DA: No comment on 'pending investigation' on HFD allegations
May 1—HARLINGEN — The Cameron County District Attorney's Office is not commenting on a "pending investigation" into whether the Harlingen Fire Department falsified Valley International Airport firefighter training records.
On Thursday, District Attorney Luis V. Saenz declined to comment.
"The DA's office does not comment on pending investigations," he said.
On April 24, the district attorney's office requested city officials provide Federal Aviation Administration documents including information regarding the fire department's "misleading entries" into training records, City Attorney Mark Sossi said.
In response, he provided the district attorney's office with two FAA investigation reports dated Feb. 19, he said in an interview.
Sossi said he had no other FAA documents stemming from the agency's investigation.
"We gave the DA everything we had from the FFA," City Manager Gabriel Gonzalez said, referring to the two Feb. 19 FAA documents.
Meanwhile, Marv Esterly, Valley International Airport's aviation director, said the district attorney's office had not contacted his office.
On April 22, the district attorney's office said it was requesting the FAA provide "their report regarding the Harlingen Fire Department's Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting training compliance documents and related records for Valley International Airport."
Late last year, Esterly contacted the FAA after three airport firefighters signed affidavits claiming deficiencies appearing to contradict records stemming from two training sessions conducted in June and July 2024, a Dec. 5, 2024 report shows.
"The discrepancies between the actual training conducted and the official training records raise the possibility of falsification," Esterly wrote the report to the FAA.
In one affidavit, a driver "indicates that the training session lasted less than 20 minutes and did not include hands-on training, despite the official training record inaccurately stating the session lasted one hour with no indication of skill performance being conducted," he wrote.
"Sworn affidavits from two ARFF personnel indicate that this class was significantly abbreviated, lasting only 14 minutes and, like the June session, lacked hands-on training," Esterly wrote in the report. "These discrepancies conflict with the official training record, which inaccurately claims compliance with the FAA-approved curriculum."
In response, he reported concerns of falsified training records to Fire Chief Rafael Balderas, Esterly said.
"Chief Balderas has informed me that he is investigating the allegations," Esterly wrote in the report. "Additionally, I, along with the airport board chairman and the airport board attorney have met with the mayor, city manager and the city attorney to discuss these findings. During our meeting, they advised that they are committed to investigating these findings thoroughly ...."
As part of their investigation, city officials requested an internal audit into the allegations, the report states.
During the audit, Sanjuana Garcia, the city's internal auditor, reviewed the records, Esterly said.
"She reviewed all training records for the ARFF and found no discrepancies," Gonzalez said.
Meanwhile, FAA officials interviewed a group of airport firefighters regarding allegations of abbreviated classes and failure to conduct hands-on training.
"HFD entered misleading entries into the June 13, 2024 and July 11, 2024 training record relative to the sufficiency and quality of the training," the FAA wrote in a Feb. 19 report. "The entries raised questions relative to potential falsification, reproduction or alteration of applications, certificates, reports or records in accordance" with the Code of Federal Regulations.
In its investigation, the FAA found "inadequate training and misleading entries to be directly isolated to the identified sessions and not systemic to the entire ARFF training program," the agency's report stated.
In closing the case, FAA officials "concluded the matter does not warrant legal enforcement."
"We will expect your future compliance with the regulations," Denson E. Stasher, the FAA's manager of safety and standards branch, wrote in the report.
Last month, the airport's board of directors tabled action on a proposed resolution calling for the termination of the airport's $1.2 million agreement with the city providing the fire department's aircraft rescue and firefighting services.
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
12 hours ago
- Associated Press
NTSB finds a fuel leak and improperly installed parts in the engine of an airliner that caught fire
A fuel leak and several improperly installed parts were found inside the engine of an American Airlines plane that caught fire after the plane landed in Denver in March, according to a new report released Thursday. The National Transportation Safety Board said one part inside the right engine of the Boeing 737-800 was loose and had been installed in an incorrect direction and that fuel was leaking from the fitting of another part that was incorrectly fastened. The preliminary findings don't identify the cause of the fire because the NTSB won't reach that conclusion until after it completes its investigation sometime next year. But former NTSB and FAA investigator Jeff Guzzetti said the problems investigators found in the engine appear to be the source of the fuel that caught fire. 'To me, it looks like improper maintenance in the right engine leading to a fuel leak,' Guzzetti said after reading the NTSB report. Photos and videos posted online showed billowing smoke and passengers standing on the plane's wing after it taxied to a gate at Denver International Airport. Twelve people were taken to the hospital with minor injuries. The plane carried 172 passengers and six crew. The NTSB said gate workers extinguished the fire within a minute even before firefighters arrived and doused lingering hot spots on the plane. Pictures included in the NTSB report show streaks on the outside of the engine from the leaking fuel, and airport video showed a trail of fluid leaking from under the right engine as the airplane taxied into the gate. Guzzetti said he believes those streaks were probably made while the plane was flying. After it landed, he said, the fuel likely pooled inside the engine and caught fire. The American Airlines flight had left Colorado Springs Airport and was bound for Dallas Fort Worth when it diverted to Denver on March 13 after the crew reported high engine vibrations. The plane's right engine caught fire after it arrived at the gate. Passengers started yelling 'fire' and 'smoke' shortly after the plane pulled up to the gate, and flight attendants saw smoke start to fill the cabin, according to the NTSB report. The flight attendants tried calling the flight crew and knocking on the cockpit door, but didn't get an answer. So the report said the flight attendants initiated the evacuation. Passengers were able to use the jetway at the front left door and the escape slide at the right rear door as well as the left over-wing doors to evacuate. But the left rear door wouldn't open, and maintenance personnel discovered afterward that the escape slide jammed in the door. The faulty slide was sent to the manufacturer for further investigation. The country has seen a recent spate of aviation disasters and close calls stoking fears about air travel, though flying remains a very safe mode of transportation.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
2 dead after small plane crashes at airport in Mocksville
MOCKSVILLE, N.C. (WGHP) — Two people are dead and one is injured after a , according to the Federal Aviation Administration. At about noon on Tuesday, the FAA confirmed that a Stinson 108 Voyager plane crashed at Sugar Valley Airport in Mocksville, located on Gilbert Road. This is an older model single-engine aircraft. Three people were reportedly on board. The pilot and a passenger died and a second passenger was left with minor injuries, according to an . The report lists the cause of the crash as unknown circumstances. The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board are investigating. This is a developing story. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Ukraine drone attack shows familiar-looking drones can be terrifying weapons
Ukraine drone attack shows familiar-looking drones can be terrifying weapons A stunning attack in Russia highlights an emerging weapon that looks a lot like something you might see flying around at the beach. Show Caption Hide Caption Ukrainian drone attack hits Russian air force bases A large scale Ukrainian drone attack hit multiple Russian air force bases, significantly setting Russia back. A stunning attack in Russia shows we live in a world where a deadly battlefield technology looks a lot like something you might see flying around at the beach. The carefully choreographed attack dubbed Russia's "Pearl Harbor" comes as Ukraine has seen incredible success weaponizing cheap drones — ones not all that different from those commonly used in the United States as aerial action cameras or for spectacular light shows. "We may be at an inflection event," said Mai'a Cross, a professor of international affairs and diplomacy at Northeastern University. "The nature of warfare has transformed." The attack has been praised by supporters of Ukraine as an innovative, economical and surgical way to conduct warfare. It also highlights a longstanding worry that drones represent an emerging danger — and years of efforts to combat that danger. How different are war drones from play drones? The U.S. military has been using expensive attack drones since at least 2001 during the war in Afghanistan. But the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 launched a new kind of drone warfare. A small nation suddenly found itself facing a much larger, richer and better-equipped country. "From my conversations with Ukrainians, the supply chain for the drones is simply commercial regular drones that we might see in daily life, but repurposed," said Cross. Combining these small, ready-made drones with new software and components turns them into killing machines at a fraction of the cost of traditional heavy military technology, and at breakneck speed. No. 1 threat: Drone attacks prompt urgent $500 million request from Pentagon "They even have tech experts embedded with military units who are able to make changes to the drones right there in the battlefield, updating the software and repairing on the fly," said Cross. The sheer number of small drones being deployed in Ukraine and Russia dwarfs their use anywhere else. Ukraine says it is producing up to four million drones annually, a number Russia says it can match. The June 1 attack may have used inexpensive drones but it was also meticulously planned for more than a year and a half, according to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "This war is still heavily dependent on manpower," said Cross. Could we be on the edge of drone terror? Americans are already primed to worry about drones, after a wave of mysterious sightings in New Jersey sparked fears and some hysteria in late 2024. (In January, President Trump said the "large numbers" of drones seen by residents were authorised to be flown by the FAA for research and other reasons. "This was not the enemy," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said.) But experts, including the U.S. military, are already thinking deeply about drone risks — from terrorism to pranks. "The simple act of spraying water or some other household cleaning agent over a crowded area would be enough to create panic," a U.S. military report issued in 2021 said. And swarms of drones could potentially overwhelm defensive capabilities, the report said. Both the military, government and private industry are studying and planning how to thwart such attacks. Most recently, on April 1 the Congressional Research Service issued a report on countering unmanned aircraft systems. Drones are regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration, which requires them to be registered and in some cases that drone pilots to be licenced. There are strict rules about where they can be flown, with airspace restrictions around airports, military bases and other "no drone" zones. Under FAA rules, all drones over 0.55 pounds are required to to broadcast identification signals, much like an airplane, to provide identification and location information, to allow for air safety and security. The FAA's Remote ID rule went into effect in March of 2024. Drone operators who conduct unsafe or unauthorized operations face fines up to $75,000 per violation. Dozens of startups have launched working in the anti-drone sector, enough that there is an annual conference where researchers gather to discuss the state of the art. Drones often used as a part of everyday life So far in the United States, drones are an inexpensive, convenient and hugely useful tool that have made significant inroads into many arenas that might seem improbable at first, said John Coggin, associate director of Virginia Tech's Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership program in Blacksburg, Virginia. Drones are used by farmers to inspect fields for insect damage and whether enough fertilizer has been applied, and to check irrigation lines. They've made a huge impact in industry, allowing critical infrastructure such as power lines, bridges and buildings to be cheaply and quickly inspected. Insurance companies use them for post-storm claim inspections. Realtors love them for shots that once would prohibitively expensive. They're a big help in search and rescue operations. As drier conditions have made fireworks displays potential wildfire risks, increasingly intricate and sophisticated drone light shows are replacing them. This is all possible because in 2016 the Federal Aviation Administration released new regulations that opened the door for commercial applications of drone technology, which have been updated multiple times since then. More rules have since been released, with new regulations in the works that would allow for still more uses. All these productive uses of drones come amid an international effort to reign in the potential threats to civilians — and some are hopeful that the threat of weaponized drones won't spread. "There have been many cases in which we humans could have taken the route that would have led to disaster but we collectively chose not to," said Cross.
