logo
Norwegian Nobel Committee chair pays tribute to atomic bomb victims in Nagasaki

Norwegian Nobel Committee chair pays tribute to atomic bomb victims in Nagasaki

NHK6 days ago
Norwegian Nobel Committee Chair Joergen Frydnes visited ground zero in Nagasaki on Wednesday and offered flowers to the victims of the atomic bombing of the city.
His trip to Japan comes after Nihon Hidankyo, the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations, which represents atomic bomb survivors known as hibakusha of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was awarded last year's Nobel Peace Prize. Frydnes arrived in the city on Tuesday night following his trip to Hiroshima.
He then visited the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum and viewed panels explaining the footsteps of Nihon Hidankyo and a banner bearing messages by atomic bomb survivors in Nagasaki. The banner had been brought to Oslo for the group's award ceremony.
At the Nagasaki National Peace Memorial Hall for the Atomic Bomb Victims, he left a message in the guest book. The message reads, "Here in Nagasaki, a city marked by unimaginable loss, we honor those who died, those who remember, and those who have transformed their suffering into a lasting call for peace."
Frydnes told reporters that he was deeply moved by the atomic bomb survivors' testimonials and was at a loss for words.
He also said at a time of increasing uncertainty when nuclear arms pose a global threat, passing down hope to future generations and bearing the responsibility is what is most needed today.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Ishiba refuses to quit even amid intense pressure for him to go
Why Ishiba refuses to quit even amid intense pressure for him to go

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Why Ishiba refuses to quit even amid intense pressure for him to go

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba faces intense pressure within the Liberal Democratic Party to take responsibility for three election defeats by resigning. But he remains at bat following his third strike as the head of the LDP — the party's July 20 Upper House election loss. Ishiba's first strike came after becoming LDP president in September last year, when he led the party to a Lower House election a month later in which it lost its majority. The second strike came when the LDP was dealt a huge blow in the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election in June, during which it lost nine seats and was relegated to becoming the second-largest party in the assembly, behind Tokyo Gov. Yuriko Koike's Tomin First no Kai (Tokyoites First). In a meeting with party executives and angry LDP lawmakers on Monday, Ishiba resisted calls for him to resign, saying he would stay on as party president and prime minister in order to prevent a political vacuum from forming. 'It's important that public opinion and our party's views are aligned,' Ishiba said, adding that an appropriate decision on his future would be made with these and other factors in mind. Recent media polls suggest that the public is not as anxious as many in the LDP to see Ishiba resign over the electoral losses, which past party presidents have often done. The LDP is also expected to complete its own evaluation of the Upper House results, and why it lost, by mid-August. Ishiba is likely to wait until the party's conclusions are official before formally deciding his future. Ishiba says that his insistence on remaining, at least for now, is also due to specific policy issues. On Tuesday, he told reporters that he wanted to make sure the 15% tariff deal with the U.S. is implemented. He said it was vital to examine the impact of the agreement on the roughly 4,300 domestic items covered by it. Pro-Ishiba demonstrators concerned about who might succeed him in the event that he steps down urge the prime minister to stay on during the rally on Friday. | AFP-JIJI Another reason Ishiba isn't bowing to pressure to resign is a busy August schedule. He'll likely attend events related to the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, such as memorial services for victims of atomic bombings in Hiroshima on Aug. 6 and Nagasaki on Aug. 9, as well as a ceremony commemorating Japan's war dead on Aug. 15. The Bon summer holidays follow soon after, and then Ishiba will welcome African leaders to the Tokyo International Conference on African Development that takes place from Aug. 20 to Aug. 22. Once August ends, any push for a leadership change becomes tricky as the political world prepares for the opening of the autumn session of parliament. The timeline is sure to be on the minds of LDP members seeking to oust Ishiba as quickly as possible. These include Sanae Takaichi, a former economic security minister and a conservative, and Toshimitsu Motegi, a veteran leader and a former party secretary-general. Both are trying to boost their standings within the party and among the public by criticizing Ishiba, who is in no hurry to let either of his rivals take over. While many LDP members agree Ishiba needs to go, the party — still reeling from the three election losses — has not rallied around a single rival candidate due to its own internal divisions. To win an LDP presidential election, a candidate needs to win a majority of votes from party parliamentarians and local chapters in the first round, or in a runoff between the top two first-round finishers. Yet even if an Ishiba rival manages to rally enough supporters to win the LDP presidency, the prime minister job is not guaranteed due to the party's lack of any parliamentary majority. Anyone replacing Ishiba would have to secure votes from at least one of the main opposition parties to become prime minister. For that to happen, LDP executives and opposition parties would first need to hammer out a deal right after a presidential election takes place. That could prove difficult to do quickly before the start of the autumn session of parliament, and would risk internal dissent within the LDP as well as create political problems for an opposition party leader who must convince members to vote for an LDP candidate to become prime minister rather than one of their own. Many want to see Ishiba strike out, but replacing him may not guarantee a more stable LDP or a more stable political situation. Staff writer Gabriele Ninivaggi contributed to this report.

Japan eyes locations for deploying longer-range standoff missiles
Japan eyes locations for deploying longer-range standoff missiles

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Japan eyes locations for deploying longer-range standoff missiles

Japan is still considering deployment locations for its longer-range standoff missiles, Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said Tuesday, with the weapons planned to be stationed by the end of next March. 'Regarding the upgraded ground-launched Type-12 anti-ship missiles, we plan to deploy them starting in fiscal 2025,' Nakatani told a news conference. 'However, the specific deployment locations are still under consideration and have not yet been decided.' Nakatani's remarks come after local media, citing unidentified government sources, reported that his ministry is finalizing a plan to deploy the missiles to the Ground Self-Defense Force's Camp Kengun in Kumamoto Prefecture. The move, intended to boost Japan's deterrence capabilities, would come as the Chinese military ramps up its training near Japan's far-flung islands near Taiwan and continues to exercise even further from China's periphery and well into the Pacific Ocean. The upgraded Type-12 missiles have a range of about 1,000 kilometers, putting Shanghai and much of the East China Sea — including the waters northeast of Taiwan — within striking distance. Nearly all of nuclear-armed North Korea would also fall within range. Nakatani said the Defense Ministry 'will continue to work toward building up Japan's standoff defense capabilities more quickly, amid the most severe and complex security environment since the end of World War II.' Japan's 2022 National Security Strategy paved the way for the ostensibly pacifist country to acquire a controversial 'counterstrike capability.' The government has long viewed the capability as constitutional so long as three conditions for the use of force are met: that an armed attack has occurred or is imminent; that there is no other way to halt an attack; and that the use of force is limited to the minimum necessary. One option for this capability is to employ standoff missiles that allow it to attack from outside an enemy's range. However, critics say the deployment sites would effectively turn them into retaliatory targets for enemies. Asked Tuesday if the government will explain the plans to local residents prior to deployment, Nakatani said that it 'will make adjustments as necessary.'

U.S. public opinion divided over atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
U.S. public opinion divided over atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

U.S. public opinion divided over atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

U.S. citizens are divided over the August 1945 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the closing days of World War II, an opinion poll conducted by the Pew Research Center in the United States shows. Respondents who said the bombings were "justified" accounted for 35%, while 31% said they were "not justified." Those who were "not sure" made up 33%. The survey, released Monday, was conducted on more than 5,000 U.S. adults between June 2 and 8, ahead of the 80th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings on the city of Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and the city of Nagasaki three days later. The share of respondents who answered that the attacks were justified fell sharply from 56% in the previous survey, in 2015, and that of those who said they were not justified also dropped, from 34%. The decreases in both answers were apparently due to the "not sure" option not being available in the 2015 survey. By gender, 51% of the male respondents thought the bombings were justified while the proportion stood at only 20% for female respondents. Older respondents tended to defend the use of the atomic bombs, with the proportion of those age 65 or over who are supportive of the bombings coming to 48%. By contrast, only 27% of those under 30 gave that answer. Meanwhile, 69% of all respondents think that the development of nuclear weapons has made the world "less safe," far exceeding the 10% who answered the opposite. A large majority, at 83%, of all respondents said they "know a lot' or 'a little" about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store