Queensland government flags potential changes to learner licence scheme, including 100 hours requirement
The former Labor government kicked off a review of Queensland's learner licence program in 2023, which still hasn't been completed.
One of the key requirements for learner drivers who are under the age of 25 is to undertake 100 hours of supervised driving.
Transport Minister Brent Mickelberg suggested the current licensing scheme had some "second order consequences", pointing to the 100 hours rule as an example.
"I think it's fair to say it's a pretty complicated space. We want to ensure that we get the right road safety outcomes, that drivers are equipped to be able to safely use our roads.
"But we also want to ensure that young people have access to be able to get a driver's licence as well."
Mr Mickelberg indicated the government was also looking at other forms of licensing, such as those used by motorcyclists.
RACQ general manager for advocacy Joshua Cooney said having a good sample of driving as a learner before going onto a provisional licence was "very important".
"It's very important for learners to be exposed to different conditions, road conditions, different weather — whether it's driving during the day or driving at night," he said.
Mr Cooney acknowledged access to a car was fundamental to accumulating 100 hours of supervised driving.
"I guess there's different ways that we can help learners through their learning journey," he said.
"But … there probably needs to be a core threshold for people to spend time as a learner driver behind the wheel learning different conditions and different circumstances.
"Mobility is critical and we appreciate the government looking at ways to help young Queenslanders with their mobility means."
Earlier this year, the Department of Transport and Main Roads said the review of the learner licence program was due to be completed by June.
The review is examining other elements of the scheme, including the practical driving test and the PrepL course.
The requirement for 100 hours of supervised driving has been in place in Queensland since 2007.
Learner drivers over the age of 25 do not need to do the 100 hours before moving to their provisional licence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
National road safety data shows pedestrian deaths have increased by almost 50 per cent since 2021
The number of pedestrians killed in Australia has risen by almost 50 per cent in four years as the country's road toll reaches a 15-year high, according to the nation's peak motoring body. Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley said it was a sign the federal government's national road safety strategy was "falling well short of its targets". The national road safety data hub shows 1,340 people died on Australia's roads in the 12 months to July 31, 2025, which was a 2.9 per cent increase from the previous year. This toll includes 205 pedestrians, which is 44 more than the 12 months prior. "Since 2021, when Australian government adopted a national road safety strategy target of halving road deaths by 2030, total road fatalities have increased by 22.2 per cent," an AAA spokesperson said. "Over the same period, fatalities among pedestrians have increased by 48.6 per cent." A spokesperson for Federal Transport Minister Catherine King said the government had introduced a number of new vehicle standards in recent years to improve safety outcomes for pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. "This includes Australian Design Rules that cover devices for indirect vision to reduce blind spots around trucks and advanced emergency braking for passenger vehicles to reduce fatal collisions with pedestrians," they said. New South Wales was the deadliest state for road fatalities, with 355 deaths recorded between August 2024 and July 2025 — 17 more lives than the year prior. Both Queensland and Victoria recorded 299 deaths, an increase of 2.7 and 1.7 per cent respectively. Western Australia's fatalities spiked by 12.7 per cent with 204 deaths over 12 months. The road toll rose 14.3 per cent in the ACT, and by 41.9 per cent in Tasmania where 44 people were killed. In South Australia, the road toll improved by 9.4 per cent, and in the Northern Territory the lives lost decreased from 64 to 44 this past year. The AAA is calling for more transparency around what could be causing these dangerous encounters, particularly those involving pedestrians. "The rising rate of pedestrian deaths was driven by sharp increases in Western Australia — 31 deaths, up from 14 a year earlier — and Queensland — 37 deaths, up from 23 a year earlier," a spokesperson said. Australian Pedestrian Association chief executive Harold Scruby questioned the decision to allow e-mobility devices on footpaths. "Footpaths were created for one purpose, to protect pedestrians from vehicles and to make us safe — and what do we do? We invite these high-powered motor bikes and e-scooters, and we expect things to not go awry," he said. Mr Scruby said the use of e-mobility devices were putting pedestrians in harms way, with eight e-scooter deaths recorded in Queensland alone last year. "It's just madness," he said. Earlier this year, the Queensland government launched an inquiry into e-scooter and e-bike safety to look at the current rules around the mobility devices, how they shape up to other jurisdictions, and how laws are enforced. "The increase in injuries and deaths we are seeing because of unsafe and unlawful riding cannot be ignored and I share the community's concern," Transport Minister Brent Mickelberg said. Australia's transport ministers met in Melbourne this month where they agreed the Western Australian government would draft a framework to regulate the use of e-scooters, that would be supported by other jurisdictions. But Mr Scruby said the action would not make up for the lives already taken. "We kill so many more people in road trauma compared to guns and knives alone." A spokesperson for Ms King said while the regulation of e-bike and e-scooter use is the responsibility of states and territories, the "community concern and risk" they presented was clear. "That's why the Australian government is continuing to work with the states and territories to identify the risks and opportunities they, as well as personal mobility devices more broadly, present — and identify appropriate risk management strategies," they said.
News.com.au
16 hours ago
- News.com.au
Driver, 77, flips car inside Sydney Westfield car park
Dashcam footage has captured the dramatic moment a driver flipped his vehicle inside a major shopping centre carpark. The vision showed a red car slowly driving towards a boom gate in the car park of Westfield Liverpool, in the city's southwest, early Tuesday afternoon when it suddenly accelerated. The driver hit the boom gate with such force it flipped the car on its roof. A pedestrian was nearby just moments earlier. Al Fahad Habarneh, who captured the footage from his rear dashcam camera as he was leaving the centre, said he watched the collision unfold in his rearview mirror. 'I was at the lights on the exit ramp and all of the sudden I heard a big bang, I checked my rearview mirrors and I saw a car flipped so I put my car to park and rushed to help get the couple out of the car,' he told Storyful. 'Luckily both the driver and passenger made it out safe.' Social media users were stunned at how the man managed to land the car on its roof. 'Wow they know how to flip a car, literally couldn't do that if I tried,' one wrote. 'Always wondered how people flip cars, didn't realise it was this easy,' another added. Others questioned if other shoppers were able to get out. 'Man that really sucks... for the person behind him,' one Instagram user said. The 77-year-old driver and his passenger were taken to Liverpool Hospital for checks.
News.com.au
16 hours ago
- News.com.au
EV cuts loom while Aussies pay for ute tax
OPINION: We've all seen the headlines: electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks are costing taxpayers billions. According to Government modelling, the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for EVs, alongside other related perks, is forecast to cost Australians $23.4 billion by 2036. That's a staggering figure, especially when you consider this policy only began in July 2022. As the Productivity Commission highlighted in its second report, the cost of the EV FBT exemption has blown out from an initial forecast of $55 million per year to a staggering $560 million, leading to calls to scrap it. But have you ever wondered about the figures for subsidising big, diesel and fuel-chugging utes over the past decade? Well, that number doesn't exist. While policymakers and commentators are lining up to slam EV incentives as 'inefficient' or 'costly', Australia's longstanding love affair with utes is being ignored. These vehicles, which make up four of the top five best-selling models in the country, are quietly driving away with generous tax perks – and Aussies are paying for it. Under Australia's tax system, commercial vehicles, such as dual-cab utes, can claim a Fringe Benefit Tax exemption, provided they're used 'primarily' for work. But the rules are so vague, that many use utes for personal reasons, which is allowed as long as it's 'minor, infrequent, and irregular'. In reality, many of these utes aren't ferrying tradies and tools. They're doing school drop-off, towing jet skis, and sitting in suburban streets. According to the Australian Institute, there are 1.5 times more utes on the road than there are actual tradies, which suggests a lot of people are claiming a tax break for a 'tool of trade' that's really just a big, comfy family car. It's not just FBT, utes also avoid the Luxury Car Tax, even if they cost well over six figures, because technically, they're not 'passenger vehicles'. So you can buy a RAM 1500 and avoid paying LCT, while someone buying a more efficient EV might get slugged. In 2023, high-end American-style utes alone cost Australians over $250 million in foregone revenue from the Luxury Car Tax, according to a report by the Australia Institute. That figure doesn't even count the tax revenue lost from the FBT exemption. Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell said Australia is subsidising 'big, dumb utes by hundreds of millions of dollars each year'. 'These vehicles are damaging roads, reducing safety and increasing emissions, yet they are given a massive tax break,' he said. I'm not ignoring the $23 billion figure attached to EV tax breaks, including FBT exemptions, import tariff relief, and other incentives but these tax breaks are designed to make EV ownership more accessible and affordable, particularly through novated leasing. According to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association, more than 100,000 Australians have taken up an EV novated lease since mid-2022. These policies are critical to making EVs accessible, especially as the upfront costs are a little higher than petrol and diesel equivalents. These EV tax breaks are part of a broader push by the Federal Government to reach net zero by 2050, with transport making up 20 per cent of national emissions. HALF-PREGNANT APPROACH But the Productivity Commission's report now recommends scrapping the EV FBT exemption, arguing it's too costly and now 'duplicative' with the New Vehicle Efficiency Standards (NVES). Sure … the (NVES) will encourage automakers to import cleaner cars into the market, but that's only half the battle. If consumers aren't incentivised to buy them, nothing changes. You need both; one brings supply, the other brings demand. As the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) noted, without continued consumer support, the 'continuation of current customer buying preferences will inevitably lead to the accrual of substantial penalties.' Automakers can't just absorb these costs; they will likely have to raise prices on popular models, reduce their availability, or exit the market altogether. Countries that have successfully transitioned to high EV adoption rates such as Norway, have almost always used both strong efficiency standards and generous consumer incentives. Relying solely on one or the other often leads to slower progress. So if we're serious about being fair and decarbonising the transport sector, then shouldn't we be looking at everything? Including utes. Talking about utes means comforting one of Australia's most beloved vehicle segments. Tradies vote and Aussies rely on them. If the Federal Government decides to pull EV tax breaks now, while leaving the ute loophole wide open, that's like turning off a light in a room and calling it a major win for energy efficiency.
