NCAD could not ‘wipe slate clean' after student with Down syndrome failed exam, WRC hears
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC) has heard a
third-level
institution made 'every effort' to support a young artist with Down syndrome pursuing a degree – but that it could not 'wipe the slate clean' after she failed a crucial first-year module.
The director of the
National College of Art and Design
(NCAD) gave evidence on Thursday that in the wake of a 'heated' meeting with the student's parents, the woman's mother, a journalist, told her 'they would make sure that my reputation was damaged'.
Ellie Dunne (25) – who is said by her legal team to be the first student with Down syndrome to enrol on a degree programme at NCAD on Thomas Street in Dublin 8 – is pursuing a complaint under the Equal Status Act 2000 against the college.
Her case is the college failed to provide her with reasonable accommodation during her first semester after starting in September 2023 and that disability discrimination continued when the college required her to re-sit a failed first-year module. The college's lawyers have denied discrimination 'in the strongest possible terms'.
READ MORE
At an earlier WRC hearing on Wednesday , the college's head of academic affairs, Dr Siún Hanrahan, said some 32 per cent of the college's approximately 1,400 students had self-declared additional needs of some description.
She said the college offers a range of supports to these students. Some were 'tailored' packages on foot of a needs assessment while 'less tailored' support was available more broadly to those who had simply self-declared additional needs.
Dr Hanrahan said there was a 'significant difference' between the requirements of the level-five art course completed by Ms Dunne at Stillorgan College of Further Education and the level-eight bachelor's degree at NCAD.
Ms Dunne had access to assistive technology and an educational support worker who was available for two days a week, the tribunal heard. After Ms Dunne failed a module, the college made the support worker available for five days. .
The witness said Ms Dunne's parents, Katy McGuinness and Feidhlim Dunne, took it as 'a very offensive thing that Ms Dunne had not successfully achieved the learning outcomes of the module'.
Ellie Dunne, centre, with her parents Katy McGuinness and Felim Dunne at the WRC in Dublin. Photograph: Stephen Bourke
'[Their] view was that the slate should be wiped clean,' she said. 'Under the [academic] regulations, that's just not possible.' .
The tribunal heard the college proposed to allow Ms Dunne re-sit the assessment with access to workshops and without academic penalty, and to have it considered by an exam board the following autumn.
Barrister Rosemary Mallon, for the respondent, instructed by Paul McDonald of AJP McDonald Solicitors, pointed out she asked Ms Dunne in cross-examination last year whether she 'knew about that offer'.
Ms Mallon said Ms Dunne had indicated she did not know about it and would have liked to have availed of it.
'If Ellie didn't know, it was because she was not told by her parents?' Ms Mallon asked Dr Hanrahan.
'Yes,' Dr Hanrahan said.
At a January 2024
meeting 'any suggestion of a repeat was met with a lot of opposition,' the college's director, Prof Sarah Glennie said, but mediation was agreed to by the family.
Prof Glennie said that during a phone call two days later Ms McGuinness said 'they would make sure that my reputation was damaged' and that 'they would bury me in the process'.
'That was directly said, that they would 'bury you' in the process?' adjudicator Breiffni O'Neill asked. Prof Glennie confirmed this.
In cross examination, counsel for the complainant Aisling Mulligan, appearing instructed by KOD Lyons, put it to the witness that Ms McGuinness had 'disputed' telling Prof Glennie she 'would be buried'.
Prof Glennie said: 'That is my recollection.'
When the disputed remark was first raised last year by Ms Mallon, Ms McGuinness said it was 'a phrase not familiar to me'.
The case has been adjourned to October.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Serbian leader vows tough response against protesters after riots
Serbian president Aleksandar Vucic has announced tough measures against anti-government protesters following days of riots in the streets of Serbia that have challenged his increasingly autocratic rule in the Balkan country. In one of his frequent TV addresses to the public, Mr Vucic accused the anti-government demonstrators of 'pure terrorism' and reiterated his claims that months of persistent protests against his rule have been orchestrated in the West and aimed at destroying Serbia . 'Our country is in grave danger, they have jeopardised all our values, normal life, each individual,' said Mr Vucic, alleging an elaborate scheme that would eventually install 'anarcho-leftist' authorities in the future. He did not offer any concrete evidence for his claims. Supporters of Serbian president Aleksandar Vucic hurl flares at protesters during an anti-government protest. Photograph: Darko Vojinovic/AP 'Unless we undertake tougher steps, it is a question of days when they [protesters] will kill someone,' said Mr Vucic. 'I am saying this for history.' The stern warnings came after five consecutive nights of clashes between the protesters on one side and police and Vucic loyalists on the other. Angry demonstrators on Saturday evening torched Mr Vucic's governing Serbian Progressive Party offices in a town in western Serbia, and those of other ruling coalition allies. The demonstrators also clashed with police in Belgrade, the capital, and in the northern city of Novi Sad. Riot officers used tear gas against protesters who hurled stun grenades, flares and bottles at them. [ Serbian protesters and president trade 'civil war' warnings after street clashes Opens in new window ] Mr Vucic did not specify the state response that he said would come within a week. But he stressed that a state of emergency is not imminent. Scores of people have already been detained and injured in the past days, while police have faced accusations of excessive force and arbitrary detentions of protesters. 'You will witness the determination of the state of Serbia,' said Mr Vucic. 'We will use everything at our disposal to restore peace and order in the country.' The clashes last week marked a significant escalation following more than nine months of largely peaceful demonstrations that started after a concrete canopy collapsed at a train station in Serbia's north, killing 16 people. Many in Serbia blamed the incident on alleged widespread corruption in state-run infrastructure projects that they say fuelled poor renovation work. The Serbian president has faced accusations of stifling democratic freedoms while allowing organised crime and corruption to flourish. He has denied this. Serbia is formally seeking EU membership, but Mr Vucic has maintained strong ties with Russia and China. On Sunday, he praised Russia's backing for his government against what he called a 'coloured revolution' against his government.
Irish Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Bogus RTE worker loses claim for six years of retrospective and holiday pay
A former bogus self-employed worker at RTÉ has lost his claim to retrospective pay and holiday entitlements from the broadcaster as a result of the misclassification of his employment status for over six years. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear complaints made by RTÉ employee, Joseph Kelly, in relation to his former employment status because they had been submitted outside the statutory timeframe. Mr Kelly claimed he was originally required by RTÉ to register as a contractor with Revenue when he started working with the national broadcaster in September 2012. He claimed he lost out on entitlements to annual leave, sick leave, public holidays and incremental salary increases as a consequence of having to become self-employed. Represented by a lay advisor, Martin McMahon, Mr Kelly sought to have his loss of earnings for a period of just over six years corrected and the necessary adjustments to his current salary scale. Eight separate claims, which were lodged with the WRC on October 9, 2024, were brought under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994. However, solicitor for RTÉ, Séamus Given of Arthur Cox LLP, submitted that the cognisable period given the six-month statutory limitation of the legislation governing claims to the WRC was from April 10, 2024. Mr Given argued that Mr Kelly had been properly paid and given all his public holiday and annual leave entitlements over the relevant period. He also claimed that the WRC had no jurisdiction to hear or extend the time limit for submitting a complaint beyond a 12-month period. The WRC heard that Mr Kelly was hired as an independent contractor in September 2012 and paid €200 per day as a media content coordinator before being made an employee of RTÉ on November 12, 2018. He currently works as a news coordinator placed on point 12 of a 14-point salary scale which ranges from €37,567 to €59,862. Mr McMahon pointed out that the matter of bogus self-employment among workers at RTÉ was the subject of a review by an independent law firm as well as a review by the Department of Social Protection. He told the WRC that Mr Kelly was unaware of these reviews, which resulted in RTÉ having to make a payment of approximately €30,000 to the Department of Social Protection to regularise his PRSI contributions. Mr McMahon said it had also led to Mr Kelly losing out on any entitlements to pay for working Sundays and public holidays as well as annual and sick leave and any other entitlement that permanent employees had. He claimed Mr Kelly was continuing to lose out due to the consequences of his initial employment misclassification. Mr McMahon said the complainant had made numerous efforts to resolve these matters without success. He argued that Mr Kelly was seeking to have his entitlements rectified and regularised so that he did not suffer any loss for the error which RTÉ accepted it had made. In his ruling, Mr Harraghy noted that Mr Kelly had provided extensive documentation in relation to the context and background of his claim and his attempts to seek a resolution with his employer. Lansdowne House, the offices of the Workplace Relations Commission in Ballsbridge, Dublin (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Agency, Dublin) The WRC adjudicator said it was clear that Mr Kelly and Mr McMahon had committed a considerable amount of time and research on the issue. He observed that all the issues that were the subject of his complaints related to the period covering his employment status up to November 2018, when he was not afforded any of the rights that an employee would have accrued. However, Mr Harraghy said his role was to apply the law to the facts but he could only consider complaints submitted within the statutory timeframe provided for by the relevant legislation. He observed that WRC adjudication officers were not empowered to modify timeframes or accept complaints which fell outside timeframes outlined by law. For that reason, Mr Harraghy said he had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints made by Mr Kelly. During a two-day hearing which took place in December 2024 and June 2025, RTÉ was accused of engaging in 'sharp practice' and attempting to 'run down the clock' on a commitment to compensate those who had lost money as a result of bogus self-employment. Mr Kelly said that when he joined the station in 2012, the HR section told him he had to become a sole trader, which also meant he was not allowed to apply for internal jobs at RTÉ. A senior HR manager at RTÉ, Angela McEvoy, said the station had accepted a decision by the Department of Social Protection in relation to Mr Kelly's PRSI insurability. However, Ms McEvoy rejected the suggestion by Mr McMahon that RTÉ had got Mr Kelly to misrepresent himself to Revenue. Mr McMahon told the WRC that it was 'not acceptable' for RTÉ to promise to follow the recommendations of an expert report in relation to bogus self-employed workers and now claim Mr Kelly's case was 'out of time'. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Irish Examiner
14 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Former 'bogus self-employed' RTÉ worker loses claim to retrospective pay at WRC
A former 'bogus self-employed' worker at RTÉ has lost his claim to retrospective pay and holiday entitlements as a result of the misclassification of his employment status for over six years. The WRC ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear complaints made by RTÉ employee, Joseph Kelly, in relation to his former employment status because they had been submitted outside the statutory timeframe. Mr Kelly claimed he was originally required by RTÉ to register as a contractor with Revenue when he began working with the broadcaster in September 2012. He claimed he lost out on entitlements to annual leave, sick leave, public holidays, and incremental salary increases as a result of having to become self-employed. Represented by a lay advisor, Martin McMahon, Mr Kelly sought to have his loss of earnings for a period of over six years corrected and the necessary adjustments to his current salary scale. Eight separate claims, which were lodged with the WRC on October 9, 2024, were brought under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994. However, solicitor for RTÉ, Séamus Given of Arthur Cox LLP, submitted that the cognisable period given the six-month statutory limitation of the legislation governing claims to the WRC was from April 10, 2024. Mr Given argued that Mr Kelly had been properly paid and given all his public holiday and annual leave entitlements over the relevant period. He also claimed that the WRC had no jurisdiction to hear or extend the time limit for submitting a complaint beyond a 12-month period. The WRC heard that Mr Kelly was hired as an independent contractor in September 2012 and paid €200 per day as a media content coordinator before being made an employee of RTÉ on November 12, 2018. He currently works as a news co-ordinator placed on point 12 of a 14-point salary scale which ranges from €37,567 to €59,862. Mr McMahon pointed out that bogus self-employment among workers at RTÉ was the subject of a review by an independent law firm as well as the Department of Social Protection. He told the WRC Mr Kelly was unaware of these reviews which resulted in RTÉ having to make a payment of approximately €30,000 to the department to regularise his PRSI contributions. Mr McMahon said it also led to Mr Kelly losing out on any entitlements to pay for working Sundays and public holidays as well as annual and sick leave and any other entitlement that permanent employees had. Mr McMahon claimed Mr Kelly was continuing to lose out due to the consequences of his initial employment misclassification and had made numerous efforts to resolve these matters without success. He argued that Mr Kelly was seeking to have his entitlements rectified and regularised so that he did not suffer any loss for the error which RTÉ accepted it had made. In his ruling, WRC adjudicator John Harraghy noted that Mr Kelly had provided extensive documentation in relation to the context and background of his claim and his attempts to seek a resolution with his employer. The WRC adjudicator said it was clear that Mr Kelly and Mr McMahon had committed a considerable amount of time and research on the issue. He observed that all the issues that were the subject of his complaints related to the period covering his employment status up to November 2018 when he was not afforded any of the rights that an employee would have accrued. However, he said his role was to apply the law to the facts but he could only consider complaints submitted within the statutory timeframe provided for by the relevant legislation. He said WRC adjudication officers were not empowered to modify timeframes or accept complaints which fell outside timeframes outlined by law. For that reason, Mr Harraghy said he had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints made by Mr Kelly. During a two-day hearing which took place in December 2024 and June 2025, RTÉ was accused of engaging in 'sharp practice' and attempting to 'run down the clock' on a commitment to compensate those who had lost money as a result of bogus self-employment. Mr Kelly said that when he joined the station in 2012 that the HR section told him he had to become a sole trader which also meant he was not allowed to apply for internal jobs at RTÉ. A senior HR manager at RTÉ, Angela McEvoy, said the station had accepted a decision by the Department of Social Protection in relation to Mr Kelly's PRSI insurability. However, Ms McEvoy rejected the suggestion by Mr McMahon that RTÉ had got Mr Kelly to misrepresent himself to Revenue. Mr McMahon told the WRC that it was 'not acceptable' for RTÉ to promise to follow the recommendations of an expert report in relation to bogus self-employed workers and now claim Mr Kelly's case was 'out of time.'
