NPR sues Trump administration over order to cut funding to public media
NEW YORK — National Public Radio and three of its local stations sued U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday, arguing that his executive order cutting funding to the 246-station network violates their free speech and relies on an authority that he does not have.
Article content
Article content
Earlier this month, Trump instructed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and federal agencies to cease funding for NPR and PBS, either directly or indirectly. The president and his supporters argue their news reporting promotes liberal bias and shouldn't be supported by taxpayers.
Article content
Article content
Retaliation is Trump's plain purpose, the lawsuit argues. It was filed in federal court in Washington by NPR and three Colorado entities — Colorado Public Radio, Aspen Public Radio and KUTE, Inc., chosen to show the system's diversity in urban and rural areas.
Article content
Article content
'By basing its directives on the substance of NPR's programming, the executive order seeks to force NPR to adapt its journalistic standards and editorial choices to the preferences of the government if it is to continue to receive federal funding,' Katherine Maher, NPR's CEO, said Tuesday.
Article content
The lawsuit alleges that he is acting to contravene the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a private nonprofit corporation set up to distribute federal funding to NPR and PBS, which is intended to insulate the system from political interference. Congress has appropriated $535 million yearly to CPB for 2025, 2026 and 2027.
Article content
In response to the lawsuit, White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields said that CPB 'is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime,' so Trump was exercising his authority under the law. 'The president was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective,' Fields said.
Article content
Article content
Trump hasn't hidden his feelings about NPR, calling it a 'liberal disinformation machine' in an April social media post.
Article content
Article content
The court fight seemed preordained, given that the heads of NPR and PBS both reacted to Trump's move earlier this month with statements that they believed it was illegal. The absence of PBS from Tuesday's filing indicates the two systems will challenge this separately; PBS has not yet gone to court, but is likely to soon.
Article content
'PBS is considering every option, including taking legal action, to allow our organization to continue to provide essential programming and services to member stations and all Americans,' PBS spokesman Jeremy Gaines said Tuesday.
Article content
The administration has battled with the press on several fronts. The Federal Communications Commission is investigating ABC, CBS and NBC News. The Associated Press also went to court after the administration restricted access to certain events in response to the organization's decision not to rename the Gulf of Mexico as Trump decreed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
Five things to know about Canada's counter-tariffs on the U.S.
President Donald Trump speaks during an event to announce new tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House, Wednesday, April 2, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) OTTAWA — After U.S. President Donald Trump boosted steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 per cent, some industry groups and the Official Opposition have called on the federal government to retaliate in kind. Here's a look at the counter-tariffs Canada has imposed so far. 1. What do the counter-tariffs cover? The Canadian government has imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods three times since Trump's trade war began, aimed at what it says are imports worth $95.4 billion worth. On March 4 — after the U.S. imposed 25 per cent tariffs on all Canadian goods, along with 10 per cent on energy products — then-prime minister Justin Trudeau announced the first raft of counter-tariffs on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods. Those 25 per cent tariffs target things like orange juice, motorcycles, clothing and shoes, coffee, cosmetics and alcohol. On March 12, the U.S. added a 25 per cent tariff on all steel and aluminum products, which was stacked on top of existing levies on Canadian goods. Canada's response a day later was 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on another $29.8 billion of U.S. goods, including steel and aluminum, tools, computers and sport equipment. On April 9, in response to another round of U.S. tariffs — this time targeting the Canadian auto industry — the federal government imposed 25 per cent duties on 'non-CUSMA compliant vehicles' from the U.S. and 25 per cent tariffs on the content of CUSMA-compliant vehicles from the U.S. The government says this covers $35.6 billion in auto imports from the United States. 2. What are the exemptions? On April 15, in the midst of the federal election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that the government was exempting some products from tariffs for six months to help Canadian businesses adapt. The tariff holiday covers specific categories: goods used in Canadian manufacturing, processing and food and beverage packaging, as well as imports used to support public health, health care, public safety and national security objectives. And when it comes to vehicle tariffs, the government said 'companies that produce autos in Canada have been granted remission to ensure the ongoing viability of their Canadian operations,' but that it is 'contingent on them maintaining production levels in Canada and on following through with planned investments.' 3. Does this mean all counter-tariffs have been dropped? On Wednesday, Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer said the government 'secretly dropped those tariffs to zero during the campaign.' This line has been repeated often by the Conservatives since the release of a report by Oxford Economics on May 13, which said Canada paused counter-tariffs for six months 'on nearly all U.S. goods imports.' The report said it estimated the exemptions would cover about 97 per cent of the tariffs. The government said that's not true. A spokesperson for Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said the exemptions apply to 30 per cent of the $60 billion worth of goods that are subject to tariffs — a figure that doesn't include the auto tariffs. William Pellerin, a partner in international trade at McMillan LLP, said the exemption is not nearly as broad as what's been reported. 'I think that report caused a lot of consternation within the trading community and the legal community. It is absolutely, certainly not zero impact on our clients,' he said, noting many of them are paying millions of dollars in duties already. 4. Where does all this leave Canadian businesses? Pellerin said there's a lot of confusion out there about what's covered by the exemptions. The Canada Border Services Agency has issued a customs notice explaining how to interpret the exemptions, 'but in many circumstances it's simply not obvious at all,' Pellerin said. As an example, he said he has clients who have been told by the CBSA that imported agricultural equipment is not exempt. 'We actually think that that's legally incorrect, that they've poorly interpreted the order-in-council,' he said. That's the kind of thing his firm is trying to sort out while it waits and hopes for a long-term resolution. 'Whatever actions need to be taken to get back to a tariff-free world (are) absolutely necessary,' he said. 5. How much tariff revenue has the government collected and where is it going? Conservative MPs have been asking this question in the House of Commons all week. On Tuesday, Conservative MP Dan Albas charged that 'Liberals promised $20 billion in elbows-up U.S. tariffs, but later dropped them with no regard to affected Canadian workers or fiscal impacts.' Prime Minister Carney responded to say that tariffs are still in effect and $1.7 billion has been collected so far. The federal government's latest fiscal monitor showed Canada collected an extra $617 million in import duties in March, as compared to the year before. Figures for April and May have not yet been published. During the election campaign, the Liberals and the Conservatives both estimated Canada would collect $20 billion in tariff revenue this fiscal year. In its election platform, the Liberal party pledged that 'every dollar raised from these tariffs will support Canadian workers and businesses affected by the trade war.' Officials at the Finance Department said in a statement that the money is going into the consolidated revenue fund and being used 'to support those hardest hit by this economic disruption.' The statement said that is happening through programs like employment insurance work-sharing, deferral of corporate income tax payments and GST/HST remittances, or by offering liquidity support through Export Development Canada, Farm Credit Canada, Business Development Canada and the Large Enterprise Tariff Loan Facility. — With files from Craig Lord This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025. Sarah Ritchie, The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
22 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Investing $50,000 in This Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stock Could Generate $2,865 in Annual Passive Income
Make money without even trying. That might sound impossible. It isn't, though. Granted, the old saying that "it takes money to make money" is usually true. You typically must have upfront capital to invest to make money. You'll also need an investment vehicle that will produce income. But the second hurdle is an easy one to jump. Income-seeking investors have plenty of alternatives. I think Realty Income (NYSE: O) is one of the best. Investing $50,000 in this ultra-high-yield dividend stock could generate $2,865 in annual passive income. About Realty Income Realty Income calls itself the "Real Estate Partner to the World's Leading Companies." That's an apt description. Realty Income owns 15,627 commercial real estate properties leased to 1,598 clients. And many of its tenants indeed rank among the world's leading companies, including Dollar General, FedEx, Home Depot, and Walmart. Like many top real estate companies, Realty Income is organized as a real estate investment trust (REIT). It's the seventh-largest REIT in the world with properties in eight countries. Realty Income's tenant base is remarkably diversified. Its clients represent 91 industries. Roughly 91% of the REIT's total rent is largely immune to economic downturns and/or insulated from e-commerce competition. Perhaps the most impressive thing about Realty Income is its reliability. The company has been in business for 56 years. It has delivered positive total operational returns for 29 consecutive years. Realty Income's compound annual total return since its listing on the New York Stock Exchange in 1994 is 13.6%. A passive income machine Even better for income investors, Realty Income is a passive income machine. Its forward dividend yield currently stands at 5.73%. An initial investment of $50,000 would generate $2,865 in annual income at that yield. By the way, you won't receive that dividend income each quarter as is the case with most dividend-paying stocks. One of Realty Income's registered trademarks is "The Monthly Dividend Company," reflecting the fact that it pays dividends monthly rather than quarterly. But is the REIT's dividend safe? I think so. Realty Income has paid a dividend for 659 months. It has also increased the dividend for 30 consecutive years. If history is any guide, you won't have to worry about inflation eroding the buying power of your passive income from this stock. The REIT's dividend has risen by a compound annual growth rate of 4.3%. Don't be alarmed by Realty Income's dividend payout ratio of nearly 288%. Earnings-based payout ratios often look worrisome. The more important financial metric to watch is adjusted funds from operations (AFFO). Realty Income used roughly 75% of its diluted AFFO in the first quarter of 2025 to fund its dividend. That's a comfortable level that gives the REIT flexibility to pay and grow its dividend. More than just a dividend Realty Income can give investors more than just a dividend, though. Its long-term growth prospects appear to be solid, too. The REIT had around $23 billion of sourced acquisition opportunities in the first quarter of 2025. That's encouraging, considering it had roughly $43 billion of sourced acquisition opportunities in all of 2024. Realty Income should have especially significant growth potential in Europe. The estimated total addressable net lease market in Europe is $8.5 trillion. Competition is limited in Europe as well, with only two major REITs other than Realty Income operating in the region. But Realty Income also has solid growth prospects in the U.S. The estimated total addressable U.S. net lease market is $5.5 trillion. Data centers and gaming present relatively new growth opportunities for REITs. A $50,000 investment in this ultra-high-yield dividend stock should easily be able to generate $2,865 per year in passive income. However, the total amount of money you could make from owning Realty Income over the long term could be much higher. Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now? Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
Toronto Star
23 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Iranians react to new Trump travel ban as tensions are high between nations
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iranians again face a U.S. travel ban imposed by President Donald Trump, with the decision drawing anger, frustration and some shrugs given the decades of tensions between the countries. Trump imposed a similar ban during his first term before withdrawing America unilaterally from Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, under which Iran drastically limited its program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
