Donald Trump tried to pursue Princess Diana as his 'ultimate trophy wife' - but he only gave her 'the creeps'
He married Ivana Trump in 1977 and stayed with her for over a decade until his affair with model Marla Maples came to light.
Once their divorce was finalised in 1990, Trump continued his relationship with Maples and the pair had a daughter, Tiffany, together in 1993 before marrying later the same year. The couple remained married for three years before separating in 1997, citing differing world views.
As his second divorce played out in court, Trump met the Slovenian-American model Melania Knauss at a party in New York City in 1998. He would propose to Melania at the Met Gala in 2004 and marry her in a seaside church in Palm Beach, Florida in 2005, making her both his third wife and the future First Lady of America.
And let's not forget Stormy Daniels, the adult film actress who claimed she had a one-night stand with the businessman in 2006. Trump was later found guilty of 34 felony counts stemming from a $130,000 hush money payment he made to Daniels in the run up to the 2016 Presidential Elections.
But Trump himself has admitted to only having 'one regret in the women department'. Writing in his 1997 book The Art of the Comeback, he said: 'I never had the opportunity to court Lady Diana Spencer.
'I met her on a number of occasions,' he continued. 'I couldn't help but notice how she moved people. She lit up the room with her charm, her presence. She was a genuine princess – a dream lady.'
It has been reported that Trump attempted to pursue Diana as his 'ultimate trophy wife' after her highly-publicised divorce from Prince Charles in 1996.
In a Sunday Times column, former BBC journalist and friend of Diana, Selina Scott recalled huge bouquets of flowers arriving at her Kensington Palace home.
This was the same tactic he used when wooing first wife Ivana.
'Trump clearly saw Diana as the ultimate trophy wife,' Scott wrote. 'As the roses and orchids piled up at her apartment she became increasingly concerned about what she should do.
'It had begun to feel as if Trump was stalking her.'
Over a private dinner, the princess confided in Scott.
'"What am I going to do?" she asked. "He gives me the creeps."
'"Just throw them in the bin," I advised. Diana laughed.'
'When she died in Paris in 1997, Trump [reportedly] told friends his biggest regret was that they hadn't dated.
'He said that he always thought he had a chance of romance and would have had a "shot' with her".'
Although Trump only met Diana a handful of times, the businessman found it hard to move on after she passed away.
In a 1997 radio interview with Howard Stern a few months after Diana's funeral, Trump said he would have 'nailed' her - but suggested he would have had her tested for HIV first.
'Why do people think it's egotistical of you to say you could've gotten with Lady Di?' Stern asked his guest. 'You could've gotten her, right? You could've nailed her?'
'I think I could have,' Trump replied.
The two men then acted out a hypothetical scenario in which Trump demanded Diana get tested before they have sex.
'Hey Lady Di, would you go to the doctor?' Stern joked, People Magazine reported.
'Go back over to my Lexus, because I have a new doctor,' Trump added, as if addressing the late princess. 'We wanna give you a little check-up.'
Broadcaster Howard Stern and Donald Trump at a party in New York city in 2000
In another interview with Stern in 2000, Trump doubled down on his claim that he would have slept with Diana 'without even hesitation'.
Discussing his top ten hottest women on the radio show, Trump placed Diana third but only after putting his ex-wife Ivana in second place and Melania in the gold-medal position.
Remembering the People's Princess, Trump described her as 'crazy' but said that was just a 'minor detail'.
'I tell you what, I think she's magnificent,' Trump told Stern. 'Lady Di was truly a woman with great beauty.
'I've seen her a couple of times. She was really beautiful, and people didn't realise she was that beautiful. She was supermodel beautiful.
'She had the height, she had the beauty, she had the skin, the whole thing.'
His comments toward Diana make it all the more impressive that Prince William managed to observe decorum on meeting the American president during his state visit in 2019, at the re-opening of Notre Dame de Paris in December 2024 and yet again at the funeral of Pope Francis in April 2025.
But perhaps the prince always knew what his late mother truly thought of Trump, as previously revealed by Earl Charles Spencer.
Trump meets Prince William at the reopening of Notre Dame cathedral in 2024
In 2023, Trump was gearing up to release a new book which he said featured letters from world leaders, politicians, and celebrities - including Princess Diana - who all wanted to 'kiss his a**'.
In a cut-throat response, Earl Spencer tweeted: 'Surprised to hear that Donald Trump is apparently claiming that my late sister Diana wanted to "kiss his a***", since the one time she mentioned him to me – when he was using her good name to sell some real estate in New York – she clearly viewed him as worse than an anal fissure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harsh reality behind Colbert's 'cancellation' as DNC spokesperson
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission served a brutal dose of reality to Stephen Colbert (pictured) fans 'wailing' over the loss of the liberal comedian's show. Brendan Carr explained how the drama over Colbert's Late Show cancellation was nothing more than political theater - and the actual motive was just dollars and cents. On Thursday, CBS announced that the comedian's decade-long run as the host of CBS' late night flagship will end next May. The sudden move s parked immediate backlash from left-wing celebrities and politicians, who claim the decision was strictly politically-motivated. The cancellation was revealed two days after Colbert used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe Paramount's $16million settlement with President Trump. Paramount, which owns CBS, decided to settle on the lawsuit over deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The entire affair came amid a pending merger between CBS parent company Paramount and Skydance - a deal still awaiting regulatory approval under the oversight of the Trump administration. CBS - long known as the 'Tiffany Network' - insisted that canceling Colbert's show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.' 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' it added. Though the program regularly topped its timeslot on network TV, it reportedly hemorrhaged $40 million a year in revenue - a staggering loss that ultimately proved unsustainable. However, the network instantly faced widespread accusations, including from US senators, of cancelling Colbert for political reasons, particularly given the timing following his vocal criticism of Trump. 'Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal, days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO,' Bernie Sanders wrote to X. Actress Jamie Lee Curtis added her voice to the backlash, telling the Associated Press : 'They just cut NPR and, you know, public broadcasting. Yes, they're trying to silence people, but that won't work. It won't work. We will just get louder.' Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to X : 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons,' she added. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' California Senator Adam Schiff (pictured) wrote to X. Jon Stewart, Colbert's former Comedy Central colleague, also weighed in on the controversy during Monday's episode of The Daily Show, questioning the network's decision to cancel the program. 'Watching Stephen exceed all expectations in the role and become the number one late-night show on network television has been an undeniable great pleasure for me as a viewer and as his friend, and now Stephen has been canceled for "purely financial reasons," Stewart said. Colbert ultimately gained a reputation as one of Trump's fiercest critics, departing from the traditional late-night in favor of a more overtly partisan approach. Following the announcement of The Late Show's cancellation, President Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to gloat over the news in a celebratory post. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote. Colbert, who briefly addressed the move Friday, devoted much of his Monday show to the controversy, eventually uniting with almost every other liberal late-night talk show host in a show of support, as well as Adam Sandler and even Lin-Manuel Miranda. The 61-year-old comic opened after a standing ovation and a lengthy applause from the New York City crowd by saying 'cancel culture has gone too far' and then joked now that the show is ending, he can say whatever he feels. Colbert said sarcastically of Paramount: 'They made one mistake, they left me alive! For the next ten months, the gloves are off!' The Late Show host then referenced Trump's comments, turning to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said: 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go [expletive] yourself.' He then referenced Trump stating in the same Truth Social post: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' Colbert replied: 'Nope, no, no. Absolutely not. Kimmel, I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross. And the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!' He also said that cancellation meant he could finally admit what he felt about the president. In contrast to his often over-the-top anti-Trump monologues, he dryly, quietly said: 'I don't care for him. Doesn't seem to have the skill set to be president. Just not a good fit, that's all.' Colbert also referenced a story from The New York Post saying the show lost $40-$50million last year, though some have suggested its as high as $100million. 'I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million, oh...' he quipped, naming the amount the company settled with Trump for over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. He then went back to bashing Trump and the recent news accusing him of writing a 'bawdy' letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. 'I'll have more to say about all this after the commercial break. The only other story is a small one... the president is buddies with a [expletive],' he said. In a follow-up post on X, Carr chimed in again, taking aim at the comedian and slamming him for his reaction to the cancellation. 'I'm surprised to learn that CBS didn't find this stuff profitable,' he wrote.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
McDonald's rival brings back a signature menu item
By Sonic is the latest fast-food chain to jump into the chicken snack wrap wars, going head-to-head with McDonald's. The chain, often ranked among America's unhealthiest, made headlines after bringing back its Crispy Tender Wraps just days before McDonald's triumphant Snack Wrap return. Sonic's wraps, priced from $1.99 on its FUN.99 value menu, come with zesty baja sauce or honey chipotle aioli and are stuffed with lettuce, tomatoes, and cheddar cheese. Fans are divided over whether Sonic can top McDonald's classic. 'The honey chipotle gonna be hard for McDonald's to top,' an Instagram user wrote. Another dismissed Sonic's attempt: 'Love u but u can't win this bestie.' The wraps join Sonic's limited-time Grillo's Pickles Big Dill Meal and Live Free Fridays special in the chain's summertime celebration. Fans had been preparing for McDonald's Snack Wraps ever since the company announced the return last year. The hype increased in March after an employee revealed what he believed was the offering's return date on TikTok. The wrap return came months after McDonald's suffered its biggest drop in sales since the pandemic. Falling 3.6 percent during this year's first quarter, the price drop was one of many that McDonald's has suffered over the years following inflation and new tariffs. Sonic has also been down on its luck after its annual sales fell 2.7 percent last year and being outperformed by regional chains like Whataburger and In-N-Out Burger. Finishing the year with approximately 3,461 US locations, Sonic's website shows the restaurant count is now down to 3,444. Other restaurant chains have also entered the chicken wrap wars. Popeyes sparked a war with McDonald's in June by releasing limited-time Chicken Wraps. The chicken chain's wraps come with similar ingredients as McDonald's wraps, and comes with Classic, Spicy, or Honey Mustard sauce. Taco Bell entered its meaty prime with a new lineup that includes crispy chicken tacos and burritos. The new concoctions, which received positive reviews from social media users, came after the impressive reception of its chicken nuggets. Unlike these chains, Burger King and Wendy's opted to add chicken wraps onto menus in 2023 and keep them there.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fossil fuels are ‘flailing and failing' as world enters new energy era, says UN chief
The age of fossil fuels is nearing its end and a clean energy revolution is well underway, UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Tuesday, urging governments to accelerate the shift before it is too late. 'We are on the cusp of a new era. Fossil fuels are running out of road. The sun is rising on a clean energy age,' Mr Guterres said in a speech in New York. 'I have never been more confident that they will fail – because we have passed the point of no return.' Backed by the latest figures from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Mr Guterres said that renewables made up 92.5 per cent of new electricity capacity last year. Investment in clean energy reached $2 trillion in 2024 – nearly $800bn more than what flowed into fossil fuels. 'The clean energy future is no longer a promise. It's a fact,' he said. 'No government. No industry. No special interest can stop it.' Despite his optimistic tone, the UN chief warned that the transition is still too slow and uneven, particularly in developing nations that lack access to finance and technology. He called on wealthy countries and major tech firms to lead the charge by committing to 100% renewable-powered operations by 2030. 'The energy transition is unstoppable,' he said. 'But the transition is not yet fast enough or fair enough.' The remarks marked a notable shift in tone from previous UN warnings that focused on the escalating dangers of global heating. This time, Mr Guterres framed the energy transition as an economic and security imperative. 'Countries that cling to fossil fuels are not protecting their economies – they are sabotaging them,' he said. 'Driving up costs. Undermining competitiveness. Locking-in stranded assets. And missing the greatest economic opportunity of the 21st century.' 'There are no price spikes for sunlight. No embargoes on wind. Renewables mean real energy security. Real energy sovereignty. And real freedom from fossil-fuel volatility.' More than 90 per cent of renewable energy projects today are cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives, according to IRENA. Solar power is now 41 per cent cheaper than the lowest-cost fossil fuel option, while onshore wind is less than half the price. Still, major gaps remain. A UN report released alongside IRENA's data warned that grid investment is failing to keep pace with the boom in renewables. For every dollar spent on clean generation, only 60 cents is going into infrastructure – when parity is needed to support the transition. Critical mineral supplies also remain a concern, as do geopolitical tensions and trade disputes that could raise costs or slow momentum. Yet Mr Guterres insisted the shift is already transforming lives – and holds vast potential for regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia where energy access remains limited. 'You can't build a coal plant in someone's backyard,' he said. 'But you can deliver solar panels to the most remote village on earth.' Environmental groups welcomed the speech. Bill Hare, CEO of Climate Analytics, said: 'Any investment in new fossil fuels now is a fool's gamble, while joining the race to renewables can only bring benefits – not just jobs and cheaper energy at stable prices, but energy independence and access where it's needed most.' Shady Khalil, senior global policy strategist at Oil Change International, said the speech sent a clear signal that 'the fossil fuel era is ending and the renewable energy transition is now unstoppable.' But he warned that 'Global North countries like the US, Canada, Norway, and Australia are still gearing up for massive oil and gas expansion,' calling it 'reckless and gluttonous short-termism' that would backfire on their economies. Jacobo Ocharan, head of political strategies at Climate Action Network International, said Guterres was 'on the money' in calling for a transition that delivers 'equity, dignity and opportunity for all.' He said COP30 must produce a roadmap 'grounded in human rights, justice and equity' rather than remaining stuck in 'the polluting and unfair past, which is where the fossil fuel industry wants us trapped.' Mr Guterres called on countries to use their updated national climate plans – due in September – to slash fossil fuel subsidies and invest in clean energy. The message, he said, was not about sacrifice but smart economics. 'This is not just a shift in power,' he said. 'This is a shift in possibility. This is our moment of opportunity.'
