logo
The religious freedom case stuck in Supreme Court limbo

The religious freedom case stuck in Supreme Court limbo

Yahoo23-04-2025
A version of this article was first published in the State of Faith newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Monday night.
As the Supreme Court prepared to hear its second religion case of the current term this week, drama was brewing around a different religious freedom battle that could be taken up soon.
Three new documents have been filed with the court in recent days regarding Apache Stronghold v. United States, a case that's been stuck in Supreme Court limbo for around five months.
The case centers on a proposed mining project in the Oak Flat area of Arizona, which is located about 70 miles east of Phoenix.
In 2021, the federal government moved to begin mining in Oak Flat. Apache Stronghold sued to block the work, arguing that allowing mining in the area would violate federal religious freedom protections.
'Oak Flat is our Mt. Sinai — the most sacred place where generations of Apache have come to connect with our Creator, our faith, and our land,' explained Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold in a press release in September.
While the lawsuit has delayed the mining project, it hasn't yet succeeded in securing long-term protections for Oak Flat.
Apache Stronghold lost at the district and circuit court levels, where judges said the planned mining project would not substantially burden Native Americans' religious exercise rights.
In September, Oak Flat's defenders asked the Supreme Court to overturn those decisions and rule that religious freedom law protects against mining on sacred land.
As usual, the court collected responses to that petition. What's strange is that the case has been stuck in the conferencing stage since late November.
On Thursday, federal officials announced that, in the absence of Supreme Court action, they've continued to prepare for the mining project and may file the Final Environmental Impact Statement as soon as this summer.
In a Friday letter, Apache Stronghold notified the Supreme Court about that announcement and urged the justices to move the case forward.
'This notice confirms the urgent need for this Court's review,' the letter said.
Then, on Monday, attorneys for Resolution Copper, the mining company involved in the case, filed another new document with the Supreme Court, in which it argued that the government's Thursday announcement 'has no bearing on this case's suitability for review.'
Later on Monday, the Justice Department filed its own letter and similarly argued that Thursday's announcement should have no bearing on the case.
'Nothing about the recent 60-day notice supports petitioner's arguments for further review,' the letter said.
The Supreme Court will next discuss the case on Friday.
At least four justices will need to vote in favor of hearing it for Apache Stronghold v. United States to make it onto the oral arguments schedule.
Pope Francis has died. Here's how he'll be remembered
How does the Catholic Church choose a new pope?
What world leaders are saying about Pope Francis' death
How storybooks on gender and sexuality sparked a major religious freedom battle
What does society owe to Christians who celebrate Easter?
Supreme Court gives surprise update on birthright citizenship battle
U.K. Supreme Court issues unanimous ruling on the definition of 'woman'
The latest on ICE raids in churches
Aimee Semple McPherson was one of the most famous evangelists in the United States in the early 20th century.
She paved the way for prominent televangelists of the 1970s and 1980s by revolutionizing the spread of religious messages over the radio waves.
McPherson was a polarizing figure, in part because of her religious teachings and in part because of financial scandals. She's also been accused of faking her own kidnapping.
McPherson is the subject of a new book, 'Sister, Sinner,' by Claire Hoffman.
My colleague Jennifer Graham has a new profile out on Franklin Graham, a prominent evangelical leader and the son of Billy Graham. Among other topics, she explored his controversial relationship with President Donald Trump.
Religious leaders generally don't enter the profession unless they're willing to conduct a funeral. Even so, many take on the role completely unprepared for that kind of work. To help his ministry students avoid that fate, one professor crafted an unexpected solution, according to Religion News Service: field trips to a cadaver lab.
A new Gallup survey on religious preferences seems to confirm what Pew Research Center found in its latest Religious Landscape Study: The U.S. religious landscape has stabilized over the past five years.
I helped with the Deseret News' coverage of the Boston Marathon on Monday morning. Three — yes, three! — former BYU runners finished in the top 10 of the men's race.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump nominates federal prosecutor to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Trump nominates federal prosecutor to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump nominates federal prosecutor to 7th Circuit Court of Appeals

President Trump on Thursday evening nominated Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Taibleson to serve as a judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, making her the sixth federal appeals court nominee of his second term. 'It is my Great Honor to nominate Rebecca Taibleson to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit, in the Great State of Wisconsin,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'Rebecca brings a wealth of EXPERIENCE AND SUCCESS, from her time as Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and, formerly, as Assistant to the United States Solicitor General.' Trump also touted Taibleson's experience having clerked for US Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Antonin Scalia. Tailbleson in 2018 notably testified in support of Kavanaugh's seat on the Supreme Court. 'Rebecca will make a fantastic Judge who will fearlessly defend the Constitution, and strongly uphold the Rule of Law,' Trump wrote. 'Congratulations Rebecca!' Taibleson has served as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin since 2016, where she is also a co-chief for the office's appellate division, according to her LinkedIn profile and the Justice Department. Trump's nomination comes after Wisconsin Sens. Ron Johnson (R) and Tammy Baldwin (D) sent Trump five recommendations for filling a vacant seat on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that is set to become vacant in October when Judge Diane Sykes takes senior status, a form of semi-retirement. Taibleson was one of five recommendations, though it was up in the air whether Trump would go his own way on his nomination, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 'Ms. Taibleson is an excellent choice to serve as a judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals,' Johnson said in a post on social media platform X praising the nomination. 'I look forward to her swift confirmation.'

Judge blocks Arkansas Ten Commandments law in 4 NWA school districts
Judge blocks Arkansas Ten Commandments law in 4 NWA school districts

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

Judge blocks Arkansas Ten Commandments law in 4 NWA school districts

Editor's note: The headline, URL and content of this story were corrected to reflect that the judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect in four districts (not in the entire state). A federal judge Aug. 4 temporarily blocked in four school districts an Arkansas law that now requires public school classrooms to prominently display the Ten Commandments. Why it matters: Some supporters of the change see the Ten Commandments as a historical document that helped shape U.S. law, but the plaintiffs in Bentonville, Fayetteville, Springdale and Siloam Springs argue that displaying the document in public schools infringes on their constitutional right to freedom of religion. State of play: Arkansas Act 573, passed by the state Legislature this year and signed into law by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, requires that every "public institution of higher education and elementary and secondary school library and classroom in the state" prominently display a copy of the "historical representation of the Ten Commandments." The posters areto be at least 16 inches by 20 inches and in a legible typeface. All copies are to be donated or purchased through private funds, but if a donated copy doesn't meet the requirements, the school can replace it using public funds. The big picture: In his ruling, U.S. Western District of Arkansas Judge Timothy Brooks cited similar laws in nearby Louisiana and Texas. The Louisiana law has been declared unconstitutional, and the Texas law is being challenged, though a ruling hasn't yet been declared. Oklahoma's state superintendent issued guidelines last year that every classroom have a copy of the Bible and the Ten Commandments and that teachers should include the documents in the curriculum. The guidance is being challenged. At least 15 other states had proposed some form of the law as of February. What they're saying: "Forty-five years ago, the Supreme Court struck down a Ten Commandments law nearly identical to the one the Arkansas General Assembly passed earlier this year. That precedent remains binding on this Court and renders Arkansas Act 573 plainly unconstitutional," Brooks wrote in the ruling. "Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law? Most likely because the State is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms." The other side: "In Arkansas, we do in fact believe that murder is wrong and stealing is bad. It is entirely appropriate to display the Ten Commandments — the basis of all Western law and morality — as a reminder to students, state employees, and every Arkansan who enters a government building," Sanders said in a statement emailed to Axios. Several state lawmakers sponsoring the bill did not immediately respond to Axios' inquiries.

California's 1-Gun-per-Month Purchase Limit Violates Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules
California's 1-Gun-per-Month Purchase Limit Violates Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules

Epoch Times

time3 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

California's 1-Gun-per-Month Purchase Limit Violates Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules

The full panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to review a lower court's ruling that California's one gun per month purchase limit violates the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment. The mandate made final the June decision against the California law. Last June, a three-judge panel ruled that the state failed to prove that the law met the standard set in the June 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store