Shake-up to Australia's visa program as government raises income thresholds, targets student visas, and tightens skilled migration eligibility
Sweeping changes to visa thresholds and tighter controls on skilled worker and student entries are set to take place on Tuesday as the Albanese government is once again recalibrating Australia's migration settings.
The Department of Home Affairs has confirmed a 4.6 per cent rise to key salary thresholds which determine eligibility for a raft of employer-sponsored skilled visas.
From next financial year, the Core Skills Income Threshold (CSIT) and the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) will jump from $73,150 to $76,515.
For more specialised, high-earning roles, the bar will be even higher, with the Specialist Skills Income Threshold (SSIT) lifting from $135,000 to $141,210.
These thresholds apply to newly lodged applications from July 1, and cover some of the most common pathways for foreign workers - including the 482 temporary visa, 186 Employer Nomination Scheme, and the regional-focused 494 visa.
Applications already in the system or existing visa holders won't be affected, but any new sponsor offers must now meet the updated salary requirements, excluding superannuation.
The changes, based on Average Weekly Ordinary Time Earnings (AWOTE) figures, are being pitched as a way to ensure that migrant workers are being paid fairly in line with Australian wages.
But for businesses already under pressure, the higher benchmarks could translate to budget headaches or hiring delays — especially in industries where salaries sit just above the threshold.
To avoid being stung, businesses are being urged to act fast — submit applications before July, lock in current pay rates, and begin Labour Market Testing immediately to stay compliant.
Missing that window could see employers caught in the post-June rush, with processing backlogs already common at the end of the financial year.
But it's not just the skilled stream under the microscope.
International students are staring down the barrel of another visa fee hike, with the cost for primary applicants likely to increase from $1,600 to $2,000.
While the government hasn't published the change in official documentation yet, the move aligns with the government's wider effort to curb migration numbers.
This would be the second price jump in as many years, following the 2023 surge which more than doubled the application fee.
Education providers have expressed concern that it could deter genuine students while doing little to address the so-called 'visa churn' from non-genuine applicants.
On the humanitarian side, the rules are getting clearer, if not tighter. Applicants under the Special Humanitarian Programme (SHP) and certain refugee streams must continue to lodge online through ImmiAccount and provide both the proposal (Form 681) and application (Form 842) at the same time. The Department has reaffirmed this as a mandatory step.
All of this comes as Labor tries to project control over a migration system that's come under heavy political fire — amid rising rents, housing shortages, and infrastructure stress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
EDITORIAL: Penny Wong the wrong person to win American's favour
Australian steel and aluminium exports to the US face punishing 50 per cent tariffs. From July 9 every single other item sent to our third largest trading partner will be subject to levies of 10 per cent. AUKUS, once touted as the 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to foster international co-operation and boost peace and stability in the Pacific, is at risk with the Americans undertaking a 30-day review of the submarine deal — seemingly in retaliation for Australia's military budget intransigence. And US President Donald Trump has made it clear where Australia stands in his list of priorities, standing Anthony Albanese up and making no effort to schedule a make-up session. Australia's relationship with its No.1 security ally is at its lowest ebb in memory. And into this fray we are sending . . . Penny Wong. The Foreign Minister is off to Washington to meet with her counterparts in the Quad strategic partnership, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The fact that it is Ms Wong, whose procrastination in backing the US's recent strike action against Iran and repeated conflation of Israel with Hamas's terrorist leadership has won her few friends in the Republican administration, who is being deployed at this critical juncture is deeply worrying. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is seemingly no closer to securing a long awaited meeting with Mr Trump. The earliest opportunity for a sit-down is believed to be in September, when Mr Albanese is scheduled to travel to the US to address the United Nations. That would make it 10 months since Mr Trump's election, and eight since his inauguration, that the Prime Minister and the President have gone with just a handful of phone calls between them. All the while tensions continue to simmer — over AUKUS, over tariffs and over whether Australia is pulling its weight in our military alliance. It's a worrisome situation and one Mr Albanese appears content to play out, unwilling to risk further damage to his ego after Mr Trump blew him off having left the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the conflict in the Middle East. Mr Albanese says Australia is continuing to lobby for an exemption to Mr Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, with diplomats working behind the scenes on making the nation's case. No doubt that's true. But it's clear that those efforts have so far entirely failed to secure any traction. This is not a problem that will be resolved through diplomats — particularly if those diplomats are Kevin Rudd, who Mr Trump has a public, personal dislike for. Nor is it likely that Ms Wong will secure any meaningful wins. Australia's best chance of repairing our relationship with our most important ally comes will come at the highest level. That means Mr Albanese needs to get to DC sooner rather than later to meet with Mr Trump. And when he does so, he needs to be armed with arguments stronger than those already tried and failed.
Courier-Mail
an hour ago
- Courier-Mail
Anthony Albanese rejects call for US to be more transparent about Australian military presence
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Anthony Albanese has rejected Coalition's front bencher Andrew Hastie's call for more 'transparency' from the United States in relation to their operations on Australian bases. Mr Hastie, a former SAS commander, has previously called for 'greater transparency' on how the US is using its Australian bases like Pine Gap near Alice Springs, and the Naval Communication Station on Western Australia's North West Cape, in order to bolster military posture in the Indo Pacific. The Coalition's home affairs spokesman urged for more 'mature' discussions on operationalising the alliance, guard rails for combat operations and clearer definitions for Australian sovereignty. Responding to the suggestion on the ABC, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not sure what he means by that,' and rejected the idea of Australia using defence as a bargaining chip to secure a tariff exemption. Andrew Hastie has said the government should press the US to be more transparent on its Australian military operations. Picture: Richard Dobson/ NewsWire 'He belongs to a political party that during the election campaign, when President Trump announced tariffs on what he called the Liberation Day, they drew into question, said 'we should be bargaining with our defence relationship,'' Mr Albanese said. 'That was something that I rejected on that day.' Asked if US' military footprint would make Australia more vulnerable in the event of intensified conflict with China, Mr Albanese said it was his goal to 'avoid conflict,' and backed Australia's alliance with the US. 'I think it is in Australia's interest and the United States' interest and the interests of other partners we have to have interoperability, to have the AUKUS arrangements in place,' he continued. 'If Mr Hastie is questioning that, then he should say that. It's why I've been very clear on that.' Anthony Albanese rejected Mr Hastie's calls and backed the Australia-US alliance. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Mr Albanese also said despite the 'laser-like focus' on when he would secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump, he was more concerned with 'supporting Australia's national interests'. He also noted that while he was prepared to meet with Mr Trump 'when a suitable time could be organised,' he flagged the yet-to-be-finalised Quad meeting between the US, Japan, India and Australia which will occur in the 'coming months'. 'We also have the Quad meeting coming up, which we are finalising as well,' he said. To date Mr Albanese has had three phone conversations with Mr Trump, and also met with US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, US trade representative, Jamieson Greer and US National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett while he was in Kanamaskis for the G7. Originally published as Anthony Albanese rejects call for US to be more transparent about its military presence in Australia
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump-Albanese meeting could happen in India
Anthony Albanese has signalled he could use a gathering of world leaders in India to meet Donald Trump as he justifies Australia's defence spending as more transparent than the measures used by other countries. Albanese is the only leader of the Quad grouping – India, the US, Japan and Australia – not to have met Trump in person and faces pressure from the White House to follow NATO and lift defence spending to at least 3.5 per cent of the nation's gross domestic product. Albanese has spoken with Trump on three occasions and was due to meet the president at the recent G7 meeting in Canada, but Trump cancelled his meetings that day and returned to Washington early to deal with events in the Middle East. Albanese told the ABC's Afternoon Briefing that he was ready to meet Trump 'when a suitable time can be organised' and noted the Quad meeting was in coming months. 'So these things are being organised, and I look forward to having a meeting and continuing the constructive dialogue that I've had with President Trump up to now,' he said. Loading The Quad has the stated goal of defending a free and open Indo-Pacific, but is widely seen as a forum for containing China. The date for the 2025 Quad leaders meeting has not yet been set, but the four nations' foreign ministers are meeting in Washington and, according to a report in Times of India earlier this month, that get-together is likely to set a date for the leaders' meeting. Albanese also plans to attend the UN leader's week in September and deliver his first address to that forum, and a possible meeting in the White House afterwards could occur after that event.
