logo
Newsom office dismisses crime fears, defends sanctuary policies amid surge in violence: 'Fake news'

Newsom office dismisses crime fears, defends sanctuary policies amid surge in violence: 'Fake news'

Fox News2 days ago
In the wake of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer being shot allegedly by two criminal illegal immigrants earlier this month, experts are calling attention to how sanctuary policies sheltering lawbreakers are directly responsible for rising crime and violence in Democratic-run jurisdictions.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office, however, pushed back against the notion that sanctuary policies are to blame, with a spokesperson calling it "fake news" and an attempt by the Trump administration to justify "their cruel and militaristic actions."
This comes after two illegal immigrants – Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez and Cristian Aybar Berroa – were arrested in connection with an off-duty CBP officer being shot in the face in a New York City park. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), both illegals have long criminal histories and had ICE detainers against them that had been ignored by New York City officials.
Last week, the Trump Justice Department announced it is suing New York City over its longstanding sanctuary policies, which DHS said enabled the shooting. The lawsuit, filed in a New York federal court, names New York City Mayor Eric Adams and several other city officials as defendants. The lawsuit claims the city has enacted policies with the intent of impeding the federal government's ability to enforce immigration laws.
Joe Borelli, a former New York City Council member, told Fox News Digital that sanctuary policies have made many of America's major cities "demonstrably" less safe.
"We have had about a decade of this 'sanctuary city' experiment in Democratic-run cities, and after all this time, we can now definitively say it's been a net loss. And that's being polite," said Borelli.
"In truth, it has drained the coffers of American cities and states and has demonstrably made our neighborhoods less safe, especially those that are home to our legal immigrant communities," he added.
Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge and policy expert at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Fox News Digital that the continued criminality of individuals like the two suspects in New York is "a direct result of the sanctuary policies."
He said the suspects in the New York shooting had a "slew of prior arrests, any one of which could have resulted in their arrest by ICE and deportation from the United States."
"But they didn't because they occurred largely in sanctuary jurisdictions where ICE didn't have cooperation from the local authorities," he explained.
"The contention that is made is that those policies are necessary in order to protect the immigrant communities, but the only things that sanctuary policies actually protect are criminals," he said. "States and localities like California, Los Angeles, Denver, Boston, Massachusetts, New York and New York City that do have sanctuary jurisdictions make it much more likely that criminal aliens will be released onto the street to re-offend."
Lora Ries, a border security and immigration expert at the Heritage Foundation, predicted that if the sanctuary policies continue, "there's going to be more preventable crime and more victims who shouldn't be victims."
"It has not just been a national security threat, but a personal safety threat," she said, adding, "and we have already too many examples of preventable crimes because perpetrators shouldn't have been here. They either snuck across the border the first time, the second time, the third time, committed crimes previously and either weren't prosecuted or weren't detained or and or weren't turned over to ICE."
Ries pointed out that, despite Democratic claims that Trump's immigration crackdown is unpopular, it is sanctuary policies – that allow criminal illegals to evade ICE - that the public is opposed to.
Since 2015, a majority of Americans have generally favored the deportation of illegal immigrants. The latest Fox News survey, released on Monday, found roughly 8 in 10 Democrats, 6 in 10 independents, and 4 in 10 Republicans agree that at least illegal immigrants charged with crimes should be deported, while others should be offered a path to stay.
Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., whose district includes portions of Denver, told Fox News Digital that sanctuary policies have made Colorado the second most dangerous state in the country.
"It's an absolutely horrible impact on public safety. And that horrible impact is tied directly back to sanctuary state policies that handcuff cops and roll out the red carpet for criminal organizations like Tren de Aragua," he explained.
"We're talking guns and drugs and human trafficking and child abuse," he continued. "And the predators and the criminals that are perpetuating these violent acts, peddling fentanyl in our community, literally killing Americans and Coloradans by the thousands, these are the people that have been festering in our society under the sanctuary state policies in Colorado."
Evans added that besides inhibiting law enforcement from above, sanctuary policies also "sends a message to other outside groups that it's okay to go and interfere with and, at times, outright assault law enforcement officers."
Tricia McLaughlin, Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary, placed the blame directly on Democratic politicians for the sanctuary policies.
"When sanctuary politicians ignore ICE detainers, they are protecting criminal illegal aliens at the expense of American citizens," McLaughlin told Fox News Digital.
"Make no mistake, Democrat politicians like Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Wu of Boston, Tim Walz, and Mayor Bass of Los Angeles are contributing to the surge in assaults of our ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE. From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi Gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale."
"These reckless policies have deadly consequences," she added.
However, Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom's office, pushed back.
"Their assertions are fake news," said Crofts-Pelayo, adding, "This is the Trump team's attempt to justify their cruel and militaristic actions upon entire populations, including Americans, legal status holders and even U.S.-born citizens."
She pointed to new data released by the California Department of Justice that indicated overall crime in the state decreased in most categories in 2024 compared to 2023. The report said that the violent crime rate in the state had decreased in 2024 by 6%. However, it said that violent crime was still up 10.8% compared to 2019. Newsom entered office in January 2019.
Although the California homicide rate is up compared to 2019 (4.3% versus 4.2%), the spokesperson pointed out that it is still the "second lowest since at least 1966."
Crofts-Pelayo said that California under Newsom "continues to lead the way out of the COVID-induced crime surge" and that the Trump administration's "extremist agenda is not about safety — it's about cruelty and quotas."
"Trump is detaining U.S. citizens, ripping families apart, and disappearing parents and workers into inhumane federal detention centers to meet self-imposed massive arrest quotas," she said, adding, "Our federal leaders should protect the businesses and workers that support our communities and not build private prisons to warehouse the people who we rely on in this state and this country for our prosperity."
Fox News Digital also reached out to New York City Mayor Eric Adams, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Big, Beautiful Fiction - Does The EU/US Trade Deal Make Sense?
A Big, Beautiful Fiction - Does The EU/US Trade Deal Make Sense?

Forbes

time18 minutes ago

  • Forbes

A Big, Beautiful Fiction - Does The EU/US Trade Deal Make Sense?

James Thurber's famous book 'The Secret Life of Walter Mitty' is yet another book I would recommend to readers, to continue a recurring theme of recent weeks. It is especially apt in the context of the US-EU trade deal. Walter Mitty appeared at the end of the 1930's, a decade that was shaped by Herbert Hoover's tariff policy, and that was marked by profound economic and geopolitical tensions. Mitty's fantasies were provoked by the reality of his pedestrian, harangued life – which will appeal to European leaders who care to dream of better days. Equally, the giddiness of Mitty's fantasies has its equivalent in the promises that Donald Trump has elicited from the EU – namely, to buy and invest hundreds of billions of dollars in energy. One week on, reaction to the US-EU trade deal is still mixed, and it is not quite clear who has 'won'. This may be because it is not a trade deal in the classical sense – at least in the sense of the laborious trade deals that the EU is used to striking, partly because a large facet of the 'deal' is based on a promise and also because the optics of the deal are quite depressing for Europe. At the headline level, EU exports into the US will be met with a 15% tariff to be paid by the US consumer, not unlike the Japanese 'deal'. Auto companies will not be displeased with a 15% tariff. Wines and spirits, steel and notably pharmaceuticals have yet to have tariff levels finalised and there will be some relief on the confirmation of 15% tariffs on pharmaceuticals, though the investigation into pharmaceutical exports back to the US is a tail risk. Interestingly, the EU has resisted attempts to water down its digital regulations. Politically the spin that the EU is putting on the agreement is that it was the best possible outcome in a difficult geopolitical climate (recall that the recent EU-China summit was a damp-squib). While there were some public expressions of dismay, notably from the French prime minister Francois Bayrou – these can be seen to be largely aimed at the public, rather than Brussels. Though Ursula von der Leyen is unpopular with EU governments for the singular way she runs her office – it is populated with officials who are close to national government (i.e. Alexandre Adam one of von der Leyen's key deputies is an arch Macronist) – there is no sense that the large countries were left out of the negotiation process, and any effort to isolate von der Leyen for blame, is ignoble. However, amongst the professional trade staff, there is still some despair at the humiliating optics of the deal, the fact that it is in many ways not binding, and the risk that there is no undertaking that it is final in the sense that another round of tariffs is imposed later. On the positive side for Europe, and flipping to the 'Mitty-esque' part of the deal, two of the key undertakings in the deal – that European companies invest USD 600 bn in the US, in addition to a commitment to purchase microchips, as well as a commitment from the EU to buy USD 750bn in energy from the US over the course of the Trump presidency – are not at all clear in their implementation, and very much open to a fudge, with the right accounting treatment. In particular the energy purchase commitment is unrealistic because it exceeds what the EU spends on energy in a given year and US energy firms do not have the capacity to service a commitment of USD 250bn in demand from Europe, whilst also serving other markets. In my view there are several aftershocks to watch for. The first is that the deal further damages trans-Atlantic relations, and the level of trust between the EU and the US is likely the lowest it has ever been, and this has strategic implications as far afield as Russia/Ukraine and the Middle East. One other implication may be a drift, by government and consumers, away from US brands – as this may well be an effect that is seen in other regions. Two financial market implications are that the dampening of growth in Europe will maintain downward pressure on rates in Europe. More importantly, in the context of a very oversold dollar, there is now an incentive for EU policy makers to try hard to talk down the euro, and we may see a short-term rebound in the currency pair. On the whole, if this is a 'final' deal and the topic of tariffs does not re-emerge in the next three years, it is not a bad deal for the semi's, autos and aerospace sectors in Europe, though the public optics are not good for the EU. The best parts of the deal for Europe are the fantastical claims of incoming European investment and energy purchases in the US. This is a Mitty style fairy tale that the Europeans hope Mr Trump believes in. The telling factor is that this deal has now emptied all goodwill from the trans-Atlantic relationship, and effectively completes another diplomatic rupture by President Trump. From a European point of view, this is yet another 'wake up call' and the best that can be hoped for is that it accelerates projects like the savings and investment union and 'strategic autonomy'. European leaders and the European policy elite keep talking about this, but until we see hard evidence (for example, German real GDP over the last five years is close to zero), they are the fantasists. Have a great week ahead Mike

New Orleans police investigating two fatal shootings near St. Roch Thursday morning
New Orleans police investigating two fatal shootings near St. Roch Thursday morning

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New Orleans police investigating two fatal shootings near St. Roch Thursday morning

NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — The New Orleans Police Department is investigating two separate shootings near the St. Roch neighborhood that killed two men on Thursday morning. According to the NOPD, around 4:16 a.m. they were alerted of a shooting at the corner of North Miro and Mandeville streets. Upon arrival, NOPD officers found a man suffering from a gunshot wound to his body. He was pronounced dead on the scene. Man arrested in connection with fatal New Orleans hit-and-run Minutes later, at 4:22 a.m., a second shooting happened in the 1600 block of Franklin Avenue. There, they found a man suffering from a gunshot wound to his body. He was also pronounced dead on the scene. 'This happened right here in front of my house. This area has gotten really bad,' said a St. Roch resident. It's unclear at this time if the two shootings are connected. However, one resident who wished not to be on camera says the sound of bullets and screams woke him up. He was heartbroken to see a body lying just feet from his front door. 'She was screaming. And I can tell she was running. There was a male on the floor, right on the ground, right there by the bus stop. Everybody was screaming Call 911 I did. By the time they got the police got here, he was dead,' said a St. Roch resident. 'Who's next? You know what I'm saying. They kill every day at the sport of the moment,' said Bertrand Coleman. Coleman says it's hard to believe crime is down, as recent statistics indicate, when someone seems to lose a loved one every day. For him and others, hearing gunshots is the norm. 'People are going to continue on that and get killed because you don't have no programs for them? Okay. I told them a long time ago. In the community, you're going to hear some kind of gunshots. I'm used to that,' said Coleman. Boater found stuck in St. Tammany Parish marsh by deputies rescued With two families now mourning the loss of a family member, residents say an increase in police enforcement could help. Also, with elections around the corner, they're eager to see what the next mayor will put in place to prevent this from happening daily. 'Let's see what you're going to do about this situation? Because the city is behaving really badly. I don't see the police presence enough. They just drive by. I know you guys know, they have a drug house right here where they use drugs. I've got children who play on these streets,' said a St. Roch resident. Both of this morning's shootings are open investigations. The NOPD is in the process of gathering evidence and information to determine possible suspects and motives. If you have any leads that can lead to an arrest, you are asked to call Crimestoppers at 822-1111. The Orleans Parish Coroner's Office will release both victims' identities after an autopsy is done, and the families are Posts New Orleans at-large candidates debate worker rights, city issues at forum Summer storms come back on Friday Favorite FQ restaurant may be forced to close Eastbank uses monster comeback to beat Mississippi in LLBWS Southwest Regional opener New Louisiana license plates showcasing the arts now available Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store