Systemic Change Crucial So That All Mokopuna Māori Thrive
The new report published today by my colleagues Aroturuki Tamariki | Independent Childrens Monitor shows the urgent need for systemic change at a collective level, so that all mokopuna Mori can thrive.
In light of a new report published today about outcomes for mokopuna Māori and whānau in the oranga tamariki system, the Chief Children's Commissioner is emphasising that all mokopuna Māori have the right to grow up safe and well with their whānau.
'The new report published today by my colleagues Aroturuki Tamariki | Independent Children's Monitor shows the urgent need for systemic change at a collective level, so that all mokopuna Māori can thrive.
'I want to see all agencies across the oranga tamariki system working better together to address the inequities highlighted in this report so that all mokopuna Māori are flourishing in their lives, in the care of their whānau. The State has duties to uphold the rights of mokopuna Māori as tangata whenua under Te Tiriti o Waitangi and under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. This new report shows that the system as a whole is still falling short of this, and that there are intergenerational impacts playing out right now.
'I meet frequently with whānau Māori and their mokopuna, iwi and hapū across the motu. They tell me it is whānau-led, iwi, hapū and kaupapa Māori approaches that are helping to strengthen whānau, keep mokopuna safe, and growing continued pathways to mana motuhake – self determination. The findings of this report back this up,' says Dr Achmad.
The Chief Children's Commissioner notes that the report shows that good progress can be made where there is genuine partnership between Māori and State agencies that keeps mokopuna and whānau central, along with the sharing of data and resources.
'I want to see these approaches strengthened and expanded so they deliver enduring wraparound services and supports for all mokopuna and whānau who need them. A stronger focus on by Māori for Māori prevention and early intervention is essential. These approaches will improve outcomes so that all mokopuna Māori grow up safe and well in the care of their whānau, connected to their whakapapa.'
She says safety concerns about mokopuna must be responded to appropriately and quickly, but that with almost half of Reports of Concern leading to no further action, the report shows this isn't happening.
'I want to see mokopuna Māori needs being met early, through Māori-led approaches working closely with whānau. These ways of working need to be better supported by the oranga tamariki system – the report highlights that this leads to the best outcomes for whānau and mokopuna.
'I am deeply concerned the report shows mokopuna Māori aged 10-17 are more likely to be prosecuted than non-Māori, and less likely to be referred by Police to alternative action or given warnings. The system must urgently stop criminalising the unmet care and protection needs of mokopuna Māori.
'Nearly 40 years have passed since the publication of Pūao-te-āta-tū. This new report shows that the system is still not working as it should be for whānau Māori and their mokopuna. The crucial change that is required must collectively meet the aspirations of whānau and mokopuna Māori,' says Dr Achmad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
40 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Who's afraid of Aotearoa
Across Aotearoa – or New Zealand, depending on the speaker – resistance to te reo Māori and calls to roll it back from public life are growing louder. In Parliament, lawmakers are pushing a growing number of policies that critics say erode Māori culture and put New Zealand at risk of losing its cultural identity. Among the policies, cuts to te reo Māori teacher training, mandating English first in public service naming and communication, the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), reversal of co-governance reforms, and undermining local Māori representation. The coalition also supported the Treaty Principles Bill, pushed by Act, which aimed to enshrine fixed principles of the Treaty and extend these to all New Zealanders, effectively diluting Māori-specific rights. The bill was ultimately rejected by Parliament. Just last week, it was revealed that Education Minister Erica Stanford stopped the printing of new editions of a series of books designed to teach Year 1s how to read, which included te reo words, while last month in Parliament, Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa'. Together, these measures signal a retreat from decades of progress toward biculturalism, says associate professor Awanui Te Huia, who teaches Māori studies at Victoria University. 'The issue that these policies have created is it emboldens those [racist] positions and it treats the irrational as rational,' she tells The Detail. 'When we're hearing these anti-Tiriti or Waitangi statements, when we hear these anti-Māori, anti-te reo Māori statements, and they are being put forward as rational and considered arguments, this is when we have some of the trouble … it platforms particular perspectives that are harmful for our community, harmful for cohesion.' She says the revival of te reo is one of our greatest national achievements – proof of a country willing to confront its past and weave its two founding cultures together. But she worries the Government's policies will stall momentum. 'It's not a zero-sum game. If te reo Māori is doing well, that does not take anything away from another person; it's additive.' And she says the cost of the rollback of Māori rights and culture is damaging. 'There is considerable racism that happens in our communities, and that has multiple implications across the spectrum – on economics … on our socio-political spectrums.' Māori journalist Ella Stewart has been covering the policy changes for RNZ's in-depth department. She tells The Detail that the Māori community is hurting, but also pushing back. 'I have spoken to a raft of people, in my personal life but also just in reporting … I remember speaking to Tureiti Moxon a couple of weeks ago, and she said that this partnership that's been forged many years ago, over decades and decades, to get to a point where Māori are actually at the decision-making table – she said that's all been taken away. 'You have also got Māori legal scholars, Te Tiriti/Treaty experts, like Carwyn Jones, who said to me, 'We are seeing that this Government has a clear strategy of removing Māori rights and removing the ability of Te Tiriti to have any impact in our law.' She says, from her conversations, people would prefer if the Government focused on big-picture issues, rather than stripping te reo Māori from agency names and books. 'I think they are mainly upset because there are some issues that are being focused on that arguably the Government could be spending time doing something more important … on more pressing issues for our people rather than 'Should the name of New Zealand be New Zealand or Aotearoa', maybe focus on how you can further our people.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Tāmaki Makaurau by-election: Labour and Te Pāti Māori face off
National, Act, New Zealand First and the Greens have all opted out of running candidates. Labour's Peeni Henare will fight for his old seat against Te Pāti Māori's choice of former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara. Vision NZ leader Hannah Tamaki, NZ Loyal's Kelvyn Alp and independent Sherry Lee Matene have also put their names into the ring. Voting begins today for overseas voters, advance voting opens on August 25, and election day is set for September 6. Victoria University of Wellington associate professor Lara Greaves told The Front Page we shouldn't read too much into the results of this by-election. 'It's a fairly straightforward by-election ... turnout will probably be quite low. 'There are a few other minor candidates and independents running around the edges just trying to get a bit of a voice for their platform and show up to the debates and get some attention. 'But, we are really looking at a Labour versus Te Pāti Māori matchup,' she said. Greaves said the electorate is one of the youngest in the country, with a median age of 'somewhere in the 20s'. 'The thing that Labour now has to balance is, do you keep the old guard, the people who held ministerial positions in the Ardern Government, the baggage that might be associated with that has to be balanced with the experience they have. 'For Labour, it is interesting because it does seem like they haven't had that many retirements. It does seem like the party will contest the next election with a lot of that lineup of the ministers from the Ardern years that are still there,' she said. Listen to the full episode to hear more about: The background of the electorate. Maori vs general electorates. Why the right bloc isn't putting anyone in contention. Key issues for voters. Why a Pākeha can run for a Māori seat. Who is running for the Tāmaki Makaurau seat? Labour MP and Tamaki Makaurau candidate Peeni Henare in his office at Parliament in July. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour's Peeni Henare held the Tāmaki Makaurau seat between 2014 and 2023 when he lost it to Kemp by a slender 42-vote margin. Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins said: 'Henare is exactly the leader Tāmaki Makaurau needs, with a deep understanding of the issues that matter.' Henare said communities had been saying 'loud and clear' they want 'jobs, access to quality and affordable health services, affordable housing, and relief from the rising cost of living must be a top priority'. Henare has noted Labour's Georgie Dansey, a wāhine Māori, would enter Parliament if he won the byelection. Te Pāti Māori has selected journalist and former TV3 broadcaster Oriini Kaipara to contest the Tāmaki Makaurau byelection. The party confirmed its selection on social media, calling Kaipara (Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Awa, Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangitihi) a 'longtime West Auckland advocate'. Kaipara said she had grown tired of 'sitting on the sidelines' and 'having to bite my tongue when I see a huge hīkoi walking past me and I cannot actively voice my truth'. Brian and Hannah Tamaki address supporters at the Auckland Domain last year during the 'Make New Zealand Great Again' convoy. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Vision NZ leader Hannah Tamaki announced early on that she would again run for the seat. The wife of Destiny Church leader Brian Tamaki received 829 votes in the 2023 election. She believed her record helping in South Auckland communities was 'unquestionable', but acknowledged her 'faith' or her association with Destiny Church's Man Up programme could unsettle voters. Members of the programme were linked to the storming of a pride event at a West Auckland library earlier this year. Protesters wearing Man Up T-shirts were also associated with temporarily blocking this year's Wellington Pride Parade. Counterspin's Kelvyn Alp with guest, far right conspiracy theorist Damien de Ment. Photo / Supplied Counterspin Media founder Kelvyn Alp has also put his name into contention. He was prominent during the 2022 Parliament protests. Twenty years ago, he was the public face of the so-called New Zealand Armed Intervention Force, which came under security service attention after it talked about overthrowing the government. Finally, Sherry Lee Matene is running as an independent. There is no publicly available information about her. What are the key dates? Wednesday, August 20: Overseas voting begins. Monday, August 25: Advance voting begins. Thursday, August 28: Cutoff for NZ Post to receive election-related mail for delivery. Friday, September 5: Advance voting ends. All political advertising must end, and election signs must be taken down by midnight. Saturday, September 6: Election day for the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election. Voting places open from 9am to 7pm. Election night - preliminary results released progressively from 7pm. Wednesday, September 17: Official results declared The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: We shouldn't undervalue the work of historians
In a public statement, the professional historical associations in New Zealand, including the NZ Historical Association and the Professional Historians Association of New Zealand/ Aotearoa have labelled these cuts 'false economy at its worst' as they put simply, 'our history deserves better'. Dr Marianne Schultz, Eden Terrace. Religion's role in politics I was interested to read two items in the Herald (Aug 18), one a report on David Seymour's criticism of church groups for promoting an education programme about Te Tiriti and the issue of Māori wards in local body governance, and the other an opinion piece by historian James Belich about the importance of understanding history. It seems Seymour has no understanding of history as he seems unaware of Rev Martin Luther King and Bishop Demond Tutu and their example of churches being involved in politics, and fighting racial discrimination in particular. Grant Watson, Murrays Bay. Not role of churches The quickest way to undermine both democracy and religion is to mix the two. That's possibly why David Seymour spoke out about over 100 churches organising political workshops on Māori wards (Aug 18). When churches run political workshops, they stop being houses of faith and start being campaign offices. Using the pulpit to push politics isn't education, it's manipulation. When religion and politics mix, both are corrupted. Democracy suffers because one side claims God is on their team, shutting down honest debate. Religion suffers because it gets dragged into the dirt of partisan fights, losing its moral authority. The Māori wards issue should be decided on democratic principles, representation, fairness, and community needs. If churches want to run politics, let them stand for election and pay taxes like every other political organisation. But they cannot do both. By speaking out, Seymour isn't being anti-religion, he's protecting it. He's defending the sacred role of churches and the integrity of our democracy. Both are stronger when they stay in their lanes. James Gregory, Parnell. Smartest in what room? David Seymour is reputed to consider himself the 'smartest person in the room'. Now it is reported that he had highly paid officials use their valuable time to compile a report for him on why requiring cyclists to wear protective headgear is a good idea. Which begs the question, where is this room and who are the other people in it? If it's the legislative chamber, then God help us all. John O'Neill, Dargaville. A state inside Gaza Strip New Zealand is under great pressure to recognise the state of Palestine. Some of the reasons are understandable but the stance taken by the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa goes way too far. Why doesn't our Government be innovative? Only recognise a state of Palestine in the geographical area of Gaza, maybe even then make it conditional on Hamas relinquishing control. We should not recognise Palestine in terms of the West Bank, parts of Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Those areas were annexed by Israel after wars. Gaza today is Israel's overreaction to terrorism. Bill Capamagian, Tauranga. What about the hostages? There have been many issues raised about recognising Palestine as a nation, but many reasons why we should defer this for a time. The obvious one is, why has Hamas not released the Israeli hostages, and when is it going to do this? Bruce Woodley, Birkenhead.
