logo
What police found in protected woodland in North Wales has divided opinion

What police found in protected woodland in North Wales has divided opinion

Police today sparked a debate after posting what was found in a protected woodland. Officers from North Wales Police said they had been made aware of a den set up in a forest in Flintshire.
They posted a number of images from the site - including a fire pit, a tent shelter and chairs, damaged trees, as well as a basketball net. The reason they had been called is that this is a site of special scientific interest (SSSI) with a formal conservation designation.
Police described the scene as "vandalism" and asked parents on Facebook"Do you know where your children are when they go out to play?".
But the responses from the public were mainly supportive of the "budding Bear Grylls". Others said they couldn't see the "vandalism" there and said young people needed outdoor spaces to play in.
The original post from the police said: "On Monday 19th May, we were made aware of vandalism having taken place at the Lower Common in Buckley where a children's den has been set up in the woodland of a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
"An SSSI is a site of special scientific interest and is a formal conservation designation. Usually describing an area that's of a particular interest to science due to the rare species of fauna, flora or any wildlife natural habitat. It's important to protect the geological and physiological features within the area.
"We have liaised with Flintshire County Council and ranger David Bryan who will arrange to have the area cleaned up. Patrols will be conducted to ensure no further damage is caused."
But one respondent said "Can't see vandalism here. I trained in Forest School and this is how incredibly imaginative children can be. Why aren't we embracing this and getting our kids enthusiastic about something before they get to a stage where they are actually being a nuisance and vandalising things 'because they're bored and have nothing to do'? Surely this is an indication that setting up a group to encourage more natural creativity would lead to more respect for their environment and community." Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Another added: "Awww....it's just a kid or some kids being creative. We've got a budding Bear Grylls in Buckley!"
It was a view widely shared, with one lady adding: "It's all feeling a bit confusing for the kids at the moment. Common land has traditionally been seen as open and accessible, but now it seems like almost every patch of green space is being designated as protected by Natural Resources Wales. Kids can't even ride mountain bikes through the Knowies anymore.
"What's tricky is that while restrictions are tight for local children, the same rules seem far more flexible when it comes to property development, which does raise some eyebrows. It sends mixed messages, especially to young people who just want to be outdoors, active, and creative.
"I absolutely recognise the importance of protecting sensitive habitats, and I'm not questioning that. But we can't ignore the growing gap it's creating for teenagers. When they're told they can't go to places like Lower Common, what's left? There are so few, accessible outdoor spaces where they can explore, build dens, and tracks to ride bikes, or simply hang out without being moved on or made to feel like they're doing something wrong.
"It would really help if Buckley Town Council could identify and actively promote specific spaces where children are welcome, areas to explore, and enjoy nature without fear of being told off. I grew up doing just that, and we now know how valuable that kind of play is for development and mental wellbeing. It would be a real shame if the next generation missed out on that freedom, simply because no one made space for them."
Another added: "Whilst I understand SSSI sites are important, children being able to play and explore is more important, anywhere kids go in Buckley they are an inconvenience."
Police actually responded to some of the comments. The South Flintshire Community Policing Team said: "We are all for children being out in the fresh air, playing and having fun, however unfortunately as this area has been designated as an SSSI, we have had complaints from members of the public about the damage caused during their den building and therefore have to respond to these. Whilst we do understand the comments being made we are simply offering words of advice to parents who may not be aware that this area is an SSSI."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fire Stick users warned they 'really could' face jail over dodgy devices
Fire Stick users warned they 'really could' face jail over dodgy devices

Wales Online

time5 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Fire Stick users warned they 'really could' face jail over dodgy devices

Fire Stick users warned they 'really could' face jail over dodgy devices The maximum penalty is five years in prison and the head of the agency cracking down said the threat is real The remote control of an Amazon Fire TV Stick An urgent warning has been issued to millions of people in the UK who have Amazon Fire Sticks loaded with specific software—as they could face prison. The head of the Federation Against Copyright Theft said people who use Fire Sticks for illegal streaming also risk identity theft, fraud and damage to their TVs and tech thanks to malware. The criminals who sell you the pirate services could even access any camera or microphone attached to your TV or Amazon devices - recording you and your family in your home without you knowing. ‌ An investigation by The Mirror found tens of thousands of adverts for 'pirate' services openly posted on Facebook. Many are for doctored Fire Sticks which offer bundles of thousands of channels for a few pounds a month. One UK mobile number is being used across 800 Facebook Marketplace ads for Fire Stick 'packages' for as little as £6. ‌ Customers are urged to contact the criminals via WhatsApp, and the adverts are posted by over 100 different Facebook users, all accounts created in the last few months, and located across the country. One seller is offereing 'All Sky channels, all sports channels, all football events, Netflix, HBO, Disney +, Amazon Prime and Apple' for as little as £2.50 a month. Prices started at £35 for a six month subscription to £150 for a five-year deal. A football fan wanting to follow all the Premier League action legally would need to pay nearly £50 a month for the cheapest Sky, TNT and Prime deals. Our crooked seller claimed to be from a company called IPTV, claiming: 'It's [an] online service to provide channels on fire stick, smart TVs, android TVs, mobile phone as well. We can provide subscriptions to other countries like Australia, USA and Canada.' Article continues below In January, a man streaming illegal TV to thousands from his home in Birmingham was jailed for two years. Criminals are also harvesting the personal details of thousands of their customers, including their card payment information. Kieron Sharp, chairman of the Federation Against Copyright Theft, said that in the last five years, FACT has been involved in 23 prosecutions leading to 36 criminals being jailed for an average of nearly three years each. In January, Sunny Kumar Kanda from Halifax, West Yorks, was jailed for two years at York Crown Court for supplying modified Fire Sticks through a Facebook group with nearly 4,000 members. In December, FACT led a two-week crackdown with police from 15 forces which targeted 30 illegal services. ‌ Kieron said: 'This has been a problem forever, since the days of pirated video cassettes and DVDs. But the rise of streaming has made things easier for the criminal in the same way as it has made things easier for the legal consumer. Is it any more of a problem than it was years ago? That's very difficult to say. There's no complete picture of the landscape.' The Intellectual Property Office has estimated that 6.2m Brits access illegally streamed TV and 3.9m people watch pirated live sport. Kieron said: 'We have adopted the attitude over the years that we would rather not criminalise the end user. 'If we take out a gang and they have a customer database, we would normally write to the consumers on that customer list telling them 'What you are doing is breaking the law and you will have to stop'. We would like to think that they would start paying for that content. ‌ 'But it is entirely possible that consumers could get swept up in our investigations. It would be a discussion for everybody involved in the business to see if that is an area that we would want to go down. It could happen, it really could. I would never say to any of the consumers through the messaging that we do that they are not going to get prosecuted because that just isn't correct.' When 29-year-old illegal Fire Stick seller Jonathan Edge, from Liverpool, was jailed for more than three years in November, he was also sentenced to two years and three months in prison for personally accessing and viewing the pirated content he distributed. FACT said watching an illegal stream was an offence under the Fraud Act 2006, with a maximum penalty of five year's imprisonment. ‌ Fraudsters can also raid your bank account, steal your identity and even hijack your camera and microphone. 'There is a risk from using these devices, it is not just us saying this,' Kieron said. 'People should be warned about this. There's a real risk of having your identity stolen or similar. If you give over your credit card details, you are giving them to criminals. 'They could get access to the camera on your TV, if it has one, or microphone. There is no safety or security with what you are getting with these modified devices. Some people set them up just to get your personal details.' A recent report by Enders Analysis found three in five who used a physical device for piracy in the last 12 months used a Fire Stick, according to Sky. Amazon said it had made changes to Fire TV to make it harder to stream pirated content and that it warned customers against 'sideloaded apps '. An Amazon spokesperson said: 'Pirated content violates our policies regarding intellectual property rights, and compromises the security and privacy of our customers. Article continues below 'We remain vigilant in our efforts to combat piracy and protect customers from the risks associated with pirated content, which includes prohibiting apps that infringe upon the rights of third parties in our Appstore, and warning customers of the risks associated with installing or using apps from unknown sources.'

Coleen and Wayne Rooney's marriage laid bare after make-or-break decision
Coleen and Wayne Rooney's marriage laid bare after make-or-break decision

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Coleen and Wayne Rooney's marriage laid bare after make-or-break decision

Coleen and Wayne Rooney have had some rollercoaster times in their marriage - but as they prepare to celebrate their 12-year anniversary, a source claims they've 'never been stronger' Wayne and Coleen Rooney were photographed looking more down in the dumps than loved-up on a pre-anniversary dinner date last week – but a source tells new they couldn't be happier. The power couple tied the knot on 12 July 2008, with the priest stating that the future would have its 'pleasures and pains, its joys and sorrows'. Truer words were never spoken as the couple, both 39, have since found themselves embroiled in public cheating scandals, brushes with the law, shock job losses and, of course, the famous Wagatha Christie court battle with Rebekah Vardy. 'They've had a lot of heartbreak and troubles,' our source said. ‌ ‌ 'Wayne has put his hands up and apologised for his fair share of them but they've made it through it all – a lot of people thought they wouldn't. The Wagatha court case was another drama but it actually brought them closer together. Wayne was so supportive and that really meant a lot to Coleen. At the moment, their marriage has never been better or stronger." Over the years, the childhood sweethearts, who met on their local Croxteth estate as young teens, have remained united, if a little bruised at times. Former Manchester United ace Wayne was the trigger for most of the dramas, which started with allegations of him having a threesome behind Coleen's back when she was pregnant with their firstborn son, Kai, in 2009. He was then charged with drink-driving in 2017 after being pulled over by police with fellow party-goer Laura Simpson in the passenger seat beside him. Shortly after the arrest, Coleen took to Facebook to deliver a lengthy statement about her marriage, and declared defiantly she would be 'fine on her own' with just her children. 'But I don't want to live like that,' she continued. 'I want to try and continue our marriage and live as a family because that's what I want to do. I know my own mind and it's something I want to try and work on… Yes, it has been a s**t time.' ‌ But that wasn't the last of their so-called s**t times, as the I'm A Celebrity runner-up puts it. They found themselves at the centre of another storm recently when a video published on X led to speculation about Wayne returning to his wayward ways. The heavily-edited clip was filmed in the Devon apartment Wayne lived in during his short-lived tenure as Plymouth Argyle manager, and showed a tracksuit-clad man, believed to be Wayne, letting a woman inside the front door. However, Wayne wasn't prepared to ignore the accusations, and released a statement on Instagram defending himself against the rumours and denying any wrongdoing. Over the years, even Coleen, who shares sons Kai, 15, Klay, 12, Kit, nine, and Cass, seven, with Wayne, has admitted there were some who doubted she would – or should – get over her public heartache. In their bombshell Rooney documentary that aired in 2022, she tackled the topic of their lowest moments head on, and confessed she'd learnt to block out other people's opinions. ‌ 'When you're making those decisions you've got to focus on what you want and not other people because' she said, 'you have so many people saying different things to you. 'Oh, why is she getting back with him?' 'Obviously, I listen to the people that matter to me, my mum and dad; they've always given me a positive outlook on things.' Last year, Coleen had her own positive moment in the spotlight when she was voted into second place on I'm A Celebrity. She was reportedly one of the series' highest paid stars, and didn't disappoint during her three weeks in the jungle. Viewers loved seeing a less polished and often hilarious version of the mum-of-four, who said afterwards she'd had 'so many people coming up to me and saying that they understand my life'. ‌ Speaking on the Stick To Football podcast earlier this year, shortly after Wayne left his role as Plymouth manager, Coleen also addressed the doubts about her marriage, saying, 'People are so opinionated, but I've always thought that it's my life, so let me get on with it – it's got nothing to do with anyone else.' According to our source, the pair remain unshakeable and will continue to weather the storms that come their way. 'They've honestly been through so many ups and downs but Coleen has loved Wayne since she was 16. It's a love that can't be broken and they're really happy to be celebrating their anniversary in such a great place. 'They've got a wonderful family and, despite everything, have managed to remain in love and strong after all these years. Coleen couldn't be happier they've made it through and is now glad she always stuck with it.'

Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb ‘revenge' strikes
Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb ‘revenge' strikes

Scottish Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb ‘revenge' strikes

VLAD ATTACK Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb 'revenge' strikes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) VLADIMIR Putin's forces unleashed their biggest drone assault yet on Ukraine's second largest city - killing at least three and injuring 17 others. Kharkiv was rocked overnight as 48 Russian drones, along with two missiles and four gliding bombs, slammed into residential areas, according to the city's mayor. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Smoke billowing from a fire burning in a building after an airstrike in Kharkiv Credit: EPA 3 At least three people were killed and 17 others injured Credit: Getty 3 Firefighters extinguish a fire at a multi-storey residential building following Russian attacks on the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv Credit: AFP 'We have a lot of damage,' Ihor Terekhov said. Three high-rise residential buildings were hit, with dramatic footage showing several storeys of one engulfed in flames. The carnage is a part of a wider Russian revenge blitz that's pummelling cities across Ukraine following its daring Operation Spiderweb. The bold Ukrainian drone raid crippled Russian warplanes at four airbases deep inside enemy territory. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store