MK Party alleges State Capture 2. 0 in new RAF board appointments
The party claims the move mirrors previous controversial appointments to SETA boards, which it says led to the removal of former Minister of Higher Education, Dr Nobuhle Nkabane.
The MK Party accuses Transport Minister Barbara Creecy of recycling ANC loyalists and political allies into cushy board positions following the ANC's electoral losses in the May 2024 general election.
It pointed to the recent appointment of individuals such as Kenneth Brown, Richard Dyantyi, and Neeshan Balton to the interim board of the Road Accident Fund (RAF) as proof of a political reward system at play.
'These appointments advance the very agenda we have consistently warned against,' said MK Party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela.
'The board is now overrun with individuals seemingly handpicked to return the RAF to the control of corrupt lawyers and exploitative medical aid schemes like Discovery, which openly pressured the Minister and her Deputy to remove Collins Letsoalo.'
The MK Party argues the appointments were not based on merit or compliance with the Companies Act, but rather on political favouritism and loyalty to President Cyril Ramaphosa. The party questioned the qualifications and motives behind the appointments of Brown, Dyantyi, and Balton, asking:
'What skills, experience or expertise do Kenneth Brown, Richard Dyantyi and Neeshan Balton bring, aside from being rewarded for attacking President Zuma and other black professionals?'
Ndhlela added: 'We demand full transparency from the Minister regarding the process used to assess the suitability of the appointed candidates.
''What criteria were applied, and was this process in accordance with the Companies Act? Or were these appointments influenced by their favourite, deeply compromised Judge Zondo, the very same judge who advised the President on how board appointments should be made?'
He further accused Creecy of disregarding the findings of the State Capture Commission led by Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, calling Zondo 'nothing more than a political tool used by Mr Ramaphosa to target his opponents.'
'The so-called 'State Capture' recommendations he issued have clearly been discarded by Ramaphosa himself and ignored entirely by his Ministers,'' he said.
The party also criticised the composition of the new RAF Board, which it claims is 'packed with Ramaphosa loyalists' and is aimed at reversing reforms introduced by former CEO Collins Letsoalo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
18 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Sassa defends pension grant suspensions as legal obligation
Grant recipients must inform Sassa about any changes in their circumstances. The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has defended its suspension of pension grants to elderly citizens. The agency says it is legally compelled to review grants when changes in beneficiaries' circumstances are suspected. Social Development Minister Nokuzola Sisisi Tolashe responded to parliamentary questions about the controversial suspensions. MK Party MP Zelna Saira Abader had questioned the legal and moral justification for suspending grants based on minimal additional income. Legal framework for Sassa grant reviews Tolashe cited the Social Assistance Regulations as the legal basis for Sassa's actions. 'In terms of the Social Assistance Regulations, section 30 (2) (a), Sassa is compelled to act on information where it suspects that a change in circumstance has occurred,' she stated. The regulations give Sassa a clear mandate to conduct reviews. 'The agency has an obligation to review social assistance at any time where it has reason to believe that changes in the beneficiary's financial circumstances may have occurred,' Tolashe explained. The minister emphasised that each case receives individual consideration. Every beneficiary undergoes review according to established eligibility criteria within the Social Assistance legislative framework. ALSO READ: Sassa sounds alarm over unlawful insurance deductions from social grants Suspensions not based on minimal income Sassa rejected claims that grants are suspended solely due to small amounts of additional income. 'Suspensions are not based solely on minimal or irregular additional income,' Tolashe stated. She explained that the agency follows a case-by-case approach. Beneficiaries receive opportunities to clarify all their income sources during the review process. The minister outlined specific grounds for suspension. 'A grant is not suspended unless there is evidence of fraud; the client no longer meets the eligibility criteria, and or there is non-compliance with the Social Assistance Act or its Regulations,' she said. Eligibility criteria and reviews The Social Assistance Regulations establish clear eligibility requirements. These criteria determine who qualifies for assistance and guide the review process. Tolashe explained the purpose of the older person's grant system. 'A social grant serves as a cornerstone of South Africa's broader social assistance programme, aimed at helping older persons live with dignity in their later years and other grant beneficiaries meet their basic needs,' she said. However, automatic qualification does not exist. 'Not everyone automatically qualifies for an older person's grant upon turning 60 years,' the minister noted. Individual assessment remains essential. Each application undergoes evaluation based on regulatory eligibility criteria. Regular reviews ensure only qualifying recipients receive grants. ALSO READ: Under review: Sassa fires off grant suspension warning Shared responsibilities According to Tolashe, the system operates on shared responsibility between Sassa and beneficiaries. Grant recipients must inform Sassa about any changes in their circumstances. Sassa maintains its review authority. 'Sassa has the right and responsibility to conduct reviews at any time, especially when changes in a beneficiary's situation come to light,' Tolashe explained. The minister defended the review process as necessary for system integrity. 'Reviews are never intended to cause harm nor deprive grant beneficiaries of the grant, but rather to uphold the integrity and fairness of the social assistance system,' she stated. READ NEXT: Sassa cracks down on beneficiaries flagged for not disclosing income
Eyewitness News
35 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Marikana Massacre: SA govt receives backlash from EFF and BOSA
JOHANNESBURG – The South African government is facing criticism for its silence on the 'Marikana Massacre' as the country remembered 34 mineworkers who were gunned down by police in 2012. Saturday marked 13 years since the incident took place at the Lonmin Platinum Mine – now known as Sibanye-Stillwater - in the North West province during a wage protest Although a commission of inquiry had been conducted, no one has faced prosecution for the tragedy to date. Several organisations and political parties honoured and commemorated the lives that were lost during the tragic incident that occurred 13 years ago - and renewed their calls for accountability. For its part, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) pointed out that many families lost fathers, brothers and sons - men who were fighting for their basic human rights and for dignity. ALSO READ: The party also criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa, a shareholder at the time at Lonmin, and the African National Congress (ANC) for failing to deliver justice. Build One SA (BOSA) also called on Ramaphosa to commemorate the massacre with a National Day, in honour of those breadwinners who were killed 13 years ago. The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) also reiterated their demands for justice. And the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) emphasised that true justice could only come through successful prosecutions.
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
News anchor apologises for 'disrespectful' barb about ANC spokesperson
'Self-entitled condescension at its pitiful level. Embarrassed at such lack of class. The ANC communications [team] has a great rapport with eNCA colleagues. The sandwich marshall [Barnes] cannot fathom,' she wrote, adding a rolling on the floor laughing emoji. In his apology, Barnes said: '[...] At the time, I thought I was being cheeky and clever, but I have since been made to realise how deep those comments cut. The comments touched on [the] very issues we are talking about at the national convention — issues of race, identity, the lack of mutual respect, but they also cut very personally.
