Vitamix Why we love itAcross all my rounds of testing, the two Vitamix blenders I tested consistently produced the smoothest product, though this one – the 5200 – had the edge. Whether I was sipping a smoothie, spooning a soup or (let's be real) dipping a finger into a batch of pesto, this blender produced luscious, vibrant results, even keeping green and purple smoothies from turning muddy in color. It also worked quickly, turning a chunky soup into a puree in less than a minute, while other competitors took 90 seconds or more to create a mulchier result. After a few rounds of testing, the touchscreen of the more expensive Ascent ($750 compared to the 5200's $470) stopped working, and the blender was unusable. Even if the Ascent had kept working throughout my testing, the results were basically the same as those of the 5200. I also appreciated that the 5200 offered an array of speeds, without an excess of settings. There's an on/off switch and a switch that lets you choose high speed or variable speed; if you choose variable, a dial at the center of the control panel lets you go from zero to 10 as you like. The device will also 'pulse' in case you want to make something chunkier, such as salsa. And it comes with a tamper, to help break down anything super thick like peanut butter. Finally, it has a seven-year warranty. It's a shame that … It's definitely loud. At just over 20in tall, it's also too large to fit under some people's cupboards. Capacity: 64 ouncesPower: 1,380 watts / 120 voltsSpeeds: 10 $198.99 at Target$186 at Amazon Why we love itOut of the gate, I was impressed by the Breville because it was one of only two blenders that could crush ice without the assistance of a tamper or a splash of water. If you're looking to make frozen margaritas on the cheap, this blender is for you. The Breville website claims that the blades offer a mix of blending and food processing functionality; I tried chopping some carrots, and it was more of a shred. Still, it's a useful option. It also whipped up a bright-green pesto quickly. While it wasn't as silky smooth as the Vitamix pesto, it got pretty close. The smoothie, too, had a bit more texture than the Vitamix smoothie, but at nearly a third of the price, it feels like an acceptable tradeoff. I also liked the lid design: it fits very tightly and securely into the jug and features a loop that helps you pull it off easily. It's a shame that … Although it comes in seven different colors, from 'red velvet cake' to 'olive tapenada', this isn't the sleekest-looking blender of the bunch. And if you're obsessive about texture, you may find that your smoothies and soups aren't perfectly smooth. Capacity: 50 ouncesPower: 1,100 wattsSpeeds: five, plus other features such as crushed ice and pulse $219 at Macys$219 at Beast Why we love itThe Beast is the newest brand on this list. Their personal blenders have a very strong motor at 1,200 watts, and this option, the Mega Plus, comes with three jars, for XL smoothies, little batches of sauce and everything in between. The Mega Plus came with more bits and bobs than any other blender I tried: in addition to the jars there are a drinking lid, two straws, a straw cleaner and a blade cleaner. If you like gear, this is likely the blender for you. Of the three personal blenders I tested, the Beast consistently produced the best results, blending everything evenly from pesto to soup. While it couldn't blend nut butter or crush ice, I'm not sure that there's a personal blender on the market that can, and it was definitely the best for thick smoothies. I also liked the color options – I tested a dark blue model. It offers two speeds: 'pulse' and 'blend'. It's a shame that … While the Beast's jars are made of plastic – the same BPA-free material that the Vitamix uses – they're so heavy I briefly thought they might be made from very thick glass. I recently deadlifted nearly 240lbs, but even I wouldn't want to carry a smoothie this heavy to the gym. Capacity: 28.75 ouncesPower: 1,200 watts / 120 voltsSpeeds: two (pulse and blend) $89.19 at Amazon$79.99 at Kohl's If you want a personal blender that will make good smoothies and shakes you can take to the gym – or you balked at the Beast's $219 price tag – the Nutribullet is your friend. At just $88, the Nutribullet blended smoothies that were only slightly more textured than those of its more expensive counterpart, and it handily blended soup and pesto without any problem. It also comes with a second jar, a lid for drinking and a clunky-looking but totally effective detachable handle. This jar was basically designed to be thrown in a gym bag. It didn't make the final cut because … Its smoothies weren't the smoothest, but they still did the trick. Capacity: 32 ounces Power: 900 watts Speeds: one $99.99 at Walmart The Oster felt decidedly nostalgic – I'm pretty sure that my parents had the same one in the 90s, with its flip-on switch and tapered glass jug. It's also the only blender that arrived with zero plastic packaging: all cardboard, no useless baggies. If you're looking for a blender that will minimize potential exposure to microplastics, this is a great option, thanks to its glass jug. The lid is still plastic, but has less contact with your food. It also offers a 10-year warranty – even longer than the Vitamix's. It didn't make the final cut because … Its blending capabilities left something to be desired: it produced a decidedly mulchy green smoothie, and it never got soup as smooth as its competitors. Because the base is so narrow, it's difficult to clean by hand, as the area beneath the blades is a challenge to reach. Capacity: 48 ounces Power: 1,000 power watts/600 blending watts Speeds: two Choosing your blender will have a lot to do with how you want to use it. Do you just want to make shakes for the gym, or are you an obsessive home cook who has always wanted to make hummus? When it comes to jug blenders, the motor's power is the factor that most contributes to the blender's ability to do its job, but jug shape also comes into play. A more narrow, round base will blend small quantities better than a wider, square base. If you're just looking for a smoothie-making machine, or you have very limited counter space or budget, a personal blender is likely your best bet, thanks to its small footprint and because the jar turns into a to-go vessel for your drink. Jug blenders are better for larger jobs, or thicker mixtures, such as thick smoothies, nut butters, spreads and soups. A higher-power blender is going to offer a smoother consistency and faster results. Most high-speed blenders can clean themselves with a little help. Rinse out your blender as best you can, add a squeeze of dish soap and fill halfway with water. Then blend on high for a minute. Unless you were blending something particularly sticky, this should clean out your blender, and all you have to do is rinse it. You may have to wash the lid by hand. Personal blenders are a little different. Cleaning the jars is the same as cleaning a water glass. Be careful when cleaning the blades. I like to soak them in hot soapy water for about 20 minutes, which will loosen any bits of soup that have lodged in crevices. These are the blenders that I tested, in alphabetical order: The Beast Mega 1200 Plus Blendtec Total Blender Classic Breville Fresh & Furious Cuisinart Hurricane Nutribullet Pro 900 Classic Series Heritage Blender with 6-Cup Glass Jar Vitamix 5200 Vitamix Ascent X5 Zwilling Enfinigy Personal Blender Marian Bull has 10 years' experience in recipe reviewing – and in cleaning her blender. She has written about food for publications including Bon Appétit, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. This article was originally published on 7 August 2025. Reviews published in the Filter may be periodically updated to reflect new products and at the editor's discretion. The date of an article's most recent update can be found in the timestamp at the top of the page.


The Guardian
02-08-2025
- The Guardian
‘Serve me these with an aperitivo immediately': the best (and worst) supermarket salted crisps
'What I've learned today,' says my friend Lucy, stepping firmly away from the crisp buffet, 'is that you can have too much of a good thing.' My volunteer testers and I were enthusiastic about the prospect of tasting our way through 10 types of lightly salted, crisply fried potato, but we all agreed, once they were laid out side by side in anonymous bowls, that it was surprisingly hard to differentiate between them. That said, good news: every single one had its cheerleaders, so there were no real duds in this sample. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. To outline what I'm looking for from a salted crisp, it should be crisp, obviously. To this end, all the bags were opened at the same time, just before the blind tasting. Salt levels are a matter of personal preference, though it should be upfront rather than a mere seasoning, while, in an ideal world, the potatoes themselves would be the primary flavour, rather than a mere texture. They should be cooked long enough that they crunch, rather than melt between the teeth, but it's a delicate balance: too long in the oil and they'll be bitter. And that oil – if you can taste it at all – should be pleasant: too strong a flavour, even of the best fat, will overpower the spuds. Last, crisps should be dangerously moreish: if you can eat one and stop, they're not good crisps. ★★★★☆ The most divisive crisps of the day, with marks ranging from one (Rose, seven, and representing the youth vote) to five (me). Noticeably yellow, thanks to the extra-virgin olive oil they're cooked in (which, unlike the Himalayan pinkness of the salt, comes through in the flavour, hence, perhaps, the loss of the kid vote), they prompt the demand: 'Serve me these with an aperitivo immediately: crunch, salt, good oil – YES.' Sadly, these Andalusian crisps have a far higher fat content than any of the others tested. One for picking at elegantly over a chilled glass of sherry. ★★★★☆ Though some find them a little undersalted, these chunky crisps' 'classic flavour' finds favour, with several testers noting with excitement that they 'actually taste of potato!' While the comments section attracts several variations on 'mid-range' (Rose judges them merely 'OK'), the decent flavour and excellent crunch make this a great value choice. ★★★☆☆ Rose finds these too crunchy, but that very quality appeals to the person who says they'd be perfect for a hangover. 'Nice enough,' someone else says, 'but surprised not to find one I like more.' That sums these up – a decent, aggressively crunchy crisp with a high salt content, but missing that elusive potatoey flavour. ★★★☆☆ 'Perfectly fine,' one tester finds, before admitting: 'Actually quite moreish.' Someone else judges them 'generic'. Thin and crisp, which divides opinion, from 'nothing to them' to 'better – lighter!', Rose judges them 'too spicy', but I rather like their saltiness and the fact that – hurrah! – they taste of baked potato. I'd buy these again. ★★★☆☆ Cooked skin on, which gives them a decent potatoey flavour. There are a few slightly sweet, caramelised ones in here, suggesting an older potato, but in general these are crunchy, well-balanced crisps that would perform well in most situations, from festival pre-drinks to family picnics. 'Middle of the road,' as Rob observes. Sign up to The Filter Get the best shopping advice from the Filter team straight to your inbox. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. after newsletter promotion ★★★☆☆ Fun fact: I once visited the Kettle Chips factory in Norwich and was allowed to cook a kettle of crisps, so I can confirm that, as the packet suggests, they are indeed hand fried in small batches. They're not my favourite, though, even when cooked by the pros – I find these a bit greasy, while other testers judge them 'blah' and 'cardboardy … does not break when you bite in'. Several testers say they 'need more salt', but I'll let them off, given they're described only as lightly salted (always a red flag for me). ★★☆☆☆ 'Bang average' sums up the response to these. 'Wouldn't put out for guests.' Rose finds them 'too bitey' (they are, it must be said, very crisp), someone else finds them 'bland', and several tasters say they feel 'cheap' and 'basic', which is not reflected in the price. Disappointing. ★★☆☆☆ These apparently taste as if 'they were opened last night'. 'A bit stale,' someone else agrees. 'Wrong texture, dense.' Personally, I like a thicker crisp, but these are a little too chewy and even I find them a touch salty, though, checking the labels afterwards, they contain less salt than some of the others, so maybe it's just that the flavour is more intense. Might be better served with a creamy dip to balance this out. ★★☆☆☆ 'Too thick, like eating greasy batter out of the bottom of the chip paper, and not in a good way,' one tester says, and although I love a thicker crisp, I'm inclined to agree – these are a bit tough, rather than snappy, and taste, as Rose notes, 'too oily'. ★★☆☆☆ Rose, who confides in me that these are the only crisps she knows, picks them out from the lineup in seconds – they're far paler and more uniform than the others – but even she's not that enthusiastic. 'Not crunchy enough' is a common complaint, while someone else thinks they're so light, they're almost 'a health snack'. The final damning verdict comes from Claire: 'An anaemic pub crisp. Fine with a cold pint, otherwise lacking.'


Scotsman
02-08-2025
- Scotsman
Scotland's overall best universities, as students prepare for SQA results day
Across Scotland, thousands of students will soon be opening their exam results - and starting to make a solid plan for what will come next. SQA results day is now just days away, falling on Tuesday, August 5 this year. As Highers results roll in, so too will the outcomes of conditional university offers, for the many students hoping to use them as a springboard to launch themselves into the next step of their academic journey. Others, including those who applied after the deadline and those who didn't get the grades they might have hoped, will have another shot at being matched up with a university that works for them through the Clearing process. Fortunately for them, Scotland has no shortage of excellent universities, even when compared to others across the UK. With results day in mind, we've revisited The Guardian's latest university league table for 2025. This prestigious ranking gives most of the UK's 160-odd universities an overall score out of 100 based on a range of different metrics, including current student's satisfaction with both teaching and feedback, the school's staff-to-student ratio, how much money the institution spends per student, the average UCAS entry score for new starters, the percentage of first year students continuing on to their second year of study - and even graduate career prospects. We looked at how each of Scotland's universities fared, to create a useful guide for this year's upcoming cohort of university students. Our list is limited to institutions that achieved a score of more than 50 out of 100, according to The Guardian's metric. It is worth noting, however, that a few schools didn't appear in the overall rankings, which the paper says is due to not enough data being available. It's also important to remember that a low score overall doesn't mean that a university won't be a good place for you to study. Rankings can jump around year-on-year based on factors like extra funding - and even universities with lower overall rankings will often rank very highly for specific courses. Here were the Scottish universities that made the cut: 1 . University of St Andrews Taking out Scotland's top spot for 2025, this prestigious institution in St Andrews, Fife, is Scotland's oldest university - and is also thought to also be one of the oldest English-speaking universities in the world. It was ranked 2nd overall across the UK, with The Guardian giving it an exceptional score of 98.6 out of 100. | Peter Thompson/Photo Sales 2 . University of Aberdeen Another historic university, Aberdeen came in second place for Scotland, and was ranked 12th overall in the UK. The Guardian gave it a score of 73.3 out of 100. | UoA/Supplied Photo Sales 3 . University of Glasgow The University of Glasgow is Scotland's third highest-ranking university. It ranked 14th overall across the UK, with The Guardian giving it a score of 68.9 out of 100. | Fabian Bleh/Wirestock Creators/Adobe Stock Photo Sales 4 . University of Edinburgh Just behind it came the capital's namesake institution, which was ranked 15th overall in the UK. The Guardian gave it a score of 68.4 out of 100. | Adobe Stock Photo Sales