World War II-era ship sinks before US-Philippine forces can use in drills
Listen to article
A World War II-era US Navy ship intended to be sunk in a live-fire military exercise by US and Philippine forces sank prematurely on Monday, slipping beneath the South China Sea before any missile or bomb could strike it.
The ex-USS Brattleboro, which served in key Pacific battles more than 80 years ago, was to be the centrepiece target in the "Balikatan" joint drills currently underway off the coast of Luzon.
'The vessel was selected because it exceeded its service life and was no longer suitable for normal operations,'Philippine military officials said.
'Due to rough sea conditions that we are currently experiencing in the excercise box and with its long service life as it expected, she took on a significant amount of water and eventually sank,' said Philippine Navy spokesperson Capt. John Percie Alcos.
He confirmed that the 184-foot ship, which was not damaged during towing, sank at 7:20 am local time.
The Brattleboro had been selected for the drill's MARSTRIKE (maritime strike) phase because it was no longer operational. It was meant to be destroyed by a combination of US Marine Corps F/A-18 jets, anti-ship missiles, bombs, and cannon fire.
Despite the vessel's early demise, the rest of the MARSTRIKE training will proceed, the Armed Forces of the Philippines said in a statement.
'The combined force will still achieve its training objectives,' the military said,
The vessel had been thoroughly cleaned before deployment and posed no environmental risk, according to the Philippine military.
The annual Balikatan exercise, running from April 21 to May 9, aims to strengthen cooperation and readiness between the US and Philippine armed forces amid rising tensions in the region.
History of ex- USS Brattleboro
The ex-USS "Brattleboro" met an unceremonious end on Monday, but its history spanned some of the most pivotal moments in 20th-century naval warfare.
Commissioned as a submarine chaser during World War II, the ship played a key role in the battles of Leyte Gulf and Okinawa—two decisive American campaigns against Imperial Japan in 1944 and 1945, respectively.
According to the US Naval History and Heritage Command, the vessel supported air defence and rescue operations during the Leyte invasion, evacuating over 400 wounded soldiers to hospital ships and downing a Japanese aircraft.
Following additional combat operations near Palau and the Philippines, the Brattleboro joined the Okinawa campaign in spring 1945.
There, it provided emergency treatment to more than 200 seriously injured personnel and rescued over 1,000 survivors from sunken vessels during the 91-day battle.
Retired from US service in the 1960s, the ship was transferred to South Vietnam in 1966.
After the fall of Saigon in 1975, it was handed over to the Philippine Navy and recommissioned in 1977 as the BRP Miguel Malvar, named after a Filipino revolutionary leader.
The vessel remained in service until its decommissioning in 2021.
Rising regional tension
The scheduled sinking of the Brattleboro had been planned in waters facing the disputed Scarborough Shoal—an area closely patrolled by Chinese military and coast guard vessels.
The Philippines also claims the shoal, located roughly 137 miles west of Zambales province.
This year's Balikatan—meaning 'shoulder-to-shoulder' in Tagalog—involves over 14,000 troops from the US and the Philippines.
The drills are intended as a robust test of the two nations' joint defence capabilities amid rising tensions in the South China Sea.
Clashes between Chinese and Philippine vessels near the shoal have intensified in recent years, fuelling fears of broader military escalation.
China continues to assert sweeping claims over the South China Sea, while forcefully opposing any US military involvement in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Zelenskyy says Russian ceasefire memorandum is an ‘ultimatum'
KYIV: President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday said that Russia was giving Ukraine an ultimatum at peace negotiations but said he was ready to hold direct talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump 'any day'. His comments came after Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul swapped terms for agreeing to a ceasefire and said they were ready to host another round of prisoner exchanges. Zelenskyy told reporters – including from AFP – that the Russian document outlining Moscow's requirements to halt its invasion amounted to an ultimatum. 'That is, it is not a memorandum of understanding. At least a memorandum of understanding should be signed by two parties, not just one party demanding something,' he said sitting around a table with international and Ukrainian media. Ukraine invited to NATO summit in The Hague: Zelenskyy 'Therefore, it cannot be called a memorandum. It is, after all, an ultimatum from the Russian side to us,' he added. Zelenskyy said that there was no point in continuing peace talks in Istanbul with the current level of Russian delegates as they are not high-ranking enough, calling instead for a sit-down with Putin. 'We are ready for exchanges, but to continue diplomatic meetings in Istanbul at a level that does not solve anything further, I think, is pointless,' Zelenskyy said, referring to the two agreements for prisoner of war swaps that have come out of the talks. He said instead that he was ready to hold a meeting with Putin and Trump. 'We are ready for such a meeting any day,' Zelenskyy said, adding that he was proposing that a ceasefire be put in place before any such summit, which would also include Turkish President Recep Tayip Erdogan. The White House said that Trump was 'open' to meeting his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts in Turkey after the two sides failed on Monday to make headway towards an elusive ceasefire. Zelenskyy added that Ukraine and Russia were prepared to exchange captured military personnel this weekend, following the agreement between Moscow and Kyiv brokered in Turkey this week. 'The Russian side has passed on information that this weekend – on Saturday and Sunday – they will be able to transfer 500 people, 500 of our military,' Zelenskyy said. 'We will be ready to exchange the relevant number' of prisoners of war, he added. Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed and millions forced to flee their homes in Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II.
Express Tribune
09-05-2025
- Express Tribune
The climate of war
The writer is an educationist based in Larkana. She can be reached at sairasamo88@ Listen to article In the ongoing wake of war between two nuclear-armed and hostile nations, South Asia's peace is at stake, painting a grim picture of doom and destruction in the minds of many - expressing a crippled fate. The consequences seem severe, threatening the future with dire outcomes. War is a condition born of chaos and conflict of interest, culminating in bloodshed, injuries and suffering. Nevertheless, throughout history, long-lasting wars have remained a persistent trait of human nature — often ending in devastation and despair. Let's glance at some of the prolonged and destructive wars in history. The Thirty Years' War (1618-1648), primarily a religious conflict, caused immense destruction and loss of life throughout Europe. World War I (1914-1918), known as the Great War, brought widespread violence and destruction, particularly on the Western Front. World War II, a conflict between the Axis powers (Germany, Italy and Japan) and the Allied powers (France, Great Britain, the US, the Soviet Union and China), along with some neutral nations, was fiercely fought, resulting in massive economic and social repercussions. Approximately 60 to 80 million people lost their lives, causing global sorrow and havoc. Its aftermath plunged millions into food shortages, malnutrition and widespread disease. Furthermore, Vietnam was the most heavily bombed country in history. Over 6.1 million tons of bombs were dropped — nearly triple the tonnage used during World War II. The Vietnam War (1955-1975) came at a severe cost: 100,000 US troops lost limbs, and countless civilians were killed or injured. Tragically, the genocide in Gaza that began on October 7, 2023, has claimed up to 61,709 innocent lives — a brutal consequence of war, spreading hatred and bewilderment throughout the Muslim world. All these wars, since their commencement, have either destroyed societies or left people socially and psychologically traumatised. War ends peace and stability — something now reflected in the bellicose posture of India. William Hazlitt once said, "Those who are at war with others are not at peace with themselves." India exemplifies this, as Prime Minister Modi seems restless. The attack on Pakistan under the cover of night is a cowardly act — a brutal step toward a belligerent era. Pakistan has rightly responded in self-defence. Following the Pahalgam incident, India has unilaterally suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, sealed the Wagah border and ordered Pakistani officials to leave within 48 hours. Within 15 days, 'Operation Sindoor' was launched, targeting Punjab and Azad Kashmir. How peaceful India is — it thrives in a climate of war rather than choosing the path of diplomacy. Political theorist Francis Fukuyama once believed that humanity in the 21st century would evolve into a globalised, post-conflict society, moving deterministically toward collective peace and prosperity. Yet, the reality proves otherwise. India's recent moves stand in stark contrast to this vision. The history of Indo-Pak relations includes three wars over Kashmir, all of which have escalated tensions, deepened animosity and made bilateral ties increasingly fragile. Agreements and accords often fall short in the face of warmongering. War always ends in destruction and confusion. Thousands are killed and injured, while societies desperately long for peace. Moreover, human resources are depleted, slowing a nation's progress. Bringing warmongers to the dialogue table requires the attention of international law and the global community. Nations involved in conflict should be offered peaceful avenues to resolve disputes. This would lead to less destruction and promote greater stability and integrity. Journalist and peace activist Norman Cousins says, "War is invention of human mind. The human mind can invent peace." So, let's invent peace and be united before the warmongers.
Express Tribune
07-05-2025
- Express Tribune
World War II-era ship sinks before US-Philippine forces can use in drills
Listen to article A World War II-era US Navy ship intended to be sunk in a live-fire military exercise by US and Philippine forces sank prematurely on Monday, slipping beneath the South China Sea before any missile or bomb could strike it. The ex-USS Brattleboro, which served in key Pacific battles more than 80 years ago, was to be the centrepiece target in the "Balikatan" joint drills currently underway off the coast of Luzon. 'The vessel was selected because it exceeded its service life and was no longer suitable for normal operations,'Philippine military officials said. 'Due to rough sea conditions that we are currently experiencing in the excercise box and with its long service life as it expected, she took on a significant amount of water and eventually sank,' said Philippine Navy spokesperson Capt. John Percie Alcos. He confirmed that the 184-foot ship, which was not damaged during towing, sank at 7:20 am local time. The Brattleboro had been selected for the drill's MARSTRIKE (maritime strike) phase because it was no longer operational. It was meant to be destroyed by a combination of US Marine Corps F/A-18 jets, anti-ship missiles, bombs, and cannon fire. Despite the vessel's early demise, the rest of the MARSTRIKE training will proceed, the Armed Forces of the Philippines said in a statement. 'The combined force will still achieve its training objectives,' the military said, The vessel had been thoroughly cleaned before deployment and posed no environmental risk, according to the Philippine military. The annual Balikatan exercise, running from April 21 to May 9, aims to strengthen cooperation and readiness between the US and Philippine armed forces amid rising tensions in the region. History of ex- USS Brattleboro The ex-USS "Brattleboro" met an unceremonious end on Monday, but its history spanned some of the most pivotal moments in 20th-century naval warfare. Commissioned as a submarine chaser during World War II, the ship played a key role in the battles of Leyte Gulf and Okinawa—two decisive American campaigns against Imperial Japan in 1944 and 1945, respectively. According to the US Naval History and Heritage Command, the vessel supported air defence and rescue operations during the Leyte invasion, evacuating over 400 wounded soldiers to hospital ships and downing a Japanese aircraft. Following additional combat operations near Palau and the Philippines, the Brattleboro joined the Okinawa campaign in spring 1945. There, it provided emergency treatment to more than 200 seriously injured personnel and rescued over 1,000 survivors from sunken vessels during the 91-day battle. Retired from US service in the 1960s, the ship was transferred to South Vietnam in 1966. After the fall of Saigon in 1975, it was handed over to the Philippine Navy and recommissioned in 1977 as the BRP Miguel Malvar, named after a Filipino revolutionary leader. The vessel remained in service until its decommissioning in 2021. Rising regional tension The scheduled sinking of the Brattleboro had been planned in waters facing the disputed Scarborough Shoal—an area closely patrolled by Chinese military and coast guard vessels. The Philippines also claims the shoal, located roughly 137 miles west of Zambales province. This year's Balikatan—meaning 'shoulder-to-shoulder' in Tagalog—involves over 14,000 troops from the US and the Philippines. The drills are intended as a robust test of the two nations' joint defence capabilities amid rising tensions in the South China Sea. Clashes between Chinese and Philippine vessels near the shoal have intensified in recent years, fuelling fears of broader military escalation. China continues to assert sweeping claims over the South China Sea, while forcefully opposing any US military involvement in the region.
