‘I'm a big believer in democracy': Electoral reform on cards for City of Melbourne
The formal request, made by Reece in a letter to minister Nick Staikos this week, was triggered by a recent council resolution following a Victorian Electoral Commission report on the 2024 council elections which revealed Melbourne's voter participation of 70.79 per cent significantly lagged the state average of 83.79 per cent.
It comes after a campaign by The Age during Victoria's local council elections in October last year which highlighted major inadequacies in the City of Melbourne Act 2001, which dictates election rules including that campaign donations don't need to be made public until 40 days after the election.
The Act hasn't been reformed since 2001 under the Bracks Labor government.
Reece, on behalf of the council, has requested a full review of the Act. The request explicitly asks for the review to consider banning donations from property developers and gambling interests as well as introducing so-called continuous donation reporting. It also seeks a review of the 'appropriateness' of the current voter entitlements.
'I'm a very big believer in democracy. Democracy is a verb. It's something that you do, and it's something you need to keep working on,' he said.
Reece said the review should examine whether foreign property owners should still be given a vote, giving an example of a person living in 'Shanghai, who has an apartment in Melbourne, but very rarely visits' and who may have a 'low connection to the city'. In contrast, he said it was also worth reviewing how to better inform international students they are able to vote.
Melbourne is the only capital city in Australia where eligible businesses get two votes in council elections, while residents only get one. The NSW government in 2023 repealed a similar rule for the City of Sydney elections, with the-then NSW Labor local government minister describing the system as 'something of which North Korea would be proud'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
8 hours ago
- The Australian
Last Post: Medicare card limits becoming clearer
Tasmania should give the vote to 16-year-olds – only 16-year-olds. They couldn't do worse. Trevor Farrant, Hackney, SA The Greens approve of 16-year-olds having the right to vote on the basis that they are old enough to pay tax. Why, then, don't we have a voting system that allows only the taxpayers to vote since it's the taxpayers' money that the government is spending? Rex King, New Farm, Qld It's puzzling why the Prime Minister, who flashed the Medicare card, was never asked during the election campaign or after if he had private health insurance ('GP reality slips out of pocket', 22/7). P. Reynolds, Gilmore, ACT Show me how to flash that Medicare card again, Albo. It doesn't appear to be working. Michael Afaras, Henley, NSW Australia, once a proud, free, viable, productive country, is heading towards becoming a kowtowing, obsequious, defenceless satellite state of China with its suffocating communist yoke lashed to the vassal's shoulders. Stephanie Millar, Cremorne, NSW Wow, shorter working hours, more holidays, no tax cuts and a vague mention of productivity – soon you won't have to work at all to make what you earn now ('Shorter hours, not tax cuts', 22/7). The Canberra forests, the only place in the country where money grows on trees. John Mullavey, Howrah, Tas It is obvious that the so-called productivity roundtable yapfest is a farce. Every Labor MP must be a member of a union and the unions that have no legal constitutional status will be there as well – so Labor and the unions will be in the majority, holding all the cards, and the remaining delegates, including employers, will be blindsided. Coke Tomyn, Camberwell, Vic What has Justin Mohamed actually achieved while travelling the world at taxpayers' expense ('First Nations envoy's $730k bill', 22/7)? Penni Seignior, Mudgeeraba, Qld Saul Kavonic's article about the risks of selling Santos is a stark reminder that nothing has been done to revert the deal on the Port of Darwin ('Risks behind Santos deal', 22/7). Ralph Hilmer, Randwick, NSW Given the Newspoll popularity of the only plan put forward by the Liberals since the election, feminisation of the party, it is perhaps time to present plan B ('Coalition support hits 40-year low', 21/7). Graeme Garde, Coolum Beach, Qld
The Age
12 hours ago
- The Age
Vilifying art-lovers at the NGV is a step too far
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. PROTESTS Exiting the NGV on Sunday, I was confronted by women protesting. My first instinct was to think they are women like me. As a teacher and Christian leader I've worked for peace, justice and reconciliation in education, churches and communities creating meaningful ways of offering hopeful transformation. I am a protester. But my instinct was wrong about these women as I don't target individuals and vilify them as they did to hundreds of us. A woman with the megaphone claimed 'anyone entering the NGV was ensuring the NGV thinks it's OK to hang out with fascists. You have blood on your hands and you support Zionism.' She then got personal to one woman saying 'you in the hat, you are supporting genocide entering the NGV'. I was collecting my bike nearby and foolishly engaged suggesting we can protest but it's wrong to target individuals as perpetrators of genocide. She then directed the megaphone at me chanting 'you support genocide'. She's right; we are all complicit in systemic and collective sins of commission and omission. But broad scale public vilification is not protest. It polarises, shuts down empathy and divides us further. Sally Apokis, South Melbourne Albanese should offer more than a gesture Anthony Albanese is correct in that the government should not recognise Palestine as a gesture only. He should do it as a commitment to the people of Palestine (''We won't make a decision as a gesture': Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine ', 28/7). At the moment Albanese is gesturing, not acting. He is unprepared to take a bold stand, whether it be to recognise Palestine or sanction Israel for its blatant crimes. While acknowledging the heartbreak of seeing children starve, he makes no mention of genocide or ethnic cleansing. It's time he be a true leader. Lorel Thomas, Blackburn South Australia must act Sadly it appears the world's leaders are deaf and blind to what has been happening in Gaza. And as Sean Kelly noted (' Mere words won't pass our moral test ', 28/7) only two months after the horrific Hamas attacks on Israelis on October 7, 2023, already 93 per cent of people were in phases 3, 4 or 5 of food insecurity. In May UN experts noted that 'while States debate terminology — is it or is it not genocide? — Israel continues its relentless destruction of life in Gaza, through attacks by land, air and sea, displacing and massacring the surviving population with impunity'. When will the Australian government take action? It's time we say to the US and the UK that we will not proceed with AUKUS unless arms supplies to Israel stop. Where is the power of leaders if they take no action to stop this carnage in Gaza? Peta Colebatch, Hawthorn Blame not so simple Regarding Sean Kelly, the Geneva Conventions allow the blocking of aid if the enemy is stealing or using it. Kelly cites a New York Times story denying Hamas is doing so, but a Washington Post report set out in detail, citing many witnesses including Gazans, how Hamas is in financial crisis because Israel has stopped it taxing aid, or stealing and selling it. Kelly writes about famine starting within months of the war beginning, but those warnings were retracted by the Famine Early Warning System, a US-funded monitoring group. The UN is also culpable. After ending its nine-week blockade in May, after having allowed enough aid into Gaza to last for some months, Israel not only facilitated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has distributed around 95 million meals, but also resumed UN access. However, there were recently 900 truckloads of aid inside Gaza checkpoints the UN hadn't collected. As for the suggestion of recognising a Palestinian state, only Palestinian Authority intransigence has prevented such a state. Hamas would say recognition only happened because of the October 7 atrocities. Recognition would simply encourage further Palestinian rejectionism and terrorism. Jamie Hyams, Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council Statehood for Palestine The people of the world claiming statehood for Palestine are living in a world of delusion. There are so many questions that still need to be asked. Some of these are: What are the geographical boundaries that define this state called Palestine? Who are the citizens of Palestine and who makes the decisions as to who becomes a citizen? What are the institutions that govern this state called Palestine? Are Jews allowed to be citizens of this new state called Palestine? These are only a few of the questions that need to be considered. No leader nor a member of the lobby groups that are advocating for statehood have made proposals that define this state. It's disingenuous on all people wishing for a state called Palestine because it's a falsehood. The people who are most vulnerable and exploited are once again being led up a path of others making. Graham Haupt, Glen Waverley Revert to 1947 borders Yes, as several correspondents to this page have stated, there are other serious human massacres also occurring, right now, in Yemen, and in Sudan. The difference is that those wars are not openly supported by a vocal and prominent segment of Australians, or accepted by Australian governments. Injustice for the people of Gaza stings our collective conscience. Here, and around the world. The only fair and long-term solution is to formally recognise those 1947 UN borders and allow the two states to exist as equals — with equal rights to exist, and also equal rights to have the military capability to defend themselves. Geoffrey McNaughton, Glen Huntly
Sydney Morning Herald
13 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How a century-old ‘zombie subdivision' became Melbourne's ‘worst case of urban blight'
The intergenerational failure to develop Solomon Heights has been blamed on a tangle of planning problems, according to Brimbank council analysis: it's hard to reach, with one road in and out of the precinct; its residential-sized lots are unsuitable for large-scale industry; and its neglected expanses are a refuge for several critically endangered plants and animals, including the striped legless lizard and the golden sun moth, which are protected under federal and state environmental laws. But the century-long campaign to develop Solomon Heights has never stopped. Glen Ora, a company that owns the undeveloped roads in the southern half of the precinct, has launched legal action to try to connect the area to water and kickstart development. The company has gone to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, appealing Greater Western Water's refusal earlier this year to grant water connection permits in the precinct. A statement of contentions seen by The Age says the refusal 'would stifle and prevent the future creation of infrastructure works in the subdivision'. The company has also approached the Department of Transport and Planning about developing Solomon Heights for housing, but it has been told there are no plans to rezone the area from industrial to residential. Glen Ora director Ron Silverstein was reluctant to comment to this masthead about his company's legal bid to force Greater Western to plumb the estate before VCAT has made a decision. 'What I'm prepared to say is there's an enormous amount of green tape involved in a transaction like this … from the Commonwealth, state and council,' he said. 'There's a huge regulatory system, which is complex, very expensive, and you need very deep pockets to do something like this.' The company is fighting to develop the Solomon Heights as it awaits a separate judgment over whether it is liable for rubbish dumping on the land. The Commonwealth-run Australian Rail Track Corporation, which owns land in Solomon Heights, has sued Glen Ora for more than $828,000, plus costs and interest. According to a statement of claim filed in court, subcontractors hired by Glen Ora dumped contaminated construction spoil, including asbestos, copper and lead, on ARTC-owned land. Loading Glen Ora has denied liability for the dumped spoil and a judgment is pending. When The Age visited Solomon Heights last week, it was clear rubbish dumping was a persistent problem. There were piles of old tyres, a rusted car body, mounds of mangled wires and rotting timber. The flat, grassy terrain is also choked with artichoke thistle and prickly pear. But Silverstein was eager to show this masthead something else that grows hidden among the weeds, and which is key to the precinct's future. 'One of the features of this property is that it's got a critically endangered plant and I don't want you to laugh when you see it. It's extremely valuable,' he said. In an overgrown corner of the estate near the Melbourne-Sydney railway line, eight spiny rice-flower plants grow, although only a trained eye would spot them. Each critically endangered plant is marked by a stake tied with a ribbon. The delicate yellow-flowered plants are protected under environment and biodiversity laws. There are 240 spiny rice-flowers in the estate, according to ecological surveys. 'People look at them and they can't understand why they're so important, and the answer is, I don't know either,' Silverstein said. Brimbank City Council has spent several years in a state of planning paralysis over Solomon Heights. In a 2019 report, it named the existence of protected plants and animals as a key impediment to development, along with the difficulty of getting property owners in the precinct to agree on a way forward. In 2022, it completed a feasibility study into creating a conservation reserve in the northern part of the estate. The Age sought a copy of the study via a freedom-of-information request but was denied, with the council saying the report is confidential. 'The document contains land use planning information, being information that, if prematurely released, is likely to encourage speculation in land values, which can be commercially sensitive,' Brimbank said. Individual lots are currently listed for more than $230,000 each. Loading The council said it has no plans to pursue public acquisition of any part of the estate. Lancashire argues that the southern part of the estate should be developed into an industrial estate that would boost local employment, and the northern section converted into an environmental reserve. 'There is a way forward,' he says. 'To see that this has been going on in my community for 100 years is gut-wrenching … we've done environmental study after environmental study. We need to stop the delays, we need to come back with a report on how to actually do it.' Monash University senior lecturer in urban planning Dr Elizabeth Taylor has studied Solomon Heights and other 'zombie subdivisions' like it, which are 'the living dead of the real estate market', seemingly trapped in time and unable to be developed. In her research, Taylor wrote that many potential solutions have been posed for the estate but 'a default position of inaction has defined it for nearly a century'. This is partly because current planning laws were not written with a 99-year-old riddle like Solomon Heights in mind. But mostly, it comes down to the cost of fixing the problem and the likely gap between what the council would be prepared to spend on compensation versus what the private landowners would demand. 'You can imagine Solomon Heights maybe being a cool park or something like that, but it just gets stuck because nobody wants to pay for it,' Taylor said.
