Federal Court dismisses Maria Chin's bid for leave to appeal
This followed Thursday's (June 26) decision by a three-member bench of the Federal Court, consisting of Justices Datuk Nordin Hassan, Datuk Abu Bakar Jais and Datuk Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera, dismissing Maria's application to obtain leave to appeal against the appellate court decision.
Justice Nordin, who chaired the bench, said there was no novel issue warranting the Federal Court to hear and determine her appeal.
He said the issue relating to the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court and Civil Courts under Article 121 (1A) of the Federal Constitution was made clear in previous court cases, including a recent one on a woman's challenge against her religious status.
ALSO READ: Syariah Court sentences Maria Chin to seven days' jail
He said Maria failed to meet the threshold requirement under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.
The Syariah High Court had issued the show cause notice in 2019 after Maria, 68, commented on the court's decision to impose a prison sentence on Emilia Hanafi, the former wife of businessman SM Faisal SM Nasimuddin.
Faisal, through his lawyers, had sought leave to initiate contempt proceedings against Maria at the Syariah High Court, and his request was granted.
A notice was subsequently issued to Maria in 2019, requiring her to explain why she should not be held in contempt for criticising the Syariah High Court's decision.
Maria then sought leave to commence a judicial review application in the civil High Court in 2021, naming the then Religious Affairs minister Zulkifli Mohamad Al-Bakri, the Federal Territories Islamic Religious Council (MAIWP), and the Federal Territories Syariah Judiciary Department as respondents.
On Aug 22, 2022, the civil High Court granted her leave to commence the judicial review, but this decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal on Nov 27 last year when it allowed an appeal by the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC).
In April 2022, the Syariah High Court sentenced Maria to seven days in prison for contempt. Maria, however, did not attend the hearing as she was hospitalised at the time.
Meanwhile, lawyer Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader, who held a watching brief for Faisal today, told the media that Maria has to go back to the Syariah Appeals Court for her appeal against the sentence. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Syed Saddiq turns down offer to return as Muda president
KUALA LUMPUR: Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman has declined an offer to return as Muda president following his acquittal of corruption charges. The Muar member of parliament said he needs more time to decide on the position. "I have informed the party's leadership that I need a little bit more time. I want to spend time with my family, focus on my constituency work in Muar, and continue fundraising for local needs. "I've already relayed my decision to the party leadership, and I will leave it at that," Free Malaysia Today quoted as saying. On June 26, Muda's acting president, Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, offered the party's presidency back to Syed Saddiq. Syed Saddiq, who was the Muda president, vacated his post during his corruption trial. He was acquitted of four charges of abetting criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of party funds and money laundering. A three-judge Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the former youth and sports minister's appeal, setting aside his conviction, seven-year prison sentence, RM10 million fine and two strokes of the rotan.
Free Malaysia Today
15 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Couple awarded RM160,000 in unpaid overtime claims
The Court of Appeal rejects the factory's argument that the couple enjoyed flexible working hours, although their contract stated it was from 5am to 8pm. PUTRAJAYA : A couple, who worked as cooks at a factory canteen in Johor, was awarded a total of RM162,420 in unpaid overtime claims after the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling earlier this year. A three-member Court of Appeal bench, chaired by Justice Lim Chong Fong, said the Employment Act limited a person's shift to eight hours a day but the couple's contract stipulated that they should work from 5am to 8pm. Despite siding with the couple, the appellate court allowed only one-third of the total amount demanded by Ee Yueh Horng and Tan Ei Guan as it said part of the claims were already factored into the overall calculation. Sinppa Industries Sdn Bhd will now have to pay the wife RM96,732 and the husband RM65,688. The amount is inclusive of 5% interest, calculated from the date the complaint was filed in the Labour Court on March 12, 2023. Ee and Tan were employed from 2019 to 2023 by the aluminium manufacturer based in Ayer Hitam. The wife's monthly salary was RM3,000 while the husband, who doubled as a part-time security guard, earned RM2,000. The factory had paid termination benefits and other outstanding amounts owed to them. Ee subsequently filed a claim for RM290,196 and Tan for RM197,066. These were dismissed outright by the labour tribunal and later affirmed by the High Court in Muar. Today, lawyer T Vijaya Sandran told the Court of Appeal that the couple was responsible for preparing three meals a day, cleaning the canteen and grocery shopping. He said they were allowed only two days off in a month. Lawyer Ina Shafina Sahima, who represented the company, submitted that the couple had enjoyed flexible working hours although their contract stated it was from 5am to 8pm. Lim, who sat with Justices Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Ahmad Kamal Shahid, rejected the argument. Lawyer Abraham Mathews also represented the couple. Ina was assisted by Nur Syarah Syazwan Amad Saturi.
Sinar Daily
16 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Najib could begin house imprisonment by November pending court decision
Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla said the correct term for Najib's potential new arrangement is "house imprisonment" rather than "house arrest", stressing that the two involved different legal processes. Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak - BERNAMA FILE PIX PUTRAJAYA – Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak could be allowed to serve his sentence from home as early as November, depending on the outcome of a High Court decision on the validity of a Royal Addendum, a supplementary royal decree concerning his imprisonment. Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla said the transition to house imprisonment can proceed even if the prosecution files an appeal, unless a stay of execution is granted by the court. 'When it comes to someone's liberty, it's rare for courts to grant a stay. 'If the appeal is successful, Najib can be returned to prison. But the time spent at home should still count and it cannot simply be disregarded due to an ongoing appeal,' he said. Lawyer Mohamed Hanif Khatri Abdulla Hanif noted that the judicial review application concerning the Royal Addendum was now in its second stage, following the Federal Court's decision on Wednesday to grant leave for the case to proceed. The substantive hearing will examine full arguments from both sides, focusing on whether the royal decree is constitutionally sound and legally enforceable. 'This stage will be affidavit-based. The case is expected to be up for mention at the High Court on Monday, to fix deadlines for affidavit submissions, hearing dates and written arguments,' Hanif said. He added that such cases would be typically resolved within one to three months, or in the best-case scenario, within a month once all required documents and submissions had been filed. He said the correct term for Najib's potential new arrangement is "house imprisonment" rather than "house arrest", stressing that the two involved different legal processes. 'This isn't house arrest. It's house imprisonment granted under a Royal pardon. Using the wrong term will only confuse the public,' he said. Najib began serving his prison sentence in August 2022. The sentence was later reduced to six years following a partial Royal pardon. Based on standard calculations, his sentence is due to end in 2028, though with statutory remission and other factors, he could be eligible for release by 2026. On the main legal question, Hanif said the issue revolved around whether a royal decree or pardon must be issued following the advice of the Pardons Board or the Attorney General. He emphasised that the case concerned constitutional and legal interpretations only, as the factual elements have already been established. Earlier this week, the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) failed in its bid to overturn the Federal Court's decision allowing Najib to initiate judicial review proceedings. The review seeks to compel the government and six others to respond to and confirm the existence and legitimacy of the Royal Addendum.
