logo
Senate Republicans look to sweeten Medicaid pot to silence dissent on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

Senate Republicans look to sweeten Medicaid pot to silence dissent on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo5 hours ago

The Medicaid debate among Senate Republicans continues to rage on, but a new proposal geared toward sating concerns over the survivability of rural hospitals could help to close the lingering fissures within the conference.
Senate Republicans are sprinting to finish their work on President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which is filled with key priorities like making his first-term tax cuts permanent, funding his immigration and border security agenda, and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse across a variety of programs.
Top Trump Health Official Slams Democrats For 'Misleading' Claims About Medicaid Reform
But lawmakers are still at odds over changes made in the Senate's version of the bill to the Medicaid provider tax rate and the effects that it could have on rural hospitals, threatening to derail the legislation near the finish line.
A proposal making the rounds from the Senate Finance Committee obtained by Fox News Digital would create a separate stabilization fund that would go toward aiding and upgrading rural healthcare.
The committee's proposal would allocate $3 billion annually to states that apply to the program over the next five fiscal years.
Read On The Fox News App
'It Just Baffles Me': Senate Republicans Sound Alarm Over Medicaid Changes, Spending In Trump Megabill
But that amount is too low for some senators and far too much for others.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, has been working on a similar proposal but would prefer a much higher fund of $100 billion. That number is unlikely to pass muster with her colleagues and still isn't high enough for her.
"I don't think that solves the entire problem," she said. "The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts and I think that's problematic as well."
Collins would prefer a return to the House GOP's proposed changes to the provider tax rate, rather than the Senate's harsher crackdown.
The Senate changes to the provider tax rate hit close to home for Collins, whose state's rural hospitals are already in jeopardy because the state of Maine failed to advance its budget in time, leaving roughly $400 million in Medicaid funding that would have gone to rural hospitals in limbo.
"Obviously any money is helpful. But no, it is not adequate," she said.
House Conservatives Go To War With Senate Over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Indeed, the changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, which were a stark departure from the House GOP's version of the bill, angered the Republicans who have warned not to make revisions to the health care program that could shut down rural hospitals and boot working Americans from their benefits.
The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5%.
However, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz and some Senate Republicans have argued that the provider tax rate is a scam rife with fraud that actually harms rural hospitals more than it helps.
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., was in the same camp, and has argued that the rate should be nixed completely. He has similarly pushed for a separate fund but wasn't keen on the cost of the current proposal.
"I don't know that we need $15 billion," he said. "But this needs to be run by CMS."
And others wanted to see more money injected into a stabilization fund.
"I think $5 billion a year would more than make them whole," Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., said.
He contended that, as the only lawmaker who has run a rural hospital, there are only roughly 12 million people on Medicaid in rural America, and that lawmakers should "tighten things up" when it comes to funding the health care program.
He said that being on Medicaid was "not the same as having healthcare," and added that "at best, two thirds of doctors accept Medicaid, and even many of the specialists, when they say they do, they won't give you an appointment for six months or a year."
"Medicaid is not the solution," he said. "It's the most broken federal system up here."Original article source: Senate Republicans look to sweeten Medicaid pot to silence dissent on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic
CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CareerBuilder + Monster job search board files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after revenue sinks nearly 40% post-pandemic

CareerBuilder + Monster, an online job-hunting joint venture, announced on Tuesday that it had filed for bankruptcy in Delaware. Kroger is closing 60 stores: See the list of locations that are reportedly shuttering in 2025 so far Humans have irreversibly changed the planet. These photos prove it 10 mistakes leaders make in crisis that break team trust The company initiated the Chapter 11 process to facilitate a sale of its operations, with assets totaling between $50 million and $100 million and estimated liabilities amounting to between $100 million and $500 million, according to its bankruptcy filing. Fast Company has reached out to the company for comment. The bankruptcy plan calls for the assets to be divided up—with the sale of its jobs board business to JobGet Inc., the sale of Monster Media Properties to Valnet Inc. (which includes and and the sale of Monster Government Services to Valsoft Corp. However, the asset sale is subject to other higher offers, according to the press release. 'For over 25 years, we have been a proud global leader in helping job seekers and companies connect and empower employment across the globe,' Jeff Furman, CEO of CareerBuilder + Monster, said in a statement. 'However, like many others in the industry, our business has been affected by a challenging and uncertain macroeconomic environment. 'In light of these conditions, we ran a robust sale process and carefully evaluated all available options. We determined that initiating this court-supervised sale process is the best path toward maximizing the value of our businesses and preserving jobs.' Furman added that CareerBuilder + Monster also plans to restructure, which would include a reduction of its current workforce, and the company is in talks with Blue Torch Capital for up to $20 million of debtor-in-possession financing. Monster, which dominated the internet job search industry starting in the 1990s, merged with then-struggling CareerBuilder in 2024, with Dutch multinational human resource consulting firm Randstad NV taking a minority stake in that business. Owned by Apollo Global Management, CareerBuilder saw a decline in subscription renewals after the pandemic, from which it never recovered. Although the merger created one mega job board, sales continued to decline, with CareerBuilder's revenue falling to $49.2 million in 2024, a 40% drop compared with 2023, according to Moody's Ratings, as reported by Bloomberg. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?
What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?

Forbes

time29 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What Advice Might Bob Dylan Give Today's Institutional Investors?

American folk-rock singer-songwriter Bob Dylan performing at BBC TV Centre, London, 1st June 1965. ... More (Photo by Val Wilmer/Redferns) Iconic American musician and Nobel Laureate in Literature Bob Dylan's words from 1964 apply to today's markets: 'the times they are a-changin.' As political misalignment in the United States emerges as a material investment risk, investors and companies are increasingly risking their long-term sustainability by downplaying it. Let's examine the hidden cost of downplaying sustainability and why many are underestimating Times Are A-Changin, and Investors Must Change With Them What matters to investors changes over time. This concept of dynamic materiality, first demonstrated by TrueValue Labs (now part of FactSet), can be seen in both cyclical trends and acute shifts. For example, during expansions, when there are tighter labor markets, strong employee relations reduce new issue bond yields, perhaps because strong employee relations help with recruiting and retaining top talent. There is also no relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities as a proxy for social capital and bond spreads. By contrast, during recessions, employee relations scores are insignificant, and high-CSR firms are able to raise more debt at lower spreads, better credit ratings, and longer maturities. These effects are stronger for firms with higher expected costs of debt. In addition to these cyclical trends, there are also acute shifts in materiality, caused by exogenous shocks like COVID-19, which increased the materiality of the following COVID-19 related social issues between January and June 2020: access and affordability, customer privacy, data security, employee health and safety, labor practices, product quality and safety. Today's acute shift in materiality is caused by rapid legal and regulatory change. As of June 22, 2025, President Trump signed 165 executive orders so far this year—the most in a first year of office since President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed 568 executive orders in 1933. The 83 anti-DEI and 56 anti-ESG (ex-DEI) lawsuits only amplify the abrupt legal and regulatory Emergence of Political Misalignment as a Material Risk. Since 2023, anti-DEI and anti-ESG lawsuits have generated hundreds of millions of dollars in legal and settlement costs. This tangible cost is in addition to the intangible cost of management distraction during lawsuits. As a result, political misalignment in the United States is emerging as a material investment risk, and investors and companies are adjusting their public-facing language to minimize the perception of misalignment. Since adjusting language is easier than reversing initiatives or changing values, many investors and companies are more sustainable than their disclosure suggests. This phenomenon is so new that green-hushing, red-washing, and MAGA-washing are all contenders to describe it with no clear frontrunner. Sustainable investing legal expert and New York University Professor Deborah Burand is one of the first academics to research the harm this creates. Pinocchio with leaf. The Case Against Greenwashing Applies to the Case Against Green-Hushing. The sustainable finance industry long advocated against greenwashing (overstating the environmental benefits of an investment or company) and its analogs. This makes sense: transparency and disclosure are material to investing. And the Biden Administration rightly pursued enforcement actions against investors and companies for false and misleading claims, vague language, or failing to disclose material information about negative social or environmental impacts. Admit That the Waters Around You Have Grown CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE - FEBRUARY 16: In this handout provided by the Clarksville Fire Rescue, ... More Clarksville Fire Rescue members perform water rescues to evacuate trapped people during flooding on February 16, 2025 in Clarksville, Tennessee. Severe winter storms brought torrential rains causing intense flooding in Tennessee and parts of Florida and Georgia. (Photo by Clarksville Fire Rescue via Getty Images) Sustainable investors and companies must strike a fine balance. Organizations can mitigate the risk of legal and regulatory challenges from the Trump administration and its supporters—with their headlines, legal expenses, and management distraction—by green-hushing. Avoiding scrutiny may feel safer in this environment. At the same time, this green-hushing can obscure accountability, disperse management and board focus, prevent sharing best practices and lessons learned, and diminish the ability of other organizations to be transparent about their values. Research from Arshia Farzamfar, Pouyan Foroughi, Lilian Ng, and Linyang Yu shows that firms pressured to improve environmental performance do so at the expense of social status, committing more compliance violations related to employment, healthcare, workplace safety, and consumer protection. It is too early for peer-reviewed research linking pressure to reduce political misalignment with committing more violations of fiduciary duty or duty to the mission. Particularly for investors and companies where sustainability drives long-term value creation or aligns with the mission or stakeholder values, this remains a space to watch. Downplaying sustainability can also diminish trust with employees, investors, and other clients who struggle to understand how investors and companies who publicly touted their commitment to sustainability in 2021, 2022, and even 2023 can reverse course so quickly. For example, at least twelve lawyers resigned from law firms that made deals with the Trump administration; Danish pension fund Akademiker terminated an over $400 million 20-year relationship with State Street due to sustainability concerns; and several companies faced boycotts after rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Losing talent, assets, and revenues can slow long-term value creation. These harms extend beyond the organizations choosing to downplay sustainability. Law firms settling with the Trump administration weakened fundamental protections. And when the Gates Foundation extricated itself from the fire by pivoting a scholarship originally for racial and ethnic minorities to Pell Grants (which are based on income and primarily benefit minorities), it became more difficult for other investors and companies to pursue Alternative: Building Resilience And Building Communities A long line of concrete blocks stretches across the sandy beach, creating a visible boundary on the ... More shore. Before deciding to downplay their sustainability, investors and companies may instead consider how to build the resilience to withstand the legal and regulatory risks of preserving their narrative on sustainability. They may wish to form communities of practice to share best practices and lessons learned with similar institutions. Or they simply may wish to dedicate more time to comparing notes with peers one-on-one. Perhaps it's time for these investors and companies to take inspiration from Bob Dylan and 'admit that the waters…have grown…and start swimmin.'

Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch
Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rocket Lab (RKLB) Jumps 9% on New Mission Launch

Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) is one of the . Rocket Lab extended its winning streak to a third straight day on Monday, jumping 9.12 percent to end at $32.78 apiece as investors repositioned portfolios ahead of the launch of the Symphony in the Stars mission. In a post on X, Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) said that its next launch attempt for the mission was scheduled for Tuesday, June 24th, at 7 PM NZT, or 3AM EDT. Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) attempted to launch the Symphony in the Stars on Friday but scrapped the plan due to strong winds. In other news, Rocket Lab Corporation (NASDAQ:RKLB) received a higher price target from Cantor Fitzgerald—$35 versus the $29 previously. The latter also maintained its 'overweight' rating on the stock. A launch pad atop a grassy hill, smoke filled sky from a successful voyage to space. Cantor Fitzgerald said that its revision was based on Rocket Lab Corporation's (NASDAQ:RKLB) successful space launch track record, which positions it in the industry. While we acknowledge the potential of RKLB as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store