Air India crash investigation focuses on pilots after finding no fault with plane so far
Preliminary findings indicate that switches controlling fuel flow to the jet's two engines were turned off, leading to a loss of thrust of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner shortly after take-off, The Wall Street Journal has reported.
These switches are used to start the jet engines, shut them down or reset them in emergencies.
It is unclear how or why they were turned off and whether the move was accidental or intentional, said the newspaper's sources familiar with US officials' early assessments.
The newspaper said that if the switches were off, it could explain why the jet's emergency power generator – known as a ram air turbine, or RAT – had been activated just before the plane crashed.
There is no immediate indication of an issue with the flight in the investigation, the outlet reported.
The report comes before a preliminary report was expected to be issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, which is leading the probe into the crash.
The Air India flight AI171 took off from Ahmedabad for a journey to London Gatwick on 12 June, yet only moments later, the plane crashed into a medical student accommodation.
All but one of the 242 passengers on board died, with further casualties on the ground bringing the death toll to at least 275.
Indian officials have released little information to the public about the investigation, which has caused some frustration with American government and industry officials.
They have also been frustrated with the slow processes of downloading, analysing and sharing the contents of the plane's black boxes - the flight-data and cockpit voice recorders.
The black boxes were recovered in the days after the crash, one from a rooftop at the site on June 13, and the other from debris on June 16.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Two Southwest flight attendants injured after jet moved to avoid plane
July 25 (Reuters) - Two flight attendants on a Southwest Airlines (LUV.N), opens new tab flight departing from Burbank, California were injured and being treated on Friday after pilots took evasive action to avoid another aircraft, the airline said. Southwest Flight 1496 sharply descended nearly 500 feet, according to flight tracking websites. The airline and the Federal Aviation Administration said pilots took action after receiving alerts of a potential collision. The Southwest Boeing 737 continued to Las Vegas, where it landed uneventfully. The FAA is investigating. No passengers were injured.
Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aviation expert questions ‘missing seconds' in Air India disaster report with timestamps that ‘don't match up'
An aviation expert has demanded answers over the unexplained 10 seconds before the tragic Air India crash that killed 260 people, saying: 'The timestamps just don't match up.' A preliminary report into the tragedy revealed that before the crash, two fuel switches - which are used to start or shut down the engines and are typically left on during flight - were moved from 'Run' to 'Cutoff', depriving the engines of fuel. The report also revealed there had been confusion in the cabin when Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and his co-pilot Clive Kunder, 28, realised the fault, before desperate attempts were made to flick them back. In an inteview with Piers Morgan on his YouTube show Uncensored, Captain Kishore Chinta - a military aviator and former air accident investigator - said that unexplained actions and delays during a 10-second window after takeoff are central to understanding what went wrong with Boeing's 787 Dreamliner. He said: 'The timestamps just don't match up. And if it took one second to put out both the switches quickly, why did it take four seconds to put them back on?' 'Practically, whatever happened, happened in the first 10 seconds from the lift off. The timestamp doesn't match up', Chinta added. The doomed aircraft took off at 8:08:39 seconds in Ahmedebad for its journey to London. About three seconds later, the jet with 242 people on board reached its maximum recorded airspeed. But within the space of just one second, both of the plane's engine fuel switches turned off from its run positions. In addition, the report did not reveal any further conversation between the two pilots during in the moments before the disaster. It would take another 10 seconds before the first fuel switch was moved back to its run position, and another four seconds after that for the second switch to snap back, according to a sequence laid out in the official preliminary report on the fatal crash. Following the preliminary report, questions have been raised over the intentions of the pilot of the Air India plane Captain Sabharwal, with some commentators believing the commercial flight was brought down deliberately. The veteran aviator, who had more than 8,200 hours in the cockpit, is being looked into by investigators over suggestions he turned off the plane's fuel switches, causing it to lose power. But Captain Chinta blasted this theory and said: 'We're doing gross injustice to the pilots who are not there to defend themselves by guestimating and coming up with theories which are mere assumptions.' He added the key to solving the mystery of the doomed flight could lie with the fuel cut off switches and whether they can be turned off in any other way than manually. 'Those fuel switches went to cut off but the report doesn't mention anywhere that those, physically, those switches moved. That is what is the key to the entire theory. So, those switches, moved? We do not know. Yes, those shut off the fuel supply, which caused the engines to lose power? Yes. Why that happened, we do not know right now'. Internet star Captain Steve, joined in on the conversation with Piers Morgan and revealed that he believes one of the pilots was behind the crash. Seconds after taking off on June 12, two fuel switches in the cockpit of Air India Flight 171 were turned off, a preliminary report revealed Hoorifying footage showed the moment the plane crashed, with a massive fireball erupting in the horizon 'The only answer that really fits all of the parameters is that the fuel control switches, as they say in the report, transitioned from run to cut off. 'But that doesn't happen without human intervention, and anybody that operates those switches knows that they are spring-loaded into position. They have a detent to hold them there. They don't vibrate out of position. That's never happened…The only way you can move those switches is to put a hand on them and move them back and then move them back up.' But he has also called for more transparency. 'You know, what would solve all this Piers, would be if the people who wrote this report got in front of a camera and behind a microphone,' he said. Ed Pierson, Executive Director & Foundation for Aviation Safety and former Boeing worker, told Piers Morgan Uncensored that before concluding it was the pilot's fault all the possible system errors should be considered. 'There's a lot of things that need to be examined here, systems wise, before we again jump to the conclusion that this was a pilot making a mistake or even intentionally.' The doomed Air India flight crashed last month and killed 260 people. It had set off for London at 1:38pm and remained airborne for about 30 seconds before losing power and falling to the ground. Upon impact, it was engulfed by a huge fireball, claiming the lives of all but one person on board. Sources close to the investigation believe recordings of the conversation from the Boeing's black box support the view that the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines. Friends and colleagues also reject the idea Sabharwal was responsible, claiming he was a 'gentle soul' and an 'ace pilot' who had never been involved in any major incident prior to the crash. Neil Pais, 61, a former colleague of Sabharwal, told The Telegraph he was 'one of the nicest people you could ever hope to fly with'. 'He had absolutely no airs about himself, so humble, so respectful. Always a smile when he spoke to you,' he added. 'I never once saw him raise his voice or lose his temper. And yet he never compromised on work or safety. If there was an issue, he'd point it out, but always in the nicest possible way.' Another colleague and close friend, Captain Kapil Kohal, said Sabharwal was a 'hero' with a 'gentle soul'. Despite his nickname of 'Sad Sack', given because of his 'melancholic eyes', Sabharwal was 'deeply charismatic and always ready to help,' he added. A family member cries upon hearing the news of her brother who died when the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. An Air India spokesperson previously said: 'Air India stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident' But the sadness noticed by his peers was resultant of a deeper tragedy. Sabharwal had struggled to come to terms with the death of his mother in 2022 and in the wake of her passing had separated from his wife and moved from Delhi to Mumbai, to be closer to his elderly father, Pushkaraj. Investigations into the tragic crash have reportedly begun to analyse Sabharwal's behaviour after 'several' Air India pilots allegedly confirmed he suffered from poor mental health. He is understood to have taken bereavement leave after his mother's death. Although it is believed that he had been 'medically cleared' by Air India prior to the fatal crash. Friends also revealed Sabharwal had considered retiring as a pilot to help care for his 90-year-old father full time.
Times
2 days ago
- Times
Why three's company for the tribal throuples of India
In the Mahabharata, a Hindu epic with which every Indian is familiar, Draupadi prays to Shiva for a husband who has five essential qualities: he should be handsome, noble, strong, a skilled archer and wise. Since no one man could possibly possess all these traits, according to Shiva's knowledge, he bestowed five husbands on her. Sunita Chauhan had different objectives. When the Hatti tribeswoman of Shillai village in Himachal Pradesh, northern India, married two brothers on July 12, she did it not out of romantic desire for a surfeit of manly attributes, but rather a hard-nosed need, and centuries-old tradition, to keep land in the family. By marrying one woman to multiple brothers the people of the Hatti tribe, which numbers about 300,000, ensure their land is not divided with the children of every marriage claiming their share, leaving diminishing returns for each generation. In hill areas, scant land is cultivable on the narrow terraces carved out of the mountainside. Polyandry is not the norm but a handful of such marriages take place every year. Chauhan's wedding to Pradeep Negi, who works in the local water department, and his brother Kapil, who is employed abroad, was a big event spread over three days. They say the decision was taken jointly; the bride told local media she 'made this decision without any pressure'. Jagat Singh Negi, a local politician who knows the families but is no relation, told The Times no woman in the tribe was coerced into the marriages. 'Pradeep and Kapil decided on marrying just one wife,' he said. 'They had known Sunita and her family for some time and approached them to see if they were willing. Sunita was perfectly happy with the proposal.' Hira Singh, a relative of the brothers, said the marriage was a moment of great joy for the tribe. 'We feel proud because our educated youth are not only keeping old traditions alive, they are also setting an example,' Singh said. 'There are many such secretive marriages but these three created history by marrying publicly.' Thanks to the chance presence of a local reporter, the story appeared in the press. What followed was a media storm that has shaken the newlyweds. Every time they go on social media they feel disturbed by the global coverage and commentary, both positive and negative. Some Indians believe polyandry exploits women, particularly if they have no choice in the matter. 'We've just withdrawn into a shell,' Pradeep told The Times. 'We're not celebrities. We're just ordinary villagers and we never expected this kind of interest. Every day, we've been getting 10 or 12 interview requests.' He sounded nonplussed by the intense interest, which they have found intrusive. 'It's our life, our private life, our personal story. But now we have no privacy. When I read some of the comments, I feel like some notorious criminal.' There is a national ban on polyandry in India but exceptions are made for some tribal areas. It is still rare enough to arouse great fascination, especially the conjugal protocols. Predictably, little information is available on these arrangements but a pre-determined rotation system is generally followed. Even less known is how much of a say the wife has in deciding the rota and what happens if she develops a preference, sexual or otherwise, for one brother. The offspring of such marriages also present a difficulty, given the remoteness of villages from DNA testing facilities. 'Families either legally name the eldest brother as the father or randomly ascribe the father — that is, one child to the elder brother and the other child to the younger brother,' Jagat Singh Negi said.
