
Return To Office Mandates Hurt Women Of Colour, But Australia Won't Talk About It
'It's like working on eggshells', says Josie*, a 25-year-old woman of Filipino heritage, when asked her experiences of working in an Australian office environment. 'Because I work in an white-dominated industry, I feel like I have to be very careful about what I say and how I say it, especially to avoid being branded as an aggressive, outspoken brown girl,' she says. By working from home, Josie speaks of feeling less pressure to constantly monitor how she is presenting herself. As doing so offers less in-person interaction, she's relatively insulated against the racism born in offices.
The women that I spoke to also expressed having to produce a level of output that wasn't expected of their white counterparts, making working from the office a frustrating experience. Leah*, a 34-year-old woman of Chinese descent, spoke of becoming more aware of her role as the 'quiet, reliable Asian girl' when in the physical confines of her white colleagues. 'There's this expectation on me to keep my head down,' Leah tells Refinery29 Australia. 'Working in an open plan office means that I often hear my white coworkers gossip about things completely unrelated to work,' she says, adding that it was 'frustrating' to see how much more time they had in their day. Working from home, she said, allows her to feel 'less on edge', while giving her the space to complete her work.
Remote working can also offer a break from having to present themselves in ways that are grounded in white, western culture. One 28-year-old woman, Zoya*, of Pakistani heritage, for example, spoke of receiving unwelcome comments from a colleague because she tended to wear trousers to work over a skirt. 'One of my coworkers was like, 'why don't you ever wear a skirt? Are you a lesbian back home or something?'' Having grown up in a culture where it wasn't common to expose her legs, Zoya has found working from home a welcome escape from comments about how she presented herself, adding that her company's claims to be 'multicultural' didn't really square with the reality of being at work.
Given the reprieve that remote work arrangements offer to women of colour, it's disturbing that almost nothing on the topic has featured in the Australian context, even though it's been discussed extensively in the US, the UK, and Canada. It's an absence that's especially egregious when research from 2024 shows that two out of three women of colour in Australia experience discrimination in the workplace, a number that is up from 10% in 2021, with racism being the predominant type of discrimination they experience.
Perhaps one of the reasons that the experiences of women of colour in offices continue to get worse is a dearth of racial literacy in Australia that, of course, bleeds into the contours of office life. While Australians usually talk about race euphemistically, to 'multiculturalism' and 'CALD', we rarely talk directly about the specificity of how people of colour are discriminated against: the specificities of how we move through the world and are impacted by it. This is baked into us from an early age, with a 2021 study finding that kids are steered away from talking about racism, stunting racial literacy from a young age.
The result of not talking about race, both on an interpersonal and government level, is that conversations like this aren't broached, and no one is thinking about how to make workplaces work for us. Thanks to a national acknowledgement that blitzing remote work arrangements disproportionately impacted women, Peter Dutton admitted he made a mistake. But the Aussie approach of thinking about an amorphous mass of 'women' isn't working. An approach to workplace equity that doesn't acknowledge the unique and specific challenges that women of colour in Australia experience is at best, mostly benefits women who are white. At worst, it's actively doing women of colour harm.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
18 minutes ago
- NBC News
Big Apple, meet Golden State: The New York Post is launching a California newspaper
The Murdoch family's pugnacious U.S. daily tabloid is headed to California. The New York Post Media Group said Monday that it is launching a West Coast newspaper in the style of its namesake East Coast periodical. The California Post will be a daily newspaper in the mold of the New York Post, with an early cover mock-up leaning in on its usual pun-heavy headlines and culture war interests: Sydney Sweeney with the headline 'WE DREAM OF JEAN-Y.' The expansion of the Murdoch family's business, which also includes Fox News parent Fox Corp., is among the biggest moves since Lachlan Murdoch took control of the media empire built by his father, Rupert Murdoch, 94, in 2023. News Corp., which publishes the Post, also faces a sizable lawsuit from President Donald Trump against one of its other papers, The Wall Street Journal, related to an article about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The New York Post, which has been publishing since 1801, has remained a conservative voice in an otherwise left-leaning region, enduring the ups and downs of modern media by sticking to its strengths: splashy headlines and aggressive reporting on local crime, politics and sports, along with an avowed right-of-center perspective. California — Los Angeles in particular — has become a flashpoint in American culture and politics. Sizable protests against immigration raids and quippy comments from Gov. Gavin Newsom have made the state a target of Trump's ire. News Corp. CEO Robert Thomson nodded at the Post and its slant in a news release for the California paper. 'Los Angeles and California surely need a daily dose of The Post as an antidote to the jaundiced, jaded journalism that has sadly proliferated,' Thomson said. Los Angeles is home to a wide variety of news outlets, including the Los Angeles Times and many entertainment-focused publications, such as Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, as well as newer entrants, most notably TMZ, which is owned by Fox Corp. The California Post will be based in Los Angeles and led by Nick Papps, who was most recently weekend editor at The Herald Sun, a major Australian newspaper and subsidiary of News Corp. He also was a West Coast correspondent for The Herald Sun. Having its headquarters outside the state has not prevented the New York Post from covering California news at length, but Post Editor-in-Chief Keith Poole said the publications will make the state a focus. California 'is the epicenter of entertainment, the AI revolution and advanced manufacturing—not to mention a sports powerhouse,' Poole said in the news release, adding that he thinks the state is lacking in 'common-sense, issue based journalism.'


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump to appoint new top labor official within days
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up MEDIA Advertisement The New York Post announces a California newspaper Copies of The New York Post are displayed at a hotel in midtown Manhattan. KARSTEN MORAN/NYT New York's biggest tabloid is heading West. The New York Post said Monday that it would introduce a new version next year called The California Post, aiming to muscle in to an ailing local news ecosystem on the West Coast. The California Post will have its headquarters in Los Angeles and replicate The New York Post's style of bombastic reporting, sports coverage, and celebrity gossip from a California perspective, the company said. The newspaper will have its own staff of reporters, editors and photographers, though it will also share some resources with The New York Post. It will publish online and will print a daily edition starting in early 2026. Keith Poole, editor-in-chief of The New York Post, will be in charge of both newspapers. Nick Papps, a longtime editor at News Corp's Australian operation, will be the editor-in-chief of The California Post. — NEW YORK TIMES Advertisement AUTOMAKER Tesla grants Musk $29 billion in stock to 'keep Elon's energies focused' A Tesla dealership in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/Getty Tesla granted shares to Elon Musk worth nearly $30 billion, the company said Monday, describing it as a 'good faith' award to help retain the carmaker's CEO after his previous multibillion-dollar pay package was struck down by a judge. The company approved a grant of 96 million shares for Musk, which he could tap after two years of service in a 'senior leadership role' at Tesla. The mercurial billionaire, whose business empire includes rockets, artificial intelligence, brain implants, and more, hinted last month that he wanted more shares in Tesla, on top of his 13 percent stake, to prevent his ouster by 'activist' shareholders. It was a 'major concern,' he said on an earnings call with analysts. With the new shares, Musk would own nearly 16 percent of Tesla, a stake that would be worth over $150 billion at the company's stock price Monday. The package amounts to an extraordinary pay raise for Musk as Tesla sales and profit are falling and the company is losing market share, in part because of his behavior. His involvement in right-wing politics has alienated many liberal car buyers who are more likely than conservatives to buy electric vehicles. Musk is already the world's richest person, worth about $350 billion, according to Bloomberg. — NEW YORK TIMES FASHION American Eagle jumps as Trump touts Sydney Sweeney jeans ad Billboards of actress Sydney Sweeney are seen outside of an American Eagle store in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty American Eagle Outfitters Inc. shares surged after President Trump came out in support of a controversial ad from the company. The spot, with the actress Sydney Sweeney, is the 'HOTTEST ad out there,' Trump said in a social media post. He added American Eagle jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Trump deleted an earlier post, in which the actress' first name was misspelled. The stock jumped about 24 percent during Monday trading to $13.28 per share. Through last week's close, the shares had declined 36 percent this year. The apparel retailer launched an ad blitz in July with the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' One of the campaign's videos plays on the same-sounding word 'genes' as Sweeney zips up her jeans and intones that 'genes are passed down from parents to offspring often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color.' 'My jeans are blue,' she adds, flashing her blue eyes at the camera. When American Eagle initially announced the ad campaign on July 23, shares rose as investors cheered the company snagging a deal with Sweeney, whose popularity has surged after appearances in TV shows such as 'White Lotus' and 'Euphoria'. In the following days, the gain eroded after critics said the ad's focus on the genes of a white, blond woman conjured up the racist theory of eugenics. Other social media users have said critics are reading too much into the ads. — BLOOMBERG NEWS Advertisement LABOR Boeing defense union goes on strike The Boeing logo at the company's factory in Renton, Wash. Lindsey Wasson/Associated Press Thousands of machinists at Boeing's defense hub in the St. Louis area went on strike at midnight Monday for the first time since the mid - 1990s, marking a new spasm of labor unrest for the Seattle-based aerospace giant. About 3,200 machinists in Missouri and Illinois who build fighter jets and munitions voted Sunday to reject the latest contract offer from Boeing. The strike represents a new challenge for Boeing chief executive Kelly Ortberg, who's attempting to revive the fortunes of the beleaguered airplane company after huge financial losses, production slowdowns, and a string of safety issues. 'We are prepared for a strike and have fully implemented our contingency plan to ensure our non-striking workforce can continue supporting our customers,' Dan Gillian, a Boeing vice president, said in a statement Sunday. — WASHINGTON POST Advertisement ECONOMY The vast majority of US adults are stressed about grocery costs, new poll finds A butcher's counter in a grocery store in Miami. Joe Raedle/Getty The vast majority of US adults are at least somewhat stressed about the cost of groceries, a new poll finds, as prices continue to rise and concerns about the impact of President Trump's tariffs remain widespread. About half of all Americans say the cost of groceries is a 'major' source of stress in their life right now, while 33 percent say it's a 'minor' source of stress, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Only 14 percent say it's not a source of stress, underscoring the pervasive anxiety most Americans continue to feel about the cost of everyday essentials. Other financial stressors — like the cost of housing or the amount of money in their bank accounts — are also broadly felt, but they weigh more heavily on younger Americans, who are less likely than older adults to have significant savings or own property. The survey also found that about 4 in 10 Americans under age 45 say they've used what are known as 'buy now, pay later' services when spending on entertainment or restaurant meals or when paying for essentials like groceries or medical care. — ASSOCIATED PRESS Advertisement TECH Lyft will use Chinese driverless cars in Britain and Germany Baidu, one of China's biggest software companies, said Monday that it would supply Lyft, an American ride-hailing service, with self-driving cars assembled by Jiangling Motors of China. ADEK BERRY/AFP via Getty Images China's automakers have teamed up with software companies to go global with their driverless cars, which are poised to claim a big share of a growing market as Western manufacturers are still preparing to compete. The industry in China is expanding despite tariffs imposed last year by the European Union on electric cars and despite some worries in Europe about the security implications of relying on Chinese suppliers. Baidu, one of China's biggest software companies, said Monday that it would supply Lyft, an American ride-hailing service, with self-driving cars assembled by Jiangling Motors of China. Lyft is expected to begin operating them next year in Germany and Britain, subject to regulatory approval, the companies said. The announcement comes three months after Uber and Momenta, a Chinese autonomous driving company, announced their own plans to begin offering self-driving cars in an unspecified European city early next year. Momenta will soon provide assisted driving technology to Chinese company IM Motors for its cars sold in Britain. — NEW YORK TIMES


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's demand to trading partners: Pledge money or get higher tariffs
Advertisement The tactic was on display last week as Trump and his team rolled out a blitz of new trade agreements before a self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline. 'South Korea is right now at a 25% Tariff, but they have an offer to buy down those Tariffs,' Trump wrote on social media Wednesday. 'I will be interested in hearing what that offer is.' The next day, Trump agreed to impose a tariff of 15 percent on imports from South Korea. The lower rate came after South Korea agreed to make $350 billion in investments in the United States and purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. Advertisement To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. 'This is no doubt a global shakedown of sorts,' said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the right-leaning Cato Institute. 'The fact is that Trump is using US tariff policy to effectively force these terms upon less-than-willing participants.' But the vague nature of these informal commitments suggests that other nations might also be looking for creative ways to escape Trump's tariffs. Although tariffs are relatively straightforward to enforce, investment and purchase commitments are not as easily policed. The EU, for instance, does not have the authority to dictate the type of investments that it has promised, and much of Japan's pledged investments are coming in the form of loans. The investment announcements have also spurred confusion and lacked the usual detail that would accompany such pacts to avoid future disputes. A large majority of the $350 billion South Korean investment would take the form of loans and loan guarantees. South Korean officials expressed confusion over what US officials meant when they said 90 percent of the profits from the investments would go to the American people. A fact sheet announcing the EU's plans allowed for some wiggle room when it said that 'E.U. companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion' in 'various sectors in the U.S.' 'I think there remain a lot of questions, including by the countries who have announced commitments, as to what those commitments actually really mean,' said Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who served as the top trade negotiator in the Obama administration. 'Is it enforceable? If they don't deliver a certain amount of investment over a particular period of time, do tariffs go back into place?' Advertisement During Trump's first term, the trade deal he struck with China included extensive commitments for Chinese purchases of American farm products that were never met. The agreement did have an enforcement mechanism, but it proved toothless. Some of the initial investment pledges appear to be too big to be true. New data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that in 2024, foreign spending to acquire, start or expand US businesses totaled $151 billion — a small fraction of the new commitments being announced. The $600 billion EU investment commitment matches the total value of the goods that the United States imported from Europe last year. Although the United States has long been a magnet for foreign investment, the longer-term effects of making countries invest under duress are not clear. 'This is the kind of deal you'd more expect to see from an emerging market that can't attract capital on its merits,' said Aaron Bartnick, who worked in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Biden administration. 'And we may find over time that if the United States insists on acting like an emerging market, our trade partners may start treating us accordingly, with more onerous terms and less favorable rates that American companies and consumers are not accustomed to dealing with.' Regardless of the economic implications, Trump's tactics show no signs of abating, as he regularly claims more than $10 trillion — and climbing — in investments from foreign companies and countries. Advertisement Daniel Ames, a professor at Columbia Business School who teaches negotiation strategy, said that Trump's approach to trade deals appears to be drawn directly from his days as a developer and businessperson. Trump became notorious for destabilizing his negotiating counterparts with severely low bids, dazzling sales pitches and an ability to capitalize on weakness to gain leverage. Ames noted, however, that the EU and countries like Japan and South Korea might also be playing into Trump's sense of vanity when they unveil whopping investment promises that might ultimately be hollow. 'Donald Trump is a gifted storyteller, and I think when his counterparts recognize this, they can play to it,' Ames said. 'If you're negotiating with a narcissist, you look for ways to make them feel like they've won.' This article originally appeared in .