&w=3840&q=100)
India on UK's 'deport now appeal later' expanded list for foreign criminals
In an announcement on Sunday, the UK Home Office confirmed that the scope of its Deport Now Appeal Later scheme will be nearly trebled from eight countries to 23, with foreign nationals from these countries to be deported to their home countries before they can appeal against that decision.
Foreigners who have had their human rights claim refused will have a chance to take part in their UK appeal hearing remotely from overseas using video technology.
For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end, said Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced, she said.
The list of countries covered under the remote hearing scheme, revived in 2023 by then Conservative home secretary Suella Braverman, included Finland, Nigeria, Estonia, Albania, Belize, Mauritius, Tanzania and Kosovo.
Now, India will be added along with Angola, Australia, Botswana, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia.
The UK government said it remains in continuous discussions with a range of other countries about joining the scheme.
We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country. Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer, said Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
According to the Home Office, previously offenders from the countries on the expanded list could remain in the UK for months or years while their cases were worked through the appeals system as an added burden on the British taxpayer beyond the end of the prison sentences.
It also released the latest figures to highlight that around 5,200 foreign nationals were deported since July 2024 when the Labour government came into office, an increase of 14 per cent over the previous year.
Additionally, the government said it is legislating to ensure that asylum seekers who commit notifiable sex offences can be stripped of their right to claim refugee protection under new powers in the Borders Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.
It is said to have invested GBP 5 million for the deployment of specialist staff to almost 80 jails around England and Wales to speed up removals and deportations.
The UK Ministry of Justice (MoJ), meanwhile, announced it will go further on a previous legislation from June stipulating that most foreign prisoners can now be deported to their home country after serving just 30 per cent of their prison time, rather than 50 per cent.
Stripping back what it termed as a decades-old law, new powers will see the immediate deportation of criminals from prison, and such offenders will then be barred from re-entering the UK.
Terrorists, murderers and others serving life sentences will continue to have to serve their prison sentence before being considered for deportation.
Deportations are up under this government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before. Our message is clear: if you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing, said Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood.
The changes will apply to prisoners serving fixed-term, or determinate, sentences and discretion to not use the measure on a case-by-case basis will be retained, the ministry said.
According to official data referenced by the MoJ, foreign offenders make up around 12 per cent of the total prison population, with prison places costing GBP 54,000 a year on average.
The tougher new measures will apply to all foreign national offenders already in custody as well as those newly sentenced, with legislation to be tabled in Parliament in the next session.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Supercentenarians' puzzle EC;124-year-old turns out to be 35
1 2 3 Patna: Bihar's ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has produced a mix of bafflement, amusement and embarrassment — from confirmed cases of voters aged well over a century to a clerical blunder that turned a 35-year-old into a supposed 124-year-old icon of political protest. According to the Election Commission , officials engaged in the SIR drive recently identified two women electors who are 120 and 119 years old, living in Bhagalpur and Gopalganj districts respectively. In Bhagalpur's Pirpainti assembly constituency, 120-year-old Asha Devi was found "alive, with wrinkles all over her face" after initial doubts about her age. Deputy election officials ordered a verification, during which BLO Farzana Khatoon checked her Aadhaar card and spoke to villagers. "During the inquiry, Asha Devi was found alive, and her age is 120," Khatoon wrote in her report. Similarly, in Gopalganj's Barauli constituency, 119-year-old Manturia Devi's age was confirmed through physical verification in the presence of the BLO and an observer. The assistant electoral registration officer stated in his letter that her reported age "was found correct". Interestingly, Ethel Caterham, a 115-year-old British woman, currently holds the title of the world's oldest living person. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Secret Lives of the Romanovs — the Last Rulers of Imperial Russia! Learn More Undo But if these centenarians are challenging Japan's life expectancy records, another case in Siwan has turned into a comedy of errors. Minta Devi of Daraundha constituency, celebrated by opposition MPs as a "124-year-old voter" during their "vote-chori" protest in Parliament, is in fact just 35. Her apparent longevity was the result of a voter ID slip that recorded her birth year as 1900 instead of 1990. "This is purely the fault of the Election Commission," she told a television news channel. "My year of birth is 1990 and I submitted the documents online, but now everyone is asking about my age." She admitted she had not checked her card when it arrived. "When the controversy broke out, I took out the card and found '15-07-1900' printed as my date of birth," she said. Her husband's name had even been placed in the 'house number' field. Siwan DM Aditya Prakash called it a "typographical error" caused when "she cited 1990 as her year of birth and this changed to 1900 due to a typo error by the computer operator". The correction, he said, "will be done within a week". Deputy election officer Sohail Ahmad confirmed she had applied through Form 6 and assured the error "will be disposed of within the stipulated time." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Goodnight, Cinderella scam': 2 British tourists robbed of $21000; what is Brazil's latest fraud targeting foreigners?
Representative Image (AI) Police in Rio de Janeiro are investigating a case where two British tourists claim they were drugged and robbed of $21,000 by three women near a beach. This incident is part of a series of crimes known in Brazil as 'Goodnight, Cinderella' scams. In these cases, criminals reportedly seduce foreigners, spike their drinks and steal their belongings, as reported by CNN. One tourist told police he drank a spiked cocktail in the early hours of Thursday after he and his friend met three women at a bar. He lost consciousness while heading to the famous Ipanema beach with the women, according to police statements. The three women were later seen stopping a taxi and leaving the area. After a witness called for help, the British tourists were taken to a hospital and received medical treatment. They reported that the women stole two cell phones and made a bank transfer of about $21,000. The Civil Police of Rio de Janeiro said they are trying to find the suspects. The Special Tourism Support Unit is reviewing security footage and interviewing witnesses. The UK Foreign Office has warned its citizens that criminals in Brazil have used dating apps to target foreigners, leading to spiking of drinks, robbery and theft from bank accounts. The office has urged travelers to be cautious and watch their drinks and belongings carefully.


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
$3.4 billion payday? Report says Trump family cashed in big from White House years
During Donald Trump's time in the White House, his family amassed an estimated $3.4 billion through various ventures, including cryptocurrency projects, real estate, and merchandise sales. Critics argue that Trump blurred the lines between public office and private gain, particularly through his children's management of business transactions, which circumvented traditional disclosure requirements. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Where did the $3.4 billion come from? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How has Donald Trump combined business and politics? Why is this legally tricky but politically effective? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does this mean for Trump's brand? FAQs It's no secret that US President Donald Trump has blurred the distinction between politics and business. However, a new analysis estimates that the Trump family has made a staggering $3.4 billion during their time in the White cryptocurrency ventures to golf resorts, licensing deals to merchandise, the Trumps have used their political platform in ways that critics say are unprecedented in modern American history. While much of it takes place in the public eye, the true money trail remains largely hidden, as per a report by the Rolling to The New Yorker, the majority of the Trump windfall, around $2.37 billion, came from cryptocurrency projects linked to the family. Financial investments led by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump reportedly increased by $339.6 of the profit is attributed to his children's management of business transactions, which avoids traditional political disclosure requirements, as per a report by the Rolling Trump's iconic Mar-a-Lago resort generated an extra $125 million in profit, thanks in part to the publicity and exclusivity associated with Trump's political brand. Add $127.7 million in merchandise sales and legal fees, as well as a budding media network worth approximately $116 million, and you can see how the Trump empire grew during and after his critics claim he has been willing to blur, or erase, the line between public office and private gain. Last month, during an official state visit to Scotland paid for by taxpayers, Trump took the time to open a new golf course near Aberdeen. He also hosted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at his private Turnberry resort, which is likely to boost the club's reputation and revenue, as per a report by the Rolling to reports, he has even discussed hosting major global summits such as the G20 at his Doral golf club, echoing similar proposals from his first term that were heavily criticized for potential conflicts of sitting presidents are subject to strict rules regarding personal investments, Trump has largely avoided direct violations by having his children handle the transactions. This "family-run" model has created a legal loophole, allowing profits to flow while protecting certain transactions from public scrutiny, as per a report by the Rolling contrasts sharply with Trump's frequent claims that political opponents used public office for personal gain. Critics argue that no other first family has so aggressively monetized the presidency, while supporters see it as a sound business from fading, the Trump brand has grown into a global network of investments, luxury properties, and digital ventures, all driven by the presidency's visibility and influence. Whether you see it as entrepreneurial genius or an ethical red flag, one thing is certain: the Trump era has been extremely beneficial to Trump's financial estimated $3.4 billion in various business his adult children, which helps him avoid certain political disclosure laws.