logo
Rise in serious care incidents reported by nurseries

Rise in serious care incidents reported by nurseries

Yahoo06-04-2025

There have been almost 20,000 reports of serious childcare incidents in nurseries in England in the past five years, the BBC has found.
That is an average of about 75 "significant events" reported to Ofsted each week - including incidents of serious injury or significant harm. There have even been rare cases involving deaths.
The latest figures for serious incidents in the year 2023-24 are 40% higher than five years previously.
Ofsted - which inspects England's education providers - says the rise may, in part, be due to its increased efforts to ensure nurseries report such events.
Industry body, the Early Years Alliance, says most providers prioritise safety and that safeguarding breaches are extremely rare.
But the parents of a baby killed by a nursery worker in 2022 describe the figures as "horrifying" and are calling for stronger safeguarding measures.
Details of organisations offering support with child bereavement are available at BBC Action Line
Nurseries made more than 4,200 reports of serious childcare incidents in 2023-24, compared with 3,021 in 2019-20 - according to Ofsted figures, obtained by the BBC through a Freedom of Information request.
Ofsted - which regulates more than 27,000 non-domestic childcare settings in England - says these were reports it assessed as urgent.
Incidents could range from injuries or illnesses, to serious accidents and deaths. They also include events affecting nursery premises, such as fires or floods.
Ofsted's broad criteria for reporting can mean nursery workers "err on the side of caution", the Early Years Alliance says. This means investigations often find no safeguarding breach has, in fact, occurred - it adds.
But a childcare expert says the rise in the number of reports highlights a "dire situation".
"Standards [of care] are so low that the government surely has an obligation to improve them," says Helen Penn, professor of early childhood from the University of East London.
Parents often rely on Ofsted's inspections and subsequent ratings to help them choose the best childcare setting.
Full inspections usually happen every six years, but the regulator can inspect more often if a nursery is graded as inadequate or requiring improvement - or if concerns are raised.
Schools rated good or outstanding are usually inspected every four years - and more frequently if graded lower.
More than 1,500 nursery inspections had been brought forward after receiving reports of serious childcare incidents - Ofsted told us.
But a former Ofsted inspector told us the regulator is not conducting enough inspections to identify poor practice and protect children.
The ex-inspector, who did not want to be named, says inspections are a "tick box exercise" which are "very easy to manipulate".
"As long as they can say: 'We've asked all these questions, what more can we do?' But you do that once every so many years - how is that safeguarding the children?" she says.
The BBC has spoken to more than 20 former and current nursery workers, all from different premises across England, who said they had witnessed poor care.
Many said frequent short-staffing was a factor in children being put at risk - and that Ofsted inspectors were not always able to spot this.
Until 2015, inspectors would arrive at nurseries unannounced - but only a third of inspections are now carried out this way. Most nurseries are informed the day before.
The notice period is used by some nurseries to deliberately mislead inspectors, some nursery workers told us. Managers ask friends or family to attend, they say, to make a nursery appear fully staffed.
One former worker said 15 babies had been left sleeping in a room with only a baby monitor and no staff members to look after them. But when Ofsted announced an inspection, managers called in staff from other locations.
The ex-Ofsted inspector says she witnessed workers man-handling children during inspections. "If you can do that in front of someone, what are you planning on doing if nobody is watching?" she adds.
Misleading inspections is an "appalling practice", says Yvette Stanley, Ofsted's Head of Early Years and Social Care - adding that inspectors have to rely on the "integrity of providers".
The parents of a baby who was killed at a now-closed nursery in Greater Manchester have told the BBC they want more frequent Ofsted inspections in nurseries - and for inspectors to check CCTV, which is not current practice.
In an exclusive interview, Katie Wheeler and John Meehan say life without their daughter Genevieve is "unbearable".
The nine-month-old died from asphyxiation at Tiny Toes nursery in Stockport, when she was tightly swaddled, strapped to a beanbag, and left unattended by nursery worker Kate Roughley for 90 minutes.
The child was seen struggling and coughing on CCTV footage, but Roughley did not check on her properly until she was "unresponsive and blue", the worker's trial heard. Roughley received a 14-year prison sentence for manslaughter in May last year.
"When I sent her to nursery, I never in a million years thought that anything like this would happen," says Genevieve's mother Katie.
"I couldn't understand how a baby of this age could go to sleep for a nap in the afternoon and then not wake up.
"I completely lost who I was, that night in hospital, holding her."
As police reviewed nursery CCTV as part of their investigation, it revealed a second staff member had also been causing harm to children.
Rebecca Gregory was jailed for three years last September after being convicted of the wilful neglect and ill-treatment of children, including threatening and pushing babies younger than one.
Ofsted says it cannot mandate CCTV use in nurseries. There is no government guidance on checking footage during inspections and it does not have the resources to do this, it adds.
The former owners of Tiny Toes in Stockport say they cannot comment because of an ongoing investigation by Stockport Council.
Local authorities are responsible for investigating any safeguarding concerns at nurseries.
In light of our findings from Ofsted about a broad range of incidents, we asked councils across England about the specific number of times harm had been caused to children by nursery workers.
Seventy-two out of more than 150 councils responded to Freedom of Information requests with figures indicating there had been 5,795 reports or allegations of children being harmed by nursery workers, over a five-year period between 2019 and 2024.
There were like-for-like figures from 36 councils for both that period and the five years up to 2015, when Ofsted stopped routine no-notice inspections.
Reports of harm to young children almost tripled over that time - from 1,303 between 2010-15, to 3,342 between 2019-24. These figures may include cases where the incident was either accidental or unproven.
Standards of care are low and if something does not change there will be "more accidents, more harm to babies, more unhappy parents and children," says early childhood professor Helen Penn.
Ofsted says it is giving "conspicuous care and monitoring" to reports of harm to children.
More frequent inspections may be a solution, says Ofsted's Yvette Stanley, but she says the regulator does not currently have the resources available to do this.
"We think we do enough no-notice inspections to reassure ourselves in the cases where the data is worrying," she adds.
The Department for Education (DfE) has said it will introduce stronger safeguarding measures in early years settings in September, including "enhanced recruitment practices" intended to prevent unsuitable people from working with children.
A spokesperson said the department will "continue to closely monitor whether any further changes to safeguarding requirements are needed in early years to keep children as safe as possible".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

East of England news quiz of the week
East of England news quiz of the week

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

East of England news quiz of the week

From unusual food bank donations to angry parents after a school rule change, how much East of England news can you remember from the past seven days? Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk. East of England news quiz of the week 24 - 30 May East of England news quiz of the week 17 - 23 May East of England news quiz of the week 10-16 May East of England news quiz of the week 3-9 May East of England news quiz of the week 26 April-2 May East of England news quiz of the week 19-25 April East of England news quiz of the week 12-18 April East of England news quiz of the week 5-11 April East of England news quiz of the week 29 March-4 April East of England news quiz of the week 22-28 March East of England news quiz of the week 15-21 March East of England news quiz of the week 8-14 March East of England news quiz of the week 1-7 March East of England news quiz of the week 22-28 February East of England news quiz of the week 15-21 February East of England news quiz of the week 8-14 February East of England news quiz of the week 1-7 February East of England news quiz of the week 25-31 January East of England news quiz of the week 18-24 January East of England news quiz of the week 11-17 January East of England news quiz of the week 4-10 January

The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca
The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca

As the annual Hajj pilgrimage draws to a close, a long-settled corner of Mecca is stirring up a storm thousands of miles away in India - not for its spiritual significance, but for a 50-year-old inheritance dispute. At the heart of the controversy is Keyi Rubath, a 19th-Century guest house built in the 1870s by Mayankutty Keyi, a wealthy Indian merchant from Malabar (modern-day Kerala), whose trading empire stretched from Mumbai to Paris. Located near Islam's holiest site, Masjid al-Haram, the building was demolished in 1971 to make way for Mecca's expansion. Saudi authorities deposited 1.4 million riyals (about $373,000 today) in the kingdom's treasury as compensation, but said no rightful heir could be identified at the time. Decades later, that sum - still held in Saudi Arabia's treasury - has sparked a bitter tussle between two sprawling branches of the Keyi family, each trying to prove its lineage and claim what they see as their rightful inheritance. Neither side has succeeded so far. For decades, successive Indian governments - both at the Centre and in Kerala - have tried and failed to resolve the deadlock. It remains unclear if Saudi authorities are even willing to release the compensation, let alone adjust it for inflation as some family members now demand - with some claiming it could be worth over $1bn today. Followers of the case note the property was a waqf - an Islamic charitable endowment - meaning descendants can manage but not own it. The Saudi department that handles Awqaf (endowed properties) did not respond to the BBC's request for comment, and the government has made no public statement on the matter. That hasn't stopped speculation - about both the money and who it rightfully belongs to. Little is known about the guest house itself, but descendants claim it stood just steps from the Masjid al-Haram, with 22 rooms and several halls spread over 1.5 acres. According to family lore, Keyi shipped wood from Malabar to build it and appointed a Malabari manager to run it - an ambitious gesture, though not unusual for the time. Saudi Arabia was a relatively poor country back then - the discovery of its massive oil fields still a few decades away. The Hajj pilgrimage and the city's importance in Islam meant that Indian Muslims often donated money or built infrastructure for Indian pilgrims there. In his 2014 book, Mecca: The Sacred City, historian Ziauddin Sardar notes that during the second half of the 18th Century, the city had acquired a distinctively Indian character with its economy and financial well-being dependent on Indian Muslims. "Almost 20% of the city's inhabitants, the largest single majority, were now of Indian origins – people from Gujarat, Punjab, Kashmir and Deccan, all collectively known locally as the Hindis," Sardar wrote. As Saudi Arabia's oil wealth surged in the 20th century, sweeping development projects reshaped Mecca. Keyi Rubath was demolished three times, the final time in the early 1970s. That's when the confusion around compensation appears to have started. According to BM Jamal, former secretary of India's Central Waqf Council, the Indian consulate in Jeddah wrote to the government back then, seeking details of Mayankutty Keyi's legal heir. "In my understanding, authorities were looking for the descendants to appoint a manager for the property, not to distribute the compensation money," Mr Jamal said. Nonetheless, two factions stepped forward: the Keyis - Mayankutty's paternal family - and the Arakkals, a royal family from Kerala into which he had married. Both families traditionally followed a matrilineal inheritance system - a custom not recognized under Saudi law, adding further complexity. The Keyis claim that Mayankutty died childless, making his sister's children his rightful heirs under matrilineal tradition. But the Arakkals claim he had a son and a daughter, and therefore, under Indian law, his children would be the legal inheritors. As the dispute dragged on, the story took on a life of its own. In 2011, after rumours swirled that the compensation could be worth millions, more than 2,500 people flooded a district office in Kannur, claiming to be Keyi's descendants. "There were people who claimed that their forefathers had taught Mayankutty in his childhood. Others claimed that their forefathers had provided timber for the guest house," a senior Keyi family member, who wanted to stay anonymous, told the BBC. Scams followed. State officials say in 2017 fraudsters posing as Keyi descendants duped locals into handing over money, promising a share of the compensation. Today, the case remains unresolved. Some descendants propose the best way to end the dispute would be to ask the Saudi government to use the compensation money to build another guest house for Hajj pilgrims, as Myankutti Keyi had intended. But others reject this, arguing that the guest house was privately owned, and so any compensation rightfully belongs to the family. Some argue that even if the family proves lineage to Mayankutty Keyi, without ownership documents, they're unlikely to gain anything. For Muhammed Shihad, a Kannur resident who has co-authored a book on the history of the Keyi and Arakkal families, though, the dispute is not just about the money - but about honouring the family's roots. "If they don't get the compensation, it would be worth openly recognising the family's and the region's connection to this noble act."

Volunteers spent 25 years building a WWI replica plane. It just took flight.
Volunteers spent 25 years building a WWI replica plane. It just took flight.

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Volunteers spent 25 years building a WWI replica plane. It just took flight.

Last month, a replica World War One plane finally took to the skies above a Royal Air Force station in Scotland. It's been a long time coming—volunteers at the Aviation Preservation Society of Scotland have been working on the project for 25 years, as originally reported by the BBC. 'Every single nut and bolt has been checked, every single bracket has been checked, every single piece of wire has been checked. You don't cobble these things together. When you're going to fly it, it has to be done right,' chairman Mike Harper told the BBC. 'If it was for a museum, if it was just going on display we would probably have finished it within a few years. But the meticulous attention to detail to get this thing in the air is what's taken the length of time.' The plane is a Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter, a biplane (a type of aircraft with two stacked wings) fighter aircraft the British designed in 1914, built in 1915, and tested in 1916 in response to Germany's monoplane aircraft, the Fokker Eindecker. Though the planes were 'modestly successful,' they quickly became obsolete in the face of Germany's new Albatros aircrafts. The name Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter comes from the unique arrangement of its struts (the thin beams that support the top wings), though the society's volunteers have more sensibly nicknamed their replica 'Sophie.' For now, Sophie is undergoing test flights. Once it completes the test phase and accomplishes five flight hours, it'll be allowed to carry an additional person in the passenger seat behind the pilot, per the BBC. 'I'm used to flying modern aeroplanes from the 50s and 60s—the classics—and they're very different from this aeroplane to fly. This is very much more of a challenge,' aircraft inspector Tim Rayner, who pilots the test flights, told the BBC after May's 15-minute flight. 'The controls are nowhere near as responsive as they became as we developed better technologies. This is 1915 and it's not that many years since the first flight so you've got to look at it as flying as you would expect for an aircraft of that era.' Talk about an ambitious hobby.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store