Factors to consider when deciding to keep or cancel a life insurance policy
The issue of keeping or cancelling a life insurance policy is a relevant one for many people.
Question: I took out a life insurance policy many years ago that will pay out about R20-million. I do not need the life cover any more, as the loan it needed to cover has been settled. The monthly premium is now about R35,000 and it increases by 6% a year. I am 70 and in good health.
Is it prudent to keep the policy or to terminate it?
Answer: The issue of keeping or cancelling a life insurance policy is a relevant one for many people. The premiums often increase by more than one's income does and they start to use up more and more of the available family budget.
The question is whether you will be helping or harming the family's financial health by cancelling it. I will take you through my thought process when it comes to answering this question.
We typically take out life insurance to cover a particular risk. This would include covering a debt or protecting the family income.
If the debt has been repaid or you have reached the stage in life where you are living off your capital, is there still a need to carry on paying the premiums on the life insurance? If you invested these premiums, at what stage would you be better off?
As we don't know when we are going to die, there is no definitive answer I can give.
You can, however, do a calculation to determine at what age the value of investing the premiums is likely to exceed the sum assured should you pass away. There are, however, a few factors that you must be aware of:
Type of life policy
Not all life policies are the same. Many of the older policies combined investment and risk benefits. When you cancelled the policy, you would get a cash payout. This cancellation payout often increased the longer you kept the policy.
They were subsequently replaced by policies that provided just risk cover, so when you cancelled the policy there would be no cash payout. I like these policies, as it is very easy to make a decision as to whether it is worth keeping them.
The current trend among life insurers is to try to encourage you to keep the policies for longer by adding in complicated bonus structures that pay out bonuses or premium refunds at certain stages in the future.
This does muddy the waters a bit, but it is relatively easy to calculate the true value of this benefit.
Annual increases in cover
Is the life cover increasing, decreasing or remaining the same each year? If so, what is the size of this increase?
Annual increases in premiums
Are the premiums increasing each year? If so, what is the size of this increase?
In many instances, these increases are a fixed percentage, so the calculation would be quite simple.
You do, however, have life insurance that increases by an age-rated factor and the premium increase gets larger each year. I would recommend that you take the average increase over the past five years and then apply it into your calculation.
So, coming to your question, I would assume that there is no annual increase in the cover amount and that your premiums will be increasing by 6% a year for the rest of your life. I will assume that the returns that you could get on an investment would be 8%.
So, if you lived to the age of 86 and beyond, you would be better off if you cancelled your life insurance and invested the proceeds.
Remember that there are a number of variables at play, such as your life expectancy and investment returns.
Tax
The other factor that needs to be taken into account is income tax. You will be paying capital gains tax on any investment growth. The life insurance policy pays out a tax-free amount, but it will form part of your estate and possibly attract between 20% and 25% in estate duty.
I would recommend that before you make the decision to cancel your policy, you consult with a financial professional who can help you to unpack these numbers. DM
Kenny Meiring is an independent financial adviser. Contact him on 082 856 0348 or at financialwellnesscoach.co.za. Send your questions to [email protected]
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
AVBOB Road to Literacy campaign gives hope to 1 000 schools and NGOs through trolley libraries
SPONSORED - The 1,000 beneficiaries of the 2025 AVBOB Road to Literacy campaign, in collaboration with Oxford University Press South Africa (OUPSA) are announced. The campaign is a nationwide trolley library initiative that continues to improve access to books in communities across South Africa, with a focus on schools and non-profit organisations (NPOs). The announcement was made at an event hosted at the Sandton Hotel in Johannesburg on 29 May 2025. The project addresses the ongoing challenges of low literacy and numeracy levels at the foundation phase by providing young learners with culturally and linguistically relevant materials in all 11 official written languages. This year's campaign reflects substantial growth from the 180 library trolleys distributed in its inaugural year, 2022. Each of the 1,000 mobile library includes 500 OUPSA books selected to support literacy and numeracy skills in alignment with the CAPS curriculum. The total number of books distributed this year will exceed 500,000, up from 250,000 in 2024. Speaking on a panel alongside Carl van der Riet (CEO of AVBOB Group), Karen Simpson (MD of OUPSA), Gugu Ndebele (Executive Director of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls), the Minister of Basic Education, Siviwe Gwarube remarked: 'This initiative is a powerful example of what can be achieved through partnerships. The campaign addresses a pressing national priority, the development of foundational literacy and numeracy, while supporting policy frameworks aimed at integrating diversity into school curricula. It does so in a way that honours South Africa's linguistic and cultural richness, ensuring that no child is left behind.' Simpson added that the partnership reflects the organisation's core belief that literacy is a foundation for lifelong learning and opportunity. 'Access to books in a learner's mother tongue has a profound impact on their ability to grasp foundational concepts, stay engaged in the classroom, and remain in the education system. We are steadfast on publishing our books in all of South Africa's official written languages, and the AVBOB Road to Literacy campaign enables us to place these resources directly in the hands of the learners who need them most.' Each trolley library is valued at R57,000, bringing the total investment for the 2025 campaign to R57 million. The trolleys are designed to be mobile, durable, and easy to access in shared or under-resourced learning environments. Along with books that promote reading for enjoyment, they include materials designed to develop numeracy, making the campaign one of the few national projects focused on both reading and mathematics at the foundational phase. The campaign also continues to grow in reach and engagement. This year's campaign received 8,661 nominations from across all nine provinces, submitted by educators, caregivers, community leaders and members of the public. Van der Riet said that although the campaign has grown substantially, its original purpose is to provide access to quality education materials, dignity and hope for a better future. 'Literacy and numeracy are academic skills and critical tools for participation, for opportunity, and dignity.' 'They are the building blocks of future learning and the means by which children are empowered to shape their own lives. The AVBOB Road to Literacy campaign embodies our belief that meaningful social investment must be both practical and purpose-driven.' He added that AVBOB, as a mutual society, exists for the benefit of its members and the wider community. 'At AVBOB, giving back to communities is more than a commitment — it's a core part of who we are. We remain deeply guided by our founders' promise of always putting people first, a principle that continues to be the golden thread in everything we do. Through the AVBOB Road to Literacy campaign, we aim to support underserved communities in a way that uplifts and empowers them, while respecting their dignity and fostering lasting impact.' Adding to this sentiment during the 29 May 2025 panel discussion, Ndebele said, 'We believe that education is the most powerful tool for changing a learners' future. Literacy unlocks confidence, agency and opportunity. We are inspired by this initiative's focus, and we hope it will ignite a lifelong love of reading in every child who encounters one of these trolley libraries.' Since 2022, the campaign has evolved from a pilot initiative into one of the most extensive mobile library programmes in the country. Educational experts have long advocated for mother tongue instruction at the early stages of schooling. Research has consistently shown that when children learn to read in their home language, they are more likely to stay in school, perform better academically, and transition successfully to additional languages later in life. Despite this, access to books in African languages remains limited, especially in underfunded schools. The Road to Literacy campaign helps address this gap, ensuring that the joy of reading, and the practical foundation of numeracy, is not restricted by geography or circumstance. Editor's notes: The complete list of the 1,000 beneficiaries of the 2025 Road to Literacy campaign are as follows:
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Weaponising the Public Finance Management Act: A new legal trend threatening public sector discipline
A concerning trend is emerging in public sector employment. Employees facing disciplinary action are increasingly wielding the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 (PFMA) not as the accountability tool it was designed to be, but as a shield against workplace consequences. This strategic pivot transforms financial governance legislation into an employment litigation weapon with potentially far-reaching implications for public administration. The PFMA was enacted in 1999 with the primary purpose of establishing a robust framework for financial governance in South Africa's public sector. At its core, the act aims to secure transparency, accountability, and sound management of revenue, expenditure, assets and liabilities across national and provincial government institutions. Among its core objectives, it provides mechanisms to prevent irregular, unauthorised, as well as fruitless and wasteful expenditure, thereby safeguarding public resources against misuse. The recent Labour Court case of Vico v The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment offers a compelling illustration of this new phenomenon. Thembalethu Vico, a director within the department who faced dismissal following disciplinary proceedings related to the removal of confiscated abalone valued at approximately R7.5-million, sought to challenge his dismissal through an unusual legal avenue: by attacking the procedural aspects of his disciplinary hearing through the lens of the PFMA. At the heart of Vico's application was an attempt to secure declaratory relief related to what he characterised as incomplete disciplinary proceedings. His arguments centred on several PFMA-related assertions: that the employer had 'unjustly and unfairly terminated' the briefing contract of the disciplinary hearing chairperson; that this termination caused 'unreasonable delay' in his disciplinary hearing; that respondents 'contravened the applicant's right to fair labour practice'; and rather notably, that expenditure on recusal applications against the chairperson constituted 'fruitless and wasteful expenditure' under the PFMA. The Labour Court's response was unequivocal. In his judgment, Judge Robert Lagrange not only dismissed the application, but characterised it as 'vexatious in nature', ordering the applicant to pay the respondents' costs. 'An attempt to circumvent the proper forums for labour disputes' The court found that Vico was 'no stranger to legal principles and reasoning' and determined that his PFMA-based arguments represented an attempt to circumvent the proper forums for labour disputes — namely the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council where he had already lodged an unfair dismissal claim. This case highlights a broader issue deserving closer scrutiny: the strategic repurposing of financial management legislation to serve employment law objectives. The PFMA, enacted in 1999, was designed to promote transparent and effective management of government finances — not as a mechanism for employees to challenge disciplinary outcomes. Yet increasingly, we witness creative legal arguments that stretch the PFMA beyond its intended boundaries. Several notable examples demonstrate this concerning pattern in other contextual scenarios: Unsuccessful tender bidders increasingly invoke the PFMA not to address genuine financial irregularities, but to contest legitimate procurement decisions they simply disagree with. By alleging technical PFMA violations, these bidders attempt to overturn procurement outcomes through financial management legislation rather than following appropriate procurement appeal processes. Some employees facing disciplinary action for performance or conduct issues have strategically repositioned themselves as 'whistleblowers' under section 51 of the PFMA. By claiming they were disciplined for reporting financial misconduct, rather than for their own workplace infractions, they attempt to transform standard employment disputes into protected disclosure matters. Some senior employees facing poor performance reviews have contested their evaluations by claiming they were instructed to take actions that would violate the PFMA. This transforms performance management into a complex legal dispute about financial legislation interpretation. Public entities facing pressure to implement organisational changes have cited PFMA compliance concerns as reasons to delay implementation, effectively using financial legislation as a strategic tool to resist operational reforms. Perhaps most troublingly, the PFMA has become weaponised in political contexts, with allegations of technical PFMA violations used to undermine political opponents in positions of financial accountability, regardless of whether actual financial mismanagement occurred. In the misconduct context, the implications of this trend are significant. Public sector managers face the daunting prospect of defending not only the substantive merits of disciplinary decisions, but also navigating complex arguments about whether their internal processes satisfy the technical requirements of financial legislation. This creates a chilling effect on departmental decision-making, potentially undermining efforts to address misconduct effectively. More worryingly, this legal strategy diverts valuable court resources. Judge Lagrange noted that the application was largely an attempt to revisit a matter that had already been decided, writing that 'it beggars belief that the applicant could have seriously believed that he could simply avoid the unequivocal effect of the judgment by approaching this court under the guise of an application for declaratory relief'. When courts must attend to such applications, genuine cases requiring judicial attention face delays. The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment's approach in the Vico case provides a template for addressing such claims. Rather than becoming entangled in debates about the PFMA's application to employment matters, they successfully redirected the court's attention to the jurisdictional question: Whether the Labour Court was the appropriate forum for what was essentially an attempt to relitigate disciplinary proceedings through a different legal framework. Distinct forums and remedies PFMA matters and employment disputes are meant to follow different procedural paths, with distinct forums and remedies designed to preserve the integrity of both systems. When properly invoked, PFMA concerns should follow established channels that begin with internal departmental controls, escalate to Treasury oversight, proceed through audit mechanisms via the Auditor-General's examination, involve executive accountability and operate through specific financial misconduct procedures established in the PFMA — all pathways that exist distinctly from labour dispute mechanisms. Notably absent from the PFMA is any provision making the Labour Court a forum for adjudicating PFMA violations, which is why the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment correctly focused on the jurisdictional question, highlighting that the applicant was attempting to bypass proper forums for both employment disputes (the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council) and financial governance concerns (internal controls, Treasury oversight and potentially criminal proceedings). As this trend continues to evolve, public sector employers would be wise to develop proactive strategies. This includes ensuring that disciplinary procedures are documented with meticulous attention to detail, that financial decisions related to such proceedings are properly authorised, and that legal teams are prepared to address PFMA-based arguments directly. The PFMA represents a crucial pillar of democratic governance and institutional transformation. The act has become instrumental in the country's ongoing struggle against corruption and State Capture — challenges that have threatened South Africa's democratic foundations and economic stability. However, the judiciary's response in the Vico case sends a clear message: the PFMA cannot be weaponised to circumvent established labour relations processes. This judgment establishes an important precedent that may discourage frivolous applications of this nature. Ultimately, public administration requires both financial accountability and efficient personnel management. When these systems are placed in artificial opposition through creative litigation strategies, neither objective is well served. The Labour Court's firm stance in the Vico case represents a welcome correction — one that reinforces the proper boundaries between financial governance and employment law in South Africa's public sector. DM
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
‘You call this leadership?': DA's Liam Jacobs grills SAFA president Danny Jordaan over travel expenses
Democratic Alliance's (DA) member of the portfolio committee on Department of Sports, Arts and Culture, has grilled SAFA president Danny Jordaan on whether he is a responsible leader, over costly travel expenses. Image: Facebook/Liam Jacobs Democratic Alliance (DA) MP and member of the portfolio committee on Sports, Arts and Culture, Liam Jacobs, who's known for his tough line of questioning, grilled SAFA President Danny Jordaan over his leadership and travel expenses. The clash occurred during a briefing on SAFA's 2023/24 annual report, which included audited financial statements and governance issues. Jacobs began his questioning by asking Jordaan, 'Do you believe in the concept of democracy? Can you please put your microphone on when you respond?' Jordaan replied, 'I'm a product of a struggle for democracy...' Jacobs continued, asking whether Jordaan respected the concept of democracy and if he understood the importance of term limits. Jordaan, who appeared caught off guard, said, 'You're asking me a question that is self-evident,' He added, 'I understand it. I was here as a member of Parliament.' Jacobs then pressed Jordaan on his long tenure as SAFA president. 'Are you aware that you are one of the longest-serving presidents of any football association on the planet?' Jordaan responded, 'It's not true,' prompting Jacobs to fire back, 'Twelve years, almost...' As tensions rose, Jordaan interjected, 'I'm still busy with my interrogation here... They must ask the questions and answer. Just order. Now he's engaging me now.' Committee Chairperson Joe McGluva intervened, urging members to allow questions to be asked and responses to follow in an orderly manner. Fellow committee member PA Marlon Daniels objected to Jacobs' conduct, particularly pointing his finger at Jordaan. 'What I witnessed here is not right. It is absolutely rude for a child to have that kind of conduct toward someone old enough to be his father,' Daniels said. McGluva then asked Jacobs to apologise for the gesture if it had occurred. 'I apologise for that,' Jacobs said. Daniels also withdrew the remark calling Jacobs a 'child.' 'I'm terribly sorry. I forgot I'm not at home where I deal with my children like that. So I withdrew...' Meanwhile, Jacobs continued with his line of questioning. 'Do you consider yourself a responsible leader?' Jordaan initially appeared hesitant but ultimately responded, 'The response was yes, Honourable Jacobs.' Jacobs then raised concerns over Jordaan's travel expenses, saying, 'In my hands, as I sit here, I have got something I know you don't think I have.' He mentioned trips, including a R131,000 trip to Ivory Coast and London, two visits to Qatar costing R56,000 and R31,000, and a trip to Vietnam for the Oceania Congress from September 29 to October 3, 2023.' 'What are we as South Africans doing in Vietnam at an Oceania Congress of an organisation that only has 13 members thousands of kilometres away?' Jacobs asked. He also mentioned trips to Cameroon for R105,574 and Morocco for R82,833, questioning the value of such spending amid SAFA's financial strain. However, Jordaan defended the Vietnam trip, saying it was related to South Africa's bid to host the FIFA Women's World Cup. 'You may know, or you may not know, that South Africa made a bid for hosting the Women's World Cup. The CEO was with me. Tumi Tlamini was with me,' Jordaan said. 'Do you have their costs there? Do you have their flight tickets there? This is a campaign.'
