logo
As GOP pushes spending cuts, many say Medicaid and food stamps are underfunded: AP-NORC poll

As GOP pushes spending cuts, many say Medicaid and food stamps are underfunded: AP-NORC poll

Associated Press7 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — As Republican senators consider President Donald Trump's big bill that could slash federal spending and extend tax cuts, a new survey shows most U.S. adults don't think the government is overspending on the programs the GOP has focused on cutting, like Medicaid and food stamps.
Americans broadly support increasing or maintaining existing levels of funding for popular safety net programs, including Social Security and Medicare, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. They're more divided on spending around the military and border security, and most think the government is spending too much on foreign aid.
The poll points to a disconnect between Republicans' policy agenda and public sentiment around the domestic programs that are up for debate in the coming weeks.
Here's the latest polling data on how Americans view federal funding:
Most want Medicaid and SNAP funding increased or kept as is
Many Americans see Medicaid and food assistance programs as underfunded — even as Congress proposes significant cuts to Medicaid and food and nutrition assistance programs — and few say 'too much' money is going to these programs.
About half of U.S. adults say 'too little' funding goes to Medicaid, which is a government health care coverage program for low-income people and people with certain disabilities. Nearly half, 45%, say food and nutrition assistance programs like food stamps, SNAP or EBT cards are underfunded, according to the poll. About 3 in 10 U.S. adults in each case say those programs are receiving 'about the right amount' of funding, indicating that most Americans likely do not want to see significant cuts to the two programs.
About 2 in 10 say Medicaid is overfunded, while about one-quarter say that about food assistance programs.
Republicans are especially likely to say 'too much' is spent on food and nutrition assistance programs when compared with Democrats and independents — 46% of Republicans say this, compared with about 1 in 10 Democrats and independents.
When it comes to Medicaid, fewer Republicans, about one-third, say the government is spending 'too much.'
Many believe Medicare, Social Security and education are underfunded
About 6 in 10 Americans say there is not enough government money going toward Social Security, Medicare or education broadly. But Democrats overwhelmingly think 'too little' money is allocated to these areas, while Republicans are happier with the status quo.
Very few think Medicare, Social Security and education are getting 'too much' funding. Only about 1 in 10 Republicans say this about either Medicare or Social Security. Roughly one-quarter of Republicans say too much is spent on education.
When it comes to Social Security, about half of Republicans say 'too little' is spent, compared with about 7 in 10 Democrats.
Americans are divided on money for border security and the military
Americans are more divided on whether the government is devoting too much money to the military or border security.
About 3 in 10 say the government is spending 'too much' on the military, while a similar share say the government is spending 'too little.' Close to 4 in 10 say the government is spending 'about the right amount.'
Republicans are much less likely to say 'too little' is being spent on border security than they were before Trump took office again in January. Now, 45% of Republicans say 'too little' is being spent, down from 79% in a January AP-NORC poll.
On the other hand, Democrats are more likely to say that 'too much' is being spent on border security. About half of Democrats now say this, compared with about 3 in 10 in January.
Most US adults say foreign aid gets too much funding
The Trump administration has asked Congress for deep reductions to foreign aid programs, including cuts to global health programs and refugee resettlement initiatives.
Foreign aid is one area with more general agreement that there is 'too much' federal spending. Most U.S. adults, 56%, say the U.S. government is spending too much on assistance to other countries, which is down from 69% in an AP-NORC poll from March 2023.
There is a deep partisan divide on the issue, though. About 8 in 10 Republicans say the country is overspending on foreign aid, compared with about one-third of Democrats.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal global crises
Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal global crises

Fast Company

time21 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal global crises

A different kind of pie chart is being used to predict global crises. A surge in takeout deliveries to the Pentagon has become a surprisingly accurate predictor of major geopolitical events, dubbed the 'Pentagon Pizza Index.' Tracking activity at local pizza joints in Arlington County, the X account Pentagon Pizza Report noted an uptick in Google Maps activity from four pizza places near the Pentagon on June 12. We, The Pizza, District Pizza Palace, Domino's, and Extreme Pizza all reportedly saw higher-than-usual order volumes around 7 p.m. ET. 'As of 6:59 p.m. ET nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity,' the X account posted. The timing? Just hours before news broke of Israel's major attack on Iran. The U.S. announced it was not involved in the attacks. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement released by the White House on June 12. However, as the theory goes, the surge in traffic at local pizza joints close to government buildings may have signaled hungry military leadership hunkering down to monitor unfolding events. 'The kind of analytics we love,' read one comment on X. 'Google Maps research beats some spy agencies around the world,' another user reacted. The predictive power of pizza isn't a new theory. As Alex Selby-Boothroyd, The Economist 's head of data journalism, wrote on LinkedIn: 'The Pentagon Pizza Index has been a surprisingly reliable predictor of seismic global events—from coups to wars—since the 1980s.' During the Cold War, Soviet operatives reportedly monitored pizza delivery activity in Washington, believing a sudden uptick in late-night orders signaled military personnel working overtime. They even gave it a code name: 'Pizzint,' short for pizza intelligence. In January 1991, Frank Meeks, who then owned 43 Domino's outlets in the Washington area, told the Los Angeles Times: 'The news media doesn't always know when something big is going to happen because they're in bed, but [pizza] deliverers are out there at 2 in the morning.' He added that on the night of August 1, 1990, the CIA ordered a record number of pizzas in a single night—21 pies. A few hours later, Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait, marking the beginning of the Gulf War. As CNN's then-Pentagon correspondent Wolf Blitzer reportedly said in 1990: 'Bottom line for journalists: Always monitor the pizzas.' Of course, a correlation between pizza delivery and global crises is not a verified method of tracking world events. In a statement to Newsweek, the Pentagon dismissed the theory, noting they have plenty of pizza options inside the building, along with sushi, sandwiches, and donuts. They also disputed the timeline suggested by the Pentagon Pizza Report, saying it did 'not align with the events.'

The ‘No Kings' protests were a glorious reminder of what America can be
The ‘No Kings' protests were a glorious reminder of what America can be

Washington Post

time21 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

The ‘No Kings' protests were a glorious reminder of what America can be

Light drizzle didn't stop tens of thousands of Philadelphians from letting President Donald Trump know that the First Amendment is still alive. In a city notorious for unruly crowds at large sporting events, protesters were peaceful and law-abiding — as were the police. I saw a sea of American flags as well as signs protesting various Trump policies. Whether we were there to protest Trump's approach to immigration or Gaza, welfare for the rich, disregard for the Constitution or disdain for the underprivileged, we were united in the need for the First Amendment, which allows us to freely express our opinions, peacefully assemble and petition our government with our grievances.

Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran
Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran

President Donald Trump does not intend to sign a joint statement calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran that had been drafted by G7 leaders in Canada, according to a person familiar with the matter, though officials preparing the document held out hope that he could eventually be convinced to add his name. The draft statement, which had been spearheaded by European officials at the summit, says Israel has a right to defend itself and that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump's decision not to sign on to the statement set up an immediate divide with his counterparts as the summit was getting underway in the Canadian Rockies. Hours before the conference was set to convene, talks were ongoing among the G7 delegations about language in the draft statement. European officials, led by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, were hoping to finalize a consensus among the leaders about the Middle East situation alongside the summit's host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. But Trump, who has questioned the utility of multilateral organizations like the G7, intends for now to withhold his signature, preventing for now a show of resolve from the world's leading democracies. 'Under the strong leadership of President Trump, the United States is back to leading the effort to restore peace around the world. President Trump will continue to work towards ensuring Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' a White House official said in response to a question about Trump's plans when it came to the joint statement. A senior Canadian official said delegations representing the seven G7 leaders would continue to work on the language of the statement, and that European leaders in particular are still engaged in the hopes of reaching a consensus. 'This is not a done deal yet, this is something that will be discussed at the leader level. We expect that the bulk of that conversation will happen in the global security session this evening. It's too early to speculate on what will or will not come out of that conversation,' the senior Canadian official said. Trump told reporters Monday morning before the summit started that he believes Iran wishes to de-escalate its conflict with Israel as the skirmish between the two nations enters its fourth day. 'Yeah,' Trump told CNN when asked if he's seen any signals or messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to de-escalate the conflict. 'They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before. I had 60 days, and they had 60 days, and on the 61st day, I said, 'We don't have a deal.' They have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late,' he said as he met with Carney. Trump issued a two-month ultimatum this spring for Iran to strike a nuclear deal or face consequences. On Friday — day 61 — Israel launched unprecedented strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear program and military leaders. The US president declined to say what, if anything, would prompt US military involvement in the conflict. 'I don't want to talk about that,' he said, remaining vague when pressed on what intelligence the US is providing Israel. Trump's counterparts at the G7 planned to press the US leader on his strategy for dealing with Israel and Iran, officials from multiple delegations said, as the spiraling Middle East conflict shadows the first day of the summit. It's not clear to European officials what makes Trump confident that talks can continue, given the scale and scope of Israel's attacks. Given US influence over Israel, Trump's fellow leaders want a clearer picture of how long the US intends to allow the conflict to continue, or whether Trump plans to apply pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate, the officials said. Already, a difference has emerged between Trump and Macron over a role for Russian President Vladimir Putin to play in mediating the conflict. After a phone call with Putin this weekend, Trump said Sunday he believed the Russian leader could act as a mediator. But Macron dismissed the idea during a visit to Greenland, saying Moscow's own violation of the UN Charter in Ukraine disqualified it from acting as a peace broker. The two men's differences over Putin were on full display Monday during Trump's first public appearance at the G7, where he criticized of the bloc for ejecting Russia eleven years ago. It was a combative opening to the president's outing in Canada, where he will meet with fellow leaders for the next two days on a wide range of subjects. 'Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in. And I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in,' Trump said during his meeting with Carney. Russia was removed from the then-G8 after annexing Crimea in 2014. Justin Trudeau, whom Trump criticized repeatedly Monday for deciding to omit Russia, become prime minister a year later. 'They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics,' Trump said. He said not having Putin at the table 'makes life more complicated.' When later asked about Putin joining, he said, 'I'm not saying he should at this point, because too much water has gone over the dam.' CNN's DJ Judd and Paula Newton contributed to this story. This is story has been updated with additional developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store