logo
FDA vaccine chief leaving agency after less than 3 months

FDA vaccine chief leaving agency after less than 3 months

WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration's polarizing vaccine chief is leaving the agency after a brief tenure that drew the ire of biotech executives, patient groups and conservative allies of President Trump.
Dr. Vinay Prasad 'did not want to be a distraction' and was stepping down from his role as the FDA's top vaccine regulator 'to spend more time with his family,' a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement late Tuesday.
Two people familiar with the situation told the Associated Press that Prasad was ousted following several recent controversies. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. Prasad did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday morning.
Prasad joined the FDA in May after years as an academic researcher at UC San Francisco, where he frequently criticized the FDA's approach to drug approvals and COVID-19 vaccines.
His contrarian approach appeared to match FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who repeatedly praised Prasad's work and intellect.
But in recent weeks, Prasad became a target of right-wing activists, including Laura Loomer, who flagged Prasad's past statements criticizing Trump and praising liberal independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
'How did this Trump-hating Bernie Bro get into the Trump admin???' Loomer posted on X last week.
Trump previously fired several national security officials a day after Loomer raised concerns about their loyalty.
Prasad also attracted scrutiny for his handling of a recent safety issue surrounding the only approved gene therapy for Duchenne's muscular dystrophy.
Under his direction, shipments of the therapy were briefly halted after a series of patient deaths, then resumed late Monday following vocal pushback from families of boys with the fatal muscle-wasting disorder.
Prasad has long been skeptical of the therapy and other muscular dystrophy drugs sold by the drugmaker, Sarepta Therapeutics. As an academic, Prasad gained prominence by attacking the FDA for being too lenient in its standards for approving cancer drugs and other new therapies.
That approach is at odds with Trump's Republican supporters, who generally favor speedier approvals and unfettered access to experimental treatments. During Trump's first term, he signed the 'Right to Try' law, a largely symbolic piece of legislation that won popular support from conservatives seeking to give dying patients expanded access to unproven drugs.
Prasad's decision to pause Sarepta's therapy was criticized last week by a columnist and the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal.
Separately, Prasad's division issued rejection letters this month to three small biotech firms seeking approval for new gene therapies.
Those therapies have been vigorously embraced many of the antiabortion groups in Trump's base for their potential to address intractable diseases that sometimes lead parents to terminate pregnancies.
Prasad's predecessor in the role, Dr. Peter Marks, oversaw a dramatic rise in approvals for new gene therapies, which aim to treat or prevent disease by replacing or modifying a portion of patients' genetic code.
Prasad has been an outspoken critic of Marks' leadership at the FDA, which included overseeing the approval of the first COVID vaccines and therapies.
Perrone writes for the Associated Press. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Agencies Told to Expunge Employee COVID-19 Vaccination Records
Federal Agencies Told to Expunge Employee COVID-19 Vaccination Records

Epoch Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Federal Agencies Told to Expunge Employee COVID-19 Vaccination Records

Federal agencies must eliminate records related to whether employees received a COVID-19 vaccine, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) said on Friday. 'All information related to an employee's COVID-19 vaccine status, noncompliance with prior vaccine mandates, or exemption requests must be expunged from any employee's Official Personnel Folder,' the office's director, Scott Kupor, told department heads in a memorandum.

Elon Musk's America Party is nowhere to be seen 1 month later
Elon Musk's America Party is nowhere to be seen 1 month later

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's America Party is nowhere to be seen 1 month later

Elon Musk said he would be forming a new political party on July 5. One month later, he hasn't taken the formal steps to do so. He's also remained a major GOP donor, even amid his feud with Trump. Elon Musk hasn't gone "founder mode" on building the America Party just yet. On July 5, enraged by the passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill" and encouraged by the results of an online poll, Musk said he would form a new political party in the United States. Over a month later, he hasn't taken any of the formal steps necessary to do so, and he hasn't publicly mentioned the idea in weeks. That's despite praise from Mark Cuban and a warning from the head of the Democratic Party that Musk's effort should be "taken seriously." In the meantime, several polls have indicated that while many Americans are hungry for a third party, far fewer are interested in one founded by Musk. This week, one of his top aides at both DOGE and xAI announced that she was breaking off to start her own podcast. Musk has also remained a major GOP donor as he's toyed with the idea of starting a third party and feuded with President Donald Trump, according to campaign finance records made public at the end of July. The tech titan gave a total of $15 million to several GOP super PACs on June 27, including: $5 million to MAGA Inc, which supports Trump; $5 million to the Senate Leadership Fund, which supports GOP senators and Senate candidates; $5 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, which supports Republican House members and candidates. Those donations came just days before Musk said he'd form the America Party — and weeks after he first floated the idea at the beginning of his feud with Trump. "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk asked his followers on June 5. All of this isn't to say that Musk couldn't pivot back to the project at some point. And if he did, he'd be joining a club of businessmen who've tried to take on the two-party system over the years. It takes a lot to stand up a new political party, including filing paperwork with the Federal Election Commission, collecting signatures to get on the ballot in various states, and recruiting candidates to run in House and Senate races next year. In other words, it's a resource-intensive and time-consuming process, and there's little indication that Musk has undertaken it. Musk did not respond to BI's request for comment for this story. Musk, the world's richest man, is known to go "founder mode" on things that he cares deeply about, devoting extraordinary amounts of energy and time to projects and even sleeping at the office. He did it when he took over Twitter, now known as X. He's done it at Tesla. He did it when he went all-in on supporting Trump in 2024. And he brought that same approach to DOGE, until he began winding down his involvement in late April. If Musk is serious about standing up a new party, we might expect him to bring that same "founder mode" approach to this venture. But so far, it hasn't happened. Read the original article on Business Insider

Air Force revokes approved retirement for trans service members: 'Complete and utter betrayal'
Air Force revokes approved retirement for trans service members: 'Complete and utter betrayal'

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Air Force revokes approved retirement for trans service members: 'Complete and utter betrayal'

Alyx, a transgender woman who has served in the Air Force for 15 years, was approved in May for early retirement due to the Trump administration's policy prohibiting trans people from serving and enlisting in the military. On Wednesday, that retirement was revoked under a new Air Force directive. She said she wasn't provided any reason other than that her retirement was 'prematurely" approved, according to documentation she provided to NBC News. 'Being told that I would be discharged for a decision on somebody's part was hard, but then being offered the retirement that I feel I'm owed, that my service is owed, that helped, and then having that yanked away for no reason, with no recourse ... that is complete and utter betrayal,' said Alyx, who is based in Virginia and asked to only use her first name due to fear that she and her family could face harassment. Multiple federal judges initially blocked President Donald Trump's executive order barring trans troops, but the Supreme Court allowed it to take effect in May. As a result of the ban, trans service members were required to choose between voluntary and involuntary separation. Voluntary separation included double the lump payout than an involuntary separation and wouldn't require the service member to pay back any bonuses they had received. Trans airmen who served at least 20 years could apply for retirement, and those with 18 to 20 years of service could apply for early retirement under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority, or TERA. In late May, the Air Force announced in a memo that airmen with 15 to 18 years of service could request early retirement under an exception to TERA. Alyx was placed on indefinite leave in May as a result of the ban, which would've required her to cut her hair short, wear a men's uniform and use the men's restroom at work. She applied for early retirement under the exception so she could receive a pension equivalent to her service and access to full health care benefits. Her application was approved June 16, according to documents she shared with NBC News, and her retirement date was set for Dec. 1. On Wednesday, that decision was reversed for Alyx and about a dozen other service members who were approved for early retirement. 'In accordance with DoD Guidance, the Department of the Air Force approved service members with 18-20 years of honorable service who self-identified to retire under the Temporary Authority for Early Retirement (TERA) program,' an Air Force spokesperson told NBC News. 'Although service members with 15-18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved.' The spokesperson added that service members are still eligible for voluntary or involuntary separation. In response to a question regarding why the previously approved retirements were rescinded, another Air Force spokesperson said in an email that those service members 'were prematurely notified that their TERA applications under the gender dysphoria provision had been approved, but higher level review was required under the DoD gender dysphoria policy for those members (between 15 and 18 years of service).' The spokesperson didn't provide more information about the higher level review or why the Air Force ultimately revoked the retirements. Master Sgt. Logan Ireland, who has served for 15 years and was a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the Trump administration's ban on trans service members, also received notice that his previously approved application for early retirement was rescinded on Wednesday 'without any case-by-case review, explanation or legal justification,' Ireland said in a statement provided by GLAD Law, an LGBTQ legal organization. 'Our involuntary removal is being carried out without dignity, without transparency, and without the respect every honorable service member deserves,' Logan said. 'This is not policy, it is betrayal.' Both Alyx and Ireland have deployed overseas, including to Lithuania, the United Arab Emirates, Afghanistan, Qatar and South Korea. Alyx said she's most proud of her work overseeing the training of more than 500 airmen at Sheppard Air Force Base. She also armed aircraft that escorted Air Force One. 'There are many of us like that who are determined to continue serving our country honorably with distinction, in spite of the enormous misunderstanding and, in a lot of cases, hatred that we receive from the people that we're defending,' Alyx said. Alyx said the ban and having her retirement rescinded has put her in a precarious financial situation. She bought a home last year assuming she would be able to rely on having a paycheck and housing allowance, but she will lose that. With retirement, she would have at least had her pension. She also struggles with feeling like she was forced to abandon her fellow airmen, who she said have been supportive throughout her career. 'Being told to go home and just sit here on my couch and try to set up for myself later while still receiving a paycheck, while leaving my unit in a shortage of manpower, in a position where they needed somebody, is very difficult for me to stomach,' she said. 'I don't really have a choice.' This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store