logo
‘Unviable': Foodies warned to brace for price hikes when eating out

‘Unviable': Foodies warned to brace for price hikes when eating out

News.com.au04-06-2025
Since opening seven years ago, Brad Pettitt's cafe has become a beloved local fixture in the tight-knit community of Albion Park, near Wollongong, and most days the 65-seater is buzzing.
Despite its popularity and Mr Pettitt's expansion into catering, functions and pop-up events, skyrocketing operating costs have pushed him to the brink.
Sharp increases to the cost of everything from insurance and electricity to the price of produce and stock have seen his profit margin shrink to a razor-thin five per cent.
Now, the owner of Three Flamingos Espresso is bracing for the latest financial hit – a 3.5 per cent hike to the minimum wage, announced on Tuesday by the Fair Work Commission.
'Our staff work really hard and they absolutely should be rewarded, but in the context of all these other huge cost increases, it's really difficult to cope,' Mr Pettitt said.
'In the past two years, our electricity costs are up 40 per cent, gas 20 per cent, insurance and worker's comp both 10 per cent, coffee recently went up 15 per cent, bacon is up 10 per cent, and eggs, of course, the big one, is 44 per cent.
'The wage increase is modest for a few employees, but we have a staff of 24 so it all adds up to a big additional expense.'
Millions of workers will see their hour rate lift to $24.95, a total of $948 per week based on 38 hours worked, up from $24.10 per hour and $915.90 per week.
The Australian Industry Group estimated that the increase will see the national wages bill rise by $5 billion over the coming financial year.
'We're doing everything we can to diversify our income streams because we can't rely on day to day trade,' Mr Pettitt said. 'It's just not viable anymore.'
He concedes an increase in menu prices is now inevitable – and he's not alone.
Industry groups say the larger-than-anticipated minimum wage increase will hurt vulnerable businesses, especially those in hospitality, and consumers will ultimately pay.
As a result, the prices of everything from a pub meal to accommodation could rise as many business owners battle to cope with higher wages bills amid especially tough trading conditions.
The 'viability' of hospitality businesses and even 'the future of gastronomy' in Australia are at risk, Restaurant and Catering Association chief executive Suresh Manickam claimed.
A recent industry survey by the group found 80 per cent of businesses were already considering a hike in menu prices, Mr Manickam said.
'The decision will need to be closely monitored for its impact on the wage-price inflationary spiral,' he warned.
'This wage hike is purely unsustainable for operators, as we know any increase in minimum wages has repercussions beyond a business' wage costs, and will lead to higher rates of unemployment and underemployment, and economic repercussions that impact the everyday consumer.'
Stephen Ferguson, national boss of the Australian Hotels Association, said the increase was 'at the higher end of the scale' and above the current inflation rate.
'And it's certainly higher than what business groups were hoping for,' Mr Ferguson said.
'No one begrudges anyone [receiving] a pay rise with the cost-of-living [crisis], but it is definitely an additional cost of business and will have an impact.'
The price a consumer pays is subject to a range of cost pressures faced by business operators, he said, adding: 'Wages are a factor, as well as electricity, food costs, insurances, and so on.'
The FWC decision comes as the national economy 'muddles through' the lowest period of growth since the recession in the early 1990s, Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said.
'Business margins are falling, private sector employment and investment is weak, while productivity is barely moving … [and] uncertainty arising from global tariffs and turmoil is also beginning to weigh on the outlook,' Mr Willox said.
'While we supported a moderate increase in real award wages reflecting cost of living concerns, 3.5 per cent combined with the additional 0.5 per cent superannuation costs employers will face from next month is well beyond what current economic conditions can safely sustain.
'Its effects will fall hardest on industries such as retail, manufacturing, and accommodation and food, which are already struggling with very weak business conditions.'
The painful combination of the cost-of-living crisis forcing consumers to pinch pennies and soaring business costs had seen revenue fall, Mr Pettitt said.
Forced menu price rises had dealt a further blow, with a fall in volumes wiping out most of the gains, he added.
'There's only so much people can pay and it gets to point where many will just cut back,' he said. 'We've seen it with coffee, where we used to 60 to 65 kilos a week, but now we're down to 50 to 55 kilos.
'You see a lot of small businesses closing and it's not hard to understand why. If you sit down and look at the numbers, it doesn't just doesn't sense. For us, it's a labour of love.'
The number of companies entering insolvency has 'risen sharply' over recent years, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia, and more than three-quarters of those are small businesses.
In another clear sign of the pressure facing business operators, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver enterprise investment as a proportion of the overall economy is at its lowest level in four decades.
'Business investment fell slightly in the March quarter, with pretty weak plans for the year ahead,' Mr Oliver said.
'Private new capital expenditure fell 0.1 per cent against expectations for a 0.5 per cent gain. What's more, investment plans for 2025-26 were just 0.7 per cent higher than the same plans a year ago for 2024-25, suggesting pretty soft business investment growth in the year ahead.'
Mr Oliver also pointed out that retail sales fell in April, showing consumers are still struggling with cost-of-living pressures and spending less as a result, hurting businesses' bottom lines.
Small businesses are the largest private sector employee in the country and many are struggling to turn a profit in the current economic climate, advocates say.
A costs crisis driven by higher rents, insurance premiums, energy bills and other input expenses have left 'razor thin margins', Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chief executive Luke Achterstraat said.
'For every dollar increase in the award rate, employers also face higher levels of workers compensation, payroll tax and, of course, another legislated increase in the superannuation guarantee from July 1,' Mr Achterstraat said.
While consumer prices will likely increase, there's only so much of the additional burden businesses can pass on, he said.
'This decision will affect more than 100 different industry awards and a multitude of different role classifications. Many owners will need to personally absorb these higher costs, unable to pass on any further price rises to consumers.'
And more pressure for businesses is likely, with Professor John Buchanan from the University of Sydney Business School tipping the FWC's next boost likely to be even bigger, Professor John
For one, the commission flagged a potential phasing out of same of the lowest wage classifications in the future.
'In this way it does not have to 'increase rates' for low paid classifications as such,' Professor Buchanan wrote in analysis for The Conversation.
'Rather, it just eliminates the possibility of having rates for exceptionally low paid jobs – and so raises the base rates dramatically for the lowest paid workers.'
Secondly, the decision marks a 'break with the recent habit' of using low paid workers as a 'shock absorber' for macroeconomic policy, he added.
'The 3.5 per cent rise is a modest increase but an important one. More important is the framework the commission has set up for decisions in future years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply
Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply

ABC News

time36 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply

Rules holding back superannuation funds from investing potential billions of dollars into housing and renewables projects could face a shake up, after broad agreement at Canberra's productivity roundtable that there is a need for change. Super funds are required to meet a "performance benchmark", under laws designed to ensure funds are performing and maintaining the retirement savings of their members. But critics have said the rules around those benchmarks discourage investment in some assets, including a rule that requires stamp duty to be disclosed as a fee in a way that they say discourages housing investment. The government flagged it was seeking to rewrite the benchmark after a 2023 review similarly found it could unintentionally be discouraging investment in some assets. Rebecca Mikula-Wright, who heads the Investor Group on Climate Change, said there had been broad agreement at this week's summit that changing those rules could accelerate housing and renewables investment. "The Your Future Your Super performance benchmark was discussed a lot in the session I was in yesterday, and really around how that is constraining the ability of super funds to invest in higher risk projects they really want to invest into," Ms Mikula-Wright told the ABC. 'The treasurer did indicate he is likely to revisit those reforms." After a day of talks focused on finding agreement on one of the thorniest issues impacting housing and the environment — Australia's "broken" environmental approvals process — Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed his pleasure at the "real prospect of a useful consensus" emerging on some of the country's key economic challenges. "Day two of the reform roundtable was really dominated by how we can boost housing supply, how we can responsibly reduce and improve regulation and speed up approvals," Mr Chalmers said. "I'm really encouraged by the consensus in the room for economic reform in these areas, and we're enthusiastic about some of the policies that participants put on the table." Ms Mikula-Wright said there had also been good support for a Productivity Commission recommendation to establish a "strike team" that could land faster approvals for key infrastructure projects, particularly around renewables. "We're competing with markets that are getting projects up faster and cheaper, so we have to do the same. Then we can attract more capital and get those projects rolling out," she said. After warnings from Housing Minister Clare O'Neil that red tape was dragging down housing approvals — and leaked Treasury documents indicating the government was considering a pause on the National Construction Code — attendees also agreed such a move should take place. The National Construction Code lays out minimum requirements for buildings on everything from fire exits and accessibility to insulation and capacity for electric vehicle chargers. But while changes to safety standards could continue, attendees discussed possible pauses on "non-essential" rules of the construction code, such as new requirements to lift energy efficiency standards. New South Wales Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said a pause on the code was needed, though the finer details were being worked through. "The pause is something that is where the conversation was concentrated on. In terms of how long it needs to be paused, who would do the review, what's the terms of reference, that work can be pursued," he said, "I think we will have a few more conversations at the roundtable and beyond to sort out those levels of detail." The ABC understands the government hopes to move fast on a pause, and not have discussions drag out for several months. After two successive terms of government failing to find a path through the thicket of reform on Australia's Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, attendees of today's roundtable were cautiously welcoming what appeared to be some progress. The complicated laws govern the environmental approval process for major projects, such as energy and mining projects, as well as housing and other developments where they potentially impact threatened species or significant cultural sites. But a major review of those decades-old laws published in 2020 concluded that they were no longer working for business or the environment — a view that today's roundtable attendees were agreed on. However, attempts under former environment minister Tanya Plibersek to update the laws were abandoned before the federal election — with a key sticking point being a plan to introduce a federal watchdog that could independently monitor EPBC approvals. Mining and other business groups did not support that proposed Environmental Protection Agency. But after extended talks today, they left saying they would be prepared to support an EPA, with a caveat that the final say would rest with the environment minister. There are still devils in the detail, including a desire from environment groups to see the EPA also given final approval powers on projects. But it marks the first significant advancement in EPBC discussions since they stalled last term. Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive, Kelly O'Shanassy, said there was agreement in the room that an EPA was needed but there remained different views on how it should operate. "There is a lot of support for efficient decision making, transparent decision making, accountability — that is not the current process," Ms O'Shanassy said. "You need to have an independent regulator that is held to account for the speed of its decisions and the quality of its decisions." Business Council of Australia chief executive, Bran Black, said a federal EPA should effectively be set-up in the same way as existing state-based authorities. "We take the view that it's really important to have a separation between the entity that is ultimately responsible for compliance and the entity that's ultimately responsible for approvals," Mr Black said. "In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to go down the path of creating multiple bodies at all [but] the government has committed to a new EPA. It's made it very clear, that's a point that it's taken to two elections now." "The question then is: what does this EPA do?" Environment Minister Murray Watt said, however, there was strong support around the table for "stronger" environmental protections and "faster and simpler" project approvals, through a more transparent process for businesses. "These are objectives our government supports, but we will ultimately need support across the parliament for reform. It was therefore very useful for the shadow treasurer, as a roundtable participant, to hear the depth of support for change," Senator Watt said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the Coalition was willing to work constructively with the government to see reforms to the environment laws passed.

Verbal clash between Australia and Israel sparks community concern
Verbal clash between Australia and Israel sparks community concern

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Verbal clash between Australia and Israel sparks community concern

Australia's leading Jewish organisation has issued a rare public rebuke of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Anthony Albanese, as strained relations between the two countries worsened overnight. The group warned that their recent verbal clashes are placing the Jewish community in a vulnerable position. In letters delivered on Tuesday, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) said Australian Jews are being drawn into a damaging 'war of words' between the two governments. In the letter to Mr Albanese, the ECAJ said they were 'appalled' by the comments made by the Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke. Mr Burke on Wednesday criticised Mr Netanyahu, saying, 'Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry.' The ECAJ said it was 'an incendiary and irresponsible comment'. The letter also called out Mr Albanese's own public criticism of Israel, saying his statement accusing Mr Netanyahu of being 'in denial' about the war's consequences was 'excessive and gratuitously insulting.' A similar tone was adopted in the letter to Mr Netanyahu, where the ECAJ condemned his remarks that characterised Mr Albanese as 'a weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.' Mr Netanyahu had personally attacked Mr Albanese on social media and in a stunning letter obtained by Sky News Australia, following tensions over Labor's decision to recognise Palestine. He accused Mr Albanese of pouring 'fuel on this anti-Semitic fire' by recognising a Palestinian state. '(It) emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets,' Mr Netanyahu said. 'Prime Minister, anti-Semitism is a cancer. It spreads when leaders stay silent. It retreats when leaders act. 'I call upon you to replace weakness with action, appeasement with resolve, and to do so by a clear date: the Jewish New Year, September 23, 2025. 'History will not forgive hesitation. It will honour action.' On X, Mr Netanyahu wrote that history 'will remember Albanese for what he is'. 'A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews.' The ECAJ described Mr Netanyahu's comments as 'inflammatory and provocative'. '(They) demonstrated a woeful lack of understanding of social and political conditions in Australia,' the ECAJ letter said. 'These comments have played straight into the hands of opponents of Israel and anti-Semites, to the detriment of the Australian Jewish community.' In both letters, the ECAJ urged the leaders to resolve differences through diplomacy rather than public posturing. 'The Australian Jewish community will not be left to deal with the fallout of a spat between two leaders who are playing to their respective domestic audiences.' The letters emphasised that both countries are 'mature democracies' and that their governments should act with the restraint expected of national leaders.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store