
First Sentencing For Possession Of Tax Evasion Tools
An Auckland man has become the first person in New Zealand to be convicted and sentenced for aiding and abetting his company's possession of electronic sales suppression tools (ESST).
In response to the growing threat of these digital tools, stiff measures were introduced in April 2022 and made it an offence to acquire or possess ESST in New Zealand.
Gurwinder Singh was sentenced in the Manukau District Court on 15 July to seven months home detention on tax evasion charges and a charge of aiding and abetting his company for possessing electronic sales suppression tools for the purpose of evading the assessment and payment of tax.
The Judge ordered the start date of the sentence be deferred until 20 August to allow Singh to travel to Fiji for family funerals.
The investigation
Singh runs a pizza outlet, Just Pizza, in Waiuku.
As part of an Inland Revenue (IR) investigation searches were carried out at his home and business addresses, and bank records obtained.
During an interview, Singh admitted he was hiding income from his tax agent so that he didn't have to pay so much tax.
Ex-employees confirmed the pizza business employed 4 staff including Singh, but PAYE returns indicated only 2 staff.
Calculated offending
Singh's offending was planned, calculated and required ongoing financial manipulation.
The total GST discrepancy from the offending is $78,777.09; income tax discrepancy is nearly $100,000; and the PAYE discrepancy is $21,337 – a total of just over $198,500.
Effect on the tax system
The threat that ESST pose to the integrity of the tax system is significant and IR has an obligation to honest businesses to stamp out its use.
There's no other purpose to ESST other than to facilitate tax evasion or money laundering. They're being used globally to systematically alter point-of-sale data collected to understate or completely conceal revenue to evade tax.
ESST work by targeting the integrity of transactions, software, internal memory, external filing, or reporting to delete, change, or simply not record selected sales data and transactions.
Background
A civil penalty and two new offences were introduced in 2022 in relation to involvement with ESS tools:
• New section 141EE establishes the ESS penalty of $5,000 for the acquisition or possession of a suppression tool.
• New section 143BB establishes an offence of manufacturing or supplying a suppression tool. A person convicted of such an offence is liable to a fine of up to $250,000.
• New section 143BC establishes an offence of acquiring or possessing a suppression tool. A person convicted of such an offence is liable to a fine of up to $50,000.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Teen father given home detention for breaking newborn's ribs
By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of The baby's young mother was experiencing post-natal depression and had been medicated to help her sleep. Photo: 123rf WARNING: This story discusses the physical assault of a newborn and may be distressing for some readers A teen father who broke the ribs of his newborn son and bruised his face and body says he had become "tired and overwhelmed" after being tasked with the baby's night feeds. The baby's young mother was experiencing post-natal depression and had been medicated to help her sleep. The father, who cannot be named, took on predominant care of the baby and, on occasions, the mother woke during the night to hear the then-18-year-old telling their son to "shut up" and "go to f***ing sleep". She later found bruising on the child, which led to the discovery that his ribs had been broken when he was around five weeks old. On Thursday, the New Plymouth District Court heard the impact of the father's actions. "At the time of being told that [my son] had two fractured ribs, I felt like my heart had been ripped out and I cried in [the father's] arms, not knowing it was him that did it," the mother said in her victim impact statement read to the court. "I am still traumatised by this and cry often, knowing that I let someone... who was so close to me look after his own child, who he was supposed to love and care for, but he hurt so badly." The mother felt wracked with guilt that she was unable to protect her son. She said the father's actions were "unspeakable" and she no longer trusted people with her child. "I cannot imagine how [my son] felt, all the pain he was going through and I feel so guilty that he was in pain with no help because I had no idea." She recalled questioning who had hurt him. "The truth is, he was right in front of me all along. "You hurt our little boy and I will never forgive you or forget." The court heard the baby had spent time in the neonatal unit after complications during his birth. After further health complications, the mother felt she had been unable to form a bond with her son and she was diagnosed with post-natal depression. She often saw the father become frustrated with their baby, and said he once shared he had thoughts of harming someone and did not know how to deal with it. When the baby was four weeks old, the mother took him to hospital as he was breathing irregularly and had a "hoarse cry that sounded like he was hurt". The symptoms went away without intervention. Later that month, bruising was discovered on the baby's cheek and jaw. "The bruising looked like an adult hand, in that they were four to five little circles the size of fingerprints," the summary of facts stated. On another occasion, the mother found "purplish marks" on the baby's legs, arms and back. She took him to hospital where it was confirmed they were bruises and were caused by his "limbs being squeezed manually". This led to a skeletal examination taking place, which found the eight-week-old had two healing rib fractures. Medical experts deemed he had sustained the fractures around three weeks earlier. The father was subsequently arrested and told police he was tired and overwhelmed after having taken on his son's night feeds. While he said there were times when he wanted to ask for help, but was too embarrassed, he denied that the responsibility ever became "too much" for him to handle. In sentencing the now 19-year-old, Judge Tony Greig said the teen had strongly denied the allegations when speaking with a pre-sentence report writer, claiming the injuries were caused by someone else. The report stated that if the father were to remain offence-free, he would need focused, rehabilitative intervention to manage his anger and emotions. He has completed a 10-week, non-violence programme but more programmes were needed, it said. The report found his prospects of successful rehabilitation were remote, given his persistent denial of what occurred and his tendency to deflect blame on to others. New Plymouth District Court. Photo: NZME But Judge Greig did not believe it was as bleak as that. While the father also denied hurting the child when speaking with a psychologist, the judge said he could hold that view and still be guilty of reckless disregard. "In other words, you handled him roughly but not in a way that was intended to cause him an injury in the way that you did." The judge found it was somewhere between an accident and a fully intentional act. "That's why I try to give you some hope of having a normal relationship with [the child] in the future. "But this is where you are going to have to show maturity and guts." The judge said the psychologist's report found several personality and situational factors predisposed the father to harming his child, including a history of having difficulty regulating his anger, seeking help, and issues with his own father. "If [the father] was responsible for his son's injuries, it might not be entirely surprising that he denies that," the judge said, reading the report. "When he found out he was going to be a father, he promised he was not going to be like his own biological father, who he knew was both violent towards his mother and had abandoned the family when he was younger." His denial may be a result of him being unable to accept that he had violated that promise, it said. The report also stated he needed further help to address his issues. On charges of injuring with reckless disregard and breaching a protection order relating to the child's mother, Judge Greig sentenced the teen to nine months of home detention. He implored him to engage in the recommended treatment, or he may never have a relationship with his son. "It is all up to you. That would be your tragedy and as you know, through having an absent father, it would be [your child's] tragedy as well." - This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald


Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Member of high-profile family dodges conviction for Pak'nSave shoplifting
A member of the high-profile Thackwray family has avoided a conviction after being caught stealing groceries from a Queenstown supermarket on 15 separate occasions. Penelope Kate Thackwray, 23, electrical tradesperson, applied for a discharge without conviction on employment and mental health grounds after admitting a charge of shoplifting items valued at $552.81 from Pak'nSave Frankton between September 28 and November 10 last year. At Thackwray's sentencing in the Queenstown District Court yesterday, Judge Murray Hunt gave her two days to pay $500 to a charity of her choice, after which he would sign off the discharge. However, he refused her application for permanent name suppression, saying it did not meet the threshold of "extreme hardship". "The understandable embarrassment you might have about seeing your name in the paper ... is simply a consequence you'll have to live with, as will others who share your name." Thackwray is one of four daughters of the late Phil Thackwray, the founder of Auckland super-yacht building company Thackwray Yachts. Her sister, Bridget, who also lives in Queenstown, is seeking planning permission to develop a purpose-built glowworm cave near the resort's CBD with her husband, Topher Richwhite. The couple made national headlines in 2022 after being detained in Iran for nearly four months while partway through travelling the world in a Jeep, documenting the journey for hundreds of thousands of followers on Instagram. The court heard that on 15 separate occasions, Thackwray was observed on CCTV putting some items directly into her trolley and others into boxes or produce bags. At the self-checkout, she paid for the items in the trolley, but for the others, she scanned them and bagged them after entering them on the machine's display as lower-value items. She later told police she had done so mistakenly because she was "freaking out" due to her social anxiety. Counsel Jono Ross said Thackwray had mental health concerns and was on a four-month waiting list for counselling. She had no previous convictions other than one for a speeding offence, which he considered legally erroneous. Prosecutor Dan Andrew said the defendant had taken a long time to address her claimed mental health issues, given the offending had occurred last year. Also, unlike many defendants in similar cases, she had not sought to reduce the gravity of her offending by doing voluntary work before sentencing. Judge Hunt said the police's scepticism about the defendant's remorse was understandable. Her claim the offending had been accidental was "nonsense". "This isn't an isolated instance, this is 15 occasions when you've gone to the store and largely followed the same method of operation." Although he had decided the consequences of a conviction outweighed the seriousness of her offending, he remained puzzled "why someone with your skill set and your ability ends up standing where you are". She was fortunate her employer, who described her as a hard worker and "reliable, kind, well-liked and dependable", remained supportive.


Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Tourist allegedly assaulted
An Australian tourist was allegedly assaulted in his car while making a U-turn in Buckingham St, Arrowtown, on Friday. The 50-year-old victim had accidentally entered the one-way street in the wrong direction about 8.45pm. He was turning his vehicle around, when a 56-year-old Queenstown man kicked the side of it before allegedly assaulting the driver. The man, who was charged with assault, threatening behaviour and intentional damage, will appear in the Queenstown District Court in September.