Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb ‘revenge' strikes
VLAD ATTACK Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb 'revenge' strikes
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
VLADIMIR Putin's forces unleashed their biggest drone assault yet on Ukraine's second largest city - killing at least three and injuring 17 others.
Kharkiv was rocked overnight as 48 Russian drones, along with two missiles and four gliding bombs, slammed into residential areas, according to the city's mayor.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Smoke billowing from a fire burning in a building after an airstrike in Kharkiv
Credit: EPA
3
At least three people were killed and 17 others injured
Credit: Getty
3
Firefighters extinguish a fire at a multi-storey residential building following Russian attacks on the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv
Credit: AFP
'We have a lot of damage,' Ihor Terekhov said.
Three high-rise residential buildings were hit, with dramatic footage showing several storeys of one engulfed in flames.
The carnage is a part of a wider Russian revenge blitz that's pummelling cities across Ukraine following its daring Operation Spiderweb.
The bold Ukrainian drone raid crippled Russian warplanes at four airbases deep inside enemy territory.
More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos.
Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP 'demeaned themselves' with focus on Reform UK at by-election
Speaking to the Sunday National, the University of Strathclyde's Dr Michael Higgins said that the communication around the by-election, in terms of both the media coverage and political parties' output, had been 'dominated to some extent by Reform UK' who had made the vote 'about race'. Voters in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse went to the polls on Thursday to elect a new MSP, with Scottish Labour's Davy Russell emerging as the winner when the vote was called in the small hours of Friday. In the wake of the SNP's loss, party activists told The National that concerns raised about a campaign focused on opposing Reform UK rather than unpopular Labour Government policies had been dismissed by party bosses. READ MORE: John Curtice issues verdict on Hamilton by-election after 'surprise' result Dr Higgins similarly said that focusing on Farage – as First Minister John Swinney did with his claim that the by-election contest was a two-horse race between Reform and the SNP – had been a 'miscalculation'. 'I think that Nigel Farage is better ignored,' the political communications expert went on. 'I think people who are serious political players – whether you're on the side of the Conservatives or the Greens or Labour or the Scottish National Party, all of them are contributing, all of them are long-standing, democratic institutions that make a considerable and valuable contribution to political culture. 'I think they demean themselves by comparing themselves or responding to the interventions of individuals such as Nigel Farage, who is not a politician but a snake oil salesman.' Dr Higgins was one of the political experts to attend Swinney's anti-far-right summit, convened in Glasgow in April, from which Reform UK were explicitly excluded. READ MORE: The 2 steps Scotland can take to defeat the far-right for good Asked if that conference had also been a 'miscalculation' by allowing Farage to present himself as anti-establishment, Dr Higgins said that had been a different case. 'I think it was a legitimate response to concerns that are shared across the political spectrum,' he told the Sunday National. Outside that conference, demonstrations were held by both Reform UK and the fascist-adjacent fringe group A Force for Good, led by Holocaust-denier Alistair McConnachie. Dr Higgins noted that the Reform UK activists had been 'very keen indeed to distance themselves' from the extremists, and said the party had an obligation to ensure that its messaging did the same. Holocaust denier Alistair McConnachie speaks outside the anti-far-right summit in Glasgow (Image: PA) Ahead of the vote, Reform UK paid around £25,000 to push a 'race-baiting' advert on Facebook and Instagram which falsely claimed Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar had said he wanted to 'prioritise the Pakistani community'. It was ultimately seen more than one million times by voters in the constituency. The advert used footage from 2022 which had been unearthed by an anonymous far-right account on Twitter/X just two weeks before Reform UK began paying for extracts of the same video to be promoted on Facebook. Asked if this was a coincidence or perhaps evidence of a rhetorical pipeline from the far right to Reform UK, Dr Higgins said: 'You're quite right in saying that is extremely coincidental, and those sorts of coincidences are to be avoided in the future.' The advert was widely condemned – with Sarwar calling Farage a 'pathetic, poisonous little man' and First Minister John Swinney labelling it 'blatantly racist' and 'unacceptable' – but became a key story of the by-election. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was targeted by a 'racist' campaign advertDr Higgins said that in terms of issues which defined the campaign, 'you need to talk about race'. 'I think it's really, really unfortunate in a Scottish context – I think it's unfortunate in a context anywhere – but they made it about race and immigration,' he went on. 'The social media post grossly misrepresented something that Anas Sarwar said. It was simply untrue, but that doesn't matter to parties such as Reform UK and Donald Trump and the populist right. 'They'll happily just try out a line and whether it's true or not, it will stick to the wall, it will stick with their constituency.' Dr Higgins said that while he would not 'characterise Reform IK's social media posts as racist, I think that they may well appeal to members of the electorate who are racist'. 'Of all the parties that are serious contenders, Reform UK are the party that will appeal most to those who are very hostile to immigration and racist.' READ MORE: Scottish independence 'already begun' as UK political culture diverges, expert says The political communications expert and author, who has written extensively on populism and the right, said that the Hamilton by-election had seen Reform UK 'setting out their stall in a national context', suggesting that similar tactics will be deployed ahead of the full Holyrood elections in May 2026. However, he further said that Reform UK's 26% vote share – which his University of Strathclyde colleague Professor John Curtice described as a 'surprise' due to being notably higher than the party is polling – may not be reflected in the full 2026 elections. 'People tend to vote in by-elections in ways that they wouldn't vote in a general election, knowing that they're not voting to constitute the government of the day,' Dr Higgins said. 'Disillusionment's really important. Most people who are not spending their days immersed in politics and are simply annoyed at both the SNP Government in Scotland and the Labour Government in the UK may be disillusioned, may not wish to vote Conservative, and may see Reform UK as a way of registering that disillusionment.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage campaigned in Scotland before the by-election (Image: Ben Whitley) He added: 'I think Nigel Farage will burn himself out in terms of his interest to the media. There's only so much attention that can be given to Farage.' The wheels did seem to come off Reform UK's bus slightly on the day of the by-election, when their party chair Zia Yusuf resigned after an MP raised what he called the 'stupid' question of a ban on the burqa at Prime Minister's Questions. Whether Farage's party can keep their momentum going into 2026 – or more crucially for them, the 2029 General Election – may depend on how the other parties respond. Can the SNP find a message which is not simply 'lock out Reform UK'? If the Hamilton by-election is a warning, they will have to.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Watch: New footage of Ukraine's daring drone raid on Russian planes
Ukraine has released new footage of its daring raid last week that struck four Russian airfields. The clip, posted by Ukraine's Security Service (SBU), appears to show a first-person view drone taking off from a mobile wooden cabin and flying across fields before landing on a Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber. Footage from the drone seems to show a previously hit plane engulfed in flames. The attack on Belaya airbase in Siberia – which is more than 2,500 miles from Ukraine – was part of the wider Operation Spiderweb on June 1 in which drones were planted on trucks and launched at key strategic sites across Russia. In total, 41 planes were damaged, Kyiv claimed, including bombers used to attack Ukrainian cities, and an A-50 spy plane. The attack was reportedly 18 months in the planning and is estimated to have caused about £5 billion in damage.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: US believes Russia response to Ukraine drone attack not over yet, expects multi-pronged strike
WASHINGTON, June 7 (Reuters) - The United States believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin's threatened retaliation against Ukraine over its drone attack last weekend has not happened yet in earnest and is likely to be a significant, multi-pronged strike, U.S. officials told Reuters. The timing of the full Russian response was unclear, with one source saying it was expected within days. A second U.S. official said the retaliation was likely to include different kinds of air capabilities, including missiles and drones. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity. They did not detail Russia's expected targets nor elaborate on intelligence matters. The first official said Moscow's attack would be "asymmetrical," meaning that its approach and targeting would not mirror Ukraine's strike last weekend against Russian warplanes. Russia launched an intense missile and drone barrage at the Ukrainian capital Kyiv on Friday and Russia's Defense Ministry said the strike on military and military-related targets was in response to what it called Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against Russia. But the U.S. officials believe the complete Russian response is yet to come. A Western diplomatic source said that while Russia's response may have started, it would likely intensify with strikes against symbolic Ukrainian targets like government buildings, in an effort to send a clear message to Kyiv. Another, senior, Western diplomat anticipated a further devastating assault by Moscow. "It will be huge, vicious and unrelenting," the diplomat said. "But the Ukrainians are brave people." The Russian and Ukrainian embassies in Washington and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Michael Kofman, a Russia expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said he expected Moscow might seek to punish Ukraine's domestic security agency, the SBU, for its role in last weekend's assault. To send a message, Russia could employ intermediate-range ballistic missiles for the attack, he said. "Most likely, they will attempt to retaliate against (SBU) headquarters, or other regional intelligence administration buildings," Kofman said, adding Russia could also target Ukrainian defense manufacturing centers. Still, Kofman suggested Russia's options for retaliation may be limited as it is already throwing a lot of its military might at Ukraine. "In general, Russia's ability to substantially escalate strikes from what they are already doing - and attempting to do over the past month - is quite constrained," he said. Kyiv says Sunday's audacious attack employed 117 unmanned aerial vehicles launched deep from within Russian territory in an operation code-named "Spider's Web." The United States assesses that up to 20 warplanes were hit - around half the number estimated by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy - and around 10 were destroyed. The Russian government on Thursday denied that any planes were destroyed and said the damage would be repaired, but Russian military bloggers have spoken of loss or serious damage to about a dozen planes, including those capable of carrying nuclear weapons. The strikes, prepared over 18 months and conducted by drones smuggled close to the bases in trucks, dealt a powerful symbolic blow to Russia, which throughout the Ukraine war has frequently reminded the world of its nuclear might. Putin told President Donald Trump in a telephone conversation on Wednesday that Moscow would have to respond to attack, Trump said in a social media post. Trump later told reporters that "it's probably not going to be pretty." "I don't like it. I said: 'Don't do it. You shouldn't do it. You should stop it,'" Trump said of his conversation with Putin. "But, again, there's a lot of hatred."
