logo
£16m Bridge of Allan flood defence plan approved

£16m Bridge of Allan flood defence plan approved

The Courier29-05-2025

Bridge of Allan's proposed flood protection scheme will go ahead after councillors gave it the official green light this week.
Stirling Council's Environment, Transport and Net Zero Committee confirmed the £16 million scheme at a meeting on Thursday May 29.
Scheme confirmation is a legal requirement and ensures Scottish Government funding for the project remains secure.
Full sign-off was delayed by a month as a result of a last-minute objection to the flood defence proposals in late April.
However, on Thursday council officers said the late objection had not been deemed valid, meaning confirmation could proceed as planned.
According to Stirling Council, a total of 24 objections were received prior to the submission deadline.
Six were considered valid, while 18 'did not meet the legal requirements' and were rejected.
All six valid complaints were later withdrawn, following further discussion with the council.
Earlier this month, lifelong Bridge of Allan resident Ronald Don shared his concerns about the flood defence proposals with The Courier.
Mr Don claims his formal objection was unfairly rejected by the council and he was not allowed to appeal.
During the committee meeting, Thomas Heald, Conservative councillor for Dunblane and Bridge of Allan said the new defences have been 'a long time coming' and will 'give a lot of peace of mind' to locals.
But he added a 'plea' about engagement, stressing that open communication with residents is still needed as the scheme progresses.
SNP Stirling North councillor Jim Thomson asked for a 'flavour' of the range of objections received, which were not presented to elected members.
Senior flood officer Katrina Smith said common themes included the impact on Bridge of Allan's allotments and the Cornton Road area, as well as concerns over value for money.
Convener and Stirling West councillor for Labour Jen Preston raised the idea of publishing the detail of the objections received.
However, the council's lead solicitor Mark Easton said ''probably not' would be the view' on doing so, since the objections had either been rejected or resolved.
The plan is for the new flood protection infrastructure to be built on the site of the existing defences as much as possible.
These were installed in the 1980s.
Modern additions will include a short extension past Bridge of Allan's allotments, as well as near Lyon Crescent.
A new embankment will also be constructed next to the town's factory site and Inverallan Road.
Stirling Council has budgeted £1.26m for the flood defences during the financial year 2025-26.
The Scottish Government has agreed to pay 80% of the estimated overall £16m cost, with the council providing the other 20%.
Part of the deal with the government stipulates that a contractor must be appointed to the project by March 31 2026.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The battle of the Channel has been fought
The battle of the Channel has been fought

Spectator

time27 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The battle of the Channel has been fought

Kemi Badenoch says the Conservative party will take a look at withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), freeing us at a leap and a bound from the tyranny of human rights lawyers. The Tory leader would give Britain the power to deter the cross-Channel influx of asylum seekers, by withdrawing protections from those arriving in Britain without papers. As there is unlikely to be a Conservative government in the foreseeable future, this announcement it's going to have no effect now, or any time soon, on the actual boats. And read the fine print: Badenoch hasn't really even made up her mind; she is going to set up a committee to look into it. In the real world, the boats aren't being stopped, the gangs aren't being smashed and the French judges and police are shrugging.

Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding
Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding

STV News

timean hour ago

  • STV News

Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding

Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland are 'at risk' from cladding which has yet to be removed, despite the Grenfell Tower disaster, the Scottish Liberal Democrats said. There are about 13,400 blocks of flats higher than 11 metres in Scotland, according to figures published by the Scottish Government this month. However new figures show that an estimated 1,260-1,450 of them need remedial work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk. In statistics published by the Scottish Government in Scotland's cladding remediation programme, it was said that by April 30, two single building assessments (SBAs), based on specification published in June 2024, had been completed and a further 13 assessments had been started. By April 30, two completed assessments identified that remedial works were required, and work had begun for one but not the other, the statistics showed. In June 2024, the Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Bill was passed, giving ministers powers to 'to assess and remediate certain types of buildings with unsafe cladding'. On Friday the Scottish Government said latest estimates indicate its cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. About 250 of the residential high-rise buildings in Scotland may require work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk, while 1,020-1,200 of the mid-rise residential buildings require work to alleviate the same issue, according to a breakdown of the figures. In contrast, by May 2025 in England, 2,477 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works, representing 49% of buildings within the programme. There is a target to complete the remediation of high-rise buildings by 2029 and for mid-rise buildings to have either been completely remediated by the date, or to have a plan in place with a date set. Of these, 1,652 buildings (33%) have been completed, according to UK Government statistics published in May. Scottish Liberal Democrat communities spokesman Willie Rennie MSP accused the Scottish Government of 'refusing to set' a similar deadline. He said the remediation work was happening 'inexplicably slowly' and called for progress. Mr Rennie said: 'In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers should be bending over backwards to remove unsafe cladding. 'But these figures show that the SNP are nowhere: they have made next to no progress, leaving so many homeowners and residents in a distressing limbo. 'The Scottish Government have repeatedly failed to appreciate the dangers posed by certain building materials. 'They have refused to set a deadline for removing cladding and they have taken an unbelievably blase approach to the problems of RAAC concrete. 'The SNP have acted inexplicably slowly. They must urgently step up the pace in remediating at-risk buildings and keep everyone who is potentially affected informed and updated on progress.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We have moved at pace to try to identify buildings in Scotland with unsafe cladding. 'For our actions to be effective, legislation was necessary and since the Cladding Remediation Act came into effect in January we have launched a £10 million scheme to support the assessment of affected buildings. 'All relevant buildings that had previously been part of our pilot programme are now either undergoing assessment or will have an assessment funded through this £10 million programme. 'We will also be launching the second stage of that scheme later this month, allowing owners to be able to apply for Scottish Government funding for measures recommended by an assessment. 'Any homeowners, including social landlords or residents with concerns about cladding issues, are encouraged to contact the Cladding Remediation Programme directly.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Mobuoy: Calls for public inquiry over one of Europe's largest illegal dumps
Mobuoy: Calls for public inquiry over one of Europe's largest illegal dumps

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Mobuoy: Calls for public inquiry over one of Europe's largest illegal dumps

Some politicians and environmental activists are calling for a public inquiry after two men were jailed last week for their roles in one of Europe's largest illegal dumps outside Doherty, 67, of Culmore Road, Derry, admitted seven charges between 2007 and 2013 relating to the contaminated Mobuoy dump at Campsie and was sentenced to one year in Gerard Farmer, 56, of Westlake in Derry, pleaded guilty to three charges between 2011 and 2013 and was jailed for 21 judge at Londonderry Crown Court said they had "acted deliberately" and been "entirely motivated by financial gain". BBC Radio Foyle's North West Today programme has been to the site at Campsie to meet environmental activist, Dean Blackwood. Mr Blackwood, a director at Faughan Anglers and principal planner for the Department of Environment up until 2013, said there was a "bubbling lake of toxic waste and no proper remediation work started"."Not only were big holes allowed to be dug up for this waste to be deposited, they were allowed to be dug outside any regulations," Mr Blackwood dump consists of two parcels of land - the City Industrial Waste (CIW) site and the Campsie Sand and Gravel (CSG) is thought to cover more than 100 acres of land or the size of about 70 football pitches."The failure of the authorities to act in a proper manner really calls into question the effectiveness of our government departments to regulate and protect the environment," Mr Blackwood said."This environmental crime has been described as unprecedented in the UK so you would have expected an unprecedented sentence," he called for a public inquiry. The Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) MLA Mark H Durkan said the men had "profited to the tune of over £40m by illegal dumping waste right beside our city's main drinking water supply". "It's clear they were only interested in their own profits and cared not one bit about the risk this posed to public health or the surrounding environment," he said the impact was being felt in the area "with the A6 road project being delayed as a result with a knock on effect on the North West's economy"."We are now looking at a bill of up to £700m to clean up this site at a time when the public purse is under significant pressure," he added. He reiterated his party's call for a full public inquiry, adding that progress and investment was needed to make the site Northern Ireland Assembly passed a motion for a public inquiry into illegal waste disposal in March in response to a question from the Green Party in 2020, the then Agriculture and Environment Minister Edwin Poots ruled one out. Alderman Darren Guy, from the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) said the sentencing "is far from adequate"."Like other parties, we would support calls for a full inquiry as we believe that there were more people involved in this crime than the two men now sentenced.""We believe it is much more important to call for the government and the Daera minister to now find the correct solutions and the funding to begin the massive clean-up of the contaminated Mobuoy site." The court was told on Friday that the amount of waste illegally disposed of could potentially have generated £30m for Doherty's company, Campsie Sand & Gravel Farmer's firm, City Industrial Waste Ltd, the potential sum was more than £ lawyers said the case against Doherty and Farmer concerned about 636,000 tonnes of waste including construction and domestic court was told that no pollution has yet been detected in the river, but that ongoing monitoring will be required, at "significant" cost to the public £700m figure for the potential repair bill is contained in 2022/23 accounts from the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) which were published in February estimate a cost range of between £17m and £ sentencing on Friday, Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir described the Mobuoy dump scandal as a "sophisticated and deliberate environmental crime of unprecedented scale".He announced plans to launch a public consultation on a draft remediation strategy for the site. Does the sentence meet the gravity of the crime? In a statement to BBC Radio Foyle, NI Water said: "Water undertake sampling and analysis for drinking water quality monitoring with samples taken at the water treatment works, the Service Reservoirs and at customer taps."There have been no water quality breaches in the treated drinking water supplied from Carmoney water treatment works that have been related to the Mobuoy waste site."Financial journalist Paul Gosling told BBC News NI "it is also one of the most dire examples possible of regulatory failure by state bodies in Northern Ireland"."The outcome will be a massive financial burden for Northern Ireland that will be a blight on the capital and revenue budgets of government here for probably decades to come," he added."People will be now asking does the sentence meet the gravity of the crime. The consequences will arguably be more severe for our society than for the perpetrators of the crime."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store